Cover of Martyr!
    Poetry

    Martyr!

    by Kaveh Akbar
    “Martyr!” by Kaveh Akbar follows Cyrus Shams, a first-generation Iranian American poet grappling with addiction, grief, and identity after his mother’s death in a U.S. government-related plane bombing. The novel traces Cyrus’s journey as he seeks meaning through art, faith, and encounters with figures like a terminally ill artist in the Brooklyn Museum. Themes of legacy, sacrifice, and the immigrant experience are explored through Cyrus’s introspective quest, blending personal tragedy with broader existential questions. Akbar’s debut novel is noted for its lyrical prose and examination of how individuals navigate pain and purpose.

    The chap­ter intro­duces Cyrus, a med­ical actor at Keady Uni­ver­si­ty Hos­pi­tal who por­trays dying patients or griev­ing fam­i­ly mem­bers for med­ical stu­dents to prac­tice dif­fi­cult con­ver­sa­tions. He finds pur­pose in inhab­it­ing var­i­ous roles, from Sal­ly Gutier­rez, a moth­er los­ing her daugh­ter, to Buck Sta­ple­ton, a Catholic coach fac­ing his wife’s brain death. The job requires him to cal­i­brate emo­tion­al respons­es based on pain scales while eval­u­at­ing stu­dents’ empa­thy through score sheets. Cyrus enjoys the per­for­ma­tive aspect, though his room­mate Zee express­es con­cern about the psy­cho­log­i­cal toll of repeat­ed­ly sim­u­lat­ing trau­ma.

    Cyrus’s work involves nuanced sce­nar­ios, such as organ dona­tion dis­cus­sions, where he must react authen­ti­cal­ly to stu­dents’ attempts at per­sua­sion. He takes pride in embody­ing diverse char­ac­ters, from a dia­bet­ic amputee to a Ger­man immi­grant with ter­mi­nal ill­ness. The hir­ing doc­tor prefers non-actors like Cyrus, believ­ing pro­fes­sion­al actors would make the sce­nar­ios about them­selves. This detail hints at Cyrus’s nat­ur­al tal­ent for emo­tion­al authen­tic­i­ty, though his moti­va­tions remain complex—blending finan­cial need, artis­tic curios­i­ty, and an unspo­ken reck­on­ing with per­son­al his­to­ry.

    Zee’s dis­com­fort with Cyrus’s job emerges as a recur­ring ten­sion. He argues that sim­u­lat­ing grief could neg­a­tive­ly impact Cyrus’s men­tal health, espe­cial­ly giv­en their shared “shit” they’ve endured—a vague ref­er­ence to past strug­gles. Cyrus deflects with humor, cit­ing the $20/hour wage and poten­tial cre­ative ben­e­fits for his stag­nant poet­ry. Their exchange reveals Cyrus’s avoid­ance of deep­er intro­spec­tion, using prac­ti­cal­i­ty and artis­tic jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to side­step Zee’s valid con­cerns about emo­tion­al labor.

    The chap­ter con­trasts Cyrus’s present sobri­ety with his for­mer alco­holism, where he roman­ti­cized drink­ing as essen­tial to his writ­ing process. Now sober but cre­ative­ly blocked, he clings to the med­ical act­ing job as both income and sub­con­scious mate­r­i­al for future work. Zee’s enthu­si­as­tic praise of Cyrus’s rare poet­ic drafts under­scores his untapped poten­tial, leav­ing read­ers to ques­tion whether Cyrus’s hos­pi­tal per­for­mances are a form of artis­tic expres­sion or emo­tion­al avoid­ance. The nar­ra­tive sets up an explo­ration of per­for­mance, trau­ma, and the blurred lines between lived and sim­u­lat­ed expe­ri­ence.

    FAQs

    • 1. Comprehension Question

      What is Cyrus’s job at Keady University Hospital, and what does it entail?
      Answer:
      Cyrus works as a medical actor at Keady University Hospital, earning $20 per hour for 15 hours weekly. His role involves simulating various patient scenarios to train medical students. He portrays different characters—such as grieving family members or terminally ill patients—based on notecards detailing their identities, conditions, and pain levels (e.g., Sally Gutierrez, a mother reacting to her daughter’s death, or Buck Stapleton, a Catholic coach considering organ donation). Cyrus evaluates the students’ empathy and communication skills through score sheets, while cameras record interactions for review. The job requires emotional range, from restrained grief (a “2” on the pain scale) to intense distress (an “8”).


      2. Analytical Question

      How does Cyrus’s roommate, Zee, view his hospital job, and what underlying concerns does this reveal?
      Answer:
      Zee expresses discomfort with Cyrus’s job, calling it “unhealthy” and suggesting it could negatively impact his mental well-being. He argues that the brain “doesn’t know the difference between acting and living,” implying that repeatedly simulating trauma might exacerbate Cyrus’s past struggles (hinted at by references to his sobriety and “all the shit you’ve been through”). Zee’s skepticism contrasts with Cyrus’s pragmatic view of the job as financially beneficial and potentially inspiring for his writing. This tension highlights themes of emotional labor and the psychological costs of performance, as well as differing coping mechanisms between the two characters.


