All Fours
Chapter 26
by July;, MirandaThe chapter opens with a breakfast conversation where Sam mentions a gymnastics classmate sharing the name of Papa’s best friend, prompting the narrator to realize it’s time to explain their unconventional family structure to their child. The couple meticulously prepares a script to navigate this delicate conversation, aiming to balance honesty with reassurance. Their dialogue reveals underlying anxieties about phrasing and the potential long-term implications of their words, reflecting both their care and the complexity of redefining familial relationships post-romance. The scene underscores the tension between planning for emotional clarity and the unpredictability of such vulnerable moments.
During the preparation, the couple grapples with existential questions about their future, including the possibility of divorce. The narrator reflects on how the concept of divorce has shifted from feeling emotionally charged to a mundane administrative process. Their collaborative effort to memorize and refine the script highlights their shared commitment to transparency while exposing their fears of failure. The mundane yet poignant details—like using a Popsicle as a cue—add levity to the weighty emotional labor of renegotiating family dynamics in a way their child can understand.
A parallel narrative follows the narrator’s visit to Dr. Mendoza, where she confronts anxieties about perimenopause and aging. The doctor reframes “freaking out” as a natural part of transitions, comparing it to the trauma of birth that prepares a baby for life. This metaphor resonates with the narrator, who begins to view her emotional turmoil as a necessary step toward a new phase. The clinical setting contrasts with the intimacy of the family conversation, yet both scenarios explore themes of change, acceptance, and the search for stability amid upheaval.
The chapter concludes with the narrator seeking positive perspectives on menopause by texting older women. Their responses—ranging from physical relief to newfound freedom and self-discovery—challenge her earlier fears. The rapid, varied replies paint a nuanced picture of post-reproductive life, emphasizing empowerment rather than decline. This collective wisdom, juxtaposed with the earlier familial and medical anxieties, weaves together the chapter’s central theme: transformation, whether in relationships or the body, demands vulnerability but can lead to unexpected liberation.
FAQs
1. How do the parents prepare to explain their “nonconforming family” structure to their child, and what concerns do they have about this conversation?
Answer:
The parents carefully prepare a script in a shared Google doc to explain their transition from a romantic relationship to a deep friendship while maintaining their family unit. They worry about phrasing things awkwardly (“being romantic together” sounds potentially creepy) or saying something disturbing. Harris expresses concern about future divorce making their current explanation seem fraudulent, though both agree this is unlikely soon. The mother rehearses the speech extensively, even accidentally dropping the script at a doctor’s office, showing both their meticulous preparation and underlying anxiety about conveying this complex family dynamic appropriately to their child.2. What significant revelation does Dr. Mendoza share about postmenopausal mental health, and how does this contrast with the narrator’s previous understanding?
Answer:
Dr. Mendoza reveals that women’s mental health postmenopause is typically better than at any other life stage except possibly childhood, due to stabilizing hormones and no longer cycling between estrogen/progesterone. This starkly contrasts with the narrator’s earlier fearful perception shaped by her friend Mary’s negative experiences. The doctor frames this as both biological (hormonal stability) and sociological (escaping patriarchal constraints on reproductive-age bodies). This prompts the narrator to actively seek positive menopausal experiences from other women, shifting her perspective from dread to curiosity about this life phase.3. Analyze how the chapter uses medical examinations as a metaphor for life transitions.
Answer:
The gynecological exam becomes an extended metaphor for life transitions - the “cold metal beak” intrusion mirroring the discomfort of change, while Dr. Mendoza’s explanation of birth trauma (“vaginal canal squeezing water from lungs”) parallels how difficult transitions prepare us for new phases. The narrator moves from passive patient (“casting myself as a passive child around doctors”) to actively inquiring about postmenopausal life, symbolizing her growing agency. Even the dropped script during the exam represents vulnerability in transition. The clinical setting underscores how bodily and existential transitions are intertwined, with medical authority both guiding and contrasting with personal revelation.4. How does the narrator’s open-sourcing experiment with older women reshape the chapter’s thematic exploration of menopause?
