Cover of All Fours
    Fiction

    All Fours

    by July;, Miranda
    Miranda July’s 2024 novel All Fours follows a 45-year-old semi-famous artist who disrupts her stable Los Angeles life with her husband and child by impulsively announcing a cross-country road trip. The journey becomes a catalyst for self-discovery as she grapples with midlife crises, sexual awakening, and perimenopause, culminating in an unexpected affair. Blending humor and poignancy, the novel explores themes of desire, identity, and the search for reinvention in middle age. July’s autofictional style and candid portrayal of female experience have drawn comparisons to a “perimenopause novel,” marking it as a distinctive entry in contemporary literature.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor grap­pling with Har­ris’s deci­sion to work with Caro and the Lon­don Sym­pho­ny Orches­tra, leav­ing her alone with their child, Sam. She feels a mix of guilt and self-loathing, crit­i­ciz­ing her own “dis­gust­ing, vain, pro­found­ly self­ish” inner life. While she man­ages to main­tain a struc­tured rou­tine with Sam, she strug­gles to cre­ate a gen­uine fam­i­ly atmos­phere, feel­ing it’s all an act. Har­ris’s absence high­lights her emo­tion­al tur­moil, though Sam’s small encour­age­ments dur­ing her work­outs bring fleet­ing moments of warmth.

    A con­ver­sa­tion with Jor­di delves into the nar­ra­tor’s per­for­ma­tive iden­ti­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly how she presents a sta­ble facade to Sam and Har­ris despite her inner chaos. Jor­di chal­lenges her to con­sid­er whether this “flat­ten­ing” of her­self is nec­es­sary, sug­gest­ing that errat­ic behav­ior does­n’t equate to irre­spon­si­bil­i­ty. Their dis­cus­sion touch­es on the cycli­cal nature of wom­en’s lives ver­sus men’s hor­mon­al con­stan­cy, sym­bol­ized by the phrase “Every day is Tuesday”—a metaphor for liv­ing by one’s bio­log­i­cal rhythms rather than soci­etal norms.

    When Har­ris returns, his pres­ence dis­rupts the nar­ra­tor’s rigid rou­tines but also injects ener­gy into the house­hold. She observes his seam­less rein­te­gra­tion, though she ques­tions whether he, too, is per­form­ing. Their reunion is awk­ward, with the nar­ra­tor over­com­pen­sat­ing with chat­ter before retreat­ing to avoid fur­ther embar­rass­ment. Their par­al­lel jet lag-induced insom­nia briefly con­nects them, but once Har­ris adjusts, she’s left alone again with her rest­less thoughts.

    The chap­ter clos­es with the nar­ra­tor con­sult­ing Dr. Men­doza about hor­mone replace­ment ther­a­py, moti­vat­ed by van­i­ty but also aware of its deep­er health ben­e­fits. Her desire to “be dewy, almost reborn” for an upcom­ing event under­scores her ongo­ing strug­gle with aging and self-image. The doc­tor’s reas­sur­ance that bioiden­ti­cal hor­mones pro­tect both exter­nal and inter­nal health offers a glim­mer of hope, tying back to the chap­ter’s themes of trans­for­ma­tion and the ten­sion between appear­ance and real­i­ty.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator describe her experience of solo parenting compared to co-parenting with Harris?

      Answer:
      The narrator finds solo parenting both easier and more hollow. While she appreciates the ability to run a “tight ship” with structured routines like having Sam make their bed and fold napkins, she struggles to generate a genuine “healthy, hearty family feeling” alone (page 184). The days feel “anemic” despite activities like bike rides and baths, suggesting performative parenting. In contrast, Harris disrupts their systems but brings energetic engagement (e.g., wrestling Sam “wholeheartedly”), highlighting how his contrasting “Driver” personality complements her style (page 185). This duality reflects the tension between control and spontaneity in family dynamics.

      2. Analyze the significance of Jordi’s statement: “If you’re lying to Harris, aren’t you lying to Sam?”

      Answer:
      Jordi’s question critiques the narrator’s compartmentalization of self. The narrator admits presenting a “more even-keeled” version of herself to Sam, mirroring her emotional dishonesty with Harris (page 184). This exposes a central conflict: the pressure to “perform sameness” for societal norms versus embracing natural hormonal and emotional cycles. Jordi challenges this by advocating for normalizing change (“Erratic doesn’t mean crazy”), framing authenticity as healthier than forced consistency (page 184). The tension escalates when Sam performs for an “imaginary audience,” subtly mirroring the narrator’s own performative tendencies, suggesting generational patterns of self-editing.

