Cover of All Fours
    Fiction

    All Fours

    by July;, Miranda
    Miranda July’s 2024 novel All Fours follows a 45-year-old semi-famous artist who disrupts her stable Los Angeles life with her husband and child by impulsively announcing a cross-country road trip. The journey becomes a catalyst for self-discovery as she grapples with midlife crises, sexual awakening, and perimenopause, culminating in an unexpected affair. Blending humor and poignancy, the novel explores themes of desire, identity, and the search for reinvention in middle age. July’s autofictional style and candid portrayal of female experience have drawn comparisons to a “perimenopause novel,” marking it as a distinctive entry in contemporary literature.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor trav­el­ing from Penn­syl­va­nia to Indi­ana, reflect­ing on her jour­ney while antic­i­pat­ing a day with Dav­ey, her lover. They dri­ve into the hills, a seclud­ed spot they hadn’t vis­it­ed since before an ear­li­er encounter referred to as “the Buc­ca­neer.” The set­ting is idyllic—a sun­lit field dot­ted with tiny flowers—but the ground is uncom­fort­ably prick­ly, prompt­ing Dav­ey to fetch makeshift bed­ding. As he returns, the nar­ra­tor stretch­es toward the sky, and they share a moment of silent obser­va­tion, struck by the nov­el­ty of see­ing each oth­er from a dis­tance. The scene is inti­mate, charged with unspo­ken ten­sion and the hum of bees in the warm, green-smelling air.

    Lying side by side on a patch­work of jack­ets and tow­els, Dav­ey breaks the silence by bring­ing up a past event involv­ing Claire, his part­ner. He reveals that Claire had doc­u­ment­ed the narrator’s actions in a room, inter­pret­ing them as a ges­ture of care toward him and Claire. The nar­ra­tor is sur­prised by this per­spec­tive, as her actions had felt impul­sive at the time. Davey’s admi­ra­tion for her generosity—particularly a finan­cial contribution—leads him to call her “a good per­son,” a label she finds absurd yet momen­tar­i­ly com­fort­ing. Their con­ver­sa­tion dances around unspo­ken feel­ings, with Dav­ey hint­ing at the narrator’s inten­tions while she deflects with humor and curios­i­ty.

    The mood shifts when Dav­ey dis­clos­es that he and Claire are sav­ing for a house and a baby, news that unset­tles the nar­ra­tor. She reacts with forced con­grat­u­la­tions, mask­ing her jeal­ousy and sense of dis­place­ment. Davey’s life, anchored by tan­gi­ble plans and com­mit­ments, con­trasts sharply with her own vague, tran­sient exis­tence. The narrator’s inter­nal mono­logue reveals her bit­ter­ness, imag­in­ing Claire’s future preg­nan­cy as uncom­pli­cat­ed, unlike her own trau­mat­ic expe­ri­ence. Over­whelmed, she abrupt­ly stands to leave, her emo­tions spi­ral­ing as Dav­ey con­fess­es his strong feel­ings for her but acknowl­edges the bound­aries he must main­tain for Claire’s sake.

    In a cli­mac­tic moment, the nar­ra­tor impul­sive­ly declares her love for Dav­ey, break­ing the unspo­ken rules of their affair. The words hang heav­i­ly between them, trans­form­ing their dynam­ic from play­ful to painful­ly real. Dav­ey con­fronts her with the impos­si­bil­i­ty of their sit­u­a­tion, ask­ing if she would leave her hus­band for him. Her stunned silence serves as answer enough, high­light­ing the futil­i­ty of their con­nec­tion. The chap­ter ends with a poignant real­iza­tion: their rela­tion­ship exists in a lim­i­nal space, unable to bridge the gap between fan­ta­sy and real­i­ty.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the setting of the hillside field contribute to the emotional tension between the narrator and Davey?

      Answer:
      The secluded hillside field serves as both a romantic and emotionally charged space that amplifies the characters’ unspoken feelings. The natural elements - dappled sunlight, tiny flowers, and buzzing bees - create an intimate atmosphere that contrasts with their complicated relationship (page 117). The physical distance when Davey pauses to look at the narrator from afar mirrors their emotional distance and unexpressed feelings. The uncomfortable ground (“pokier than it looked”) parallels the uncomfortable truths they eventually discuss about Davey’s plans with Claire (page 119). This setting allows their guarded emotions to surface in ways they couldn’t in more constrained environments.