      3. Critical Thinking Question

      Why might the hospital prefer hiring “non-actors” like Cyrus for medical training simulations?
      Answer:
      The doctor explains that professional actors tend to make the scenarios “about themselves,” likely meaning they overperform or prioritize dramatic flair over authenticity. Non-actors like Cyrus may provide more genuine, subdued reactions that better mimic real patient behavior, allowing medical students to practice with realistic emotional cues. This preference underscores the hospital’s goal of training students in nuanced, patient-centered care rather than theatrical interactions. Cyrus’s ability to modulate his responses (e.g., dialing grief to a “6”) demonstrates the balance the role requires—authentic enough to be instructive but controlled enough to maintain consistency for evaluation.


      4. Application Question

      How might Cyrus’s experiences as a medical actor influence his poetry, based on the chapter’s details?
      Answer:
      Cyrus mentions the job could eventually benefit his writing, referencing the idea of “living the poems [he’s] not writing yet.” By embodying diverse identities and emotional states (e.g., a diabetic accountant facing amputation or a grieving immigrant), he accumulates raw material for future work. The chapter also notes his past struggle with writer’s block and reliance on alcohol for inspiration. The simulations could serve as a sober alternative, offering visceral experiences to channel into his poetry—particularly themes of mortality, identity, and human connection. His attention to language (e.g., quoting the Quran’s phrasing about death) suggests he’s already processing these experiences artistically.


      5. Reflective Question

      What contradictions or ironies do you notice in Cyrus’s relationship with performance, both in his job and personal life?
      Answer:
      Cyrus thrives on performance—whether pretending to die for medical students or theatrically quoting lines about drinking in bars—yet these acts reveal deeper vulnerabilities. His hospital role lets him safely explore mortality and grief, but Zee’s critique hints that Cyrus might be using performance to avoid confronting his own trauma. Similarly, his past reliance on alcohol as a “sacramental” creative tool contrasts with his current writer’s block, suggesting performance has been both a crutch and a catalyst. The irony lies in his job’s demand for authentic-feigning; it requires emotional honesty even as it involves artifice, mirroring his complex relationship with truth in art and sobriety.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Cyrus would step into the fourth-floor hospital office and a secretary would hand him a notecard with a fake patient’s name and identity on it beside a little cartoon face on the 0–10 pain scale where 0 was a smiling ‘No hurt at all’ face, 4 was a straight-faced ‘Hurts a little more,’ and 10 was a sobbing ‘Hurts worst’ face, a gruesome cartoon with an upside-down U for a mouth. Cyrus felt he’d found his calling.”

      This quote introduces the surreal yet clinical nature of Cyrus’s work as a medical actor, blending performative artifice with raw human emotion. It captures the book’s exploration of identity and the commodification of suffering.

      2. “The med students were often overeager to console him, like daytime talk-show hosts. Or they’d be repelled by the artifice of the situation and barely engage.”

      This observation highlights the tension between genuine empathy and performative professionalism in medical training. It underscores the chapter’s critique of institutionalized compassion.

      3. “When he raised an eyebrow, she quickly explained: ‘Non-actors, I mean. Actors tend to get a little—she spun her hands in tight circles—’Marlon Brando about it. They can’t help making it about themselves.‘”

      This ironic exchange reveals the hospital’s preference for “authentic” performances of grief over theatricality, while simultaneously acknowledging the inherent artifice of the exercise. It speaks to the novel’s themes of authenticity and performance.

      4. “Zee made a little face, then said, ‘It just doesn’t seem healthy, Cyrus.’…‘I mean, your brain doesn’t know the difference between acting and living.’”

      Zee’s concern introduces the psychological toll of Cyrus’s work, foreshadowing deeper explorations of trauma and identity. This exchange marks a turning point where Cyrus’s coping mechanism is questioned.

      5. “Before getting sober, Cyrus didn’t write so much as he drank about writing, describing booze as essential to his process, ‘nearly sacramental’—he really said it like that—in the way it ‘opened his mind to the hidden voice’ beneath the mundane ‘argle-bargle of the every-day.’”

      This self-aware reflection on artistic pretension reveals Cyrus’s struggle with authenticity in both life and art. The quote exemplifies the novel’s examination of creative paralysis and self-deception.

    Quotes

    1. “Cyrus would step into the fourth-floor hospital office and a secretary would hand him a notecard with a fake patient’s name and identity on it beside a little cartoon face on the 0–10 pain scale where 0 was a smiling ‘No hurt at all’ face, 4 was a straight-faced ‘Hurts a little more,’ and 10 was a sobbing ‘Hurts worst’ face, a gruesome cartoon with an upside-down U for a mouth. Cyrus felt he’d found his calling.”

    This quote introduces the surreal yet clinical nature of Cyrus’s work as a medical actor, blending performative artifice with raw human emotion. It captures the book’s exploration of identity and the commodification of suffering.