      3. What symbolic meaning does the phrase “Every day is Tuesday” hold in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The phrase critiques rigid societal structures (like workweeks) that ignore biological rhythms. Borrowed from Arkanda’s system of numbering days, it represents rejecting external calendars in favor of personal cycles—such as working intensely for two weeks, then resting during menstruation (page 185). This metaphor challenges “hormonal constancy” associated with male physiology, advocating for systems that honor female bodily autonomy. Jordi’s bumper-sticker repetition of the phrase (page 185) underscores its thematic weight: a call to redesign lifestyles around internal clocks rather than conforming to patriarchal norms of productivity.

      4. How does the narrator’s interaction with Dr. Mendoza reveal her motivations for hormone therapy?

      Answer:
      While the narrator initially cites vanity (e.g., wanting “dewy” skin for Davey’s dance), Dr. Mendoza reframes hormone therapy as holistic care, noting parallel internal benefits like joint protection and dementia risk reduction (page 186). This exchange highlights the narrator’s conflicted priorities: superficial desires mask deeper fears of aging and bodily decay. The doctor’s smile suggests gentle admonishment, emphasizing that vanity-driven choices can align with health—if contextualized properly. The scene subtly critiques societal pressures on women to prioritize youth while revealing the narrator’s anxiety about physical decline.

      5. Evaluate how the chapter portrays the tension between transformation and stability in relationships.

      Answer:
      The narrator and Jordi celebrate their “constant transformation” as a “big secret,” contrasting with their performed “sameness” for others (page 184). Yet this churn is “painful,” revealing the exhaustion of self-reinvention. Harris’s return exacerbates this: his jet lag briefly synchronizes with her insomnia, but their rhythms soon diverge again (page 186), mirroring their emotional disconnect. The chapter suggests relationships require balancing growth with consistency—e.g., Harris’s “acting” during family play (page 185) hints at the labor of maintaining stability amid internal change. Ultimately, the narrator’s retreat to her bedroom (page 186) underscores the loneliness of unresolved tension.

    Quotes

    • 1. “These days nothing I felt was admirable or defensible. My entire inner life—my soul—was disgusting, vain, profoundly selfish. Only by lifting actual blocks of iron could I redeem myself for a short time.”

      This quote captures the narrator’s intense self-loathing and existential crisis, revealing how physical exertion becomes her only perceived path to temporary redemption. It sets the tone for the chapter’s exploration of identity, self-perception, and the struggle for authenticity.

      2. “Our constant transformation was a big secret, of course—for the world, even for Sam, we performed sameness.”

      This insightful passage articulates the central tension between internal transformation and external performance, particularly regarding feminine identity. It introduces the chapter’s key theme about the societal pressure to maintain a facade of stability despite natural human flux.

      3. “Every day is Tuesday.”

      This deceptively simple phrase becomes a powerful metaphor for rejecting rigid societal structures in favor of biological and personal rhythms. It represents the narrator’s emerging philosophy of living according to one’s natural cycles rather than artificial calendars.

      4. “Vanity is a great motivator because you can see the outside of your body. But remember that the same changes are happening on the inside, too.”

      Dr. Mendoza’s advice highlights the chapter’s exploration of aging and authenticity, suggesting that superficial concerns can reveal deeper truths about our relationship with our bodies and mortality. It connects physical appearance to broader questions of health and identity.

      5. “I ached with missing, not him.”

      This brief but potent statement reveals the narrator’s complex emotional landscape and unspoken desires. It encapsulates the chapter’s themes of unfulfilled longing and the gap between domestic reality and personal yearning.

    Quotes

    1. “These days nothing I felt was admirable or defensible. My entire inner life—my soul—was disgusting, vain, profoundly selfish. Only by lifting actual blocks of iron could I redeem myself for a short time.”

    This quote captures the narrator’s intense self-loathing and existential crisis, revealing how physical exertion becomes her only perceived path to temporary redemption. It sets the tone for the chapter’s exploration of identity, self-perception, and the struggle for authenticity.

    2. “Our constant transformation was a big secret, of course—for the world, even for Sam, we performed sameness.”

