Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Roth, Veronica — Divergent 01 — Divergent
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Roth, Veronica — Divergent 01 — Divergent

    by Veronica, Roth,
    Divergent, the debut novel by Veronica Roth, is a young adult dystopian story set in a futuristic, faction-divided Chicago. Society is organized into five groups, each dedicated to a specific virtue: Abnegation (selflessness), Candor (honesty), Dauntless (bravery), Amity (peace), and Erudite (intelligence). Sixteen-year-old Beatrice Prior, born into Abnegation, must choose her permanent faction during a coming-of-age ceremony. She selects Dauntless but discovers she is Divergent—an anomaly who doesn’t fit into any single faction, making her a target. As tensions rise between factions, Beatrice (now Tris) uncovers a conspiracy threatening the fragile social order. The novel explores identity, choice, and societal control, establishing the foundation for a trilogy.
    PreviousNext
    Roth, Veronica — Divergent 01 — Divergent

    CHAPTER NINE

    by Veronica, Roth,

    The chap­ter opens in the train­ing room where Four announces that one ini­ti­ate will not be fight­ing due to an odd num­ber. Tris, the pro­tag­o­nist, is relieved to avoid com­bat but notices Christi­na is paired against Mol­ly, nick­named “the Tank,” a for­mi­da­ble oppo­nent allied with Peter and Drew. Christi­na explains her dis­dain for the trio, describ­ing Peter as manip­u­la­tive, Drew as a mind­less fol­low­er, and Mol­ly as cru­el. Tris reflects on her new­found friend­ship with Christi­na, con­trast­ing it with the super­fi­cial rela­tion­ships she had in her for­mer fac­tion, Abne­ga­tion. The dynam­ic between the char­ac­ters sets the stage for the ten­sion and alliances with­in the group.

    The focus shifts to the ongo­ing fight between Will and Al, two ini­ti­ates with con­trast­ing physiques. Al’s strength over­whelms Will, but Will uses agili­ty to dodge attacks. The fight high­lights the bru­tal nature of Daunt­less train­ing, where phys­i­cal dom­i­nance is prized. Mean­while, Tris observes Eric and Four’s con­flict­ing philoso­phies: Eric enforces a ruth­less “no sur­ren­der” rule, while Four advo­cates for hon­or and acknowl­edg­ing strength. Their debate under­scores the ide­o­log­i­cal divide with­in Daunt­less, with Eric rep­re­sent­ing the fac­tion’s harsh new direc­tion and Four embody­ing its tra­di­tion­al val­ues.

    Christi­na and Tris con­tin­ue dis­cussing Peter’s group, with Christi­na can­did­ly express­ing her hatred for them, a stark con­trast to Tris’s reserved Abne­ga­tion upbring­ing. Christi­na’s hon­esty about her feel­ings sur­pris­es Tris, who is unac­cus­tomed to such open­ness. The con­ver­sa­tion reveals cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences between fac­tions, as Can­dor val­ues blunt truth-telling, while Abne­ga­tion dis­cour­ages self-expres­sion. Tris’s inter­nal conflict—balancing her curios­i­ty about Daunt­less norms with her ingrained aver­sion to gossip—adds depth to her char­ac­ter devel­op­ment.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates in Al’s bru­tal knock­out of Will, who taunts him despite the odds. The fight­’s inten­si­ty mir­rors the ini­ti­ates’ strug­gle to adapt to Daunt­less’s mer­ci­less envi­ron­ment. Tris com­pares Al to a griz­zly bear, empha­siz­ing his raw pow­er. The scene ends with Will uncon­scious, under­scor­ing the high stakes of ini­ti­a­tion. The chap­ter effec­tive­ly blends action, char­ac­ter dynam­ics, and the­mat­ic explo­ration, illus­trat­ing the phys­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal chal­lenges Tris faces in her new fac­tion.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the fight between Al and Will reflect the differing philosophies of Four and Eric regarding Dauntless values?

      Answer:
      The fight showcases a fundamental ideological conflict between Four’s traditional Dauntless values and Eric’s ruthless interpretation. Four believes in honorable combat where one can concede, stating “A brave man acknowledges the strength of others,” while Eric insists “A brave man never surrenders,” reflecting a win-at-all-costs mentality. This is evident when Eric overrules Four’s suggestion about concession, asserting “new rules” where fights only end when someone is incapacitated. The chapter positions Four as representing the faction’s original honorable ideals, while Eric embodies a more brutal, survival-of-the-fittest approach that dominates current Dauntless culture.

      2. Analyze how Tris’s observations about friendship contrast her Abnegation upbringing with her new Dauntless experiences.

