Cover of Gods & Monsters
    FantasyRomance NovelYoung Adult

    Gods & Monsters

    by Mahurin, Shelby
    “Gods & Monsters” by Shelby Mahurin is the final installment in the “Serpent & Dove” trilogy, a YA fantasy series blending French-inspired witchcraft, forbidden romance, and political intrigue. Following a devastating loss, protagonist Lou—now possessed by a powerful enemy witch—joins Reid, Beau, and Coco in a quest for vengeance against the dark witch Morgane. Themes of sacrifice, identity, and the blurred lines between good and evil drive the narrative as alliances are tested and divine forces intervene. The novel culminates in a high-stakes battle, resolving the trilogy’s central conflicts while exploring the cost of power and redemption. Its mix of action, mythology, and emotional depth solidifies its place in the YA fantasy genre.

    The chap­ter “Dark­ness Mine” from *Dark­ness Mine* delves into the pro­tag­o­nist Lou’s har­row­ing expe­ri­ence of being con­sumed by an all-encom­pass­ing dark­ness. The nar­ra­tive vivid­ly describes how the dark­ness becomes an oppres­sive force, merg­ing with Lou’s iden­ti­ty until they feel indis­tin­guish­able from it. The pain and suf­fo­ca­tion are pal­pa­ble as Lou strug­gles with­out form, sens­es, or con­trol, empha­siz­ing a pro­found sense of dis­in­te­gra­tion and help­less­ness. The dark­ness is not just exter­nal but inter­nal­ized, blur­ring the line between self and void.

    Amidst this tor­ment, Lou becomes aware of a seduc­tive voice emerg­ing from the shad­ows, offer­ing an escape through sur­ren­der. The voice promis­es obliv­ion and an end to suf­fer­ing, tempt­ing Lou with the allure of for­get­ting their pain. This moment high­lights the psy­cho­log­i­cal bat­tle between the desire for relief and the instinct to resist. The voice’s beau­ty and pow­er make it near­ly irre­sistible, reflect­ing the uni­ver­sal strug­gle against despair and the temp­ta­tion to give in to eas­i­er, dark­er paths.

    Despite the voice’s allure, Lou hes­i­tates, sens­ing that sur­ren­der would mean los­ing something—or someone—crucial. This inter­nal con­flict under­scores the theme of iden­ti­ty and mem­o­ry, as Lou grap­ples with frag­ment­ed rec­ol­lec­tions of their past self and rela­tion­ships. The inabil­i­ty to remem­ber who they are or what they’re hold­ing onto adds lay­ers of ten­sion and mys­tery, sug­gest­ing that even in the depths of despair, there’s a lin­ger­ing spark of self-preser­va­tion.

    Ulti­mate­ly, Lou clings to a frag­ile sense of self, resist­ing the darkness’s claim even as it insists, “You are the dark­ness.” The chap­ter ends on a note of defi­ance, with Lou fold­ing tighter into them­selves like a grain of sand against an over­whelm­ing tide. This poignant imagery cap­tures the resilience of the human spir­it, even when faced with anni­hi­la­tion, leav­ing read­ers to pon­der the cost of sur­vival and the nature of iden­ti­ty in the face of obliv­ion.

    FAQs

    • 1. Comprehension: How does the narrator describe their experience of darkness in this chapter?

      Answer:
      The narrator describes the darkness as an all-encompassing, suffocating force that becomes indistinguishable from themselves. It “shrouds everything,” pressing against their chest, throat, and tongue until it is them. They feel trapped, unformed, and unmade, experiencing pain despite having no physical form. The darkness blinds and chokes them, offering oblivion through a seductive voice that urges surrender. The narrator resists, clinging to a vague memory of someone important, even as the darkness claims, “You are the darkness. This darkness is yours” (p. 16–17).


      2. Analytical: What internal conflict does the narrator face, and how does it manifest?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s conflict is between surrendering to the darkness (and its promise of painless oblivion) and resisting to preserve an unnamed but vital memory. This manifests in their hesitation—”a moment or a thousand moments”—as they weigh the appeal of forgetting against the instinct to hold on. The voice personifies temptation, while the narrator’s fragmented self-awareness (“I cannot remember who I am”) underscores their struggle for identity. The tension between annihilation and preservation drives the chapter’s emotional core (p. 17).


      3. Critical Thinking: Why might the author have chosen to frame the darkness as both oppressive and possessive (e.g., “This darkness, mine”)?

      Answer:
      This duality suggests the darkness is both an external force and an internalized state. By claiming it as “mine,” the narrator acknowledges a twisted ownership, implying the darkness is part of their identity or a manifestation of their psyche (e.g., trauma or despair). The oppressive quality reflects suffering, while the possessive language hints at agency—perhaps a struggle to reclaim control. This paradox deepens the themes of existential crisis and self-dissolution, blurring the line between victim and embodiment (p. 16–17).


      4. Application: How might the narrator’s resistance to the voice’s temptation reflect broader themes of survival or identity?

      Answer:
      The resistance underscores the human instinct to preserve identity even in despair. Though the narrator can’t recall specifics, their refusal to surrender suggests that memory—or the idea of memory—anchors survival. This mirrors real-world struggles where individuals cling to fragmented hope (e.g., “someone important”) amid trauma. The chapter illustrates how identity persists through resistance, even when reduced to a “grain of sand” against overwhelming forces (p. 17).