      2. What does the $20,000 expenditure reveal about the narrator’s motivations and Davey’s misinterpretation of them?

      Answer:
      The $20,000 initially appears as a selfless gesture to support Claire’s career, which Davey interprets as romantic reassurance about their relationship (page 118). However, the narrator’s reaction (“What a preposterous theory”) suggests her motivations were more complex and possibly self-serving (page 118). This misunderstanding highlights their different perspectives - Davey sees it as commitment, while the narrator seems to view it as an impulsive act. The money becomes symbolic of their misaligned expectations, with Davey believing it cemented their bond while the narrator may have seen it as a temporary indulgence.

      3. Analyze how the revelation about Davey and Claire’s plans for a house and baby changes the emotional dynamic between the characters.

      Answer:
      This revelation acts as a turning point that shatters the narrator’s fantasy about their relationship (page 119). Where previously there was playful tension, now there’s painful reality - Davey’s life plans with Claire make their affair unsustainable. The narrator’s abrupt physical reaction (standing up, tramping away) contrasts with her earlier relaxed posture, showing emotional distress. Her bitter thoughts about childbirth (“the baby wouldn’t bleed out inside of her”) reveal unresolved trauma that this situation triggers. Davey’s visible misery (page 119) shows he recognizes this moment has fundamentally changed their connection from carefree to complicated.

      4. How does the exchange of “I love you” statements demonstrate the fundamental incompatibility between these characters?

      Answer:
      Their declarations highlight opposing approaches to love and commitment (page 120). The narrator freely expresses love as an abundant emotion (“wasn’t something I needed to save”), while Davey treats it as a finite resource (“need to save some things for Claire”). His statement about her not leaving her husband underscores their different life stages - he’s building a future while she’s entrenched in an existing marriage. The metaphor of a ghost (“you’re see-through”) brutally conveys how impractical she finds the idea of a real future with Davey, despite their strong feelings.

      5. What does Davey’s comment about the Buccaneer room reveal about how men and women might interpret the same situation differently?

      Answer:
      Davey’s interpretation of the narrator’s extravagant room redesign as romantic preparation for their future (“getting our home ready”) contrasts sharply with her view of it as “brainless mania” (page 118). This shows gendered differences in reading emotional signals - he sees domestic effort as relationship investment, while she views it as impulsive self-expression. His embarrassment about this interpretation reveals traditional masculine expectations, while her self-conscious reaction (“Batty”) shows awareness of societal judgments about women’s behavior. Their exchange demonstrates how the same actions can carry profoundly different meanings based on gender perspectives.

    Quotes

    • 1. “It seemed like maybe you were getting ready for me. Getting our home ready.”

      This quote captures Davey’s misinterpretation of the protagonist’s actions as romantic gestures, revealing how their perspectives on the relationship diverge. It highlights the tension between his hopeful projection and her more chaotic motivations.

      2. “That we could hang out without me having to worry you were going to fuck me over. You’re a good person. I needed to know that.”

      Davey’s statement exposes his fundamental need for emotional security, while ironically underscoring the protagonist’s self-awareness of her moral ambiguity. This moment crystallizes their contrasting views on morality and intention.

      3. “His life was so pungent and real… whereas Davey had been thoroughly, perhaps overly, loved, and so Claire had stayed in focus.”

      This introspective observation contrasts their life trajectories - his anchored in tangible plans and commitments, hers adrift in emotional ambiguity. It reveals the protagonist’s envy of his purposeful existence while acknowledging her own detachment.

      4. “I love you,’ I yelled back. And then I said it a few more times. It wasn’t something I needed to save for one person.”

      This explosive declaration marks the emotional climax of the chapter, laying bare the protagonist’s reckless emotional availability versus Davey’s guarded commitment. The repetition emphasizes her willingness to spend emotional currency others hoard.

      5. “You love me but you wouldn’t leave your husband for me.”

      Davey’s painful realization cuts to the core of their impossible situation, exposing the boundaries of their connection. This moment transforms their dynamic from playful affair to sobering reality check about the limits of their love.

    Quotes

    1. “It seemed like maybe you were getting ready for me. Getting our home ready.”

    This quote captures Davey’s misinterpretation of the protagonist’s actions as romantic gestures, revealing how their perspectives on the relationship diverge. It highlights the tension between his hopeful projection and her more chaotic motivations.

    2. “That we could hang out without me having to worry you were going to fuck me over. You’re a good person. I needed to know that.”

