Cover of If These Wings Could Fly
    FantasyFictionLiterary FictionYoung Adult

    If These Wings Could Fly

    by McCauley, Kyrie
    If These Wings Could Fly by Kyrie McCauley is a lyrical young adult novel that explores the complexities of family violence through the story of seventeen-year-old Leighton. As she starts her senior year, Leighton struggles to protect her two younger sisters while coping with her father’s ongoing abusive behavior. The narrative incorporates elements of magical realism, using the presence of thousands of crows to underscore themes of trauma, resilience, and hope.

    In Chap­ter Fifty-One, the pro­tag­o­nist Leighton returns home to a tense fam­i­ly atmos­phere marked by recent con­flict. Her father express­es sin­cere regret for his out­burst, attribut­ing it to mount­ing pres­sures from his fail­ing busi­ness and per­son­al strug­gles. Despite his apolo­gies and a detailed plan to improve the house­hold envi­ron­ment and reduce stress, Leighton sens­es that the family’s issues run deep­er than just man­ag­ing the phys­i­cal space. The par­ents empha­size prac­ti­cal changes and more afford­able fam­i­ly activ­i­ties, hop­ing to restore har­mo­ny, but Leighton remains skep­ti­cal about the effec­tive­ness of these mea­sures.

    The chap­ter reveals the com­plex dynam­ics with­in the fam­i­ly, par­tic­u­lar­ly the unspo­ken ten­sions between Leighton and her father. While her sib­lings and moth­er appear will­ing to embrace the pro­posed plan, Leighton is con­flict­ed, rec­og­niz­ing that the root caus­es of their strug­gles are emo­tion­al and rela­tion­al rather than pure­ly logis­ti­cal. Her inter­nal resis­tance high­lights a frac­ture with­in the fam­i­ly sys­tem, where past griev­ances and ongo­ing dis­ap­point­ments cre­ate a frag­ile atmos­phere. The qui­et exchange of looks with her sis­ter Camp­bell under­scores the shared under­stand­ing that sur­face-lev­el solu­tions may not suf­fice.

    Leighton’s reflec­tions deep­en as she observes the nat­ur­al world around her, sym­bol­ized by the birds in the yard, which serve as a metaphor for the family’s state—numerous, yet pre­car­i­ous­ly bal­anced. Her mother’s words attempt to human­ize their father, acknowl­edg­ing his flaws and strug­gles with­out excus­ing his behav­ior. How­ev­er, Leighton grap­ples with her feel­ings of resent­ment and dis­trust, espe­cial­ly upon learn­ing where her father has been stay­ing, which fur­ther com­pli­cates her per­cep­tion of his role with­in their lives and the com­mu­ni­ty.

    The chap­ter clos­es with a poignant con­trast between Leighton’s view of the fam­i­ly as a frac­tured, unsta­ble sys­tem and her mother’s stead­fast belief in the con­cept of home as a place of resilience and love. This dual­i­ty encap­su­lates the cen­tral ten­sion of the chap­ter: the chal­lenge of main­tain­ing famil­ial bonds amid chaos and pain. Leighton’s ten­ta­tive ges­ture of hold­ing her mother’s hand sym­bol­izes a frag­ile hope for rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, even as the under­ly­ing issues remain unre­solved and the future uncer­tain.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of the father’s apology and the family’s discussion about changes after the outburst in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The father’s apology is a pivotal moment that reveals his regret and recognition of his harmful behavior during the recent outburst. His apology, coupled with the family’s discussion about practical changes—such as maintaining the house better and managing bills—shows an attempt to address the stressors that contributed to his actions. However, the chapter highlights that these changes focus mainly on external factors and the family’s behavior, implicitly placing responsibility on them rather than on the father’s deeper issues. This dynamic reflects the complexity of family conflict, where attempts at resolution may overlook the root causes of dysfunction, leaving some family members, like Leighton and Campbell, skeptical about the effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

      2. How does the relationship between Leighton and her father reflect broader themes of family conflict and forgiveness in the chapter?