    This insightful passage articulates the central tension between internal transformation and external performance, particularly regarding feminine identity. It introduces the chapter’s key theme about the societal pressure to maintain a facade of stability despite natural human flux.

    3. “Every day is Tuesday.”

    This deceptively simple phrase becomes a powerful metaphor for rejecting rigid societal structures in favor of biological and personal rhythms. It represents the narrator’s emerging philosophy of living according to one’s natural cycles rather than artificial calendars.

    4. “Vanity is a great motivator because you can see the outside of your body. But remember that the same changes are happening on the inside, too.”

    Dr. Mendoza’s advice highlights the chapter’s exploration of aging and authenticity, suggesting that superficial concerns can reveal deeper truths about our relationship with our bodies and mortality. It connects physical appearance to broader questions of health and identity.

    5. “I ached with missing, not him.”

    This brief but potent statement reveals the narrator’s complex emotional landscape and unspoken desires. It encapsulates the chapter’s themes of unfulfilled longing and the gap between domestic reality and personal yearning.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator describe her experience of solo parenting compared to co-parenting with Harris?

    Answer:
    The narrator finds solo parenting both easier and more hollow. While she appreciates the ability to run a “tight ship” with structured routines like having Sam make their bed and fold napkins, she struggles to generate a genuine “healthy, hearty family feeling” alone (page 184). The days feel “anemic” despite activities like bike rides and baths, suggesting performative parenting. In contrast, Harris disrupts their systems but brings energetic engagement (e.g., wrestling Sam “wholeheartedly”), highlighting how his contrasting “Driver” personality complements her style (page 185). This duality reflects the tension between control and spontaneity in family dynamics.

    2. Analyze the significance of Jordi’s statement: “If you’re lying to Harris, aren’t you lying to Sam?”

    Answer:
    Jordi’s question critiques the narrator’s compartmentalization of self. The narrator admits presenting a “more even-keeled” version of herself to Sam, mirroring her emotional dishonesty with Harris (page 184). This exposes a central conflict: the pressure to “perform sameness” for societal norms versus embracing natural hormonal and emotional cycles. Jordi challenges this by advocating for normalizing change (“Erratic doesn’t mean crazy”), framing authenticity as healthier than forced consistency (page 184). The tension escalates when Sam performs for an “imaginary audience,” subtly mirroring the narrator’s own performative tendencies, suggesting generational patterns of self-editing.

    3. What symbolic meaning does the phrase “Every day is Tuesday” hold in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The phrase critiques rigid societal structures (like workweeks) that ignore biological rhythms. Borrowed from Arkanda’s system of numbering days, it represents rejecting external calendars in favor of personal cycles—such as working intensely for two weeks, then resting during menstruation (page 185). This metaphor challenges “hormonal constancy” associated with male physiology, advocating for systems that honor female bodily autonomy. Jordi’s bumper-sticker repetition of the phrase (page 185) underscores its thematic weight: a call to redesign lifestyles around internal clocks rather than conforming to patriarchal norms of productivity.

    4. How does the narrator’s interaction with Dr. Mendoza reveal her motivations for hormone therapy?

    Answer:
    While the narrator initially cites vanity (e.g., wanting “dewy” skin for Davey’s dance), Dr. Mendoza reframes hormone therapy as holistic care, noting parallel internal benefits like joint protection and dementia risk reduction (page 186). This exchange highlights the narrator’s conflicted priorities: superficial desires mask deeper fears of aging and bodily decay. The doctor’s smile suggests gentle admonishment, emphasizing that vanity-driven choices can align with health—if contextualized properly. The scene subtly critiques societal pressures on women to prioritize youth while revealing the narrator’s anxiety about physical decline.

    5. Evaluate how the chapter portrays the tension between transformation and stability in relationships.

    Answer:
    The narrator and Jordi celebrate their “constant transformation” as a “big secret,” contrasting with their performed “sameness” for others (page 184). Yet this churn is “painful,” revealing the exhaustion of self-reinvention. Harris’s return exacerbates this: his jet lag briefly synchronizes with her insomnia, but their rhythms soon diverge again (page 186), mirroring their emotional disconnect. The chapter suggests relationships require balancing growth with consistency—e.g., Harris’s “acting” during family play (page 185) hints at the labor of maintaining stability amid internal change. Ultimately, the narrator’s retreat to her bedroom (page 186) underscores the loneliness of unresolved tension.

    Note