Cover of All Fours
    Fiction

    All Fours

    by July;, Miranda
    Miranda July’s 2024 novel All Fours follows a 45-year-old semi-famous artist who disrupts her stable Los Angeles life with her husband and child by impulsively announcing a cross-country road trip. The journey becomes a catalyst for self-discovery as she grapples with midlife crises, sexual awakening, and perimenopause, culminating in an unexpected affair. Blending humor and poignancy, the novel explores themes of desire, identity, and the search for reinvention in middle age. July’s autofictional style and candid portrayal of female experience have drawn comparisons to a “perimenopause novel,” marking it as a distinctive entry in contemporary literature.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor receiv­ing a note from their neigh­bor, Bri­an, warn­ing that some­one may have been using a tele­pho­to lens to pho­to­graph their home. The note’s apolo­getic tone—“Sorry to trou­ble you”—delights the nar­ra­tor, who rel­ish­es the dra­ma. The nar­ra­tor reflects on their large, cur­tain­less win­dows, through which they often observe their hus­band, Har­ris, and their child, Sam, with a sense of ten­der detach­ment. This moment under­scores the narrator’s fas­ci­na­tion with the gap between how things appear from a dis­tance and how they feel up close.

    Bri­an, iden­ti­fied as the “FBI neigh­bor,” is known for con­spic­u­ous­ly wear­ing his FBI vest, which becomes a source of mild amuse­ment for the nar­ra­tor and their fam­i­ly. Har­ris dis­miss­es the note’s con­cern, brush­ing off the idea of a stranger pho­tograph­ing their home as unre­mark­able in the mod­ern age. The nar­ra­tor, how­ev­er, feels unset­tled and aban­doned when Har­ris doesn’t engage with their wor­ry, high­light­ing the emo­tion­al dis­tance in their mar­riage. Their rela­tion­ship is described as cau­tious and for­mal, like two diplo­mats wary of each oth­er, yet the nar­ra­tor finds com­fort in the idea that their patience might lead to a late-in-life hon­ey­moon.

    The nar­ra­tor con­trasts their mar­riage with those of their friends, par­tic­u­lar­ly Cassie and Jor­di, whose rela­tion­ships seem either over­ly affec­tion­ate or odd­ly one-sided. These obser­va­tions reveal the narrator’s pre­oc­cu­pa­tion with under­stand­ing how oth­er peo­ple nav­i­gate love and con­nec­tion. They col­lect snip­pets of their friends’ lives—texts, emails, conversations—as if try­ing to grasp the elu­sive nature of human rela­tion­ships. This quest for insight into oth­ers’ expe­ri­ences reflects a deep­er yearn­ing to make sense of their own place in the world.

    Ulti­mate­ly, the nar­ra­tor delays call­ing Bri­an, savor­ing the antic­i­pa­tion and the sense of being watched over. When they final­ly speak, Bri­an down­plays the inci­dent, sug­gest­ing the pho­tog­ra­ph­er might have sim­ply admired their house. The nar­ra­tor, dis­ap­point­ed, leans into false mod­esty, hint­ing at their pub­lic per­sona, only for Bri­an to remind them that sur­veil­lance is his job. The chap­ter clos­es with the narrator’s wry acknowl­edg­ment of their own self-impor­tance, leav­ing the mys­tery of the pho­tog­ra­ph­er unre­solved but the narrator’s curios­i­ty undi­min­ished.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator initially react to Brian’s note, and what does this reveal about her character?

      Answer:
      The narrator expresses excitement about being “troubled” by Brian’s note, stating she’s been waiting her whole life for such an interaction. This reveals her longing for attention and surveillance, suggesting she desires to be noticed or watched over. Her reaction contrasts with typical discomfort one might feel about privacy invasion, instead showing a peculiar enthusiasm for being observed. This is further emphasized when she admits to “hoping” someone was watching her through the windows, revealing deeper psychological needs for external validation or connection (pages 3-6).

      2. Analyze the narrator’s description of her marriage to Harris. What metaphors does she use, and what do they convey about their relationship?