Answer:
The spontaneous text survey provides diverse, overwhelmingly positive perspectives that counter cultural menopause narratives. Responses range from physical relief (migraine cessation) to psychological liberation (feeling like one’s “true self”), spiritual transformation (losing religious constraints), and social freedom (indifference to others’ opinions). This crowdsourced wisdom—contrasting with the earlier singular horror story—demonstrates menopause’s multifaceted nature. The rapid, stoplight-checked replies structurally mirror how insights about aging can arrive unpredictably, reshaping the narrator’s (and reader’s) understanding from monolithic dread to nuanced possibility.5. Evaluate how the chapter balances humor and gravity in discussing family and bodily transitions.
Answer:
The narrative deftly oscillates between levity and profundity: the parents’ script-writing includes comedic debate over phrasing (“say it more neutrally”), while addressing serious family restructuring. The dropped doctor’s office script imagines reactions ranging from admiration to pity, humorously acknowledging societal judgment. Medical humor (“Was I sexually active? And how!”) contrasts with raw confessions (family suicides). Dr. Mendoza’s clinical metaphors about birth trauma lend gravity to the menopause discussion, while texts about postmenopausal freedom (“I feel like I’m 9”) inject playful optimism. This balance makes transformative life experiences feel authentically complex—neither trivialized nor overdramatized.
Quotes
1. “Divorce, just the word, used to feel serrated like a knife, something to wave around dangerously. Now I associated it with taxes, paperwork, bureaucracy.”
This quote captures the narrator’s evolving perspective on divorce—from something emotionally charged to a mundane administrative process. It reflects the chapter’s theme of redefining relationships and family structures.
2. “Picture how the vaginal canal squeezes the water out of a baby’s lungs—it’s the shock of this squeezing and the sudden cold air that makes the baby cry out and take their first breath! The trauma itself prepares them for the next phase, life on Earth.”
Dr. Mendoza’s vivid metaphor connects physical transitions (like childbirth) to emotional ones (like menopause). This represents the chapter’s exploration of life phases and how upheaval can lead to growth.
3. “a woman’s mental health postmenopause is usually better than it’s been at any other time in the life of that particular woman, other than maybe childhood.”
This surprising insight challenges common negative perceptions of menopause. It introduces the chapter’s counter-narrative about the potential benefits of this life stage.
4. “I feel like my true self. Like I’m 9 years old and I can do whatever I want”
This response from the narrator’s text thread exemplifies the liberating aspects of postmenopausal life that the chapter highlights. It shows how shedding reproductive roles can lead to personal rediscovery.
5. “in a patriarchy your body is technically not your own until you pass the reproductive age.”
Dr. Mendoza’s blunt feminist analysis frames the chapter’s underlying argument about bodily autonomy and societal expectations. It connects personal experiences to broader systemic issues.
Quotes
1. “Divorce, just the word, used to feel serrated like a knife, something to wave around dangerously. Now I associated it with taxes, paperwork, bureaucracy.”
This quote captures the narrator’s evolving perspective on divorce
— from something emotionally charged to a mundane administrative process. It reflects the chapter’s theme of redefining relationships and family structures.2. “Picture how the vaginal canal squeezes the water out of a baby’s lungs—it’s the shock of this squeezing and the sudden cold air that makes the baby cry out and take their first breath! The trauma itself prepares them for the next phase, life on Earth.”
Dr. Mendoza’s vivid metaphor connects physical transitions (like childbirth) to emotional ones (like menopause). This represents the chapter’s exploration of life phases and how upheaval can lead to growth.
3. “a woman’s mental health postmenopause is usually better than it’s been at any other time in the life of that particular woman, other than maybe childhood.”
This surprising insight challenges common negative perceptions of menopause. It introduces the chapter’s counter-narrative about the potential benefits of this life stage.
