Header Image
    Cover of Worldly Ways and Byways
    storyview

    Worldly Ways and Byways

    by

    Chap­ter 38 – A Con­quest of Europe begins by humor­ous­ly cast­ing Amer­i­cans as the great “dis­cov­er­ers” of Europe, arriv­ing around the mid-19th cen­tu­ry with the same bold­ness and con­fi­dence as ancient con­querors. The chap­ter pokes fun at how Amer­i­cans viewed the Old World—charming yet out­dat­ed, quaint but inef­fi­cient. Euro­peans are described as con­tent crafts­men, still immersed in tra­di­tions, unaware of the rapid indus­tri­al­iza­tion and mod­ern con­ve­niences that defined life across the Atlantic. Their build­ings were love­ly but frag­ile, their tools func­tion­al yet prim­i­tive. When Amer­i­cans arrived, they brought with them the promise—or threat—of rapid progress, wrapped in the form of steamships, fac­to­ries, adver­tis­ing, and finan­cial spec­u­la­tion. Where Europe had cathe­drals, Amer­i­ca had cap­i­tal. Where Europe had arti­sans, Amer­i­ca had entre­pre­neurs.

    Once in Europe, Amer­i­cans were ini­tial­ly wel­comed with enthu­si­asm. Locals mis­took the sheer con­fi­dence and spend­ing habits of the first wave of vis­i­tors as signs that all Amer­i­cans were immense­ly wealthy. Shop­keep­ers, innkeep­ers, and even minor nobil­i­ty eager­ly catered to these vis­i­tors, rais­ing prices and adjust­ing ser­vices to attract more of the seem­ing­ly bot­tom­less Amer­i­can wal­let. But this fas­ci­na­tion quick­ly turned to dis­il­lu­sion­ment. Amer­i­cans didn’t just con­sume; they col­o­nized taste, scoop­ing up antiques, art­works, and cul­tur­al trea­sures with all the restraint of a gold rush. Local prices inflat­ed. Cred­it sys­tems were mis­used. Sud­den­ly, these friend­ly vis­i­tors became eco­nom­ic invaders, drain­ing cul­tur­al and com­mer­cial resources.

    Yet the Euro­peans adapt­ed. In a twist of irony, they began sell­ing fakes and repli­cas to the eager Amer­i­can buy­ers. Faux Louis XVI fur­ni­ture, ersatz Old Mas­ter paint­ings, and new­ly man­u­fac­tured “antiques” flood­ed the mar­ket. Amer­i­cans, eager to bring home tokens of cul­tur­al refine­ment, often couldn’t tell the difference—or didn’t care. Pos­ses­sion became more impor­tant than authen­tic­i­ty. This rever­sal turned the con­querors into the con­quered, as their wealth was drained by clever Euro­pean mer­chants. This trade, humor­ous and exploita­tive in equal mea­sure, laid bare the naivety of those who believed mon­ey could sub­sti­tute for dis­cern­ment.

    The nar­ra­tive also draws par­al­lels between the ear­li­er Eng­lish inva­sions of con­ti­nen­tal soci­ety and this new wave of Amer­i­can influ­ence. Both groups were per­ceived as cul­tur­al­ly tone-deaf, view­ing local cus­toms as odd­i­ties rather than tra­di­tions wor­thy of respect. Amer­i­cans, how­ev­er, went a step fur­ther. They didn’t mere­ly ignore Euro­pean customs—they tried to replace them. The desire for accep­tance by aris­to­crat­ic cir­cles led many Amer­i­cans, par­tic­u­lar­ly women, to mim­ic old-world ele­gance, adopt­ing Euro­pean man­ners and wardrobe with near-fanat­i­cal zeal. Lav­ish balls, design­er gowns, and exag­ger­at­ed eti­quette became weapons in the bat­tle for social legit­i­ma­cy.

    But these efforts often fell flat. Euro­pean elites viewed Amer­i­can mon­ey as vul­gar and Amer­i­can behav­ior as gauche. No amount of imi­ta­tion could erase the cul­tur­al dis­tance. This exclu­sion deep­ened resent­ment among Amer­i­cans, who believed their finan­cial con­tri­bu­tions should grant them access. What fol­lowed was a sort of iden­ti­ty cri­sis among expats—stuck between admi­ra­tion for Europe and bit­ter­ness at being rebuffed. In this com­plex social bal­let, Amer­i­cans found them­selves out of step, too eager to be liked, too loud to be ignored.

    Diplo­ma­cy did lit­tle to help. Amer­i­can rep­re­sen­ta­tives abroad, often cho­sen for polit­i­cal loy­al­ty rather than diplo­mat­ic skill, only wors­ened the per­cep­tion. Instead of bridg­ing cul­tur­al gaps, they fre­quent­ly con­firmed stereo­types of Amer­i­can arro­gance and igno­rance. Mean­while, Amer­i­cans who could not afford to return home or failed to estab­lish mean­ing­ful Euro­pean ties became strand­ed social­ly and finan­cial­ly. These expa­tri­ates, once ambi­tious and hope­ful, turned into iso­lat­ed fig­ures cling­ing to an iden­ti­ty no longer tied to either con­ti­nent.

    The chap­ter ends with a sym­bol­ic act of retal­i­a­tion. Amer­i­cans, unable to gain cul­tur­al recog­ni­tion abroad, begin appro­pri­at­ing French plays, strip­ping them of their orig­i­nal con­text and pre­sent­ing them to Amer­i­can audi­ences as domes­tic cre­ations. It was a qui­et but telling rebellion—if Europe wouldn’t wel­come America’s influ­ence, then Amer­i­ca would take what it liked and reshape it with­out per­mis­sion. The ges­ture under­scores the ongo­ing ten­sion between cul­tur­al envy and defi­ance, between long­ing for old-world respect and assert­ing new-world dom­i­nance.

    Ulti­mate­ly, Chap­ter 38 sat­i­rizes not only the brash­ness of Amer­i­can trav­el­ers but also the van­i­ty and rigid­i­ty of Euro­pean soci­ety. It lays bare the mis­steps of cul­tur­al impe­ri­al­ism and the often com­ic attempts at social assim­i­la­tion. Through clever metaphors and anec­dotes, the author cri­tiques both con­ti­nents: one for its obses­sion with sta­tus, the oth­er for its blind faith in mon­ey. In the end, the so-called con­quest of Europe was not a vic­to­ry but a far­ci­cal exchange of illusions—each side sell­ing myths, each side buy­ing in.

    Quotes

    FAQs

    Note