Cover of Blood & Honey
    FantasyRomance Novel

    Blood & Honey

    by Mahurin, Shelby
    “Blood & Honey” by Shelby Mahurin is the second installment in the “Serpent & Dove” trilogy, a young adult fantasy-romance series. Following a near-fatal encounter with the Dames Blanches, protagonists Lou, Reid, Coco, and Ansel become fugitives, fleeing from coven, kingdom, and church. The narrative revolves around their journey to secure allies while navigating escalating dangers, including deadly witches and internal conflicts. The book shifts tone from the first installment, focusing more on tension and survival than romance. Key themes include loyalty, sacrifice, and the struggle between destiny and choice. The novel ends on a cliffhanger, setting up the trilogy’s conclusion. With 528 pages, it expands the dark, magical world of Belterra while deepening character arcs and conflicts.

    The chap­ter depicts an emo­tion­al­ly charged moment between Lou and Reid as they grap­ple with grief and self-accep­tance. Lou reflects on Rei­d’s trou­bled past, acknowl­edg­ing how few peo­ple have gen­uine­ly loved him—including his adop­tive father, the Arch­bish­op, who recent­ly died. Despite Rei­d’s flaws and their com­pli­cat­ed his­to­ry, Lou rec­og­nizes his deep need for love and com­fort. Their embrace becomes a sanc­tu­ary as Reid process­es his loss, reveal­ing his fear that the Arch­bish­op would have hat­ed him if he’d known his true nature. Lou reas­sures him, high­light­ing the com­plex­i­ty of their rela­tion­ships and the pain of unspo­ken truths.

    Rei­d’s emo­tion­al vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty gives way to a trans­for­ma­tive real­iza­tion about mag­ic and iden­ti­ty. He demon­strates his new­found con­trol over mag­ic by turn­ing snowflakes into fire­flies and ani­mat­ing flo­ral wall­pa­per, sym­bol­iz­ing his rejec­tion of past prej­u­dices. Lou watch­es in awe as he artic­u­lates a piv­otal truth: mag­ic is nei­ther good nor evil, but a tool shaped by its wield­er. This moment marks Rei­d’s accep­tance of his own mag­i­cal nature, a stark con­trast to his ear­li­er beliefs. Their dia­logue under­scores growth—Reid no longer hates him­self or Lou, and he embraces a future where they can both wield mag­ic with­out fear.

    The con­ver­sa­tion shifts to Lou’s inse­cu­ri­ties about her own mag­i­cal mishaps, includ­ing acci­den­tal­ly harm­ing a friend. Reid, now empa­thet­ic, refus­es to judge her, empha­siz­ing that mis­takes don’t define them. Their mutu­al apolo­gies reveal a deep­en­ing bond, with Reid declar­ing, “Where you go, I go.” Lou coun­ters his self-doubt by affirm­ing his mul­ti­fac­eted identity—huntsman, son, broth­er, husband—and most impor­tant­ly, some­one deeply loved. Her play­ful teas­ing about his stub­born­ness light­ens the mood, but her mes­sage is clear: Reid is no longer alone.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates in an inti­mate rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, with Reid seek­ing phys­i­cal con­nec­tion as a way to express what words can­not. Lou ini­tial­ly hes­i­tates, con­cerned about his emo­tion­al state, but relents when she sees the raw sin­cer­i­ty in his eyes. Their ten­der inter­ac­tion, under­scored by descrip­tions of trem­bling hands and burn­ing touch­es, sym­bol­izes heal­ing and mutu­al sur­ren­der. The unre­solved scene—Reid slow­ly undress­ing Lou—hints at a new chap­ter in their rela­tion­ship, one built on vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, trust, and shared redemp­tion.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Lou’s perspective on Reid’s relationship with the Archbishop evolve in this chapter?

      Answer:
      Lou initially acknowledges the Archbishop’s hypocrisy and hatred but comes to recognize his genuine love for Reid as a father figure. She reflects that despite his flaws, the Archbishop “loved him most and loved him longest” (p. 440), contrasting this with her own past abandonment of Reid. This realization fosters gratitude, as she admits the Archbishop provided Reid with paternal care she never received. The complexity of their relationship is further underscored when Reid confesses, “He hated himself” (p. 441), revealing the Archbishop’s internal conflict and deepening Lou’s empathy for both men.

