Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of If These Wings Could Fly
    FantasyFictionLiterary FictionYoung Adult

    If These Wings Could Fly

    by McCauley, Kyrie
    If These Wings Could Fly by Kyrie McCauley is a lyrical young adult novel that explores the complexities of family violence through the story of seventeen-year-old Leighton. As she starts her senior year, Leighton struggles to protect her two younger sisters while coping with her father’s ongoing abusive behavior. The narrative incorporates elements of magical realism, using the presence of thousands of crows to underscore themes of trauma, resilience, and hope.
    PreviousNext
    If These Wings Could Fly

    Chapter Seventy-Three

    by McCauley, Kyrie

    In Chap­ter Sev­en­ty-Three of *If These Wings Could Fly*, the nar­ra­tor con­fronts a pow­er­ful inter­nal con­flict sur­round­ing a fire that has ignit­ed, both lit­er­al­ly and metaphor­i­cal­ly. While assert­ing that they did not phys­i­cal­ly start the blaze, the nar­ra­tor admits to hav­ing nur­tured a deep, dark desire for destruc­tion. This fire sym­bol­izes more than just a phys­i­cal event; it embod­ies the intense emo­tions and sup­pressed fears that have long fes­tered with­in them. The chap­ter explores the com­plex­i­ty of inten­tion ver­sus action, reveal­ing how unspo­ken wish­es and inter­nal tur­moil can man­i­fest in unfore­seen and destruc­tive ways.

    The narrator’s reflec­tions reveal a pro­found sense of guilt inter­twined with acknowl­edg­ment of per­son­al respon­si­bil­i­ty. They con­fess to hav­ing “willed” and “dreamed” the fire into exis­tence, sug­gest­ing that the destruc­tive out­come was fueled by accu­mu­lat­ed fear and resent­ment. This admis­sion under­scores the theme of inner con­flict, where the nar­ra­tor grap­ples with the con­se­quences of har­bor­ing ill will. The fire becomes a metaphor for the emo­tion­al and psy­cho­log­i­cal pres­sures that have built up over time, high­light­ing the destruc­tive poten­tial of unre­solved anger and pain.

    Despite the tur­moil, the nar­ra­tor shows no incli­na­tion to halt the fire once it has begun. This accep­tance of the fire’s con­tin­u­a­tion sug­gests a com­plex mix of defi­ance and sur­ren­der. The narrator’s stance implies that the fire, while dan­ger­ous, also rep­re­sents a form of release or trans­for­ma­tion. It is as if the blaze offers a way to con­front long-sup­pressed fears and emo­tions, even at the cost of destruc­tion. This ambiva­lence adds depth to the nar­ra­tive, illus­trat­ing the ten­sion between destruc­tion and the desire for change or cathar­sis.

    Ulti­mate­ly, this chap­ter delves into the human psyche’s dark­er cor­ners, exam­in­ing how buried emo­tions can ignite unfore­seen con­se­quences. The narrator’s can­did admis­sion and the vivid imagery of the fire serve as a metaphor for inter­nal strug­gle and the dual­i­ty of human intent. Through this explo­ration, the chap­ter invites read­ers to con­sid­er the com­plex­i­ties of guilt, respon­si­bil­i­ty, and the trans­for­ma­tive pow­er of con­fronting one’s inner demons. It is a poignant reflec­tion on how the fires we do not phys­i­cal­ly start can nev­er­the­less con­sume us from with­in.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What does the narrator mean when they say, “I did not set the fire, but I willed it”?

      Answer:
      The narrator is expressing a complex emotional state where they deny physically starting the fire but admit to having mentally or emotionally desired it. The phrase “I willed it” suggests that the narrator harbored a deep, perhaps unconscious, desire for the destructive event to occur. This indicates internal conflict—while they did not literally ignite the fire, their feelings and thoughts contributed to its inevitability. The fire symbolizes the narrator’s suppressed anger, fear, or need for change, which they “nurtured” inside themselves, as shown by the metaphor of the ill wish nestled in their stomach.

