Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of The Brothers Hawthorne
    MysteryRomance NovelThrillerYoung Adult

    The Brothers Hawthorne

    by Barnes, Jennifer Lynn
    “The Brothers Hawthorne” by Jennifer Lynn Barnes is a spin-off from “The Inheritance Games” trilogy, focusing on the Hawthorne brothers, Grayson and Jameson. The novel follows their separate yet intertwined journeys as they navigate complex family dynamics and high-stakes challenges. Grayson steps in to protect his half-sisters from trouble, while Jameson and Avery Grambs (the heir to their grandfather’s fortune) embark on a twisted game in Europe. Themes of family loyalty, gender, and class dynamics are explored as the brothers confront their identities and sacrifices. The book blends mystery and suspense, continuing the series’ legacy of intricate puzzles and emotional depth.
    PreviousNext
    The Brothers Hawthorne

    CHAPTER 22: GRAYSON

    by Barnes, Jennifer Lynn

    Grayson exits the house and over­hears a tense con­ver­sa­tion between Aca­cia and Kent Trow­bridge, a lawyer. Aca­cia is vis­i­bly upset, accus­ing Trow­bridge of leav­ing her daugh­ter unat­tend­ed overnight with­out noti­fy­ing her. Trow­bridge defends his actions, claim­ing the child need­ed to learn a les­son, while Aca­cia asserts he has no right to inter­fere. Grayson, skilled at blend­ing into his sur­round­ings, silent­ly moves clos­er to observe the exchange. The con­fronta­tion reveals under­ly­ing ten­sions, with Trow­bridge address­ing Aca­cia for­mal­ly as “Mrs. Grayson,” a point­ed choice sug­gest­ing pow­er dynam­ics at play.

    The argu­ment esca­lates as Aca­cia reveals her con­cerns about inves­ti­ga­tors and her strug­gle to pro­tect her daugh­ters with­out ade­quate resources. Trow­bridge dis­miss­es her efforts, remind­ing her of her孤立无援 situation—her par­ents and hus­band are gone, and finan­cial con­straints weigh heav­i­ly. Aca­cia insists she will han­dle things her­self, but Trow­bridge per­sists, offer­ing his sup­port in a way that feels over­bear­ing. The ten­sion peaks when Trow­bridge places a hand on Acacia’s shoul­der, prompt­ing Grayson to inter­vene delib­er­ate­ly, mak­ing his pres­ence known with cal­cu­lat­ed steps.

    Grayson’s arrival shifts the pow­er dynam­ic. He intro­duces him­self with delib­er­ate calm, forc­ing Trow­bridge to acknowl­edge him. The lawyer rec­og­nizes the Hawthorne name, and Grayson sub­tly asserts dom­i­nance by imply­ing he knows more than he reveals. Trow­bridge retreats, promis­ing to speak with Aca­cia lat­er, but Grayson ensures the inter­ac­tion ends on his terms. He waits until Trow­bridge leaves before address­ing Aca­cia, choos­ing not to pry into the details of their con­ver­sa­tion, instead main­tain­ing a com­posed demeanor.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Grayson mak­ing a phone call to Zabrows­ki, a con­tact whose use­ful­ness he ques­tions. His tone is firm, giv­ing Zabrows­ki one chance to prove his worth. This action under­scores Grayson’s strate­gic mind­set and his pref­er­ence for con­trol. The chap­ter high­lights Grayson’s abil­i­ty to nav­i­gate tense sit­u­a­tions, his pro­tec­tive instincts toward Aca­cia, and his cal­cu­lat­ed approach to pow­er and infor­ma­tion.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What does Grayson’s ability to “go still with a moment’s notice” reveal about his character and skills?

      Answer:
      Grayson’s ability to instantly control his body and blend into his surroundings demonstrates his exceptional self-discipline, situational awareness, and tactical training. This skill aligns with his calculated, observant nature—he intentionally moves silently to eavesdrop on Acacia and Kent’s conversation, showing he values information gathering. The text emphasizes this through phrases like “complete control of his body” and “silent, measured” steps, suggesting he’s adept at surveillance and maintaining psychological advantage in tense situations, much like his grandfather whose commanding presence he inherits.

