Cover of If These Wings Could Fly
    FantasyFictionLiterary FictionYoung Adult

    If These Wings Could Fly

    by McCauley, Kyrie
    If These Wings Could Fly by Kyrie McCauley is a lyrical young adult novel that explores the complexities of family violence through the story of seventeen-year-old Leighton. As she starts her senior year, Leighton struggles to protect her two younger sisters while coping with her father’s ongoing abusive behavior. The narrative incorporates elements of magical realism, using the presence of thousands of crows to underscore themes of trauma, resilience, and hope.

    In Chap­ter Six of “If These Wings Could Fly,” the nar­ra­tor and Camp­bell pass by Mrs. Stieg’s house on their way to the bus stop. The nar­ra­tor notices a severe­ly dam­aged bush in the far cor­ner of the gar­den, dis­tinct from a pre­vi­ous­ly bro­ken bush near­by. This new dam­age is more extreme, with the bush pul­ver­ized to the point that only dis­turbed soil, crushed crim­son petals, and shat­tered branch­es remain. The vivid descrip­tion empha­sizes the extent of destruc­tion, set­ting an atmos­phere of ten­sion and curios­i­ty sur­round­ing the inci­dent.

    The nar­ra­tor points out the dam­aged bush to Camp­bell, who reacts with a non­cha­lant shrug. How­ev­er, the nar­ra­tor per­ceives some­thing deep­er in Campbell’s expression—her large brown eyes gleam with a sub­tle pride. This detail hints at Campbell’s pos­si­ble involve­ment in the destruc­tion, sug­gest­ing a hid­den lay­er of com­plex­i­ty in her char­ac­ter. The narrator’s obser­va­tion cre­ates an unspo­ken under­stand­ing between them, adding intrigue to their rela­tion­ship and the unfold­ing sto­ry.

    Despite the strong sus­pi­cion that Campbell’s bike might car­ry traces of the crushed petals, the nar­ra­tor choos­es not to inves­ti­gate fur­ther. This deci­sion reflects a delib­er­ate restraint, pos­si­bly to avoid con­fronta­tion or out of a desire to pre­serve their friend­ship. The narrator’s inter­nal con­flict is sub­tly con­veyed, reveal­ing the nuanced dynam­ics between the char­ac­ters and the unspo­ken bound­aries they nav­i­gate.

    Over­all, this chap­ter uses a brief but impact­ful scene to explore themes of dam­age, secre­cy, and the com­plex­i­ties of ado­les­cent rela­tion­ships. The focus on small details—the crushed bush, the crim­son petals, and Campbell’s proud gaze—builds a lay­ered nar­ra­tive that invites read­ers to con­sid­er the under­ly­ing motives and emo­tions at play. The chapter’s tone remains obser­vant and sub­tly charged, main­tain­ing coher­ence with the book’s intro­spec­tive style.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of the damaged bush in Mrs. Stieg’s garden as observed by the narrator?

      Answer:
      The damaged bush in Mrs. Stieg’s garden symbolizes disruption and possibly mischief occurring in the neighborhood. The narrator notes that the bush is not just broken but “pulverized,” indicating a more intense level of destruction than the first bush they noticed. This detail draws attention to a pattern of damage and hints at underlying tensions or conflicts. The mention of “crimson petals” adds a vivid, almost violent imagery to the scene, emphasizing the severity of the destruction. The bush acts as a focal point that triggers the narrator’s curiosity and suspicion, especially regarding Campbell’s possible involvement.

      2. How does the interaction between the narrator and Campbell deepen our understanding of their relationship and characters?

      Answer:
      The interaction reveals a subtle dynamic between the narrator and Campbell. When the narrator points out the damaged bush, Campbell shrugs, displaying a nonchalant or dismissive attitude. However, the narrator perceives something different in Campbell’s eyes—a “shine with pride”—suggesting that Campbell may be responsible for the damage but is proud or unrepentant about it. This contrast between Campbell’s outward indifference and the narrator’s insight into her emotions suggests a complex relationship, where the narrator is observant and perhaps cautious, while Campbell is more rebellious or unapologetic. It highlights themes of trust, perception, and unspoken understanding between the two characters.