      2. How does the narrator’s admission about the fire reflect their internal struggles?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s admission reveals a profound internal struggle characterized by fear, resentment, and a longing for release. They describe the ill wish for the fire as “nestled in my stomach, feeding on all the fear that I’ve swallowed living here,” illustrating how their emotional pain and suppressed fears have fermented into destructive desires. This internal turmoil is so intense that it manifests as a metaphorical fire—an urge to burn away their circumstances or constraints. Their conflicted stance—denying setting the fire but not trying to stop it—reflects ambivalence and an acceptance of the consequences of their inner turmoil.

      3. In what ways might the fire symbolize broader themes or emotions in this chapter?

      Answer:
      The fire likely symbolizes destruction, transformation, and the narrator’s emotional upheaval. It represents a catalyst for change, born from the narrator’s fear and repressed anger. The repetition of “Burn, baby, burn” emphasizes a desire to purge or cleanse through destruction. The fire can be interpreted as a metaphor for the narrator’s breaking point—the moment when internal pressures become external realities. It also touches on themes of responsibility and guilt, as the narrator struggles with their role in causing harm, whether direct or indirect. This symbolism invites readers to consider how internal emotions can lead to external consequences.

      4. How does the narrator’s tone and language influence the reader’s perception of their character?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s tone is confessional and raw, blending denial with admission, which creates a complex and conflicted character. The use of short, emphatic sentences like “I did not set the fire” juxtaposed with introspective phrases such as “I dreamed it” and “I harbored the ill wish” conveys vulnerability and inner turmoil. The candidness about their feelings and the metaphorical language (“nestled in my stomach”) elicits empathy, revealing a character who is both haunted and resigned. This nuanced tone invites readers to engage deeply with the narrator’s psychological state, challenging simple judgments about guilt or innocence.

      5. How might understanding the narrator’s feelings about the fire inform how we interpret their actions and motivations in the broader story?

      Answer:
      Understanding the narrator’s feelings about the fire—particularly their acknowledgment of emotional culpability despite physical denial—provides insight into their motivations and internal conflicts throughout the broader story. It suggests that their actions are driven by deep-seated fear, resentment, or a desire for change, rather than mere accident or malice. This perspective encourages readers to view the narrator as a complex individual shaped by their environment and emotions, rather than a straightforward antagonist or victim. It also raises questions about accountability, intention, and the consequences of suppressed emotions in human behavior.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I DID NOT SET THE FIRE, but I might as well have. I could tell you that I didn’t mean for this to happen, but that would be a lie.”

      This opening statement immediately sets the tone of conflicted responsibility and internal struggle, revealing the narrator’s acknowledgment of their indirect role in a destructive event, which is central to the chapter’s emotional and thematic core.

      2. “I didn’t set the fire, but I willed it. I dreamed it. I harbored the ill wish deep inside of me. It was nestled in my stomach, feeding on all the fear that I’ve swallowed living here. Burn, baby, burn.”

      This quote delves deeper into the narrator’s psyche, illustrating how suppressed fear and resentment can manifest as a destructive desire. It captures the complex interplay between passive feelings and active consequences, a key insight into the narrator’s mindset.

      3. “I did not set the fire.”

      This succinct repetition emphasizes denial and the tension between action and intent, underlining the narrator’s struggle to reconcile their feelings with the reality of what happened.

      4. “But I wasn’t about to put it out once it finally began.”

      This closing line reveals acceptance and perhaps a surrender to the consequences of the fire, symbolizing a turning point where the narrator embraces the unfolding destruction rather than resisting it, highlighting themes of agency and consequence.

    Quotes

    1. “I DID NOT SET THE FIRE, but I might as well have. I could tell you that I didn’t mean for this to happen, but that would be a lie.”

    This opening statement immediately sets the tone of conflicted responsibility and internal struggle, revealing the narrator’s acknowledgment of their indirect role in a destructive event, which is central to the chapter’s emotional and thematic core.