      2. Analyze the power dynamics in the conversation between Acacia and Kent Trowbridge. How does Grayson disrupt them?

      Answer:
      Kent asserts dominance by reminding Acacia of her diminished resources (“Your parents aren’t here… your husband is gone”) and positioning himself as her protector, even touching her shoulder invasively. Acacia resists (“I am going to handle this”) but seems cornered. Grayson disrupts this by strategically making noise, forcing Kent to step back physically and socially. His introduction—”Grayson Hawthorne”—invokes his family’s power, and his deliberate handshake ritual forces Kent to approach him, reversing control. The phrase “There was power in those two words” underscores Grayson’s psychological maneuvering.

      3. What does the chapter imply about the broader conflict involving Acacia’s family through her hushed admission to Kent?

      Answer:
      Acacia’s mention that “Gigi saw the investigators” and her struggle to “protect the girls” hints at a looming legal or financial threat targeting her family. Kent’s reference to “the money” suggests inherited wealth is at risk, possibly tied to absent parents and a deceased husband. The tension implies Acacia is fighting to maintain autonomy (rejecting Kent’s “help”) while grappling with systemic vulnerabilities. Grayson’s later call to Zabrowski—a likely investigator—shows he’s independently probing the situation, signaling deeper layers of intrigue involving the Hawthorne name’s influence.

      4. How does the author use physical descriptions and movement to characterize Kent Trowbridge?

      Answer:
      Kent is portrayed as superficially confident but insecure: he moves like someone who “prided himself on being fitter than men half his age,” revealing vanity. His shorter stature compared to Acacia contrasts with his attempts to control her. Key actions—like touching her shoulder and dropping his hand abruptly when Grayson appears—paint him as performative in his authority. The text frames him as a manipulator (“first-name basis” vs. pointedly calling her “Mrs. Grayson”), using social nuance to assert pressure rather than genuine strength.

      5. Why might Grayson choose not to confront Acacia about the overheard conversation, and what does this reveal about his strategy?

      Answer:
      Grayson avoids direct confrontation to maintain leverage and observe Acacia’s actions unimpeded. By not revealing his knowledge, he preserves the element of surprise and avoids tipping his hand to Kent. Instead, he takes independent action (calling Zabrowski), showing his preference for covert problem-solving. This aligns with his grandfather’s tactics—the chapter notes he shares the elder’s commanding presence but also implies he values patience. His restraint suggests he’s gathering intel for a larger play, consistent with the Hawthorne family’s reputation for strategic dominance.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Grayson could go still with a moment’s notice. Complete control of his body made it that much easier to disappear into his surroundings.”

      This quote highlights Grayson’s exceptional self-control and ability to observe situations unnoticed, a key character trait that defines his strategic approach to confrontations.

      2. “There was power in those two words. Make them wonder what you know.”

      This moment showcases Grayson’s psychological tactics in dealing with adversaries. The deliberate ambiguity creates tension and establishes dominance, reflecting his calculated nature.

      3. “‘I am going to handle this.’ Acacia’s voice wasn’t hushed now.”

      This quote marks a turning point where Acacia asserts her agency against Kent’s patronizing tone. It reveals the underlying power dynamics and her determination to protect her family despite challenges.

      4. “‘Your parents aren’t here anymore. Your husband is gone. And the money—’ ‘I know.’”

      This exchange exposes the vulnerable position Acacia is in, with Kent exploiting her losses. The curt response shows her painful awareness of her circumstances while hinting at deeper financial troubles.

      5. “‘Zabrowski, you have exactly one chance to prove to me that you’re worth continuing to keep on retainer.’”

      Grayson’s closing line demonstrates his no-nonsense leadership style and sets up future action. It reveals how he leverages resources to address problems while maintaining strict standards for those who work for him.

    Quotes

    1. “Grayson could go still with a moment’s notice. Complete control of his body made it that much easier to disappear into his surroundings.”

    This quote highlights Grayson’s exceptional self-control and ability to observe situations unnoticed, a key character trait that defines his strategic approach to confrontations.

