Header Background Image
    Cover of All Fours
    Fiction

    All Fours

    by July;, Miranda

    The chapter opens with the narrator reflecting on an unconventional decision to drive to New York instead of flying, prompted by a conversation at a party. Harris, the narrator’s partner, introduces a theory dividing people into “Drivers” and “Parkers.” Drivers, he explains, find joy in mundane activities and can endure long, uneventful tasks like cross-country drives, while Parkers thrive on challenging, applause-worthy tasks but often feel bored or disappointed otherwise. The narrator subtly reveals her identification as a Parker, hinting at underlying feelings of depression and disconnection from Harris’s grounded demeanor.

    Harris’s theory sparks a lively debate among the party guests, with Sonja and her husband weighing in on their preferences. Sonja, initially resistant to being labeled a Driver, eventually embraces the idea, while Harris insists these roles are innate. The narrator observes Harris’s unusual animation around Sonja, contrasting it with his typical reserved nature. This interaction highlights the narrator’s sense of being an outsider, a theme reinforced by her tendency to mentally “step aside” when Harris connects with others, such as waitstaff or strangers.

    The narrator shifts focus to her own behavior at the party, losing herself in dance with uninhibited, almost provocative movements. She becomes acutely aware of how others perceive her, from the amused host’s father to Harris’s likely disapproval. This moment underscores her internal conflict between self-expression and societal expectations, as well as her complicated relationship with Harris, who leans traditional despite their deep bond. A silent salute between them reveals a profound, unspoken loyalty that transcends fleeting emotions.

    The chapter closes with the narrator retreating to the bathroom, contemplating the possibility of transforming from a Parker into a Driver—both metaphorically and literally. She imagines completing a cross-country drive, returning to Harris and their child, Sam, with a sense of accomplishment. This fleeting fantasy hints at her desire for change and reconciliation, though the chapter leaves unresolved whether she will act on it. The narrative captures the tension between identity and relationships, blending introspection with vivid, relatable scenes.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is Harris’s theory about “Parkers” and “Drivers,” and how does the narrator react to being classified as a Parker?

      Answer:
      Harris’s theory divides people into two categories: “Drivers” who find joy in everyday activities and can endure mundane tasks like cross-country drives, and “Parkers” who thrive on discrete, challenging tasks that might earn them praise but often feel fundamentally disappointed. The narrator recognizes herself as a Parker and reflects that what Harris calls “disappointed” might actually be depression. She observes Harris’s animated interaction with Sonja (a Driver) and feels like a third wheel, though she notes their deep, unspoken connection remains intact through their special salute gesture.

      2. How does the narrator’s dance scene reveal her complex relationship with attention and self-expression?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s uninhibited dancing—described as “fuck[ing] the air” with aggressive, creative movements—shows her desire for both liberation and validation. She oscillates between confidence (interpreting smiles as admiration) and insecurity (wondering if others are embarrassed for her). The scene also highlights her relationship with Harris: she fears his judgment (“unnecessarily provocative”) but finds comfort in their silent salute, which represents a deeper bond beyond fleeting reactions. This mirrors her broader tension between craving recognition and retreating into self-doubt.

      3. Analyze the significance of the “salute” between the narrator and Harris. What does it symbolize about their relationship?

      Answer:
      The salute, originating from their first meeting, serves as a nonverbal affirmation of their connection—a way to say “There you are” across crowded rooms. Unlike typical couples who might physically reunite, they preserve the moment’s tenderness by maintaining distance, suggesting their bond thrives in abstraction. The narrator describes it as “steadfast devotion” that transcends fleeting emotions, hinting at a love that’s profound but potentially constrained by their personalities (her need for stimulation, his traditionalism). It’s a ritual that acknowledges both their intimacy and the space between them.

      4. How does the narrator’s internal monologue about pets reflect her broader worldview and conflicts?

      Answer:
      Her ambivalence about pets—questioning animal domestication as “a kind of slavery” while acknowledging the impracticality of reversing it—mirrors her tendency to overanalyze and moralize everyday choices. This aligns with her Parker persona: she seeks intellectual challenges (debating ethics) but struggles with mundane realities (Harris and Sam wanting a dog). Her self-awareness (“my least winning qualities”) shows she recognizes how her critiques isolate her, yet she can’t suppress them, reinforcing Harris’s view that Parkers are “disappointed” by life’s ordinary aspects.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Well, in life there are Parkers and there are Drivers. Drivers are able to maintain awareness and engagement even when life is boring. They don’t need applause for every little thing—they can get joy from petting a dog or hanging out with their kid and that’s enough.”

      This quote introduces Harris’s central personality theory that divides people into two types: those who find joy in mundane moments (Drivers) and those who crave dramatic challenges (Parkers). It sets up the chapter’s exploration of the narrator’s self-perception and relationship dynamics.

      2. “Parkers… need a discrete task that seems impossible, something that takes every bit of focus and for which they might receive applause… The rest of the time they’re bored and fundamentally kind of… disappointed.”

      This elaboration on the Parker archetype reveals the narrator’s underlying dissatisfaction with herself and her life. The quote captures the chapter’s psychological tension and hints at her marital dynamics with Harris.