      Answer:
      Tris reflects that in Abnegation, “it’s impossible to have real friendship when no one feels like they can accept help or even talk about themselves,” highlighting her faction’s emphasis on selflessness to the point of emotional suppression. In contrast, her budding friendship with Christina thrives on candor and mutual vulnerability—she already knows more about Christina in two days than she ever knew about her Abnegation friend Susan. This demonstrates Tris’s growing appreciation for Dauntless’s openness, where Christina freely expresses hatred for Peter’s group and defends honesty about feelings as a virtue (“Who cares?”). The chapter shows Tris beginning to value emotional authenticity over Abnegation’s strict self-denial.

      3. What does Christina’s description of Peter, Drew, and Molly reveal about Candor’s social dynamics and her own personality?

      Answer:
      Christina’s scathing descriptions—calling Peter “pure evil” for manipulative childhood behavior, Drew a thoughtless “sidekick,” and Molly someone who “fries ants with a magnifying glass”—demonstrate Candor’s culture of blunt honesty. Her willingness to openly hate them (“I’ve told them”) contrasts with Tris’s Abnegation-bred discomfort with conflict. However, Christina justifies her hatred as constructive (“helping them by reminding they aren’t God’s gift”), suggesting Candor views harsh truths as socially beneficial. Her crooked-bottom teeth and unapologetic attitude reinforce her authenticity, presenting an alternative to Tris’s reserved nature while exposing Candor’s belief that unfiltered expression creates genuine relationships.

      4. How does the author use physical descriptions to foreshadow conflict between Tris and Peter’s group?

      Answer:
      The detailed descriptions of Peter’s faction create visual antagonism: Molly’s “broad shoulders” and “bulbous nose,” Drew’s “boulder” build and “carrot” hair, and their frequent “furtive looks” and whispering suggest looming threats. Peter’s unspecified evilness (backed by Christina’s anecdotes) establishes him as a primary antagonist. Their physical clustering mirrors their unified maliciousness, contrasting with Tris and Christina’s openness. The repeated focus on their secretive behavior (“pulling heads together”) builds tension, implying they’re plotting against Tris—especially significant since she’s the one not fighting, making her vulnerable. These descriptions prime readers for future confrontations between the groups.

      5. Evaluate how the chapter uses the fight scene to explore themes of power and vulnerability.

      Answer:
      The Al-Will fight becomes a microcosm of Dauntless power dynamics. Al’s “grizzly bear” strength initially seems dominant, but Will’s agility and strategy (“kicking him hard in the back”) show alternative forms of power. Eric’s intervention emphasizes that in this environment, power comes from ruthless persistence (“never surrenders”), while Four’s philosophy values strategic concession. Tris’s observation that Will’s determination grows when challenged (“light in his eyes”) suggests vulnerability can transform into strength. The scene ultimately questions what true power is—brute force, cleverness, or the wisdom to yield—while foreshadowing Tris’s own journey navigating physical and ideological battles in Dauntless.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I guess I haven’t real y had a friend, period. It’s impossible to have real friendship when no one feels like they can accept help or even talk about themselves.”

      This quote captures Tris’s realization about the superficial relationships in her former faction (Abnegation) compared to the deeper connections forming in Dauntless. It highlights the theme of faction culture shaping interpersonal dynamics.

      2. “Peter is pure evil. When we were kids, he would pick fights with people from other factions and then, when an adult came to break it up, he’d cry and make up some story about how the other kid started it.”

      Christina’s description of Peter establishes him as a key antagonist and illustrates the different moral codes between factions (Candor’s truth-telling vs. Peter’s manipulation). This foreshadows future conflicts.

      3. “A brave man acknowledges the strength of others. A brave man never surrenders.”

      This exchange between Four and Eric presents the central ideological conflict in Dauntless - honorable strength vs. ruthless dominance. The contrast between “old” and “new” Dauntless values becomes a recurring theme.

      4. “It ends when one of you is unable to continue… According to the old rules, one of you could also concede. According to the new rules, no one concedes.”

      This brutal fight rule demonstrates the harsh initiation process and the faction’s evolving culture under Eric’s leadership. It creates tension about how far initiates will be pushed.

      5. “When I was younger, I read a book about grizzly bears. There was a picture of one standing on its hind legs with its paws outstretched, roaring. That is how Al looks now.”

      Tris’s vivid simile during the fight scene shows her analytical mind at work even in tense moments. The animal imagery emphasizes the primal, violent nature of Dauntless training.

    Quotes

    1. “I guess I haven’t real y had a friend, period. It’s impossible to have real friendship when no one feels like they can accept help or even talk about themselves.”

    This quote captures Tris’s realization about the superficial relationships in her former faction (Abnegation) compared to the deeper connections forming in Dauntless. It highlights the theme of faction culture shaping interpersonal dynamics.

    2. “Peter is pure evil. When we were kids, he would pick fights with people from other factions and then, when an adult came to break it up, he’d cry and make up some story about how the other kid started it.”