    Davey’s statement exposes his fundamental need for emotional security, while ironically underscoring the protagonist’s self-awareness of her moral ambiguity. This moment crystallizes their contrasting views on morality and intention.

    3. “His life was so pungent and real… whereas Davey had been thoroughly, perhaps overly, loved, and so Claire had stayed in focus.”

    This introspective observation contrasts their life trajectories - his anchored in tangible plans and commitments, hers adrift in emotional ambiguity. It reveals the protagonist’s envy of his purposeful existence while acknowledging her own detachment.

    4. “I love you,’ I yelled back. And then I said it a few more times. It wasn’t something I needed to save for one person.”

    This explosive declaration marks the emotional climax of the chapter, laying bare the protagonist’s reckless emotional availability versus Davey’s guarded commitment. The repetition emphasizes her willingness to spend emotional currency others hoard.

    5. “You love me but you wouldn’t leave your husband for me.”

    Davey’s painful realization cuts to the core of their impossible situation, exposing the boundaries of their connection. This moment transforms their dynamic from playful affair to sobering reality check about the limits of their love.

    FAQs

    1. How does the setting of the hillside field contribute to the emotional tension between the narrator and Davey?

    Answer:
    The secluded hillside field serves as both a romantic and emotionally charged space that amplifies the characters’ unspoken feelings. The natural elements - dappled sunlight, tiny flowers, and buzzing bees - create an intimate atmosphere that contrasts with their complicated relationship (page 117). The physical distance when Davey pauses to look at the narrator from afar mirrors their emotional distance and unexpressed feelings. The uncomfortable ground (“pokier than it looked”) parallels the uncomfortable truths they eventually discuss about Davey’s plans with Claire (page 119). This setting allows their guarded emotions to surface in ways they couldn’t in more constrained environments.

    2. What does the $20,000 expenditure reveal about the narrator’s motivations and Davey’s misinterpretation of them?

    Answer:
    The $20,000 initially appears as a selfless gesture to support Claire’s career, which Davey interprets as romantic reassurance about their relationship (page 118). However, the narrator’s reaction (“What a preposterous theory”) suggests her motivations were more complex and possibly self-serving (page 118). This misunderstanding highlights their different perspectives - Davey sees it as commitment, while the narrator seems to view it as an impulsive act. The money becomes symbolic of their misaligned expectations, with Davey believing it cemented their bond while the narrator may have seen it as a temporary indulgence.

    3. Analyze how the revelation about Davey and Claire’s plans for a house and baby changes the emotional dynamic between the characters.

    Answer:
    This revelation acts as a turning point that shatters the narrator’s fantasy about their relationship (page 119). Where previously there was playful tension, now there’s painful reality - Davey’s life plans with Claire make their affair unsustainable. The narrator’s abrupt physical reaction (standing up, tramping away) contrasts with her earlier relaxed posture, showing emotional distress. Her bitter thoughts about childbirth (“the baby wouldn’t bleed out inside of her”) reveal unresolved trauma that this situation triggers. Davey’s visible misery (page 119) shows he recognizes this moment has fundamentally changed their connection from carefree to complicated.

    4. How does the exchange of “I love you” statements demonstrate the fundamental incompatibility between these characters?

    Answer:
    Their declarations highlight opposing approaches to love and commitment (page 120). The narrator freely expresses love as an abundant emotion (“wasn’t something I needed to save”), while Davey treats it as a finite resource (“need to save some things for Claire”). His statement about her not leaving her husband underscores their different life stages - he’s building a future while she’s entrenched in an existing marriage. The metaphor of a ghost (“you’re see-through”) brutally conveys how impractical she finds the idea of a real future with Davey, despite their strong feelings.

    5. What does Davey’s comment about the Buccaneer room reveal about how men and women might interpret the same situation differently?

    Answer:
    Davey’s interpretation of the narrator’s extravagant room redesign as romantic preparation for their future (“getting our home ready”) contrasts sharply with her view of it as “brainless mania” (page 118). This shows gendered differences in reading emotional signals - he sees domestic effort as relationship investment, while she views it as impulsive self-expression. His embarrassment about this interpretation reveals traditional masculine expectations, while her self-conscious reaction (“Batty”) shows awareness of societal judgments about women’s behavior. Their exchange demonstrates how the same actions can carry profoundly different meanings based on gender perspectives.

    Note