Cover of All Fours
    Fiction

    All Fours

    by July;, Miranda
    Miranda July’s 2024 novel All Fours follows a 45-year-old semi-famous artist who disrupts her stable Los Angeles life with her husband and child by impulsively announcing a cross-country road trip. The journey becomes a catalyst for self-discovery as she grapples with midlife crises, sexual awakening, and perimenopause, culminating in an unexpected affair. Blending humor and poignancy, the novel explores themes of desire, identity, and the search for reinvention in middle age. July’s autofictional style and candid portrayal of female experience have drawn comparisons to a “perimenopause novel,” marking it as a distinctive entry in contemporary literature.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor car­ing for their child while Har­ris announces a brunch to cel­e­brate Caro’s new sin­gle. The nar­ra­tor ques­tions Har­ris’s pri­or­i­ties, won­der­ing if this event hints at his affair with Caro or is mere­ly a pub­lic dis­play. Their strained rela­tion­ship is evi­dent as Har­ris express­es frus­tra­tion, wish­ing for a part­ner who gen­uine­ly wants to be present. The nar­ra­tor reflects on their own emo­tion­al dis­tance, imag­in­ing a more domes­tic, con­tent ver­sion of her­self that Har­ris might pre­fer, while observ­ing their child’s regres­sion into bed-wet­ting, a sign of under­ly­ing stress in the house­hold.

    Lat­er, dur­ing Har­ris’s overnight absence, the nar­ra­tor angri­ly mas­tur­bates to thoughts of him with Caro, then reach­es out to Jor­di for sup­port. Jor­di shares her own expe­ri­ence of sleep­ing in her stu­dio, fram­ing it as a lib­er­at­ing trend. Their con­ver­sa­tion shifts to the nar­ra­tor’s crum­bling mar­riage, with Jor­di sug­gest­ing a “spe­cial place” for rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. The nar­ra­tor men­tions their shared salut­ing rit­u­al, a ges­ture of trust, but admits they lack deep­er emo­tion­al con­nec­tion. The chap­ter high­lights the nar­ra­tor’s grow­ing iso­la­tion and the absur­di­ty of their attempts to ratio­nal­ize Har­ris’s behav­ior, such as his absence from Par­ent Night due to work with a “cel­list from Japan.”

    The nar­ra­tive then tran­si­tions to a poignant moment at Par­ent Night, where the nar­ra­tor com­forts their child, Sam, who dis­likes their own art­work. The nar­ra­tor texts the draw­ing to their father, an ama­teur geol­o­gist, spark­ing an unex­pect­ed con­ver­sa­tion about the nar­ra­tor’s moth­er. The father reveals that the moth­er had tem­porar­i­ly left dur­ing her menopause, a detail the nar­ra­tor had for­got­ten or repressed. This rev­e­la­tion adds anoth­er lay­er to the nar­ra­tor’s sense of insta­bil­i­ty, draw­ing par­al­lels between their moth­er’s past actions and their own cur­rent mar­i­tal strug­gles.

    The chap­ter clos­es with the nar­ra­tor recall­ing their moth­er’s brief inde­pen­dence in a small stu­dio, a mem­o­ry over­shad­owed by her even­tu­al return due to health con­cerns. This reflec­tion on famil­ial pat­terns of upheaval and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion mir­rors the nar­ra­tor’s own waver­ing between want­i­ng to sal­vage their mar­riage and desir­ing escape. The chap­ter under­scores themes of emo­tion­al dis­con­nec­tion, the search for iden­ti­ty out­side rela­tion­ships, and the cycli­cal nature of per­son­al and gen­er­a­tional trau­ma.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator’s interaction with Harris about the brunch reveal the tension in their relationship?

      Answer:
      The brunch discussion highlights growing marital tension through subtle but significant cues. When Harris announces the event to celebrate Caro’s single, the narrator’s internal monologue (“This was where his focus was?”) reveals her disbelief at his priorities during their strained relationship. Her offer to help set up then leave shows both avoidance and passive-aggression, while Harris’s whispered response (“I’d like to be with a person who actually wants to be here”) demonstrates his emotional withdrawal. Their communication has degraded to forehead-directed statements and earbud-wearing retreats, with the narrator even imagining Harris preferring a hypothetical “sleepy, smiling” alternative partner.

