Cover of Martyr!
    Poetry

    Martyr!

    by Kaveh Akbar
    “Martyr!” by Kaveh Akbar follows Cyrus Shams, a first-generation Iranian American poet grappling with addiction, grief, and identity after his mother’s death in a U.S. government-related plane bombing. The novel traces Cyrus’s journey as he seeks meaning through art, faith, and encounters with figures like a terminally ill artist in the Brooklyn Museum. Themes of legacy, sacrifice, and the immigrant experience are explored through Cyrus’s introspective quest, blending personal tragedy with broader existential questions. Akbar’s debut novel is noted for its lyrical prose and examination of how individuals navigate pain and purpose.

    The chap­ter depicts the nar­ra­tor’s life work­ing at an indus­tri­al chick­en breed­er farm in Fort Wayne, where the chick­ens are genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied for rapid growth and effi­cien­cy, stripped of immune sys­tems to max­i­mize pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. The nar­ra­tor describes the ster­ile, lab­o­ra­to­ry-like envi­ron­ment, con­trast­ing it with tra­di­tion­al farm­ing imagery. Their dai­ly rou­tine involves metic­u­lous biose­cu­ri­ty mea­sures, includ­ing show­er­ing and wear­ing scrubs to pre­vent con­t­a­m­i­na­tion. The chick­ens, referred to as “indus­tri­al,” reach slaugh­ter weight in just 35 days, a frac­tion of the time required for back­yard poul­try. This work pro­vides sta­bil­i­ty for the nar­ra­tor and their son, Cyrus, though it under­scores the unnat­u­ral­ness of indus­tri­al­ized food pro­duc­tion.

    Life out­side work revolves around mod­est rou­tines with Cyrus, who is remark­ably self-suf­fi­cient from a young age. The nar­ra­tor pre­pares sim­ple, eco­nom­i­cal meals like stews and rice, while Fri­day nights are reserved for frozen piz­za and movies—a cher­ished bond­ing activ­i­ty. Sports, par­tic­u­lar­ly bas­ket­ball and favorite play­ers like Reg­gie Miller, serve as a cul­tur­al bridge in their immi­grant com­mu­ni­ty. The nar­ra­tor also grap­ples with per­son­al strug­gles, hint­ed at through their reliance on bulk gin, which they humor­ous­ly spec­u­late might be a British plot to keep them sub­dued, reflect­ing their com­plex rela­tion­ship with cop­ing mech­a­nisms.

    The work envi­ron­ment is a melt­ing pot of immi­grants, with lim­it­ed but mean­ing­ful inter­ac­tions cen­tered around food and lan­guage prac­tice. The nar­ra­tor’s job involves col­lect­ing eggs from barns, a messy and pre­cise task requir­ing care to avoid dam­ag­ing the fer­til­ized eggs. Con­ver­sa­tions with cowork­ers often revolve around culi­nary tra­di­tions from their home­lands, though biose­cu­ri­ty rules pre­vent shar­ing actu­al dish­es. These exchanges high­light the iso­la­tion and cama­raderie among work­ers, who rarely dis­cuss their pasts but find com­mon ground in their shared immi­grant expe­ri­ences and the uni­ver­sal lan­guage of food.

    The chap­ter clos­es with reflec­tions on par­ent­hood and pur­pose, as the nar­ra­tor recalls a hadith about a starv­ing man giv­en a baby to care for instead of direct aid. This metaphor mir­rors their own life—Cyrus becomes their rea­son to endure hard­ship, though the nar­ra­tor admits to feel­ing dis­tant from him at times. Cyrus’s inde­pen­dence and hid­den tal­ents, like teach­ing him­self chess, reveal a depth the nar­ra­tor only glimpses. The chap­ter poignant­ly cap­tures the qui­et sac­ri­fices of immi­grant life, the strug­gle to find mean­ing, and the unspo­ken love between par­ent and child.

    FAQs

    • 1. What were the key differences between the industrial chickens described in the chapter and traditional backyard chickens?

      Answer:
      The industrial chickens were bred for maximum efficiency in converting feed to protein, reaching slaughter weight of nearly seven pounds in just 35 days—a process that might take a year for backyard chickens. Unlike traditional chickens, these birds had weakened immune systems since they lived in biosecure barns and never encountered natural environments. The narrator emphasizes they couldn’t survive exposure to real dirt or bacteria, calling them “magic” for their rapid growth with minimal feed. This contrasts sharply with the image of chickens pecking in dirt or splashing in puddles, highlighting the artificiality of industrial poultry production.

