Cover of If These Wings Could Fly
    FantasyFictionLiterary FictionYoung Adult

    If These Wings Could Fly

    by McCauley, Kyrie
    If These Wings Could Fly by Kyrie McCauley is a lyrical young adult novel that explores the complexities of family violence through the story of seventeen-year-old Leighton. As she starts her senior year, Leighton struggles to protect her two younger sisters while coping with her father’s ongoing abusive behavior. The narrative incorporates elements of magical realism, using the presence of thousands of crows to underscore themes of trauma, resilience, and hope.

    In this chap­ter, the pro­tag­o­nist, Leighton, is unex­pect­ed­ly called out of art class by Mrs. Riley to the news­room, where she deliv­ers sig­nif­i­cant news regard­ing Leighton’s essay. The coun­cil has cho­sen Leighton’s essay for a schol­ar­ship, which is a sub­stan­tial achieve­ment accom­pa­nied by a $5,000 award. How­ev­er, the coun­cil refus­es to pub­lish the essay in the local news­pa­per, the Auburn Gazette, cit­ing con­cerns that it pos­es a lia­bil­i­ty. This deci­sion intro­duces a com­plex dynam­ic between recog­ni­tion and cen­sor­ship, high­light­ing the ten­sion between per­son­al achieve­ment and com­mu­ni­ty sen­si­bil­i­ties.

    Mrs. Riley explains that although the coun­cil acknowl­edges the mer­it of the essay and believes Leighton deserves the schol­ar­ship, they con­sid­er the essay poten­tial­ly dangerous—not just for Leighton and her fam­i­ly but for the town as a whole. This rea­son­ing sug­gests that the essay touch­es on sen­si­tive or con­tro­ver­sial issues that the coun­cil fears could pro­voke back­lash or unrest. The protagonist’s reac­tion is one of qui­et defi­ance and deter­mi­na­tion, under­scored by the sym­bol­ic pres­ence of Joe, a bird out­side the win­dow, who seems to silent­ly urge her to take action despite the risks.

    Leighton pro­pos­es a com­pro­mise: to pub­lish the essay anony­mous­ly. She argues that if the coun­cil refus­es even this option, it would reveal that their objec­tions are not sole­ly about pro­tec­tion but about sup­press­ing the essay’s mes­sage. She express­es a strong desire to see her work shared with the Auburn com­mu­ni­ty, even with­out pub­lic cred­it, empha­siz­ing the impor­tance of the essay’s impact over per­son­al recog­ni­tion. Mrs. Riley is hes­i­tant but agrees to advo­cate for anony­mous pub­li­ca­tion, reflect­ing the del­i­cate bal­ance between insti­tu­tion­al con­straints and indi­vid­ual expres­sion.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Leighton con­tem­plat­ing alter­na­tive uses for her essay, such as sub­mit­ting it to oth­er col­lege appli­ca­tions, includ­ing New York Uni­ver­si­ty. This res­o­lu­tion reflects her resilience and adapt­abil­i­ty in the face of cen­sor­ship. The absence of Joe at the end sym­bol­izes a moment of tran­si­tion, leav­ing Leighton poised to con­tin­ue her jour­ney with a renewed sense of pur­pose and com­mit­ment to her voice, despite the chal­lenges posed by the town’s resis­tance.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the main conflict presented in this chapter regarding Leighton’s essay and the scholarship?

      Answer:
      The primary conflict is that although the council has chosen Leighton’s essay for a $5,000 scholarship, they are refusing to publish the essay in the Auburn Gazette. Mrs. Riley explains that while the council acknowledges the essay’s merit and the deserving nature of the scholarship, they consider printing the essay a “liability.” This liability is tied to concerns for Leighton and her family’s safety as well as the town’s reputation. Leighton faces the challenge of having her work recognized and shared publicly while navigating the council’s reluctance and the implications of censorship.