    2. “I didn’t set the fire, but I willed it. I dreamed it. I harbored the ill wish deep inside of me. It was nestled in my stomach, feeding on all the fear that I’ve swallowed living here. Burn, baby, burn.”

    This quote delves deeper into the narrator’s psyche, illustrating how suppressed fear and resentment can manifest as a destructive desire. It captures the complex interplay between passive feelings and active consequences, a key insight into the narrator’s mindset.

    3. “I did not set the fire.”

    This succinct repetition emphasizes denial and the tension between action and intent, underlining the narrator’s struggle to reconcile their feelings with the reality of what happened.

    4. “But I wasn’t about to put it out once it finally began.”

    This closing line reveals acceptance and perhaps a surrender to the consequences of the fire, symbolizing a turning point where the narrator embraces the unfolding destruction rather than resisting it, highlighting themes of agency and consequence.

    FAQs

    1. What does the narrator mean when they say, “I did not set the fire, but I willed it”?

    Answer:
    The narrator is expressing a complex emotional state where they deny physically starting the fire but admit to having mentally or emotionally desired it. The phrase “I willed it” suggests that the narrator harbored a deep, perhaps unconscious, desire for the destructive event to occur. This indicates internal conflict—while they did not literally ignite the fire, their feelings and thoughts contributed to its inevitability. The fire symbolizes the narrator’s suppressed anger, fear, or need for change, which they “nurtured” inside themselves, as shown by the metaphor of the ill wish nestled in their stomach.

    2. How does the narrator’s admission about the fire reflect their internal struggles?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s admission reveals a profound internal struggle characterized by fear, resentment, and a longing for release. They describe the ill wish for the fire as “nestled in my stomach, feeding on all the fear that I’ve swallowed living here,” illustrating how their emotional pain and suppressed fears have fermented into destructive desires. This internal turmoil is so intense that it manifests as a metaphorical fire—an urge to burn away their circumstances or constraints. Their conflicted stance—denying setting the fire but not trying to stop it—reflects ambivalence and an acceptance of the consequences of their inner turmoil.

    3. In what ways might the fire symbolize broader themes or emotions in this chapter?

    Answer:
    The fire likely symbolizes destruction, transformation, and the narrator’s emotional upheaval. It represents a catalyst for change, born from the narrator’s fear and repressed anger. The repetition of “Burn, baby, burn” emphasizes a desire to purge or cleanse through destruction. The fire can be interpreted as a metaphor for the narrator’s breaking point—the moment when internal pressures become external realities. It also touches on themes of responsibility and guilt, as the narrator struggles with their role in causing harm, whether direct or indirect. This symbolism invites readers to consider how internal emotions can lead to external consequences.

    4. How does the narrator’s tone and language influence the reader’s perception of their character?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s tone is confessional and raw, blending denial with admission, which creates a complex and conflicted character. The use of short, emphatic sentences like “I did not set the fire” juxtaposed with introspective phrases such as “I dreamed it” and “I harbored the ill wish” conveys vulnerability and inner turmoil. The candidness about their feelings and the metaphorical language (“nestled in my stomach”) elicits empathy, revealing a character who is both haunted and resigned. This nuanced tone invites readers to engage deeply with the narrator’s psychological state, challenging simple judgments about guilt or innocence.

    5. How might understanding the narrator’s feelings about the fire inform how we interpret their actions and motivations in the broader story?

    Answer:
    Understanding the narrator’s feelings about the fire—particularly their acknowledgment of emotional culpability despite physical denial—provides insight into their motivations and internal conflicts throughout the broader story. It suggests that their actions are driven by deep-seated fear, resentment, or a desire for change, rather than mere accident or malice. This perspective encourages readers to view the narrator as a complex individual shaped by their environment and emotions, rather than a straightforward antagonist or victim. It also raises questions about accountability, intention, and the consequences of suppressed emotions in human behavior.

    Note