Cover of Ghostroots
    FictionGothic FictionHistorical FictionHorror

    Ghostroots

    by Aguda, ‘Pemi
    “Ghostroots” by ‘Pemi Aguda is a debut short story collection set in Lagos, Nigeria, blending the mundane with the supernatural. The twelve stories explore themes of inheritance, maternal lineage, and haunting legacies, often focusing on women grappling with familial and societal burdens. Aguda’s prose weaves unsettling yet deeply human narratives, where everyday life intersects with spectral presences. Notable stories include “Breastmilk,” which delves into generational trauma. The collection has been praised for its elegant voice and was a finalist for the National Book Award for Fiction, marking Aguda as a significant new voice in contemporary literature.

    The chap­ter “Things Boys Do” explores the unset­tling dynam­ics between fathers and their new­born sons through three dis­tinct nar­ra­tives. The first man wit­ness­es his wife’s trau­mat­ic child­birth, where the baby’s arrival is marked by eerie silence and a doc­tor’s eva­sive reas­sur­ance. The father is haunt­ed by the infan­t’s unnerv­ing white eye­balls and his wife’s sub­se­quent health decline, leav­ing him fear­ful of his own child. This seg­ment sets a tone of dread, ques­tion­ing the nat­ur­al bond between par­ent and off­spring.

    The sec­ond man grap­ples with his moth­er’s insis­tence that his son is not bio­log­i­cal­ly his, adding famil­ial ten­sion to his wife’s post-birth strug­gles. The baby’s unset­tling eye move­ments and his moth­er’s accu­sa­tions cre­ate a atmos­phere of dis­trust. When his wife dies short­ly after, the man is left alone with John­ny, the child he strug­gles to accept. This nar­ra­tive thread under­scores themes of doubt and the fragili­ty of pater­nal con­nec­tions.

    The third man, an adop­tive father, expe­ri­ences an inex­plic­a­ble unease with his new son. Despite his wife’s appar­ent bond with the baby, he feels judged by the infan­t’s stern gaze and notices fleet­ing gray flecks in its eyes. His play­ful inter­ac­tion turns to dis­com­fort, leav­ing him to whis­per, “You’re not a good boy.” This vignette ampli­fies the chap­ter’s recur­ring motif of chil­dren as unset­tling, almost oth­er­world­ly fig­ures who dis­rupt pater­nal cer­tain­ty.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates with the first man’s grow­ing fear of his son Jon, whose pres­ence trig­gers vis­cer­al dread. The nar­ra­tives col­lec­tive­ly paint a por­trait of mas­culin­i­ty in cri­sis, where father­hood is fraught with unspo­ken fears and super­nat­ur­al under­tones. The boys, though infants, wield an unset­tling pow­er that desta­bi­lizes the men around them, chal­leng­ing tra­di­tion­al notions of pater­nal instinct and famil­ial har­mo­ny.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the chapter portray the complex emotions fathers experience toward their newborn sons?

      Answer:
      The chapter vividly depicts three fathers grappling with disturbing, unnatural reactions to their infant sons. The first man feels visceral fear when alone with Jon, experiencing “a flinching, recoiling, chilling thing” (page 109). The second man is repulsed by his baby’s eye movements, described as “like a buried thing digging its way up” (page 106). The third man feels judged and unsettled by his adopted son’s stern gaze and mysterious gray flecks in his eyes (page 108). These reactions subvert traditional paternal bonding narratives, suggesting something ominous about these particular infants while revealing how fatherhood can trigger unexpected psychological responses.

      2. What symbolic significance might the babies’ eyes hold across the three vignettes?

      Answer:
      Eyes serve as recurring symbols of unease and supernatural implication. The first baby’s startling white eyeballs appear amidst birth fluids (page 105), imprinting on his father’s mind. The second baby’s eyes move unnaturally beneath closed lids (page 106), suggesting hidden activity. The adopted baby’s gray-flecked irises momentarily flash (page 108), conveying an otherworldly warning. Collectively, these ocular details transform infant eyes from symbols of innocence into windows revealing something ancient, knowing, and potentially malevolent. The eye imagery connects the boys while foreshadowing their possible shared supernatural origin or destiny.