      2. Analyze the symbolic significance of Reid’s magic transformation (snowflakes → fireflies → flowers) in this scene.

      Answer:
      Reid’s manipulation of snowflakes into fireflies and wallpaper flowers into real blossoms (pp. 441-442) symbolizes his emotional and ideological transformation. The snowflakes represent his cold, rigid past as a huntsman, while the fireflies—fragile yet luminous—mirror his newfound hope and vulnerability. The flowers (particularly winter jasmine, which blooms in adversity) signify growth and reconciliation with his identity. This magic also physically manifests Lou’s earlier assertion that “magic isn’t good or evil” (p. 442), demonstrating Reid’s acceptance of his witch nature as a tool for beauty rather than violence.

      3. How does Reid’s apology to Lou reflect his character development?

      Answer:
      Reid’s apology marks a pivotal shift from self-righteousness to accountability. He admits, “I shouldn’t have resented you using magic” (p. 442), acknowledging his past prejudice. His plea—”don’t let it take you somewhere I can’t follow”—reveals fear of loss rather than condemnation, emphasizing emotional growth. Notably, he communicates through actions (“Let me show you,” p. 444) rather than dogma, contrasting with earlier chapters where he relied on Chantry rhetoric. This aligns with Lou’s description of him as “brave and strong and good” (p. 443), highlighting his integration of vulnerability into his moral identity.

      4. What thematic role does physical touch play in this chapter?

      Answer:
      Touch serves as a language of reconciliation and affirmation. Lou holds Reid as he grieves (p. 440), grounding him physically when his world has collapsed. Their mutual caresses—stroking backs, cupping faces—externalize unspoken trust, particularly when Reid “trembles” while touching Lou (p. 444), revealing his raw emotional state. The progression from comforting embraces to intimate contact mirrors their relationship’s healing, with touch bridging gaps words cannot. This physicality culminates in Lou’s kisses (p. 443), each one redefining Reid’s identity (“husband,” “brother”), literally pressing love onto his body as an antidote to isolation.

      5. Evaluate Lou’s statement: “You’ll never be alone.” How does this chapter challenge traditional notions of belonging?

      Answer:
      Lou’s declaration dismantles the Chantry’s isolationist ideology by redefining belonging as unconditional. While Reid has lost his biological family (the Archbishop, Madame Labelle), Lou constructs a new kinship framework through chosen bonds: “You are a brother… a husband… loved” (p. 443). This contrasts with societal labels (“huntsman,” “witch”) that previously divided them. The cemetery outside the window (p. 443) symbolizes death of old loyalties, making space for Lou’s promise. Her inclusion of Reid’s flaws (“sanctimonious,” p. 443) further rejects perfection as a prerequisite for love, presenting belonging as an active, imperfect practice rather than an inherited status.

    Quotes

    • 1. “How many people in this world had truly loved Reid? A lost little boy in a trash can grown into a hardened young man in a uniform. Two? Maybe three?”

      This poignant reflection captures Lou’s realization of Reid’s profound loneliness and the scarcity of unconditional love in his life. It underscores the chapter’s exploration of belonging and the impact of childhood trauma.

      2. “Magic isn’t good or evil. It heeds those who summon it. When life is a choice between fighting or fleeing—every moment life or death—everything becomes a weapon.”

      Reid’s philosophical statement represents a turning point in his understanding of magic and morality. This quote encapsulates the chapter’s central theme about perspective shaping reality and the dual nature of power.

      3. “But life is more than those moments, Lou. We’re more than those moments.”

      This simple yet powerful declaration marks Reid’s emotional breakthrough. It signifies his rejection of a survivalist mentality and embrace of a more holistic, hopeful worldview.

      4. “You are a huntsman… You are a son… You are a brother… You are a husband… But most important, you are loved.”

      Lou’s litany of affirmations represents the chapter’s emotional climax, systematically rebuilding Reid’s shattered identity. Each title counters his internalized shame, culminating in the transformative power of love.

      5. “Let me touch you. Let me show you.”

      This vulnerable request demonstrates Reid’s transition from verbal expression to physical intimacy as a language of love. It captures the chapter’s exploration of healing through connection after profound loss.

    Quotes

    1. “How many people in this world had truly loved Reid? A lost little boy in a trash can grown into a hardened young man in a uniform. Two? Maybe three?”

    This poignant reflection captures Lou’s realization of Reid’s profound loneliness and the scarcity of unconditional love in his life. It underscores the chapter’s exploration of belonging and the impact of childhood trauma.

