Chapter Index
    Cover of Rhythm of War (9781429952040)
    Fantasy

    Rhythm of War (9781429952040)

    by Sanderson, Brandon
    “Rhythm of War” is the fourth installment in Brandon Sanderson’s epic fantasy series, The Stormlight Archive. Set on the planet Roshar, the novel continues the conflict between Dalinar Kholin’s coalition of Knights Radiant and the forces of Odium, a malevolent god seeking dominion. The story delves deeper into the psychological and emotional struggles of key characters, including Kaladin, Shallan, and Navani, as they grapple with war, trauma, and the mysteries of ancient magics. Themes of resilience, identity, and the cost of power are explored amidst intricate world-building and high-stakes battles. The book expands the Cosmere universe, revealing new layers of lore and setting the stage for future confrontations.

    Navani Kholin, a schol­ar and leader, opens the chap­ter by advo­cat­ing for trans­paren­cy among the coali­tion of mon­archs, urg­ing Thayle­nah to share their secret fab­r­i­al tech­niques for the greater good. Her plea under­scores the esca­lat­ing dan­gers their world faces and the need for col­lec­tive knowl­edge. Mean­while, Navani and her team, includ­ing the ardent Rushu, study a crys­talline pil­lar in Urithiru, focus­ing on four gar­nets that resem­ble the sup­pres­sion fabrial’s design. Despite ini­tial excite­ment, their research hits a dead end, leav­ing Navani frus­trat­ed but deter­mined to uncov­er the pillar’s secrets.

    Rushu reveals a trou­bling dis­cov­ery: the spren pow­er­ing the sup­pres­sion fab­r­i­al in Shades­mar is cor­rupt­ed, akin to Renarin’s enig­mat­ic spren, Glys. This rais­es con­cerns about the spren’s loy­al­ty and whether it will­ing­ly aids the ene­my. Navani argues that spren, like humans, have indi­vid­ual alle­giances, though she pri­vate­ly ques­tions Glys’s nature. The dis­cus­sion high­lights the eth­i­cal dilem­ma of impris­on­ing sapi­ent spren for fab­ri­als, a prac­tice con­demned by an anony­mous span­reed mes­sage accus­ing Navani of mon­strous behav­ior. Navani pon­ders whether ancient fab­ri­als, like the Oath­gates, treat­ed spren more humane­ly.

    Navani redi­rects her team’s efforts toward acti­vat­ing the gar­net clus­ter in the pil­lar, the­o­riz­ing it once pro­tect­ed Urithiru from the Fused. She also tasks Rushu with reset­ting the sup­pres­sion fab­r­i­al to reverse its effects, poten­tial­ly dis­abling the Fused’s pow­ers. As she con­tem­plates the tower’s vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties, Navani grows uneasy about the pos­si­bil­i­ty of Masked Ones—Fused with Light­weav­ing abilities—infiltrating Urithiru unde­tect­ed. She orders Rushu to assem­ble a team to devise pro­to­cols for iden­ti­fy­ing hid­den ene­mies, empha­siz­ing the need for vig­i­lance against the Fused’s unpre­dictable capa­bil­i­ties.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Navani enter­ing an ancient library room, once filled with Radi­ant mes­sages encod­ed in gem­stones. This space, now repur­posed for ongo­ing research, sym­bol­izes her relent­less pur­suit of knowl­edge amid mount­ing threats. Her reflec­tions on the tower’s defens­es, the ethics of fab­r­i­al cre­ation, and the enemy’s cun­ning strate­gies under­score the chapter’s themes of inno­va­tion, trust, and sur­vival in a world tee­ter­ing on the brink of chaos.

    FAQs

    • 1. What key discovery does Navani make about the garnets in the crystalline pillar, and why is this significant?

      Answer:
      Navani observes that four garnets in the crystalline pillar match the exact construction used in the suppression fabrial, suggesting these specific garnets may be part of an ancient defense mechanism against the Fused. This discovery is significant because it implies the pillar contains dormant fabrial technology that once protected Urithiru from incursions. The precision of the layout indicates intentional design rather than coincidence, offering a potential breakthrough in reactivating the tower’s defenses. However, the team hits a dead end when they fail to find other matching fabrial patterns in the pillar, highlighting the complexity of ancient Radiant technology.

      2. How does the behavior of the suppression fabrial’s spren in Shadesmar challenge Navani’s theories, and what ethical dilemma does this raise?

