Chapter Index
    Cover of Rhythm of War (9781429952040)
    Fantasy

    Rhythm of War (9781429952040)

    by Sanderson, Brandon
    “Rhythm of War” is the fourth installment in Brandon Sanderson’s epic fantasy series, The Stormlight Archive. Set on the planet Roshar, the novel continues the conflict between Dalinar Kholin’s coalition of Knights Radiant and the forces of Odium, a malevolent god seeking dominion. The story delves deeper into the psychological and emotional struggles of key characters, including Kaladin, Shallan, and Navani, as they grapple with war, trauma, and the mysteries of ancient magics. Themes of resilience, identity, and the cost of power are explored amidst intricate world-building and high-stakes battles. The book expands the Cosmere universe, revealing new layers of lore and setting the stage for future confrontations.

    Tar­a­van­gian awak­ens to anoth­er day of phys­i­cal and men­tal strug­gle, caught between the pain of move­ment and the anguish of stay­ing still. His cog­ni­tive abil­i­ties are dimin­ished, mak­ing even sim­ple tasks like read­ing his own notes labo­ri­ous. He notices sun­light stream­ing through a win­dow he didn’t open, real­iz­ing Dali­nar must have ordered it—a small kind­ness in his con­fined exis­tence. Despite his fog­gy mind, Tar­a­van­gian forces him­self to fol­low a rou­tine, copy­ing instruc­tions into a note­book, though their mean­ing eludes him in his cur­rent state.

    The chap­ter delves into Taravangian’s inter­nal con­flict as he grap­ples with his dimin­ished intel­lect and the frus­tra­tion of for­get­ting sim­ple things, like check­ing for fresh food before eat­ing stale bread. He reflects on how oth­ers per­ceive his strug­gles, feel­ing iso­lat­ed and mis­un­der­stood. His emo­tion­al vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty is pal­pa­ble, espe­cial­ly when he recalls how people’s anger at his mis­takes often reduced him to tears. The nar­ra­tive high­lights his lone­li­ness and the weight of liv­ing with a mind that betrays him.

    A sud­den inter­rup­tion comes when a guard announces a vis­i­tor, spark­ing Taravangian’s hope that it might be Szeth, the per­son he’s been prepar­ing to meet. Instead, he’s con­front­ed by Renar­in, Dalinar’s son, who speaks cryp­ti­cal­ly about see­ing dark­ness in Taravangian’s future with a flick­er of light. Renarin’s awk­ward attempt to offer comfort—extending his hand—leaves Tar­a­van­gian emo­tion­al­ly raw but unable to accept the ges­ture. The encounter under­scores Taravangian’s iso­la­tion and the moral ambi­gu­i­ty of his cho­sen path.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Tar­a­van­gian ques­tion­ing his cer­tain­ty about his deci­sions, jux­ta­posed against the guard’s grim asser­tion that not every­one can return from dark­ness. Renarin’s words linger, sug­gest­ing hope even in Taravangian’s self-imposed exile. The ten­sion between Taravangian’s resolve and his lin­ger­ing doubts cre­ates a poignant end­ing, leav­ing the read­er to pon­der whether his path is one of neces­si­ty or fol­ly.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Taravangian’s mental state affect his daily routine and decision-making in this chapter?

      Answer:
      Taravangian’s fluctuating intelligence and cognitive struggles profoundly impact his daily life. The chapter opens with him debating whether to endure the pain of moving or the anguish of staying in bed, highlighting his physical and mental suffering. His “thoughts moving as if through thick syrup” illustrate his impaired reasoning, causing him to forget tasks (like checking for fresh food) and requiring laborious repetition to comprehend his own notes. His emotional volatility—nearly crying when frustrated or touched by Renarin’s gesture—further complicates his interactions. These challenges force him to rely on pre-written instructions from his smarter self, revealing how his unstable condition creates a fragmented existence.

      2. Analyze the significance of Renarin’s visit and his message about “darkness” and “light.” How does this interaction reflect broader themes in the story?

      Answer:
      Renarin’s visit introduces a moral and metaphysical tension. His vision of Taravangian’s “dark” future with a “flickering light” symbolizes the conflict between damnation and redemption, mirroring Dalinar’s own past struggles. Renarin’s hesitant offer of hope (“no man is ever so far lost”) contrasts with Taravangian’s resigned pragmatism (“We can’t all return from the dark”). This echoes the series’ theme of choice versus destiny—Taravangian believes his path is deliberate, while Renarin suggests transformation is possible. The awkward handshake attempt underscores the difficulty of connection, emphasizing isolation as both a personal and cosmic struggle in the narrative.

