Cover of Martyr!
    Poetry

    Martyr!

    by Kaveh Akbar
    “Martyr!” by Kaveh Akbar follows Cyrus Shams, a first-generation Iranian American poet grappling with addiction, grief, and identity after his mother’s death in a U.S. government-related plane bombing. The novel traces Cyrus’s journey as he seeks meaning through art, faith, and encounters with figures like a terminally ill artist in the Brooklyn Museum. Themes of legacy, sacrifice, and the immigrant experience are explored through Cyrus’s introspective quest, blending personal tragedy with broader existential questions. Akbar’s debut novel is noted for its lyrical prose and examination of how individuals navigate pain and purpose.

    The chap­ter fol­lows Arash Shi­razi, a young Iran­ian man con­script­ed into mil­i­tary ser­vice dur­ing the Iran-Iraq War in 1984. With no means to avoid enlist­ment, Arash reflects on the absur­di­ty of war and the shift from a rev­o­lu­tion led by ide­al­ists to one con­trolled by armed zealots. He resigns him­self to his fate, imag­in­ing his future as just anoth­er mar­tyr’s pho­to on the mosque wall. His obser­va­tions high­light the sense­less­ness of war, where men like him—poor, une­d­u­cat­ed, and with­out spe­cial skills—are deemed expend­able, referred to as “zero sol­diers.”

    Arash’s intro­spec­tion deep­ens as he wit­ness­es a young con­script being berat­ed by a woman, pos­si­bly his wife or sis­ter, for choos­ing to enlist. The scene con­trasts sharply with Arash’s own accep­tance of his fate. He imag­ines the young man as a pianist, his del­i­cate hands meant for music, not war. This moment under­scores the tragedy of wast­ed poten­tial and the arbi­trary nature of con­scrip­tion. Arash mus­es on the moti­va­tions for enlistment—ideology, fam­i­ly pres­sure, or sheer inevitability—and con­cludes that for him, resis­tance is futile.

    The nar­ra­tive shifts to Arash’s depar­ture for train­ing at a makeshift camp in the Alborz Moun­tains. His moth­er’s silent grief dur­ing his head-shav­ing rit­u­al reveals the per­son­al toll of war. Arash car­ries a fam­i­ly pho­to, a snap­shot of hap­pi­er times marred by polit­i­cal ten­sions. At the camp, he is grouped with oth­er “zero sol­diers,” those with min­i­mal edu­ca­tion, rein­forc­ing his expend­abil­i­ty. The harsh, tran­sient nature of the camp mir­rors the dis­pos­abil­i­ty of their lives, yet Arash finds a strange lib­er­a­tion in hav­ing no expec­ta­tions placed upon him.

    Arash’s reflec­tions blend res­ig­na­tion and exis­ten­tial accep­tance. The moun­tains, unre­al in their grandeur, sym­bol­ize the sur­re­al nature of his cir­cum­stances. The chap­ter cap­tures the dis­so­nance between indi­vid­ual human­i­ty and the machin­ery of war, where young men are reduced to num­bers and sta­tis­tics. Arash’s voice—wry, obser­vant, and devoid of self-pity—paints a poignant pic­ture of a gen­er­a­tion caught between rev­o­lu­tion and war, their lives dic­tat­ed by forces beyond their con­trol.

    FAQs

    • 1. What does the term “zero soldier” mean in the context of this chapter, and why does Arash Shirazi find this designation liberating?

      Answer:
      A “zero soldier” refers to recruits with no education (less than high school), no special skills, and no family responsibilities, making them expendable in war. Arash explains this includes men like himself who “didn’t finish high school” and have “zero responsibilities outside of [their] country.” The chapter mentions a grim military adage: “If a zero soldier has to use a grenade to escape with their life, they shouldn’t waste the grenade.” Paradoxically, Arash finds this label liberating because it removes societal pressure to achieve or “become” something—it “vents away all pressure to become” and “asks only that you be.” This reflects his resigned acceptance of fate amid the Iran-Iraq War’s brutality.

      2. Analyze the significance of the piano prodigy scene in the vaccination waiting room. How does this encounter reveal Arash’s worldview?

      Answer:
      The scene where Arash observes a young man with “cathedral hands” being berated for enlisting serves as a contrast to Arash’s own passive acceptance of conscription. While Arash sees himself as having “no great talent” and thus belonging in war, he romanticizes the prodigy’s potential (imagining him “swimming through an underwater cathedral” playing Debussy). This reveals Arash’s nuanced perspective: though he dismisses ideological fervor (noting the boy lacks a “nationalist” demeanor), he still recognizes the tragedy of wasted potential in war. His musings about Beeta (a possible daughter, teacher, or mother) underscore war’s indiscriminate destruction of personal narratives.