      Answer:
      The suppression fabrial’s spren in Shadesmar is corrupted, resembling Renarin’s spren and refusing to communicate, which suggests it may be collaborating with the enemy. This challenges Navani’s assumption that spren operate independently with individual loyalties. The ethical dilemma arises from the revelation that ancient fabrials may have imprisoned sapient spren in the Cognitive Realm, akin to Soulcasters. This raises questions about the morality of fabrial creation—whether modern methods are more humane or if all spren captivity is inherently exploitative. Navani grapples with balancing technological necessity against ethical responsibility.

      3. What strategic concerns does Navani raise about the Fused, and what countermeasures does she propose?

      Answer:
      Navani worries that the Fused, particularly Masked Ones with Lightweaving abilities, could infiltrate Urithiru undetected, as the tower’s ancient protections are no longer fully operational. She notes that while current Oathgate protocols mitigate some risks, the enemy’s unknown capabilities remain a threat. Her countermeasures include two-pronged action: (1) focusing research on reactivating the garnet-based pillar defenses and (2) assembling a team of abstract thinkers to develop protocols for identifying hidden Fused. This reflects her proactive approach to security, emphasizing both technological restoration and innovative problem-solving.

      4. Analyze the significance of the epigraph’s plea for transparency in the context of Navani’s research challenges.

      Answer:
      The epigraph, a lecture by Navani, underscores her belief that collective survival depends on sharing knowledge—specifically Thaylen fabrial techniques for manipulating Stormlight. This plea mirrors her current struggle: her team’s dead ends highlight the limitations of isolated research. The chapter shows her practicing this philosophy by openly sharing findings (e.g., Rushu’s reports) and seeking collaborative solutions (e.g., assigning teams to study the pillar and Fused detection). The tension between secrecy and cooperation becomes a thematic undercurrent, as Navani weighs the risks of exposing vulnerabilities against the benefits of shared innovation.

      5. How does the chapter portray the relationship between spren agency and fabrial functionality, and what implications does this have for future fabrial development?

      Answer:
      The chapter contrasts two models: ancient fabrials that imprison sapient spren (like the suppression fabrial’s corrupted spren) and modern fabrials that may use non-sapient spren. The Oathgate spren, which seem content, suggest some spren willingly cooperate, while the corrupted spren implies forced servitude can backfire. This duality forces Navani to reconsider fabrial ethics—whether future designs should prioritize spren consent or if efficiency justifies coercion. The unresolved tension hints at a potential paradigm shift: fabrial advancement may depend on forging partnerships with spren rather than subjugating them, aligning with Radiant ideals of symbiosis.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The world becomes an increasingly dangerous place, and so I come to the crux of my argument. We cannot afford to keep secrets from one another any longer.”

      This opening epigraph by Navani Kholin sets the chapter’s central theme—the urgent need for collaboration in the face of growing threats. It frames her plea for shared knowledge among nations and scholars as a matter of survival.

      2. “The spren that runs the suppression device… has been corrupted, very similar to Renarin’s spren… It seems to be working with the enemy deliberately.”

      This revelation about corrupted spren introduces a critical mystery—some spren are actively aiding the enemy, raising questions about their nature and loyalties. It challenges assumptions about spren-human relationships and foreshadows deeper conflicts.

      3. “We should assume they each have individual loyalties, like humans.”

      Navani’s insight about spren individuality counters simplistic categorizations, emphasizing their complex personhood. This perspective informs her approach to fabrial science and reflects the chapter’s recurring theme of understanding rather than dominating spren.

      4. “You capture spren… You imprison them. Hundreds of them. You are a monster. You must stop.”

      This haunting accusation (received via spanreed) presents the moral dilemma at the heart of fabrial technology. It forces Navani to confront the ethical implications of her research and consider alternative methods of working with spren.

      5. “Masked Ones could be among us and we’d never know it. You or I could be one of them right now.”

      This chilling realization underscores the chapter’s tension between security and paranoia. Navani’s warning about shape-shifting Fused infiltrators drives her urgency to reactivate Urithiru’s defenses and creates palpable suspense about unseen threats.

    Quotes

    1. “The world becomes an increasingly dangerous place, and so I come to the crux of my argument. We cannot afford to keep secrets from one another any longer.”

    This opening epigraph by Navani Kholin sets the chapter’s central theme—the urgent need for collaboration in the face of growing threats. It frames her plea for shared knowledge among nations and scholars as a matter of survival.

    2. “The spren that runs the suppression device… has been corrupted, very similar to Renarin’s spren… It seems to be working with the enemy deliberately.”