      3. Why does Taravangian distrust Dalinar Kholin’s involvement in his plans, despite acknowledging him as “kindly”?

      Answer:
      Taravangian’s notes explicitly warn against involving Dalinar because Dalinar would “do what was right. Not what was needed.” This dichotomy reflects their opposing philosophies: Dalinar prioritizes moral absolutes (honor, unity), while Taravangian embraces utilitarian sacrifices (e.g., his past murders for the “greater good”). Taravangian admires Dalinar’s kindness but fears his rigidity would thwart necessary ruthlessness. The chapter reinforces this when Renarin mentions Dalinar’s disappointment in failing to “change” Taravangian—highlighting their irreconcilable worldviews. Taravangian’s distrust stems from a belief that survival requires morally ambiguous actions Dalinar would reject.

      4. How does the physical setting (e.g., the boarded-up window, prison-like room) mirror Taravangian’s psychological state?

      Answer:
      The oppressive setting externalizes Taravangian’s inner turmoil. Initially, the “boarded-up” windows symbolize his isolation and self-imposed confinement to his destructive plans. The sudden sunlight from Dalinar’s intervention represents fleeting hope or external compassion, which Taravangian struggles to accept. His prison-like room mirrors his mental captivity—to his fluctuating intelligence, guilt, and deterministic worldview (“I knew precisely where I was going”). Even the stale bread he eats before noticing fresh food reflects his habitual suffering and myopic focus. These details create a claustrophobic atmosphere that parallels his trapped psyche.

      5. Evaluate the guard’s final statement: “We can’t all return from the dark.” How does this complicate Renarin’s message of hope?

      Answer:
      The guard’s line (likely Szeth in disguise) starkly rejects Renarin’s optimism, reinforcing Taravangian’s belief in irredeemable paths. It introduces fatalism—that some choices (like Taravangian’s atrocities) permanently sever redemption. This tension between hope and despair is central to the series: Renarin represents Dalinar’s hard-won belief in change, while the guard/Taravangian embodies the Cost of utilitarian evil. The statement also foreshadows Taravangian’s future as Odium’s pawn, suggesting his “darkness” may be inevitable. By juxtaposing these perspectives, the chapter questions whether redemption is universal or if some are too far gone—a theme explored through multiple characters’ arcs.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Dalinar Kholin would do what was right. Not what was needed.”

      This quote captures Taravangian’s core philosophical conflict with Dalinar, revealing his belief that moral absolutism is insufficient in the face of existential threats. It underscores the chapter’s tension between pragmatic and idealistic approaches to salvation.

      2. “People took their minds for granted. They thought themselves wonderful because of how they’d been born.”

      A profound reflection from Taravangian during one of his “dumb” days, highlighting the chapter’s exploration of intelligence, human nature, and the curse of self-awareness. This insight gains weight coming from a character who experiences radical fluctuations in cognitive ability.

      3. “I see your future, Taravangian. It is dark. Not like anything I’ve seen before. Except there’s a point of light flickering in the darkness.”

      Renarin’s prophetic vision introduces the chapter’s central mystery about Taravangian’s fate. This ominous yet hopeful imagery creates suspense while reflecting the story’s broader themes of redemption and damnation.

      4. “I lived through his return, and it taught me that no man is ever so far lost that he cannot find his way back. You are not alone.”

      Renarin’s attempt to reach Taravangian represents the chapter’s emotional climax, offering a counterpoint to Taravangian’s nihilism. This quote encapsulates the novel’s recurring theme of redemption while establishing Renarin as a compassionate foil to his father.

      5. “We can’t all return from the dark.”

      The guard’s chilling final line (possibly Odium in disguise) provides a stark rebuttal to Renarin’s hope, leaving the chapter on an ambiguous note. This duality between light and dark mirrors Taravangian’s internal conflict about his path forward.

    Quotes

    1. “Dalinar Kholin would do what was right. Not what was needed.”

    This quote captures Taravangian’s core philosophical conflict with Dalinar, revealing his belief that moral absolutism is insufficient in the face of existential threats. It underscores the chapter’s tension between pragmatic and idealistic approaches to salvation.

    2. “People took their minds for granted. They thought themselves wonderful because of how they’d been born.”

    A profound reflection from Taravangian during one of his “dumb” days, highlighting the chapter’s exploration of intelligence, human nature, and the curse of self-awareness. This insight gains weight coming from a character who experiences radical fluctuations in cognitive ability.

    3. “I see your future, Taravangian. It is dark. Not like anything I’ve seen before. Except there’s a point of light flickering in the darkness.”