      3. Why does the narrator choose not to check Campbell’s bike for evidence, and what does this decision suggest about their perspective or values?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s choice not to inspect Campbell’s bike, despite suspecting it might bear evidence of the bush’s destruction, suggests a deliberate decision to preserve trust or avoid confrontation. This restraint indicates empathy or loyalty, valuing their relationship over certainty or proof. It also reflects the narrator’s internal conflict—aware of the possible truth but unwilling to confirm it, perhaps to maintain the status quo or avoid alienating Campbell. This decision underscores themes of discretion, friendship boundaries, and the complex moral choices people face when dealing with ambiguous situations.

      4. In what ways does the imagery used to describe the damaged bush contribute to the mood or tone of the passage?

      Answer:
      The imagery of the damaged bush—“pulverized,” “disturbed dirt,” “pieces of crimson petals,” and “smashed branches”—creates a vivid and somewhat violent picture that contributes to a mood of unease and tension. The destruction is described in detail, emphasizing total devastation rather than mere damage, which evokes feelings of loss and disorder. The choice of the word “crimson” for the petals adds a dramatic, almost bloody connotation, enhancing the intensity of the scene. This imagery sets a tone that is both somber and suspenseful, drawing the reader into the narrator’s emotional response and the underlying mystery of the damage.

      5. How might the narrator’s observations and decisions in this passage reflect broader themes in the chapter or book?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s observations and decisions likely reflect broader themes such as the complexity of human relationships, the tension between truth and loyalty, and the impact of seemingly small actions on community dynamics. By noticing the damaged bush and suspecting Campbell yet choosing not to confront her, the narrator embodies the struggle to balance honesty with compassion. This moment may illustrate how individuals navigate moral ambiguity and the consequences of their choices. Additionally, the attention to nature’s destruction could symbolize larger disruptions in the characters’ lives or environments, tying personal conflicts to wider thematic concerns about damage, resilience, and the possibility of restoration.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Beyond the crows lining her fence, in the far corner of her garden, another bush has been decimated. Not just broken like the first bush, but pulverized. All that’s left is disturbed dirt and pieces of crimson petals, smashed branches . . . nothing is intact.”

      This quote vividly sets the scene and symbolizes a deeper disruption or damage, highlighting the extent of destruction that goes beyond mere surface damage. It introduces a tone of loss and devastation that is central to the chapter’s atmosphere.

      2. “When I point it out to Campbell, she shrugs, but there’s something there—something in Cam’s big brown eyes that shine with pride—and I know that if I checked her bike right now, I’d find matching bits of crimson petals on the tires.”

      This passage reveals an unspoken complicity or secret connection between the narrator and Campbell, emphasizing subtle character dynamics. It suggests pride in an act of rebellion or mischief, adding a layer of complexity to their relationship and the narrative.

      3. “I don’t check.”

      This brief, powerful statement conveys restraint and acceptance, reflecting an important turning point in the narrator’s perspective or actions. It encapsulates a moment of choice to avoid confrontation or confirmation, underscoring themes of trust, denial, or protective silence.

    Quotes

    1. “Beyond the crows lining her fence, in the far corner of her garden, another bush has been decimated. Not just broken like the first bush, but pulverized. All that’s left is disturbed dirt and pieces of crimson petals, smashed branches . . . nothing is intact.”

    This quote vividly sets the scene and symbolizes a deeper disruption or damage, highlighting the extent of destruction that goes beyond mere surface damage. It introduces a tone of loss and devastation that is central to the chapter’s atmosphere.