    2. “The med students were often overeager to console him, like daytime talk-show hosts. Or they’d be repelled by the artifice of the situation and barely engage.”

    This observation highlights the tension between genuine empathy and performative professionalism in medical training. It underscores the chapter’s critique of institutionalized compassion.

    3. “When he raised an eyebrow, she quickly explained: ‘Non-actors, I mean. Actors tend to get a little—she spun her hands in tight circles—’Marlon Brando about it. They can’t help making it about themselves.‘”

    This ironic exchange reveals the hospital’s preference for “authentic” performances of grief over theatricality, while simultaneously acknowledging the inherent artifice of the exercise. It speaks to the novel’s themes of authenticity and performance.

    4. “Zee made a little face, then said, ‘It just doesn’t seem healthy, Cyrus.’…‘I mean, your brain doesn’t know the difference between acting and living.’”

    Zee’s concern introduces the psychological toll of Cyrus’s work, foreshadowing deeper explorations of trauma and identity. This exchange marks a turning point where Cyrus’s coping mechanism is questioned.

    5. “Before getting sober, Cyrus didn’t write so much as he drank about writing, describing booze as essential to his process, ‘nearly sacramental’—he really said it like that—in the way it ‘opened his mind to the hidden voice’ beneath the mundane ‘argle-bargle of the every-day.’”

    This self-aware reflection on artistic pretension reveals Cyrus’s struggle with authenticity in both life and art. The quote exemplifies the novel’s examination of creative paralysis and self-deception.

    FAQs

    1. Comprehension Question

    What is Cyrus’s job at Keady University Hospital, and what does it entail?
    Answer:
    Cyrus works as a medical actor at Keady University Hospital, earning $20 per hour for 15 hours weekly. His role involves simulating various patient scenarios to train medical students. He portrays different characters—such as grieving family members or terminally ill patients—based on notecards detailing their identities, conditions, and pain levels (e.g., Sally Gutierrez, a mother reacting to her daughter’s death, or Buck Stapleton, a Catholic coach considering organ donation). Cyrus evaluates the students’ empathy and communication skills through score sheets, while cameras record interactions for review. The job requires emotional range, from restrained grief (a “2” on the pain scale) to intense distress (an “8”).


    2. Analytical Question

    How does Cyrus’s roommate, Zee, view his hospital job, and what underlying concerns does this reveal?
    Answer:
    Zee expresses discomfort with Cyrus’s job, calling it “unhealthy” and suggesting it could negatively impact his mental well-being. He argues that the brain “doesn’t know the difference between acting and living,” implying that repeatedly simulating trauma might exacerbate Cyrus’s past struggles (hinted at by references to his sobriety and “all the shit you’ve been through”). Zee’s skepticism contrasts with Cyrus’s pragmatic view of the job as financially beneficial and potentially inspiring for his writing. This tension highlights themes of emotional labor and the psychological costs of performance, as well as differing coping mechanisms between the two characters.


    3. Critical Thinking Question

    Why might the hospital prefer hiring “non-actors” like Cyrus for medical training simulations?
    Answer:
    The doctor explains that professional actors tend to make the scenarios “about themselves,” likely meaning they overperform or prioritize dramatic flair over authenticity. Non-actors like Cyrus may provide more genuine, subdued reactions that better mimic real patient behavior, allowing medical students to practice with realistic emotional cues. This preference underscores the hospital’s goal of training students in nuanced, patient-centered care rather than theatrical interactions. Cyrus’s ability to modulate his responses (e.g., dialing grief to a “6”) demonstrates the balance the role requires—authentic enough to be instructive but controlled enough to maintain consistency for evaluation.


    4. Application Question

    How might Cyrus’s experiences as a medical actor influence his poetry, based on the chapter’s details?
    Answer:
    Cyrus mentions the job could eventually benefit his writing, referencing the idea of “living the poems [he’s] not writing yet.” By embodying diverse identities and emotional states (e.g., a diabetic accountant facing amputation or a grieving immigrant), he accumulates raw material for future work. The chapter also notes his past struggle with writer’s block and reliance on alcohol for inspiration. The simulations could serve as a sober alternative, offering visceral experiences to channel into his poetry—particularly themes of mortality, identity, and human connection. His attention to language (e.g., quoting the Quran’s phrasing about death) suggests he’s already processing these experiences artistically.


    5. Reflective Question

    What contradictions or ironies do you notice in Cyrus’s relationship with performance, both in his job and personal life?
    Answer:
    Cyrus thrives on performance—whether pretending to die for medical students or theatrically quoting lines about drinking in bars—yet these acts reveal deeper vulnerabilities. His hospital role lets him safely explore mortality and grief, but Zee’s critique hints that Cyrus might be using performance to avoid confronting his own trauma. Similarly, his past reliance on alcohol as a “sacramental” creative tool contrasts with his current writer’s block, suggesting performance has been both a crutch and a catalyst. The irony lies in his job’s demand for authentic-feigning; it requires emotional honesty even as it involves artifice, mirroring his complex relationship with truth in art and sobriety.

    Note