      3. How does the chapter use physical descriptions to convey themes of identity and mortality? Provide specific examples.

      Answer:
      Physical descriptions serve as metaphors for erasure and anonymity in war. Shaved heads dominate the narrative: Arash’s mother shaves his head while sobbing, and he envisions his future martyr photo as one of many “bald dead martyr[s]” distinguished only by scars or moles. The “hairless” skulls make soldiers interchangeable, emphasizing their expendability. Conversely, the piano prodigy’s “long soft fingers” symbolize individuality and artistry—qualities war destroys. Even Arash’s self-description (“ugly in a way that works”) hints at how war reduces men to utilitarian objects. These details reinforce the dehumanizing machinery of conflict.

      4. What historical and political context does Arash provide for the Iran-Iraq War, and how does his personal stance complicate this narrative?

      Answer:
      Arash contextualizes the war as a betrayal of Iran’s revolutionary ideals: after a revolution led by “pacifists with hyacinths,” “idiot zealots ended up with all the guns.” He acknowledges Iraq’s invasion (Saddam wanting Iran to “bow”) but critiques the Ayatollah’s regime, noting most citizens “didn’t believe the Ayatollah’s nonsense” yet resented foreign interference more. His ambivalence reflects the chapter’s tension between patriotism and disillusionment—he enlists not out of zeal but because it’s “inescapable, a thing like sickness or death.” This contrasts with the piano prodigy’s implied coercion, showing war’s multifaceted oppression.

      5. Compare Arash’s family photograph memory to his observations of the piano prodigy’s family dynamics. What do these parallels suggest about the role of family in wartime?

      Answer:
      Both scenes reveal family as a site of silent suffering and fractured communication. Arash’s photograph memory captures discord (his sister Roya’s fake smile, parents “like stone lions,” and a week-long silence after a political fight). Similarly, the prodigy’s companion (possibly a wife or sister) “seethes” at his enlistment, their relationship strained by unspoken trauma (possibly involving “Beeta”). These parallels suggest war amplifies familial tensions while eroding emotional expression—Arash’s mother sobs silently during his haircut, just as the prodigy’s “flinch” is suppressed. Family becomes both a tether to humanity and a reminder of what war destroys.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I enlist because I have to enlist. The few ways out—chronic illness, being the eldest son of a widowed parent, being rich—aren’t available to me.”

      This opening statement captures the protagonist’s resigned acceptance of conscription, establishing the chapter’s central theme of forced participation in war. It introduces the harsh realities of draft evasion and societal pressures in revolutionary Iran.

      2. “How did this happen? Zealots. Guns, tanks. And now, war.”

      This terse, impactful reflection represents the narrator’s disillusionment with Iran’s political transformation. The fragmented syntax mirrors the suddenness of change from idealistic revolution to militarized conflict, a key historical context for the chapter.

      3. “I imagine him swimming through an underwater cathedral, stained glass and tiny fish, with just his fingers, just his soft hands making sunken cathedral sounds.”

      This lyrical passage demonstrates the narrator’s poetic sensibility amid harsh circumstances. The contrast between this artistic imagination and the reality of war preparation highlights the tragedy of wasted potential in conflict.

      4. “The way it vents away all pressure to become. How it asks only that you be.”

      This philosophical reflection on being deemed “expendable” reveals the narrator’s surprising existential liberation. It represents a key turning point where he transforms military dehumanization into a form of radical acceptance.

      5. “I wonder what they imagined that place being, before they arrived there. I wonder if they were disappointed, or if there was no place to arrive to at all.”

      This meditation on mortality and afterlife captures the chapter’s existential undercurrent. The narrator’s questioning of martyrdom’s promises serves as subtle critique of wartime propaganda and its empty ideals.

    Quotes

    1. “I enlist because I have to enlist. The few ways out—chronic illness, being the eldest son of a widowed parent, being rich—aren’t available to me.”

    This opening statement captures the protagonist’s resigned acceptance of conscription, establishing the chapter’s central theme of forced participation in war. It introduces the harsh realities of draft evasion and societal pressures in revolutionary Iran.

    2. “How did this happen? Zealots. Guns, tanks. And now, war.”

    This terse, impactful reflection represents the narrator’s disillusionment with Iran’s political transformation. The fragmented syntax mirrors the suddenness of change from idealistic revolution to militarized conflict, a key historical context for the chapter.