      3. “Being a third wheel is my native state. Sometimes Harris will seem to have rapport with a waitress or a cashier and I immediately cede to them as a couple—I internally step aside and give my place to the other woman.”

      This vulnerable admission exposes the narrator’s deep-seated insecurities and patterns of self-erasure in relationships. It’s a key moment of self-revelation that explains much of her behavior throughout the chapter.

      4. “At this slight remove all our formality falls away, revealing a mutual and steadfast devotion so tender I could have cried right there on the dance floor… we understood the feeling would disappear if we got too close.”

      This poignant description captures the complex, almost mystical connection between the narrator and Harris. It reveals the paradoxical nature of their intimacy - strongest when maintained at a distance.

      5. “Of course it wasn’t too late to switch from Parker to Driver—anyone with a driver’s license could drive across the country.”

      The closing lines suggest the narrator’s dawning realization about personal transformation possibilities. This incomplete thought leaves readers anticipating whether she will actually make this metaphorical journey.

    Quotes

    1. “Well, in life there are Parkers and there are Drivers. Drivers are able to maintain awareness and engagement even when life is boring. They don’t need applause for every little thing

    — they can get joy from petting a dog or hanging out with their kid and that’s enough.”

    This quote introduces Harris’s central personality theory that divides people into two types: those who find joy in mundane moments (Drivers) and those who crave dramatic challenges (Parkers). It sets up the chapter’s exploration of the narrator’s self-perception and relationship dynamics.

    2. “Parkers… need a discrete task that seems impossible, something that takes every bit of focus and for which they might receive applause… The rest of the time they’re bored and fundamentally kind of… disappointed.”

    This elaboration on the Parker archetype reveals the narrator’s underlying dissatisfaction with herself and her life. The quote captures the chapter’s psychological tension and hints at her marital dynamics with Harris.

    3. “Being a third wheel is my native state. Sometimes Harris will seem to have rapport with a waitress or a cashier and I immediately cede to them as a couple—I internally step aside and give my place to the other woman.”

    This vulnerable admission exposes the narrator’s deep-seated insecurities and patterns of self-erasure in relationships. It’s a key moment of self-revelation that explains much of her behavior throughout the chapter.

    4. “At this slight remove all our formality falls away, revealing a mutual and steadfast devotion so tender I could have cried right there on the dance floor… we understood the feeling would disappear if we got too close.”

    This poignant description captures the complex, almost mystical connection between the narrator and Harris. It reveals the paradoxical nature of their intimacy - strongest when maintained at a distance.

    5. “Of course it wasn’t too late to switch from Parker to Driver—anyone with a driver’s license could drive across the country.”

    The closing lines suggest the narrator’s dawning realization about personal transformation possibilities. This incomplete thought leaves readers anticipating whether she will actually make this metaphorical journey.

    FAQs

    1. What is Harris’s theory about “Parkers” and “Drivers,” and how does the narrator react to being classified as a Parker?

    Answer:
    Harris’s theory divides people into two categories: “Drivers” who find joy in everyday activities and can endure mundane tasks like cross-country drives, and “Parkers” who thrive on discrete, challenging tasks that might earn them praise but often feel fundamentally disappointed. The narrator recognizes herself as a Parker and reflects that what Harris calls “disappointed” might actually be depression. She observes Harris’s animated interaction with Sonja (a Driver) and feels like a third wheel, though she notes their deep, unspoken connection remains intact through their special salute gesture.

    2. How does the narrator’s dance scene reveal her complex relationship with attention and self-expression?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s uninhibited dancing—described as “fuck[ing] the air” with aggressive, creative movements—shows her desire for both liberation and validation. She oscillates between confidence (interpreting smiles as admiration) and insecurity (wondering if others are embarrassed for her). The scene also highlights her relationship with Harris: she fears his judgment (“unnecessarily provocative”) but finds comfort in their silent salute, which represents a deeper bond beyond fleeting reactions. This mirrors her broader tension between craving recognition and retreating into self-doubt.

    3. Analyze the significance of the “salute” between the narrator and Harris. What does it symbolize about their relationship?

    Answer:
    The salute, originating from their first meeting, serves as a nonverbal affirmation of their connection—a way to say “There you are” across crowded rooms. Unlike typical couples who might physically reunite, they preserve the moment’s tenderness by maintaining distance, suggesting their bond thrives in abstraction. The narrator describes it as “steadfast devotion” that transcends fleeting emotions, hinting at a love that’s profound but potentially constrained by their personalities (her need for stimulation, his traditionalism). It’s a ritual that acknowledges both their intimacy and the space between them.

    4. How does the narrator’s internal monologue about pets reflect her broader worldview and conflicts?

    Answer:
    Her ambivalence about pets—questioning animal domestication as “a kind of slavery” while acknowledging the impracticality of reversing it—mirrors her tendency to overanalyze and moralize everyday choices. This aligns with her Parker persona: she seeks intellectual challenges (debating ethics) but struggles with mundane realities (Harris and Sam wanting a dog). Her self-awareness (“my least winning qualities”) shows she recognizes how her critiques isolate her, yet she can’t suppress them, reinforcing Harris’s view that Parkers are “disappointed” by life’s ordinary aspects.

    0 Comments

    Heads up! Your comment will be invisible to other guests and subscribers (except for replies), including you after a grace period.
    Note