      2. How does the presence of Joe, the bird outside the window, function symbolically in this chapter?

      Answer:
      Joe, the bird with a black eye sitting by the window, symbolizes the silenced voice and the underlying tension in the situation. His silent yelling, unheard by others due to the wind carrying away the sound, parallels Leighton’s essay being suppressed despite its importance. Joe’s presence highlights the theme of voicelessness and the struggle to be heard, embodying the frustration of being censored. When Joe disappears at the end, it may symbolize the fleeting nature of hope or the isolation felt when one’s voice is muted by external forces.

      3. What reasoning does Leighton use to argue for anonymous publication of her essay, and what does this reveal about her character?

      Answer:
      Leighton argues that publishing the essay anonymously removes the “liability” to her personally, shifting the risk back onto those opposing the essay’s publication. She insists that if the essay cannot be published with her name, it should at least be shared to ensure the ideas reach the community it was written for. This reasoning shows Leighton’s determination, courage, and commitment to truth and justice, even when facing personal risk. It reveals her willingness to sacrifice personal recognition for the greater good and to challenge institutional censorship.

      4. In what ways does this chapter explore the theme of censorship and its impact on individuals and communities?

      Answer:
      This chapter highlights censorship through the council’s refusal to publish Leighton’s essay despite awarding her the scholarship. The council fears the essay’s content is too controversial or dangerous, labeling it a “liability.” This act silences Leighton’s voice and limits public discourse, reflecting how censorship suppresses important perspectives and truths. The impact is twofold: it isolates Leighton and her family from full recognition and protection, and it deprives the community of an important conversation. The chapter invites readers to consider how fear and control can stifle expression and the consequences of such suppression on social progress.

      5. How might Leighton’s decision to send the essay to other college applications or use it in other ways influence her future opportunities?

      Answer:
      By choosing to submit the essay to other college applications, such as NYU, or finding alternative ways to use it, Leighton demonstrates resourcefulness and resilience. This approach could enhance her chances of admission by showcasing her strong writing and commitment to meaningful topics, potentially opening doors that the local censorship closes. It also allows her to maintain ownership and pride in her work while circumventing local barriers. This strategy reflects adaptability in overcoming obstacles and could positively shape her academic and personal future by ensuring her voice is heard beyond her immediate environment.

    Quotes

    • 1. “So here’s the situation,” she dives in without preamble. “The council is choosing your essay.”

      This quote marks the pivotal moment when the protagonist learns that her essay has been selected for a significant scholarship, setting the stage for the chapter’s conflict between recognition and censorship.

      2. “They seem to really believe you deserve the scholarship money. They were impressed by the essay and the topic. So was I, by the way, when they forwarded me a copy, Leighton. But they don’t want to print it. They called it a liability.”

      This statement reveals the central tension: the essay is valued and rewarded privately, yet publicly suppressed due to perceived risks, highlighting themes of censorship and the power dynamics within the town.

      3. “Well, they implied that printing it could be dangerous to you . . . your family. But, Leighton, we both know it’s a liability for the town, too.”

      Here, the quote exposes the dual nature of the “liability” — it is not just a threat to the protagonist’s personal safety but also an indictment of the town’s unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths.

      4. “Tell them to publish it anonymously.”

      This succinct demand captures the protagonist’s determination to have her voice heard despite obstacles, reflecting a key turning point where she strategizes to bypass censorship while preserving her message.

      5. “Then it’s not a liability to me. Only to them. And if they still refuse, at least we know it wasn’t just about protecting me. At least then I tried everything.”

      This concluding insight underscores the protagonist’s resolve and the moral clarity she gains — recognizing that resistance to publication reveals deeper motives beyond personal protection, and affirming her commitment to truth.

    Quotes

    1. “So here’s the situation,” she dives in without preamble. “The council is choosing your essay.”

    This quote marks the pivotal moment when the protagonist learns that her essay has been selected for a significant scholarship, setting the stage for the chapter’s conflict between recognition and censorship.