      Answer:
      The narrator compares her marriage to “two diplomats who aren’t sure if the other one has poisoned our drink,” illustrating their cautious, formal dynamic. They maintain emotional distance, each waiting for the other to make the first move (“Forever thirsty but forever wanting the other one to take the first sip”). This metaphor highlights their lack of vulnerability and constant testing of boundaries. She also mentions they’ll likely have their “honeymoon in their sixties,” suggesting delayed intimacy. These descriptions paint a relationship built on restraint rather than spontaneity (page 4).

      3. How does the narrator’s perspective on relationships differ from her friend Cassie’s, and what does this reveal about her worldview?

      Answer:
      The narrator is “mortified” when Cassie says “Love you!” to her husband, criticizing the disconnect between Cassie’s complaints about marriage and this affectionate display. Cassie defends it as genuine, laughing it off as beyond her control. The narrator struggles to reconcile this contradiction, expecting consistency in emotions. This reveals her analytical, almost clinical approach to relationships—she seeks logical coherence where others accept complexity. Her fascination with recording friends’ interactions (like Jordi’s dynamic with her wife) further shows her tendency to dissect relationships as puzzles rather than embrace their inherent messiness (pages 4-5).

      4. What ironic contrast exists between Brian’s FBI identity and the narrator’s response to his surveillance concerns?

      Answer:
      Brian’s overt FBI persona (wearing his vest excessively, like a “Dodgers player watering the lawn in uniform”) contrasts with the narrator’s unperturbed reaction to potential surveillance. While Brian’s job involves protecting privacy/security, the narrator romanticizes the idea of being watched, even telling Brian she’s “a bit of a public figure” to justify the attention. The irony peaks when Brian deadpans, “It’s literally my job,” snapping her back to reality. This highlights the tension between professional vigilance and her personal yearning for scrutiny (pages 4-6).

      5. How does the narrator’s description of worrying as “hoping” reflect a central theme of the chapter?

      Answer:
      The narrator redefines worrying as “hoping” someone is watching her, exposing a theme of existential longing—for connection, purpose, or even surveillance. This reframing suggests she interprets potential threats (a stranger photographing her home) as proof of being noticed or cared for. Her desire for an external “someone who cares enough to watch over me” mirrors her observations of others’ relationships: she seeks validation she can’t find in her guarded marriage. The chapter repeatedly returns to this idea of performative existence, whether through FBI neighbors or recorded conversations (pages 5-6).

    Quotes

    • 1. “Sorry to trouble you but it looked like someone was using a telephoto lens to take pictures through your windows from the street. If it was someone you know, then sorry for the misunderstanding, if not, though, I got the make/model/license of their vehicle.”

      This opening note from the FBI neighbor sets the chapter’s tone of paranoia and curiosity. It introduces the central mystery while revealing the narrator’s attraction to being “troubled” by such intrusions.

      2. “Harris and I are more formal, like two diplomats who aren’t sure if the other one has poisoned our drink. Forever thirsty but forever wanting the other one to take the first sip.”

      This vivid metaphor perfectly captures the narrator’s emotionally guarded marriage dynamic. The diplomatic analogy suggests both careful politeness and underlying suspicion in their relationship.

      3. “I’m forever wanting to know what it feels like to be other people. What were we all doing? What the hell was going on here on Earth?”

      This philosophical musing reveals the narrator’s fundamental curiosity about human experience. It explains her fascination with collecting intimate artifacts from friends’ lives, framing it as an existential quest.

      4. “Just please let there be someone who cares enough to watch over me. It took me two days to call Brian the neighbor because I was busy savoring my position, like when a crush finally texts back.”

      This confession exposes the narrator’s deep desire for attention and surveillance. The comparison to romantic anticipation shows how she transforms paranoia into something desirable and validating.

    Quotes

    1. “Sorry to trouble you but it looked like someone was using a telephoto lens to take pictures through your windows from the street. If it was someone you know, then sorry for the misunderstanding, if not, though, I got the make/model/license of their vehicle.”

    This opening note from the FBI neighbor sets the chapter’s tone of paranoia and curiosity. It introduces the central mystery while revealing the narrator’s attraction to being “troubled” by such intrusions.