    2. “Magic isn’t good or evil. It heeds those who summon it. When life is a choice between fighting or fleeing—every moment life or death—everything becomes a weapon.”

    Reid’s philosophical statement represents a turning point in his understanding of magic and morality. This quote encapsulates the chapter’s central theme about perspective shaping reality and the dual nature of power.

    3. “But life is more than those moments, Lou. We’re more than those moments.”

    This simple yet powerful declaration marks Reid’s emotional breakthrough. It signifies his rejection of a survivalist mentality and embrace of a more holistic, hopeful worldview.

    4. “You are a huntsman… You are a son… You are a brother… You are a husband… But most important, you are loved.”

    Lou’s litany of affirmations represents the chapter’s emotional climax, systematically rebuilding Reid’s shattered identity. Each title counters his internalized shame, culminating in the transformative power of love.

    5. “Let me touch you. Let me show you.”

    This vulnerable request demonstrates Reid’s transition from verbal expression to physical intimacy as a language of love. It captures the chapter’s exploration of healing through connection after profound loss.

    FAQs

    1. How does Lou’s perspective on Reid’s relationship with the Archbishop evolve in this chapter?

    Answer:
    Lou initially acknowledges the Archbishop’s hypocrisy and hatred but comes to recognize his genuine love for Reid as a father figure. She reflects that despite his flaws, the Archbishop “loved him most and loved him longest” (p. 440), contrasting this with her own past abandonment of Reid. This realization fosters gratitude, as she admits the Archbishop provided Reid with paternal care she never received. The complexity of their relationship is further underscored when Reid confesses, “He hated himself” (p. 441), revealing the Archbishop’s internal conflict and deepening Lou’s empathy for both men.

    2. Analyze the symbolic significance of Reid’s magic transformation (snowflakes → fireflies → flowers) in this scene.

    Answer:
    Reid’s manipulation of snowflakes into fireflies and wallpaper flowers into real blossoms (pp. 441-442) symbolizes his emotional and ideological transformation. The snowflakes represent his cold, rigid past as a huntsman, while the fireflies—fragile yet luminous—mirror his newfound hope and vulnerability. The flowers (particularly winter jasmine, which blooms in adversity) signify growth and reconciliation with his identity. This magic also physically manifests Lou’s earlier assertion that “magic isn’t good or evil” (p. 442), demonstrating Reid’s acceptance of his witch nature as a tool for beauty rather than violence.

    3. How does Reid’s apology to Lou reflect his character development?

    Answer:
    Reid’s apology marks a pivotal shift from self-righteousness to accountability. He admits, “I shouldn’t have resented you using magic” (p. 442), acknowledging his past prejudice. His plea—”don’t let it take you somewhere I can’t follow”—reveals fear of loss rather than condemnation, emphasizing emotional growth. Notably, he communicates through actions (“Let me show you,” p. 444) rather than dogma, contrasting with earlier chapters where he relied on Chantry rhetoric. This aligns with Lou’s description of him as “brave and strong and good” (p. 443), highlighting his integration of vulnerability into his moral identity.

    4. What thematic role does physical touch play in this chapter?

    Answer:
    Touch serves as a language of reconciliation and affirmation. Lou holds Reid as he grieves (p. 440), grounding him physically when his world has collapsed. Their mutual caresses—stroking backs, cupping faces—externalize unspoken trust, particularly when Reid “trembles” while touching Lou (p. 444), revealing his raw emotional state. The progression from comforting embraces to intimate contact mirrors their relationship’s healing, with touch bridging gaps words cannot. This physicality culminates in Lou’s kisses (p. 443), each one redefining Reid’s identity (“husband,” “brother”), literally pressing love onto his body as an antidote to isolation.

    5. Evaluate Lou’s statement: “You’ll never be alone.” How does this chapter challenge traditional notions of belonging?

    Answer:
    Lou’s declaration dismantles the Chantry’s isolationist ideology by redefining belonging as unconditional. While Reid has lost his biological family (the Archbishop, Madame Labelle), Lou constructs a new kinship framework through chosen bonds: “You are a brother… a husband… loved” (p. 443). This contrasts with societal labels (“huntsman,” “witch”) that previously divided them. The cemetery outside the window (p. 443) symbolizes death of old loyalties, making space for Lou’s promise. Her inclusion of Reid’s flaws (“sanctimonious,” p. 443) further rejects perfection as a prerequisite for love, presenting belonging as an active, imperfect practice rather than an inherited status.

    Note