    Quotes

    • 1. “It shrouds everything. It envelops me, constricts me, pressing against my chest, my throat, my tongue until it is me. Trapped within its eye, drowning in its depths, I fold in on myself until I no longer exist at all. I am the darkness. This darkness, mine.”

      This opening passage powerfully establishes the chapter’s central theme of existential merging with darkness. The visceral description captures the protagonist’s complete absorption into the void, blurring the line between self and environment in a way that foreshadows the internal struggle to come.

      2. “Surrender, it croons, and forget. Feel no pain.

      This represents the pivotal temptation moment in the narrative, where the voice in the darkness offers oblivion as relief from suffering. The poetic phrasing contrasts beautifully with the chapter’s otherwise oppressive tone, making this seductive offer particularly memorable.

      3. “If I let go, I will lose something important. Someone important. I cannot remember who it is. I cannot remember who I am.”

      These lines capture the chapter’s core conflict between surrender and preservation of identity. Despite the overwhelming darkness, the protagonist clings to a vague sense of self and connection, making this a crucial turning point in the internal narrative.

      4. “You are the darkness. The shadows press closer, and I fold myself tighter. A grain of sand below infinite black waves. This darkness is yours.

      This climactic moment encapsulates the chapter’s central paradox - the protagonist is simultaneously consumed by yet identified with the darkness. The striking imagery of a grain of sand versus infinite waves perfectly illustrates the scale of this existential struggle.

    Quotes

    1. “It shrouds everything. It envelops me, constricts me, pressing against my chest, my throat, my tongue until it is me. Trapped within its eye, drowning in its depths, I fold in on myself until I no longer exist at all. I am the darkness. This darkness, mine.”

    This opening passage powerfully establishes the chapter’s central theme of existential merging with darkness. The visceral description captures the protagonist’s complete absorption into the void, blurring the line between self and environment in a way that foreshadows the internal struggle to come.

    2. “Surrender, it croons, and forget. Feel no pain.

    This represents the pivotal temptation moment in the narrative, where the voice in the darkness offers oblivion as relief from suffering. The poetic phrasing contrasts beautifully with the chapter’s otherwise oppressive tone, making this seductive offer particularly memorable.

    3. “If I let go, I will lose something important. Someone important. I cannot remember who it is. I cannot remember who I am.”

    These lines capture the chapter’s core conflict between surrender and preservation of identity. Despite the overwhelming darkness, the protagonist clings to a vague sense of self and connection, making this a crucial turning point in the internal narrative.

    4. “You are the darkness. The shadows press closer, and I fold myself tighter. A grain of sand below infinite black waves. This darkness is yours.

    This climactic moment encapsulates the chapter’s central paradox - the protagonist is simultaneously consumed by yet identified with the darkness. The striking imagery of a grain of sand versus infinite waves perfectly illustrates the scale of this existential struggle.

    FAQs

    1. Comprehension: How does the narrator describe their experience of darkness in this chapter?

    Answer:
    The narrator describes the darkness as an all-encompassing, suffocating force that becomes indistinguishable from themselves. It “shrouds everything,” pressing against their chest, throat, and tongue until it is them. They feel trapped, unformed, and unmade, experiencing pain despite having no physical form. The darkness blinds and chokes them, offering oblivion through a seductive voice that urges surrender. The narrator resists, clinging to a vague memory of someone important, even as the darkness claims, “You are the darkness. This darkness is yours” (p. 16–17).


    2. Analytical: What internal conflict does the narrator face, and how does it manifest?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s conflict is between surrendering to the darkness (and its promise of painless oblivion) and resisting to preserve an unnamed but vital memory. This manifests in their hesitation—”a moment or a thousand moments”—as they weigh the appeal of forgetting against the instinct to hold on. The voice personifies temptation, while the narrator’s fragmented self-awareness (“I cannot remember who I am”) underscores their struggle for identity. The tension between annihilation and preservation drives the chapter’s emotional core (p. 17).


    3. Critical Thinking: Why might the author have chosen to frame the darkness as both oppressive and possessive (e.g., “This darkness, mine”)?

    Answer:
    This duality suggests the darkness is both an external force and an internalized state. By claiming it as “mine,” the narrator acknowledges a twisted ownership, implying the darkness is part of their identity or a manifestation of their psyche (e.g., trauma or despair). The oppressive quality reflects suffering, while the possessive language hints at agency—perhaps a struggle to reclaim control. This paradox deepens the themes of existential crisis and self-dissolution, blurring the line between victim and embodiment (p. 16–17).


    4. Application: How might the narrator’s resistance to the voice’s temptation reflect broader themes of survival or identity?

    Answer:
    The resistance underscores the human instinct to preserve identity even in despair. Though the narrator can’t recall specifics, their refusal to surrender suggests that memory—or the idea of memory—anchors survival. This mirrors real-world struggles where individuals cling to fragmented hope (e.g., “someone important”) amid trauma. The chapter illustrates how identity persists through resistance, even when reduced to a “grain of sand” against overwhelming forces (p. 17).

    Note