      Answer:
      Leighton’s relationship with her father is fraught with tension, pain, and unspoken grievances. While her father expresses remorse and a desire to improve, Leighton struggles internally with accepting his apology, recognizing the pattern of his behavior and the damage it causes. Their relationship embodies the chapter’s broader themes of family conflict, where love and loyalty are tested by hurt and disappointment. The metaphor of the family as a “solar system of planets” orbiting chaotically captures the fragile balance of their interactions—bound by gravity (love and shared history) but at risk of collision due to unresolved issues. Forgiveness is complicated by the father’s flaws and the family’s collective trauma, emphasizing that healing is a gradual and uncertain process.

      3. What role does the metaphor of the “solar system of planets” play in understanding the family dynamics described in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The “solar system of planets” metaphor vividly illustrates the family’s delicate and unstable dynamic. Each family member represents a planet whose orbit has been disrupted by incidents like the father’s outburst, causing increasing chaos and unpredictability in their interactions. The metaphor conveys how, despite the turmoil, the family members remain gravitationally bound—connected by love, shared experiences, and history—even as they risk “impact” or emotional collision. This imagery helps readers grasp the complexity of familial relationships where proximity and connection coexist with conflict and potential breakdown, highlighting the tension between the desire for closeness and the need for individual space or healing.

      4. In what ways does the chapter explore the theme of personal responsibility versus external circumstances in shaping behavior?

      Answer:
      The chapter grapples with the tension between personal responsibility and external pressures in explaining the father’s behavior. The father attributes his outburst to external stressors such as company pressures and household maintenance, suggesting that these circumstances overwhelmed him. The family’s proposed solutions focus on mitigating these external stressors, like keeping the house in good shape and managing expenses. However, Leighton and Campbell perceive this as insufficient, implying that the father’s personal accountability for his actions is being minimized. The dialogue between Leighton and her mother further emphasizes this conflict: while the mother acknowledges the father’s flaws and demons, Leighton resists excusing his behavior solely on that basis. This exploration invites reflection on how much weight should be given to context versus individual choice in understanding harmful actions.

      5. How might the family’s plan to include “more fun stuff” and family time impact their healing process, according to the chapter?

      Answer:
      The family’s plan to incorporate more affordable “fun stuff” and family time represents an effort to rebuild connection and reduce stress through positive shared experiences. This approach acknowledges that emotional healing and improved relationships often require intentional bonding and moments of joy to counterbalance conflict and hardship. However, the chapter suggests some ambivalence about this plan, particularly from Leighton, who feels that the focus on external fixes and superficial changes may not address deeper emotional wounds or underlying issues. While increased family time could foster communication and understanding, the success of this strategy depends on whether it is accompanied by sincere personal accountability and emotional openness. Without addressing core problems, such efforts risk being temporary distractions rather than catalysts for lasting healing.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I just want you girls to know that I’m really sorry, and I have no idea what came over me the other night. It’s been a lot of pressure with the company, things I don’t want to worry you guys with, and I think I was just bottling it all up.”

      This quote reveals the father’s attempt to explain and apologize for his troubling behavior, highlighting the theme of hidden pressures and the complexity of family dynamics. It sets the emotional tone early in the chapter and introduces the tension between personal struggle and family impact.

      2. “Mom moves to sit beside him on the couch. ‘Your father and I talked a lot this weekend on the phone, about how terrible his behavior was, and what needs to change around here so we don’t have a repeat of Thursday night. Starting with us keeping the house in really good shape so it doesn’t stress him out after a long day at work. And we have to watch heat and energy use and keep the bills as low as we can.’”

      This passage illustrates the parents’ focus on surface-level solutions and the misattribution of blame to household conditions rather than addressing deeper issues. It underscores a central argument about avoidance and the insufficiency of simple fixes in healing family wounds.

      3. “‘He’s not a monster, Leighton,’ she says. ‘He’s just a person. A flawed person, who has a lot of demons.’”

      This succinct, empathetic insight captures the chapter’s nuanced portrayal of the father figure—not as an irredeemable villain but as a deeply flawed human being. It reflects the struggle to balance judgment with understanding within the family narrative.