      3. How does the chapter use medical settings and professionals to heighten the unsettling atmosphere?

      Answer:
      Medical contexts amplify dread through professional inadequacy and ominous ambiguity. The first doctor avoids direct answers about the baby’s condition, forcing out strained congratulations (page 106). Ikeja General Hospital dismisses the second mother while she’s still hemorrhaging with the callous explanation “everybody bleeds” (page 106). These medical failures create vulnerability for the families while suggesting professionals either can’t or won’t acknowledge the abnormal nature of these births. The hospital’s inability to help implies the supernatural exceeds medical understanding, leaving fathers isolated with their terrifying paternal experiences.

      4. Analyze how maternal figures are portrayed in contrast to paternal experiences.

      Answer:
      Mothers exist in states of extreme physical sacrifice or absence. The first mother’s insides are destroyed during birth (page 105), the second mother dies postpartum (page 109), and the adoptive mother exists in exhausted survival mode (page 107). Meanwhile, the second man’s mother introduces conflict by denying the baby’s legitimacy (page 107). This constructs motherhood as either physically catastrophic or emotionally fraught, while fathers grapple with psychological terror. The maternal figures’ suffering seems to enable the sons’ existence, positioning the boys as parasitic forces that consume their mothers and unnerve their fathers.

      5. What thematic connections can be drawn between the vignette structure and the chapter’s title “Things Boys Do”?

      Answer:
      The tripartite structure reveals a pattern of destructive male behavior beginning at birth. Each boy causes harm: the first destroys his mother’s reproductive capacity, the second’s birth leads to maternal death, and the third exhibits unsettling precocity. The title’s plural “boys” suggests these are not isolated incidents but examples of a recurring phenomenon. The vignette format implies these are case studies in a larger cycle of male-caused suffering. The chapter’s opening line—”Children can be cruel”—frames these narratives as examinations of inherent male violence manifesting from infancy, challenging notions of childhood innocence.

    Quotes

    • 1. “What he does not know is that he is watching their son destroy her insides, shredding, making sure there will be no others to follow.”

      This opening line introduces the chapter’s central theme of the destructive nature of these boys, foreshadowing the physical and emotional toll they take on their mothers. The visceral imagery sets a tone of horror and inevitability.

      2. “That baby is not yours, I’m sure of it… I know it. I feel it.”

      The second man’s mother voices the unsettling intuition shared by all three families - that these boys are somehow unnatural or otherworldly. This quote represents the growing sense of dread and alienation surrounding the children.

      3. “How does one feel embarrassed in the sight of a three-week-old baby?”

      This rhetorical question captures the uncanny power these infants wield over their fathers. The third man’s discomfort reveals the unnatural dynamic where the babies seem to judge rather than depend on their parents.

      4. “What father is frightened of his own child, scared to hold him, scared to be looked at by him, to be really seen by him?”

      This poignant reflection from the first man articulates the chapter’s exploration of inverted parental relationships. The quote powerfully conveys the shame and terror of fearing one’s own offspring.

      5. “There was another boy, once. But that was so long ago.”

      This haunting interlude suggests these events are part of a recurring cycle, implying the boys’ existence may be supernatural or mythological in nature. The brevity and mystery of the statement make it particularly memorable.

    Quotes

    1. “What he does not know is that he is watching their son destroy her insides, shredding, making sure there will be no others to follow.”

    This opening line introduces the chapter’s central theme of the destructive nature of these boys, foreshadowing the physical and emotional toll they take on their mothers. The visceral imagery sets a tone of horror and inevitability.

    2. “That baby is not yours, I’m sure of it… I know it. I feel it.”

    The second man’s mother voices the unsettling intuition shared by all three families - that these boys are somehow unnatural or otherworldly. This quote represents the growing sense of dread and alienation surrounding the children.