    3. “I imagine him swimming through an underwater cathedral, stained glass and tiny fish, with just his fingers, just his soft hands making sunken cathedral sounds.”

    This lyrical passage demonstrates the narrator’s poetic sensibility amid harsh circumstances. The contrast between this artistic imagination and the reality of war preparation highlights the tragedy of wasted potential in conflict.

    4. “The way it vents away all pressure to become. How it asks only that you be.”

    This philosophical reflection on being deemed “expendable” reveals the narrator’s surprising existential liberation. It represents a key turning point where he transforms military dehumanization into a form of radical acceptance.

    5. “I wonder what they imagined that place being, before they arrived there. I wonder if they were disappointed, or if there was no place to arrive to at all.”

    This meditation on mortality and afterlife captures the chapter’s existential undercurrent. The narrator’s questioning of martyrdom’s promises serves as subtle critique of wartime propaganda and its empty ideals.

    FAQs

    1. What does the term “zero soldier” mean in the context of this chapter, and why does Arash Shirazi find this designation liberating?

    Answer:
    A “zero soldier” refers to recruits with no education (less than high school), no special skills, and no family responsibilities, making them expendable in war. Arash explains this includes men like himself who “didn’t finish high school” and have “zero responsibilities outside of [their] country.” The chapter mentions a grim military adage: “If a zero soldier has to use a grenade to escape with their life, they shouldn’t waste the grenade.” Paradoxically, Arash finds this label liberating because it removes societal pressure to achieve or “become” something—it “vents away all pressure to become” and “asks only that you be.” This reflects his resigned acceptance of fate amid the Iran-Iraq War’s brutality.

    2. Analyze the significance of the piano prodigy scene in the vaccination waiting room. How does this encounter reveal Arash’s worldview?

    Answer:
    The scene where Arash observes a young man with “cathedral hands” being berated for enlisting serves as a contrast to Arash’s own passive acceptance of conscription. While Arash sees himself as having “no great talent” and thus belonging in war, he romanticizes the prodigy’s potential (imagining him “swimming through an underwater cathedral” playing Debussy). This reveals Arash’s nuanced perspective: though he dismisses ideological fervor (noting the boy lacks a “nationalist” demeanor), he still recognizes the tragedy of wasted potential in war. His musings about Beeta (a possible daughter, teacher, or mother) underscore war’s indiscriminate destruction of personal narratives.

    3. How does the chapter use physical descriptions to convey themes of identity and mortality? Provide specific examples.

    Answer:
    Physical descriptions serve as metaphors for erasure and anonymity in war. Shaved heads dominate the narrative: Arash’s mother shaves his head while sobbing, and he envisions his future martyr photo as one of many “bald dead martyr[s]” distinguished only by scars or moles. The “hairless” skulls make soldiers interchangeable, emphasizing their expendability. Conversely, the piano prodigy’s “long soft fingers” symbolize individuality and artistry—qualities war destroys. Even Arash’s self-description (“ugly in a way that works”) hints at how war reduces men to utilitarian objects. These details reinforce the dehumanizing machinery of conflict.

    4. What historical and political context does Arash provide for the Iran-Iraq War, and how does his personal stance complicate this narrative?

    Answer:
    Arash contextualizes the war as a betrayal of Iran’s revolutionary ideals: after a revolution led by “pacifists with hyacinths,” “idiot zealots ended up with all the guns.” He acknowledges Iraq’s invasion (Saddam wanting Iran to “bow”) but critiques the Ayatollah’s regime, noting most citizens “didn’t believe the Ayatollah’s nonsense” yet resented foreign interference more. His ambivalence reflects the chapter’s tension between patriotism and disillusionment—he enlists not out of zeal but because it’s “inescapable, a thing like sickness or death.” This contrasts with the piano prodigy’s implied coercion, showing war’s multifaceted oppression.

    5. Compare Arash’s family photograph memory to his observations of the piano prodigy’s family dynamics. What do these parallels suggest about the role of family in wartime?

    Answer:
    Both scenes reveal family as a site of silent suffering and fractured communication. Arash’s photograph memory captures discord (his sister Roya’s fake smile, parents “like stone lions,” and a week-long silence after a political fight). Similarly, the prodigy’s companion (possibly a wife or sister) “seethes” at his enlistment, their relationship strained by unspoken trauma (possibly involving “Beeta”). These parallels suggest war amplifies familial tensions while eroding emotional expression—Arash’s mother sobs silently during his haircut, just as the prodigy’s “flinch” is suppressed. Family becomes both a tether to humanity and a reminder of what war destroys.

    Note