      2. Analyze how the motif of “saluting” functions symbolically in the chapter.

      Answer:
      The saluting ritual serves as both a symbol of their original connection and a barometer for their current disconnect. When explaining it to Jordi, the narrator recalls their first meeting’s magical quality (“Oh, there you are”), showing how it represented weaponless trust historically. However, the failed plan to salute at Parent Night (due to Harris’s absence) mirrors their emotional distance. Jordi’s interpretation of salutes as ancient trust gestures ironically underscores what’s now missing - their relationship has become weaponized with suspicion (Caro rumors), unspoken resentments, and the narrator’s angry sexual fantasies about Harris’s potential infidelity.

      3. What does the narrator’s conversation with her father reveal about intergenerational patterns of marital crisis?

      Answer:
      The father’s revelation about Elaine’s menopause-era separation exposes cyclical family trauma. His emphatic correction (“She moved out! You know that”) suggests the narrator has repressed this memory, just as she’s currently replicating her mother’s pattern of temporary escapes (her studio nights). The canned soup detail symbolizes both women’s quest for simplicity during upheaval. Importantly, the arrhythmia diagnosis that reunited her parents parallels the narrator’s hope that some external factor (like Parent Night) might restore her marriage, while simultaneously fearing they’re permanently “reshaping the calendar” into disconnected Tuesdays.

      4. How does the chapter use contrasting imagery to portray the narrator’s internal conflict?

      Answer:
      Vivid contrasts highlight her psychological turmoil: She tenderly brushes Sam’s hair while harboring infidelity suspicions; masturbates angrily to Harris’s imagined affair after lovingly discussing their child’s artwork; envisions herself both as a “toothless, ranting woman” abandoning family for pleasure and as a responsible parent preserving Sam’s basalt drawing. The heater vent’s warmth versus “pee sheets” regression mirrors how domestic comfort coexists with dysfunction. Even Jordi’s “bold” exhilaration versus the narrator’s self-perceived “tawdry” joy creates tension between self-actualization and guilt.

      5. What significance does the “every day is Tuesday” concept hold in the narrator’s emotional journey?

      Answer:
      This phrase encapsulates her existential crisis about marital stagnation. Initially representing liberation (Jordi’s “reshaping the calendar” enthusiasm), it later terrifies her as a potential “new life” of endless dissociation. The Tuesday metaphor reflects how workweek structures - Harris’s overnights, her studio Thursdays - have replaced marital intimacy with scheduled apartness. Her sudden inability to remember why this seemed important (“something a crazy person would say”) shows awareness that deconstructing time hasn’t solved deeper issues. The concept ultimately questions whether their relationship can escape this flattened emotional landscape.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I’d like to be with a person who actually wants to be here,” he whispered. Not to me but to himself or the gods.

      This moment captures the growing emotional distance between the narrator and Harris, revealing his unspoken frustration with their relationship dynamic. The private whisper underscores the breakdown in communication.

      2. “We’re reshaping the calendar. The bookmark worked. Every day is Tuesday.”

      Jordi’s observation reflects the narrator’s attempt to redefine time and routine as a way to cope with marital dissatisfaction. The phrase highlights how small rebellions (like sleeping apart) can fundamentally alter one’s perception of life.

      3. “Salutes began as gestures of trust to show you weren’t holding a weapon,” she said. “So that’s a good start.”

      This exchange about the couple’s saluting ritual becomes a poignant metaphor for their relationship - a symbolic gesture of trust that now feels hollow amid their growing suspicions and emotional armoring.

      4. “She moved out! You know that… It was right after her surgery; a direct result of her sudden menopause.”

      The revelation about the narrator’s mother’s temporary departure mirrors the narrator’s current marital crisis, suggesting generational patterns of women seeking space during hormonal transitions. This adds historical context to the narrator’s behavior.

    Quotes

    1. “I’d like to be with a person who actually wants to be here,” he whispered. Not to me but to himself or the gods.

    This moment captures the growing emotional distance between the narrator and Harris, revealing his unspoken frustration with their relationship dynamic. The private whisper underscores the breakdown in communication.