    3. “How does one feel embarrassed in the sight of a three-week-old baby?”

    This rhetorical question captures the uncanny power these infants wield over their fathers. The third man’s discomfort reveals the unnatural dynamic where the babies seem to judge rather than depend on their parents.

    4. “What father is frightened of his own child, scared to hold him, scared to be looked at by him, to be really seen by him?”

    This poignant reflection from the first man articulates the chapter’s exploration of inverted parental relationships. The quote powerfully conveys the shame and terror of fearing one’s own offspring.

    5. “There was another boy, once. But that was so long ago.”

    This haunting interlude suggests these events are part of a recurring cycle, implying the boys’ existence may be supernatural or mythological in nature. The brevity and mystery of the statement make it particularly memorable.

    FAQs

    1. How does the chapter portray the complex emotions fathers experience toward their newborn sons?

    Answer:
    The chapter vividly depicts three fathers grappling with disturbing, unnatural reactions to their infant sons. The first man feels visceral fear when alone with Jon, experiencing “a flinching, recoiling, chilling thing” (page 109). The second man is repulsed by his baby’s eye movements, described as “like a buried thing digging its way up” (page 106). The third man feels judged and unsettled by his adopted son’s stern gaze and mysterious gray flecks in his eyes (page 108). These reactions subvert traditional paternal bonding narratives, suggesting something ominous about these particular infants while revealing how fatherhood can trigger unexpected psychological responses.

    2. What symbolic significance might the babies’ eyes hold across the three vignettes?

    Answer:
    Eyes serve as recurring symbols of unease and supernatural implication. The first baby’s startling white eyeballs appear amidst birth fluids (page 105), imprinting on his father’s mind. The second baby’s eyes move unnaturally beneath closed lids (page 106), suggesting hidden activity. The adopted baby’s gray-flecked irises momentarily flash (page 108), conveying an otherworldly warning. Collectively, these ocular details transform infant eyes from symbols of innocence into windows revealing something ancient, knowing, and potentially malevolent. The eye imagery connects the boys while foreshadowing their possible shared supernatural origin or destiny.

    3. How does the chapter use medical settings and professionals to heighten the unsettling atmosphere?

    Answer:
    Medical contexts amplify dread through professional inadequacy and ominous ambiguity. The first doctor avoids direct answers about the baby’s condition, forcing out strained congratulations (page 106). Ikeja General Hospital dismisses the second mother while she’s still hemorrhaging with the callous explanation “everybody bleeds” (page 106). These medical failures create vulnerability for the families while suggesting professionals either can’t or won’t acknowledge the abnormal nature of these births. The hospital’s inability to help implies the supernatural exceeds medical understanding, leaving fathers isolated with their terrifying paternal experiences.

    4. Analyze how maternal figures are portrayed in contrast to paternal experiences.

    Answer:
    Mothers exist in states of extreme physical sacrifice or absence. The first mother’s insides are destroyed during birth (page 105), the second mother dies postpartum (page 109), and the adoptive mother exists in exhausted survival mode (page 107). Meanwhile, the second man’s mother introduces conflict by denying the baby’s legitimacy (page 107). This constructs motherhood as either physically catastrophic or emotionally fraught, while fathers grapple with psychological terror. The maternal figures’ suffering seems to enable the sons’ existence, positioning the boys as parasitic forces that consume their mothers and unnerve their fathers.

    5. What thematic connections can be drawn between the vignette structure and the chapter’s title “Things Boys Do”?

    Answer:
    The tripartite structure reveals a pattern of destructive male behavior beginning at birth. Each boy causes harm: the first destroys his mother’s reproductive capacity, the second’s birth leads to maternal death, and the third exhibits unsettling precocity. The title’s plural “boys” suggests these are not isolated incidents but examples of a recurring phenomenon. The vignette format implies these are case studies in a larger cycle of male-caused suffering. The chapter’s opening line—”Children can be cruel”—frames these narratives as examinations of inherent male violence manifesting from infancy, challenging notions of childhood innocence.

    Note