    2. “They seem to really believe you deserve the scholarship money. They were impressed by the essay and the topic. So was I, by the way, when they forwarded me a copy, Leighton. But they don’t want to print it. They called it a liability.”

    This statement reveals the central tension: the essay is valued and rewarded privately, yet publicly suppressed due to perceived risks, highlighting themes of censorship and the power dynamics within the town.

    3. “Well, they implied that printing it could be dangerous to you . . . your family. But, Leighton, we both know it’s a liability for the town, too.”

    Here, the quote exposes the dual nature of the “liability” — it is not just a threat to the protagonist’s personal safety but also an indictment of the town’s unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths.

    4. “Tell them to publish it anonymously.”

    This succinct demand captures the protagonist’s determination to have her voice heard despite obstacles, reflecting a key turning point where she strategizes to bypass censorship while preserving her message.

    5. “Then it’s not a liability to me. Only to them. And if they still refuse, at least we know it wasn’t just about protecting me. At least then I tried everything.”

    This concluding insight underscores the protagonist’s resolve and the moral clarity she gains — recognizing that resistance to publication reveals deeper motives beyond personal protection, and affirming her commitment to truth.

    FAQs

    1. What is the main conflict presented in this chapter regarding Leighton’s essay and the scholarship?

    Answer:
    The primary conflict is that although the council has chosen Leighton’s essay for a $5,000 scholarship, they are refusing to publish the essay in the Auburn Gazette. Mrs. Riley explains that while the council acknowledges the essay’s merit and the deserving nature of the scholarship, they consider printing the essay a “liability.” This liability is tied to concerns for Leighton and her family’s safety as well as the town’s reputation. Leighton faces the challenge of having her work recognized and shared publicly while navigating the council’s reluctance and the implications of censorship.

    2. How does the presence of Joe, the bird outside the window, function symbolically in this chapter?

    Answer:
    Joe, the bird with a black eye sitting by the window, symbolizes the silenced voice and the underlying tension in the situation. His silent yelling, unheard by others due to the wind carrying away the sound, parallels Leighton’s essay being suppressed despite its importance. Joe’s presence highlights the theme of voicelessness and the struggle to be heard, embodying the frustration of being censored. When Joe disappears at the end, it may symbolize the fleeting nature of hope or the isolation felt when one’s voice is muted by external forces.

    3. What reasoning does Leighton use to argue for anonymous publication of her essay, and what does this reveal about her character?

    Answer:
    Leighton argues that publishing the essay anonymously removes the “liability” to her personally, shifting the risk back onto those opposing the essay’s publication. She insists that if the essay cannot be published with her name, it should at least be shared to ensure the ideas reach the community it was written for. This reasoning shows Leighton’s determination, courage, and commitment to truth and justice, even when facing personal risk. It reveals her willingness to sacrifice personal recognition for the greater good and to challenge institutional censorship.

    4. In what ways does this chapter explore the theme of censorship and its impact on individuals and communities?

    Answer:
    This chapter highlights censorship through the council’s refusal to publish Leighton’s essay despite awarding her the scholarship. The council fears the essay’s content is too controversial or dangerous, labeling it a “liability.” This act silences Leighton’s voice and limits public discourse, reflecting how censorship suppresses important perspectives and truths. The impact is twofold: it isolates Leighton and her family from full recognition and protection, and it deprives the community of an important conversation. The chapter invites readers to consider how fear and control can stifle expression and the consequences of such suppression on social progress.

    5. How might Leighton’s decision to send the essay to other college applications or use it in other ways influence her future opportunities?

    Answer:
    By choosing to submit the essay to other college applications, such as NYU, or finding alternative ways to use it, Leighton demonstrates resourcefulness and resilience. This approach could enhance her chances of admission by showcasing her strong writing and commitment to meaningful topics, potentially opening doors that the local censorship closes. It also allows her to maintain ownership and pride in her work while circumventing local barriers. This strategy reflects adaptability in overcoming obstacles and could positively shape her academic and personal future by ensuring her voice is heard beyond her immediate environment.

    Note