      2. How does the narrator’s relationship with Cyrus reflect themes of parenthood and cultural adaptation?

      Answer:
      The narrator portrays parenthood as both a responsibility and a lifeline, referencing a hadith about a starving man given purpose through caring for a child. Cyrus is described as self-sufficient from first grade, yet their bond is nurtured through shared rituals like Friday movie nights (Westerns and comedies) and basketball games. The narrator also emphasizes cultural adaptation—they discuss Muslim NBA players as points of pride and use sports as a bridge to connect with coworkers and Cyrus’s school community. However, there’s emotional distance; the narrator admits Cyrus often shared more with his uncle Arash than with him, revealing the complexities of immigrant parenting.

      3. Analyze how the chapter uses food to illustrate the narrator’s immigrant experience and workplace dynamics.

      Answer:
      Food serves as a lens for both isolation and connection. At home, the narrator cooks economical stews with cheap ingredients, while workplace biosecurity rules forbid bringing outside food, creating a paradox: unlimited free vegetarian meals (like bean burritos) are provided, but sharing cultural dishes is impossible. Conversations about cassava, tamales, and Iranian food remain theoretical, highlighting how immigration fractures culinary traditions. The bulk gin purchases—joked as a “British” tool to keep Iranians “backwards”—further underscore how consumption habits reflect displacement and coping mechanisms in a new culture.

      4. What contradictions does the narrator reveal about their work at the breeder farm?

      Answer:
      The job is framed as scientifically advanced (“more laboratory than farm”) yet physically grueling, involving digging through feces-covered eggs. The chickens are called “machines,” emphasizing their engineered efficiency, but the care required—like avoiding crushed eggs—hints at their fragile biology. Workers must shower and wear scrubs like medical professionals, yet the environment is filthy. The narrator also critiques the system’s ethos (“A chicken was a machine”), even as they take pride in the birds’ unnatural growth rates. These contradictions reflect the tension between industrial agriculture’s promises and its dehumanizing realities.

      5. How does the hadith about the starving man relate to the narrator’s life with Cyrus?

      Answer:
      The hadith mirrors the narrator’s experience of finding purpose through parenthood after displacement. Initially skeptical of the story’s logic (questioning why God didn’t simply provide food), the narrator later embodies its lesson: Cyrus becomes their reason to endure hardship, much like the infant motivates the starving man. However, the relationship is complex—Cyrus’s independence (“basically an adult from the beginning”) contrasts with the hadith’s idealized dependency. The narrator’s reflection suggests parenthood’s redemptive power isn’t straightforward but rooted in small, practical acts of care, like shared pizza nights or basketball games.

    Quotes

    • 1. “A chicken was a machine that converted grain into protein. That was the line. Easy enough.”

      This quote encapsulates the industrial, dehumanizing perspective of modern poultry farming, where living creatures are reduced to mere production units. It introduces the chapter’s critical view of industrialized agriculture and sets the tone for the narrator’s lived experience in this system.

      2. “Industrial chickens, that’s what we called our birds. They were like magic. Grew like weeds and you barely had to feed them.”

      This paradoxical description highlights both the wonder and horror of genetic manipulation in food production. The quote reveals how efficiency has been prioritized over natural biological processes, creating creatures that can’t survive outside controlled environments.

      3. “I bought gin in bulk, giant half-gallon plastic bottles with British names… Filthy medicine. But what was the alternative?”

      This poignant quote reveals the narrator’s struggle with addiction as a coping mechanism for his difficult circumstances. The rhetorical question underscores the sense of entrapment and limited choices faced by immigrants in challenging living situations.

      4. “God stories always seemed to work that way. Sideways, convoluted. Like one of those elaborate chain-reaction machines built in the most deliberately nonsensical way, using a track and a spring and a candle and a balloon to ring a bell.”

      This metaphorical reflection on religious narratives demonstrates the narrator’s philosophical questioning. It represents a key moment of introspection about faith, purpose, and the complex ways people find meaning in hardship.

      5. “Cyrus grew, I worked. What more to say?”

      This stark, minimalist statement captures the essence of the immigrant parent experience - years reduced to their most basic components of survival and child-rearing. Its brevity speaks volumes about the narrator’s resigned acceptance of this limited existence.

    Quotes

    1. “A chicken was a machine that converted grain into protein. That was the line. Easy enough.”

    This quote encapsulates the industrial, dehumanizing perspective of modern poultry farming, where living creatures are reduced to mere production units. It introduces the chapter’s critical view of industrialized agriculture and sets the tone for the narrator’s lived experience in this system.

