Header Image
    Cover of We Solve Murders
    Mystery

    We Solve Murders

    by

    In Chap­ter 37 of We Solve Mur­ders, Amy, Steve, and Rosie engage in a tense and grip­ping con­ver­sa­tion as they con­front the very real threats Amy may face. Rosie, con­cerned, ques­tions whether Jeff could have pos­si­bly obtained a sam­ple of Amy’s blood, but Amy swift­ly defends Jeff, explain­ing that he had already warned her about the dan­gers sur­round­ing indi­vid­u­als like Lou­bet and Joe Blow. As they delve deep­er into the inves­ti­ga­tion, Steve points out a trou­bling con­nec­tion: Jeff was aware of Amy’s where­abouts when mul­ti­ple mur­ders occurred, sug­gest­ing that he may have played a role in or been con­nect­ed to these events. This real­iza­tion caus­es unease with­in the group, as they begin to ques­tion the reli­a­bil­i­ty and inten­tions of those clos­est to Amy, includ­ing Jeff. The more they dis­cuss, the clear­er it becomes that they are tan­gled in a web of deceit and manip­u­la­tion, and it’s unclear who can tru­ly be trust­ed.

    As the con­ver­sa­tion unfolds, Amy brings up anoth­er key fig­ure: Henk van Veen. She men­tions how Henk, once a trust­ed col­league, has been steal­ing clients since he left the com­pa­ny, and she implies that Henk might now be a poten­tial sus­pect in the string of mur­ders. Rosie spec­u­lates that Henk could also be involved in elim­i­nat­ing clients to intim­i­date oth­ers from asso­ci­at­ing with Max­i­mum Impact, the com­pa­ny they all had ties to. This the­o­ry only deep­ens the mys­tery sur­round­ing their inves­ti­ga­tion, as it rais­es ques­tions about who might be ben­e­fit­ing from the mur­ders and whether those involved are play­ing both sides. Despite their sus­pi­cions, Amy is unsure of Henk’s cur­rent where­abouts but believes that he would­n’t have access to her move­ments or be track­ing her. The con­ver­sa­tion shifts, and Amy also rais­es con­cerns about Susan Knox, Jeff’s assis­tant, who she believes may know both her loca­tion and could have access to her blood sam­ple. Rosie, ever the proac­tive one, sug­gests that they relo­cate to St. Lucia to con­tin­ue their inves­ti­ga­tion, but Steve hes­i­tates, feel­ing con­flict­ed about leav­ing his new home and life behind so soon. This inner con­flict high­lights Steve’s per­son­al strug­gle between duty and com­fort, cre­at­ing ten­sion with­in the trio. The real­iza­tion that Amy’s blood might be found at a crime scene only ampli­fies the stakes, forc­ing them to con­front the grav­i­ty of their sit­u­a­tion and make hard deci­sions about what comes next.

    The chap­ter inten­si­fies as the trio begins to focus on Bel­la Sanchez’s mur­der, which has sparked Amy’s grow­ing deter­mi­na­tion to inves­ti­gate. She insists that they must go to St. Lucia to con­tin­ue their inquiries, deter­mined to uncov­er the truth about what hap­pened to Bel­la and the pos­si­ble link between her death and the larg­er crim­i­nal activ­i­ties at play. Rosie, unwa­ver­ing in her sup­port, encour­ages Amy to pur­sue this course of action, but Steve remains con­flict­ed about leav­ing the safe­ty of his new home. How­ev­er, just as the ten­sion reach­es its peak, Steve receives a phone call from Car­los, inform­ing them that Eddie Flood is active­ly search­ing for Amy. This new infor­ma­tion shifts the focus of their plans, mak­ing the need for imme­di­ate action more press­ing than ever. The group is now forced to con­sid­er St. Lucia not only as a place of inves­ti­ga­tion but also as a refuge from the grow­ing dan­gers sur­round­ing them. Rosie’s quick think­ing shines through as she men­tions that her pilot is avail­able, ready to help them escape as soon as pos­si­ble. With the sense of urgency mount­ing, they pre­pare to leave, know­ing that each moment counts. Their resolve strength­ens as they head towards their next step, ready to face the chal­lenges that lie ahead while try­ing to stay one step ahead of those who want to see them fail. The chap­ter con­cludes with a pal­pa­ble sense of antic­i­pa­tion, sig­nal­ing that the inves­ti­ga­tion and their jour­ney are far from over.

    Quotes

    FAQs

    Note