4. “I feel like my true self. Like I’m 9 years old and I can do whatever I want”
This response from the narrator’s text thread exemplifies the liberating aspects of postmenopausal life that the chapter highlights. It shows how shedding reproductive roles can lead to personal rediscovery.
5. “in a patriarchy your body is technically not your own until you pass the reproductive age.”
Dr. Mendoza’s blunt feminist analysis frames the chapter’s underlying argument about bodily autonomy and societal expectations. It connects personal experiences to broader systemic issues.
FAQs
1. How do the parents prepare to explain their “nonconforming family” structure to their child, and what concerns do they have about this conversation?
Answer:
The parents carefully prepare a script in a shared Google doc to explain their transition from a romantic relationship to a deep friendship while maintaining their family unit. They worry about phrasing things awkwardly (“being romantic together” sounds potentially creepy) or saying something disturbing. Harris expresses concern about future divorce making their current explanation seem fraudulent, though both agree this is unlikely soon. The mother rehearses the speech extensively, even accidentally dropping the script at a doctor’s office, showing both their meticulous preparation and underlying anxiety about conveying this complex family dynamic appropriately to their child.
2. What significant revelation does Dr. Mendoza share about postmenopausal mental health, and how does this contrast with the narrator’s previous understanding?
Answer:
Dr. Mendoza reveals that women’s mental health postmenopause is typically better than at any other life stage except possibly childhood, due to stabilizing hormones and no longer cycling between estrogen/progesterone. This starkly contrasts with the narrator’s earlier fearful perception shaped by her friend Mary’s negative experiences. The doctor frames this as both biological (hormonal stability) and sociological (escaping patriarchal constraints on reproductive-age bodies). This prompts the narrator to actively seek positive menopausal experiences from other women, shifting her perspective from dread to curiosity about this life phase.
3. Analyze how the chapter uses medical examinations as a metaphor for life transitions.
Answer:
The gynecological exam becomes an extended metaphor for life transitions - the “cold metal beak” intrusion mirroring the discomfort of change, while Dr. Mendoza’s explanation of birth trauma (“vaginal canal squeezing water from lungs”) parallels how difficult transitions prepare us for new phases. The narrator moves from passive patient (“casting myself as a passive child around doctors”) to actively inquiring about postmenopausal life, symbolizing her growing agency. Even the dropped script during the exam represents vulnerability in transition. The clinical setting underscores how bodily and existential transitions are intertwined, with medical authority both guiding and contrasting with personal revelation.
4. How does the narrator’s open-sourcing experiment with older women reshape the chapter’s thematic exploration of menopause?
Answer:
The spontaneous text survey provides diverse, overwhelmingly positive perspectives that counter cultural menopause narratives. Responses range from physical relief (migraine cessation) to psychological liberation (feeling like one’s “true self”), spiritual transformation (losing religious constraints), and social freedom (indifference to others’ opinions). This crowdsourced wisdom—contrasting with the earlier singular horror story—demonstrates menopause’s multifaceted nature. The rapid, stoplight-checked replies structurally mirror how insights about aging can arrive unpredictably, reshaping the narrator’s (and reader’s) understanding from monolithic dread to nuanced possibility.
5. Evaluate how the chapter balances humor and gravity in discussing family and bodily transitions.
Answer:
The narrative deftly oscillates between levity and profundity: the parents’ script-writing includes comedic debate over phrasing (“say it more neutrally”), while addressing serious family restructuring. The dropped doctor’s office script imagines reactions ranging from admiration to pity, humorously acknowledging societal judgment. Medical humor (“Was I sexually active? And how!”) contrasts with raw confessions (family suicides). Dr. Mendoza’s clinical metaphors about birth trauma lend gravity to the menopause discussion, while texts about postmenopausal freedom (“I feel like I’m 9”) inject playful optimism. This balance makes transformative life experiences feel authentically complex—neither trivialized nor overdramatized.
0 Comments