    2. “Industrial chickens, that’s what we called our birds. They were like magic. Grew like weeds and you barely had to feed them.”

    This paradoxical description highlights both the wonder and horror of genetic manipulation in food production. The quote reveals how efficiency has been prioritized over natural biological processes, creating creatures that can’t survive outside controlled environments.

    3. “I bought gin in bulk, giant half-gallon plastic bottles with British names… Filthy medicine. But what was the alternative?”

    This poignant quote reveals the narrator’s struggle with addiction as a coping mechanism for his difficult circumstances. The rhetorical question underscores the sense of entrapment and limited choices faced by immigrants in challenging living situations.

    4. “God stories always seemed to work that way. Sideways, convoluted. Like one of those elaborate chain-reaction machines built in the most deliberately nonsensical way, using a track and a spring and a candle and a balloon to ring a bell.”

    This metaphorical reflection on religious narratives demonstrates the narrator’s philosophical questioning. It represents a key moment of introspection about faith, purpose, and the complex ways people find meaning in hardship.

    5. “Cyrus grew, I worked. What more to say?”

    This stark, minimalist statement captures the essence of the immigrant parent experience - years reduced to their most basic components of survival and child-rearing. Its brevity speaks volumes about the narrator’s resigned acceptance of this limited existence.

    FAQs

    1. What were the key differences between the industrial chickens described in the chapter and traditional backyard chickens?

    Answer:
    The industrial chickens were bred for maximum efficiency in converting feed to protein, reaching slaughter weight of nearly seven pounds in just 35 days—a process that might take a year for backyard chickens. Unlike traditional chickens, these birds had weakened immune systems since they lived in biosecure barns and never encountered natural environments. The narrator emphasizes they couldn’t survive exposure to real dirt or bacteria, calling them “magic” for their rapid growth with minimal feed. This contrasts sharply with the image of chickens pecking in dirt or splashing in puddles, highlighting the artificiality of industrial poultry production.

    2. How does the narrator’s relationship with Cyrus reflect themes of parenthood and cultural adaptation?

    Answer:
    The narrator portrays parenthood as both a responsibility and a lifeline, referencing a hadith about a starving man given purpose through caring for a child. Cyrus is described as self-sufficient from first grade, yet their bond is nurtured through shared rituals like Friday movie nights (Westerns and comedies) and basketball games. The narrator also emphasizes cultural adaptation—they discuss Muslim NBA players as points of pride and use sports as a bridge to connect with coworkers and Cyrus’s school community. However, there’s emotional distance; the narrator admits Cyrus often shared more with his uncle Arash than with him, revealing the complexities of immigrant parenting.

    3. Analyze how the chapter uses food to illustrate the narrator’s immigrant experience and workplace dynamics.

    Answer:
    Food serves as a lens for both isolation and connection. At home, the narrator cooks economical stews with cheap ingredients, while workplace biosecurity rules forbid bringing outside food, creating a paradox: unlimited free vegetarian meals (like bean burritos) are provided, but sharing cultural dishes is impossible. Conversations about cassava, tamales, and Iranian food remain theoretical, highlighting how immigration fractures culinary traditions. The bulk gin purchases—joked as a “British” tool to keep Iranians “backwards”—further underscore how consumption habits reflect displacement and coping mechanisms in a new culture.

    4. What contradictions does the narrator reveal about their work at the breeder farm?

    Answer:
    The job is framed as scientifically advanced (“more laboratory than farm”) yet physically grueling, involving digging through feces-covered eggs. The chickens are called “machines,” emphasizing their engineered efficiency, but the care required—like avoiding crushed eggs—hints at their fragile biology. Workers must shower and wear scrubs like medical professionals, yet the environment is filthy. The narrator also critiques the system’s ethos (“A chicken was a machine”), even as they take pride in the birds’ unnatural growth rates. These contradictions reflect the tension between industrial agriculture’s promises and its dehumanizing realities.

    5. How does the hadith about the starving man relate to the narrator’s life with Cyrus?

    Answer:
    The hadith mirrors the narrator’s experience of finding purpose through parenthood after displacement. Initially skeptical of the story’s logic (questioning why God didn’t simply provide food), the narrator later embodies its lesson: Cyrus becomes their reason to endure hardship, much like the infant motivates the starving man. However, the relationship is complex—Cyrus’s independence (“basically an adult from the beginning”) contrasts with the hadith’s idealized dependency. The narrator’s reflection suggests parenthood’s redemptive power isn’t straightforward but rooted in small, practical acts of care, like shared pizza nights or basketball games.

    Note