    2. “We’re reshaping the calendar. The bookmark worked. Every day is Tuesday.”

    Jordi’s observation reflects the narrator’s attempt to redefine time and routine as a way to cope with marital dissatisfaction. The phrase highlights how small rebellions (like sleeping apart) can fundamentally alter one’s perception of life.

    3. “Salutes began as gestures of trust to show you weren’t holding a weapon,” she said. “So that’s a good start.”

    This exchange about the couple’s saluting ritual becomes a poignant metaphor for their relationship - a symbolic gesture of trust that now feels hollow amid their growing suspicions and emotional armoring.

    4. “She moved out! You know that… It was right after her surgery; a direct result of her sudden menopause.”

    The revelation about the narrator’s mother’s temporary departure mirrors the narrator’s current marital crisis, suggesting generational patterns of women seeking space during hormonal transitions. This adds historical context to the narrator’s behavior.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator’s interaction with Harris about the brunch reveal the tension in their relationship?

    Answer:
    The brunch discussion highlights growing marital tension through subtle but significant cues. When Harris announces the event to celebrate Caro’s single, the narrator’s internal monologue (“This was where his focus was?”) reveals her disbelief at his priorities during their strained relationship. Her offer to help set up then leave shows both avoidance and passive-aggression, while Harris’s whispered response (“I’d like to be with a person who actually wants to be here”) demonstrates his emotional withdrawal. Their communication has degraded to forehead-directed statements and earbud-wearing retreats, with the narrator even imagining Harris preferring a hypothetical “sleepy, smiling” alternative partner.

    2. Analyze how the motif of “saluting” functions symbolically in the chapter.

    Answer:
    The saluting ritual serves as both a symbol of their original connection and a barometer for their current disconnect. When explaining it to Jordi, the narrator recalls their first meeting’s magical quality (“Oh, there you are”), showing how it represented weaponless trust historically. However, the failed plan to salute at Parent Night (due to Harris’s absence) mirrors their emotional distance. Jordi’s interpretation of salutes as ancient trust gestures ironically underscores what’s now missing - their relationship has become weaponized with suspicion (Caro rumors), unspoken resentments, and the narrator’s angry sexual fantasies about Harris’s potential infidelity.

    3. What does the narrator’s conversation with her father reveal about intergenerational patterns of marital crisis?

    Answer:
    The father’s revelation about Elaine’s menopause-era separation exposes cyclical family trauma. His emphatic correction (“She moved out! You know that”) suggests the narrator has repressed this memory, just as she’s currently replicating her mother’s pattern of temporary escapes (her studio nights). The canned soup detail symbolizes both women’s quest for simplicity during upheaval. Importantly, the arrhythmia diagnosis that reunited her parents parallels the narrator’s hope that some external factor (like Parent Night) might restore her marriage, while simultaneously fearing they’re permanently “reshaping the calendar” into disconnected Tuesdays.

    4. How does the chapter use contrasting imagery to portray the narrator’s internal conflict?

    Answer:
    Vivid contrasts highlight her psychological turmoil: She tenderly brushes Sam’s hair while harboring infidelity suspicions; masturbates angrily to Harris’s imagined affair after lovingly discussing their child’s artwork; envisions herself both as a “toothless, ranting woman” abandoning family for pleasure and as a responsible parent preserving Sam’s basalt drawing. The heater vent’s warmth versus “pee sheets” regression mirrors how domestic comfort coexists with dysfunction. Even Jordi’s “bold” exhilaration versus the narrator’s self-perceived “tawdry” joy creates tension between self-actualization and guilt.

    5. What significance does the “every day is Tuesday” concept hold in the narrator’s emotional journey?

    Answer:
    This phrase encapsulates her existential crisis about marital stagnation. Initially representing liberation (Jordi’s “reshaping the calendar” enthusiasm), it later terrifies her as a potential “new life” of endless dissociation. The Tuesday metaphor reflects how workweek structures - Harris’s overnights, her studio Thursdays - have replaced marital intimacy with scheduled apartness. Her sudden inability to remember why this seemed important (“something a crazy person would say”) shows awareness that deconstructing time hasn’t solved deeper issues. The concept ultimately questions whether their relationship can escape this flattened emotional landscape.

    Note