    2. “When I point it out to Campbell, she shrugs, but there’s something there—something in Cam’s big brown eyes that shine with pride—and I know that if I checked her bike right now, I’d find matching bits of crimson petals on the tires.”

    This passage reveals an unspoken complicity or secret connection between the narrator and Campbell, emphasizing subtle character dynamics. It suggests pride in an act of rebellion or mischief, adding a layer of complexity to their relationship and the narrative.

    3. “I don’t check.”

    This brief, powerful statement conveys restraint and acceptance, reflecting an important turning point in the narrator’s perspective or actions. It encapsulates a moment of choice to avoid confrontation or confirmation, underscoring themes of trust, denial, or protective silence.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of the damaged bush in Mrs. Stieg’s garden as observed by the narrator?

    Answer:
    The damaged bush in Mrs. Stieg’s garden symbolizes disruption and possibly mischief occurring in the neighborhood. The narrator notes that the bush is not just broken but “pulverized,” indicating a more intense level of destruction than the first bush they noticed. This detail draws attention to a pattern of damage and hints at underlying tensions or conflicts. The mention of “crimson petals” adds a vivid, almost violent imagery to the scene, emphasizing the severity of the destruction. The bush acts as a focal point that triggers the narrator’s curiosity and suspicion, especially regarding Campbell’s possible involvement.

    2. How does the interaction between the narrator and Campbell deepen our understanding of their relationship and characters?

    Answer:
    The interaction reveals a subtle dynamic between the narrator and Campbell. When the narrator points out the damaged bush, Campbell shrugs, displaying a nonchalant or dismissive attitude. However, the narrator perceives something different in Campbell’s eyes—a “shine with pride”—suggesting that Campbell may be responsible for the damage but is proud or unrepentant about it. This contrast between Campbell’s outward indifference and the narrator’s insight into her emotions suggests a complex relationship, where the narrator is observant and perhaps cautious, while Campbell is more rebellious or unapologetic. It highlights themes of trust, perception, and unspoken understanding between the two characters.

    3. Why does the narrator choose not to check Campbell’s bike for evidence, and what does this decision suggest about their perspective or values?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s choice not to inspect Campbell’s bike, despite suspecting it might bear evidence of the bush’s destruction, suggests a deliberate decision to preserve trust or avoid confrontation. This restraint indicates empathy or loyalty, valuing their relationship over certainty or proof. It also reflects the narrator’s internal conflict—aware of the possible truth but unwilling to confirm it, perhaps to maintain the status quo or avoid alienating Campbell. This decision underscores themes of discretion, friendship boundaries, and the complex moral choices people face when dealing with ambiguous situations.

    4. In what ways does the imagery used to describe the damaged bush contribute to the mood or tone of the passage?

    Answer:
    The imagery of the damaged bush—“pulverized,” “disturbed dirt,” “pieces of crimson petals,” and “smashed branches”—creates a vivid and somewhat violent picture that contributes to a mood of unease and tension. The destruction is described in detail, emphasizing total devastation rather than mere damage, which evokes feelings of loss and disorder. The choice of the word “crimson” for the petals adds a dramatic, almost bloody connotation, enhancing the intensity of the scene. This imagery sets a tone that is both somber and suspenseful, drawing the reader into the narrator’s emotional response and the underlying mystery of the damage.

    5. How might the narrator’s observations and decisions in this passage reflect broader themes in the chapter or book?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s observations and decisions likely reflect broader themes such as the complexity of human relationships, the tension between truth and loyalty, and the impact of seemingly small actions on community dynamics. By noticing the damaged bush and suspecting Campbell yet choosing not to confront her, the narrator embodies the struggle to balance honesty with compassion. This moment may illustrate how individuals navigate moral ambiguity and the consequences of their choices. Additionally, the attention to nature’s destruction could symbolize larger disruptions in the characters’ lives or environments, tying personal conflicts to wider thematic concerns about damage, resilience, and the possibility of restoration.

    Note