    2. “There was power in those two words. Make them wonder what you know.”

    This moment showcases Grayson’s psychological tactics in dealing with adversaries. The deliberate ambiguity creates tension and establishes dominance, reflecting his calculated nature.

    3. “‘I am going to handle this.’ Acacia’s voice wasn’t hushed now.”

    This quote marks a turning point where Acacia asserts her agency against Kent’s patronizing tone. It reveals the underlying power dynamics and her determination to protect her family despite challenges.

    4. “‘Your parents aren’t here anymore. Your husband is gone. And the money—’ ‘I know.’”

    This exchange exposes the vulnerable position Acacia is in, with Kent exploiting her losses. The curt response shows her painful awareness of her circumstances while hinting at deeper financial troubles.

    5. “‘Zabrowski, you have exactly one chance to prove to me that you’re worth continuing to keep on retainer.’”

    Grayson’s closing line demonstrates his no-nonsense leadership style and sets up future action. It reveals how he leverages resources to address problems while maintaining strict standards for those who work for him.

    FAQs

    1. What does Grayson’s ability to “go still with a moment’s notice” reveal about his character and skills?

    Answer:
    Grayson’s ability to instantly control his body and blend into his surroundings demonstrates his exceptional self-discipline, situational awareness, and tactical training. This skill aligns with his calculated, observant nature—he intentionally moves silently to eavesdrop on Acacia and Kent’s conversation, showing he values information gathering. The text emphasizes this through phrases like “complete control of his body” and “silent, measured” steps, suggesting he’s adept at surveillance and maintaining psychological advantage in tense situations, much like his grandfather whose commanding presence he inherits.

    2. Analyze the power dynamics in the conversation between Acacia and Kent Trowbridge. How does Grayson disrupt them?

    Answer:
    Kent asserts dominance by reminding Acacia of her diminished resources (“Your parents aren’t here… your husband is gone”) and positioning himself as her protector, even touching her shoulder invasively. Acacia resists (“I am going to handle this”) but seems cornered. Grayson disrupts this by strategically making noise, forcing Kent to step back physically and socially. His introduction—”Grayson Hawthorne”—invokes his family’s power, and his deliberate handshake ritual forces Kent to approach him, reversing control. The phrase “There was power in those two words” underscores Grayson’s psychological maneuvering.

    3. What does the chapter imply about the broader conflict involving Acacia’s family through her hushed admission to Kent?

    Answer:
    Acacia’s mention that “Gigi saw the investigators” and her struggle to “protect the girls” hints at a looming legal or financial threat targeting her family. Kent’s reference to “the money” suggests inherited wealth is at risk, possibly tied to absent parents and a deceased husband. The tension implies Acacia is fighting to maintain autonomy (rejecting Kent’s “help”) while grappling with systemic vulnerabilities. Grayson’s later call to Zabrowski—a likely investigator—shows he’s independently probing the situation, signaling deeper layers of intrigue involving the Hawthorne name’s influence.

    4. How does the author use physical descriptions and movement to characterize Kent Trowbridge?

    Answer:
    Kent is portrayed as superficially confident but insecure: he moves like someone who “prided himself on being fitter than men half his age,” revealing vanity. His shorter stature compared to Acacia contrasts with his attempts to control her. Key actions—like touching her shoulder and dropping his hand abruptly when Grayson appears—paint him as performative in his authority. The text frames him as a manipulator (“first-name basis” vs. pointedly calling her “Mrs. Grayson”), using social nuance to assert pressure rather than genuine strength.

    5. Why might Grayson choose not to confront Acacia about the overheard conversation, and what does this reveal about his strategy?

    Answer:
    Grayson avoids direct confrontation to maintain leverage and observe Acacia’s actions unimpeded. By not revealing his knowledge, he preserves the element of surprise and avoids tipping his hand to Kent. Instead, he takes independent action (calling Zabrowski), showing his preference for covert problem-solving. This aligns with his grandfather’s tactics—the chapter notes he shares the elder’s commanding presence but also implies he values patience. His restraint suggests he’s gathering intel for a larger play, consistent with the Hawthorne family’s reputation for strategic dominance.

    Note