    This revelation about corrupted spren introduces a critical mystery—some spren are actively aiding the enemy, raising questions about their nature and loyalties. It challenges assumptions about spren-human relationships and foreshadows deeper conflicts.

    3. “We should assume they each have individual loyalties, like humans.”

    Navani’s insight about spren individuality counters simplistic categorizations, emphasizing their complex personhood. This perspective informs her approach to fabrial science and reflects the chapter’s recurring theme of understanding rather than dominating spren.

    4. “You capture spren… You imprison them. Hundreds of them. You are a monster. You must stop.”

    This haunting accusation (received via spanreed) presents the moral dilemma at the heart of fabrial technology. It forces Navani to confront the ethical implications of her research and consider alternative methods of working with spren.

    5. “Masked Ones could be among us and we’d never know it. You or I could be one of them right now.”

    This chilling realization underscores the chapter’s tension between security and paranoia. Navani’s warning about shape-shifting Fused infiltrators drives her urgency to reactivate Urithiru’s defenses and creates palpable suspense about unseen threats.

    FAQs

    1. What key discovery does Navani make about the garnets in the crystalline pillar, and why is this significant?

    Answer:
    Navani observes that four garnets in the crystalline pillar match the exact construction used in the suppression fabrial, suggesting these specific garnets may be part of an ancient defense mechanism against the Fused. This discovery is significant because it implies the pillar contains dormant fabrial technology that once protected Urithiru from incursions. The precision of the layout indicates intentional design rather than coincidence, offering a potential breakthrough in reactivating the tower’s defenses. However, the team hits a dead end when they fail to find other matching fabrial patterns in the pillar, highlighting the complexity of ancient Radiant technology.

    2. How does the behavior of the suppression fabrial’s spren in Shadesmar challenge Navani’s theories, and what ethical dilemma does this raise?

    Answer:
    The suppression fabrial’s spren in Shadesmar is corrupted, resembling Renarin’s spren and refusing to communicate, which suggests it may be collaborating with the enemy. This challenges Navani’s assumption that spren operate independently with individual loyalties. The ethical dilemma arises from the revelation that ancient fabrials may have imprisoned sapient spren in the Cognitive Realm, akin to Soulcasters. This raises questions about the morality of fabrial creation—whether modern methods are more humane or if all spren captivity is inherently exploitative. Navani grapples with balancing technological necessity against ethical responsibility.

    3. What strategic concerns does Navani raise about the Fused, and what countermeasures does she propose?

    Answer:
    Navani worries that the Fused, particularly Masked Ones with Lightweaving abilities, could infiltrate Urithiru undetected, as the tower’s ancient protections are no longer fully operational. She notes that while current Oathgate protocols mitigate some risks, the enemy’s unknown capabilities remain a threat. Her countermeasures include two-pronged action: (1) focusing research on reactivating the garnet-based pillar defenses and (2) assembling a team of abstract thinkers to develop protocols for identifying hidden Fused. This reflects her proactive approach to security, emphasizing both technological restoration and innovative problem-solving.

    4. Analyze the significance of the epigraph’s plea for transparency in the context of Navani’s research challenges.

    Answer:
    The epigraph, a lecture by Navani, underscores her belief that collective survival depends on sharing knowledge—specifically Thaylen fabrial techniques for manipulating Stormlight. This plea mirrors her current struggle: her team’s dead ends highlight the limitations of isolated research. The chapter shows her practicing this philosophy by openly sharing findings (e.g., Rushu’s reports) and seeking collaborative solutions (e.g., assigning teams to study the pillar and Fused detection). The tension between secrecy and cooperation becomes a thematic undercurrent, as Navani weighs the risks of exposing vulnerabilities against the benefits of shared innovation.

    5. How does the chapter portray the relationship between spren agency and fabrial functionality, and what implications does this have for future fabrial development?

    Answer:
    The chapter contrasts two models: ancient fabrials that imprison sapient spren (like the suppression fabrial’s corrupted spren) and modern fabrials that may use non-sapient spren. The Oathgate spren, which seem content, suggest some spren willingly cooperate, while the corrupted spren implies forced servitude can backfire. This duality forces Navani to reconsider fabrial ethics—whether future designs should prioritize spren consent or if efficiency justifies coercion. The unresolved tension hints at a potential paradigm shift: fabrial advancement may depend on forging partnerships with spren rather than subjugating them, aligning with Radiant ideals of symbiosis.

    Note