    Christina’s description of Peter establishes him as a key antagonist and illustrates the different moral codes between factions (Candor’s truth-telling vs. Peter’s manipulation). This foreshadows future conflicts.

    3. “A brave man acknowledges the strength of others. A brave man never surrenders.”

    This exchange between Four and Eric presents the central ideological conflict in Dauntless - honorable strength vs. ruthless dominance. The contrast between “old” and “new” Dauntless values becomes a recurring theme.

    4. “It ends when one of you is unable to continue… According to the old rules, one of you could also concede. According to the new rules, no one concedes.”

    This brutal fight rule demonstrates the harsh initiation process and the faction’s evolving culture under Eric’s leadership. It creates tension about how far initiates will be pushed.

    5. “When I was younger, I read a book about grizzly bears. There was a picture of one standing on its hind legs with its paws outstretched, roaring. That is how Al looks now.”

    Tris’s vivid simile during the fight scene shows her analytical mind at work even in tense moments. The animal imagery emphasizes the primal, violent nature of Dauntless training.

    FAQs

    1. How does the fight between Al and Will reflect the differing philosophies of Four and Eric regarding Dauntless values?

    Answer:
    The fight showcases a fundamental ideological conflict between Four’s traditional Dauntless values and Eric’s ruthless interpretation. Four believes in honorable combat where one can concede, stating “A brave man acknowledges the strength of others,” while Eric insists “A brave man never surrenders,” reflecting a win-at-all-costs mentality. This is evident when Eric overrules Four’s suggestion about concession, asserting “new rules” where fights only end when someone is incapacitated. The chapter positions Four as representing the faction’s original honorable ideals, while Eric embodies a more brutal, survival-of-the-fittest approach that dominates current Dauntless culture.

    2. Analyze how Tris’s observations about friendship contrast her Abnegation upbringing with her new Dauntless experiences.

    Answer:
    Tris reflects that in Abnegation, “it’s impossible to have real friendship when no one feels like they can accept help or even talk about themselves,” highlighting her faction’s emphasis on selflessness to the point of emotional suppression. In contrast, her budding friendship with Christina thrives on candor and mutual vulnerability—she already knows more about Christina in two days than she ever knew about her Abnegation friend Susan. This demonstrates Tris’s growing appreciation for Dauntless’s openness, where Christina freely expresses hatred for Peter’s group and defends honesty about feelings as a virtue (“Who cares?”). The chapter shows Tris beginning to value emotional authenticity over Abnegation’s strict self-denial.

    3. What does Christina’s description of Peter, Drew, and Molly reveal about Candor’s social dynamics and her own personality?

    Answer:
    Christina’s scathing descriptions—calling Peter “pure evil” for manipulative childhood behavior, Drew a thoughtless “sidekick,” and Molly someone who “fries ants with a magnifying glass”—demonstrate Candor’s culture of blunt honesty. Her willingness to openly hate them (“I’ve told them”) contrasts with Tris’s Abnegation-bred discomfort with conflict. However, Christina justifies her hatred as constructive (“helping them by reminding they aren’t God’s gift”), suggesting Candor views harsh truths as socially beneficial. Her crooked-bottom teeth and unapologetic attitude reinforce her authenticity, presenting an alternative to Tris’s reserved nature while exposing Candor’s belief that unfiltered expression creates genuine relationships.

    4. How does the author use physical descriptions to foreshadow conflict between Tris and Peter’s group?

    Answer:
    The detailed descriptions of Peter’s faction create visual antagonism: Molly’s “broad shoulders” and “bulbous nose,” Drew’s “boulder” build and “carrot” hair, and their frequent “furtive looks” and whispering suggest looming threats. Peter’s unspecified evilness (backed by Christina’s anecdotes) establishes him as a primary antagonist. Their physical clustering mirrors their unified maliciousness, contrasting with Tris and Christina’s openness. The repeated focus on their secretive behavior (“pulling heads together”) builds tension, implying they’re plotting against Tris—especially significant since she’s the one not fighting, making her vulnerable. These descriptions prime readers for future confrontations between the groups.

    5. Evaluate how the chapter uses the fight scene to explore themes of power and vulnerability.

    Answer:
    The Al-Will fight becomes a microcosm of Dauntless power dynamics. Al’s “grizzly bear” strength initially seems dominant, but Will’s agility and strategy (“kicking him hard in the back”) show alternative forms of power. Eric’s intervention emphasizes that in this environment, power comes from ruthless persistence (“never surrenders”), while Four’s philosophy values strategic concession. Tris’s observation that Will’s determination grows when challenged (“light in his eyes”) suggests vulnerability can transform into strength. The scene ultimately questions what true power is—brute force, cleverness, or the wisdom to yield—while foreshadowing Tris’s own journey navigating physical and ideological battles in Dauntless.

    Note