    Renarin’s prophetic vision introduces the chapter’s central mystery about Taravangian’s fate. This ominous yet hopeful imagery creates suspense while reflecting the story’s broader themes of redemption and damnation.

    4. “I lived through his return, and it taught me that no man is ever so far lost that he cannot find his way back. You are not alone.”

    Renarin’s attempt to reach Taravangian represents the chapter’s emotional climax, offering a counterpoint to Taravangian’s nihilism. This quote encapsulates the novel’s recurring theme of redemption while establishing Renarin as a compassionate foil to his father.

    5. “We can’t all return from the dark.”

    The guard’s chilling final line (possibly Odium in disguise) provides a stark rebuttal to Renarin’s hope, leaving the chapter on an ambiguous note. This duality between light and dark mirrors Taravangian’s internal conflict about his path forward.

    FAQs

    1. How does Taravangian’s mental state affect his daily routine and decision-making in this chapter?

    Answer:
    Taravangian’s fluctuating intelligence and cognitive struggles profoundly impact his daily life. The chapter opens with him debating whether to endure the pain of moving or the anguish of staying in bed, highlighting his physical and mental suffering. His “thoughts moving as if through thick syrup” illustrate his impaired reasoning, causing him to forget tasks (like checking for fresh food) and requiring laborious repetition to comprehend his own notes. His emotional volatility—nearly crying when frustrated or touched by Renarin’s gesture—further complicates his interactions. These challenges force him to rely on pre-written instructions from his smarter self, revealing how his unstable condition creates a fragmented existence.

    2. Analyze the significance of Renarin’s visit and his message about “darkness” and “light.” How does this interaction reflect broader themes in the story?

    Answer:
    Renarin’s visit introduces a moral and metaphysical tension. His vision of Taravangian’s “dark” future with a “flickering light” symbolizes the conflict between damnation and redemption, mirroring Dalinar’s own past struggles. Renarin’s hesitant offer of hope (“no man is ever so far lost”) contrasts with Taravangian’s resigned pragmatism (“We can’t all return from the dark”). This echoes the series’ theme of choice versus destiny—Taravangian believes his path is deliberate, while Renarin suggests transformation is possible. The awkward handshake attempt underscores the difficulty of connection, emphasizing isolation as both a personal and cosmic struggle in the narrative.

    3. Why does Taravangian distrust Dalinar Kholin’s involvement in his plans, despite acknowledging him as “kindly”?

    Answer:
    Taravangian’s notes explicitly warn against involving Dalinar because Dalinar would “do what was right. Not what was needed.” This dichotomy reflects their opposing philosophies: Dalinar prioritizes moral absolutes (honor, unity), while Taravangian embraces utilitarian sacrifices (e.g., his past murders for the “greater good”). Taravangian admires Dalinar’s kindness but fears his rigidity would thwart necessary ruthlessness. The chapter reinforces this when Renarin mentions Dalinar’s disappointment in failing to “change” Taravangian—highlighting their irreconcilable worldviews. Taravangian’s distrust stems from a belief that survival requires morally ambiguous actions Dalinar would reject.

    4. How does the physical setting (e.g., the boarded-up window, prison-like room) mirror Taravangian’s psychological state?

    Answer:
    The oppressive setting externalizes Taravangian’s inner turmoil. Initially, the “boarded-up” windows symbolize his isolation and self-imposed confinement to his destructive plans. The sudden sunlight from Dalinar’s intervention represents fleeting hope or external compassion, which Taravangian struggles to accept. His prison-like room mirrors his mental captivity—to his fluctuating intelligence, guilt, and deterministic worldview (“I knew precisely where I was going”). Even the stale bread he eats before noticing fresh food reflects his habitual suffering and myopic focus. These details create a claustrophobic atmosphere that parallels his trapped psyche.

    5. Evaluate the guard’s final statement: “We can’t all return from the dark.” How does this complicate Renarin’s message of hope?

    Answer:
    The guard’s line (likely Szeth in disguise) starkly rejects Renarin’s optimism, reinforcing Taravangian’s belief in irredeemable paths. It introduces fatalism—that some choices (like Taravangian’s atrocities) permanently sever redemption. This tension between hope and despair is central to the series: Renarin represents Dalinar’s hard-won belief in change, while the guard/Taravangian embodies the Cost of utilitarian evil. The statement also foreshadows Taravangian’s future as Odium’s pawn, suggesting his “darkness” may be inevitable. By juxtaposing these perspectives, the chapter questions whether redemption is universal or if some are too far gone—a theme explored through multiple characters’ arcs.

    Note