    2. “Harris and I are more formal, like two diplomats who aren’t sure if the other one has poisoned our drink. Forever thirsty but forever wanting the other one to take the first sip.”

    This vivid metaphor perfectly captures the narrator’s emotionally guarded marriage dynamic. The diplomatic analogy suggests both careful politeness and underlying suspicion in their relationship.

    3. “I’m forever wanting to know what it feels like to be other people. What were we all doing? What the hell was going on here on Earth?”

    This philosophical musing reveals the narrator’s fundamental curiosity about human experience. It explains her fascination with collecting intimate artifacts from friends’ lives, framing it as an existential quest.

    4. “Just please let there be someone who cares enough to watch over me. It took me two days to call Brian the neighbor because I was busy savoring my position, like when a crush finally texts back.”

    This confession exposes the narrator’s deep desire for attention and surveillance. The comparison to romantic anticipation shows how she transforms paranoia into something desirable and validating.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator initially react to Brian’s note, and what does this reveal about her character?

    Answer:
    The narrator expresses excitement about being “troubled” by Brian’s note, stating she’s been waiting her whole life for such an interaction. This reveals her longing for attention and surveillance, suggesting she desires to be noticed or watched over. Her reaction contrasts with typical discomfort one might feel about privacy invasion, instead showing a peculiar enthusiasm for being observed. This is further emphasized when she admits to “hoping” someone was watching her through the windows, revealing deeper psychological needs for external validation or connection (pages 3-6).

    2. Analyze the narrator’s description of her marriage to Harris. What metaphors does she use, and what do they convey about their relationship?

    Answer:
    The narrator compares her marriage to “two diplomats who aren’t sure if the other one has poisoned our drink,” illustrating their cautious, formal dynamic. They maintain emotional distance, each waiting for the other to make the first move (“Forever thirsty but forever wanting the other one to take the first sip”). This metaphor highlights their lack of vulnerability and constant testing of boundaries. She also mentions they’ll likely have their “honeymoon in their sixties,” suggesting delayed intimacy. These descriptions paint a relationship built on restraint rather than spontaneity (page 4).

    3. How does the narrator’s perspective on relationships differ from her friend Cassie’s, and what does this reveal about her worldview?

    Answer:
    The narrator is “mortified” when Cassie says “Love you!” to her husband, criticizing the disconnect between Cassie’s complaints about marriage and this affectionate display. Cassie defends it as genuine, laughing it off as beyond her control. The narrator struggles to reconcile this contradiction, expecting consistency in emotions. This reveals her analytical, almost clinical approach to relationships—she seeks logical coherence where others accept complexity. Her fascination with recording friends’ interactions (like Jordi’s dynamic with her wife) further shows her tendency to dissect relationships as puzzles rather than embrace their inherent messiness (pages 4-5).

    4. What ironic contrast exists between Brian’s FBI identity and the narrator’s response to his surveillance concerns?

    Answer:
    Brian’s overt FBI persona (wearing his vest excessively, like a “Dodgers player watering the lawn in uniform”) contrasts with the narrator’s unperturbed reaction to potential surveillance. While Brian’s job involves protecting privacy/security, the narrator romanticizes the idea of being watched, even telling Brian she’s “a bit of a public figure” to justify the attention. The irony peaks when Brian deadpans, “It’s literally my job,” snapping her back to reality. This highlights the tension between professional vigilance and her personal yearning for scrutiny (pages 4-6).

    5. How does the narrator’s description of worrying as “hoping” reflect a central theme of the chapter?

    Answer:
    The narrator redefines worrying as “hoping” someone is watching her, exposing a theme of existential longing—for connection, purpose, or even surveillance. This reframing suggests she interprets potential threats (a stranger photographing her home) as proof of being noticed or cared for. Her desire for an external “someone who cares enough to watch over me” mirrors her observations of others’ relationships: she seeks validation she can’t find in her guarded marriage. The chapter repeatedly returns to this idea of performative existence, whether through FBI neighbors or recorded conversations (pages 5-6).

    Note