      4. “Our family is a solar system of planets rocked off their orbits a little farther with each incident like the other night. We are moving around each other in increasing chaos, haphazard and violent, all of us bracing for impact. And I don’t know how to break away from it, because there’s gravity here, in between us. There are good things that bind us to each other.”

      This metaphor powerfully conveys the fragile and tumultuous state of the family, emphasizing both the destructive tensions and the persistent bonds that keep them connected. It serves as a pivotal reflection on the chapter’s exploration of family complexity and resilience.

      5. “I see a fractured system, delicate and damaged, that could collapse right under our feet. She sees home.”

      This closing contrast between the narrator’s perception of instability and the mother’s enduring hope encapsulates the chapter’s central conflict—between despair and the desire to hold the family together. It poignantly underscores differing perspectives on what ‘home’ means amidst hardship.

    Quotes

    1. “I just want you girls to know that I’m really sorry, and I have no idea what came over me the other night. It’s been a lot of pressure with the company, things I don’t want to worry you guys with, and I think I was just bottling it all up.”

    This quote reveals the father’s attempt to explain and apologize for his troubling behavior, highlighting the theme of hidden pressures and the complexity of family dynamics. It sets the emotional tone early in the chapter and introduces the tension between personal struggle and family impact.

    2. “Mom moves to sit beside him on the couch. ‘Your father and I talked a lot this weekend on the phone, about how terrible his behavior was, and what needs to change around here so we don’t have a repeat of Thursday night. Starting with us keeping the house in really good shape so it doesn’t stress him out after a long day at work. And we have to watch heat and energy use and keep the bills as low as we can.’”

    This passage illustrates the parents’ focus on surface-level solutions and the misattribution of blame to household conditions rather than addressing deeper issues. It underscores a central argument about avoidance and the insufficiency of simple fixes in healing family wounds.

    3. “‘He’s not a monster, Leighton,’ she says. ‘He’s just a person. A flawed person, who has a lot of demons.’”

    This succinct, empathetic insight captures the chapter’s nuanced portrayal of the father figure—not as an irredeemable villain but as a deeply flawed human being. It reflects the struggle to balance judgment with understanding within the family narrative.

    4. “Our family is a solar system of planets rocked off their orbits a little farther with each incident like the other night. We are moving around each other in increasing chaos, haphazard and violent, all of us bracing for impact. And I don’t know how to break away from it, because there’s gravity here, in between us. There are good things that bind us to each other.”

    This metaphor powerfully conveys the fragile and tumultuous state of the family, emphasizing both the destructive tensions and the persistent bonds that keep them connected. It serves as a pivotal reflection on the chapter’s exploration of family complexity and resilience.

    5. “I see a fractured system, delicate and damaged, that could collapse right under our feet. She sees home.”

    This closing contrast between the narrator’s perception of instability and the mother’s enduring hope encapsulates the chapter’s central conflict—between despair and the desire to hold the family together. It poignantly underscores differing perspectives on what ‘home’ means amidst hardship.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of the father’s apology and the family’s discussion about changes after the outburst in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The father’s apology is a pivotal moment that reveals his regret and recognition of his harmful behavior during the recent outburst. His apology, coupled with the family’s discussion about practical changes—such as maintaining the house better and managing bills—shows an attempt to address the stressors that contributed to his actions. However, the chapter highlights that these changes focus mainly on external factors and the family’s behavior, implicitly placing responsibility on them rather than on the father’s deeper issues. This dynamic reflects the complexity of family conflict, where attempts at resolution may overlook the root causes of dysfunction, leaving some family members, like Leighton and Campbell, skeptical about the effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

    2. How does the relationship between Leighton and her father reflect broader themes of family conflict and forgiveness in the chapter?

    Answer:
    Leighton’s relationship with her father is fraught with tension, pain, and unspoken grievances. While her father expresses remorse and a desire to improve, Leighton struggles internally with accepting his apology, recognizing the pattern of his behavior and the damage it causes. Their relationship embodies the chapter’s broader themes of family conflict, where love and loyalty are tested by hurt and disappointment. The metaphor of the family as a “solar system of planets” orbiting chaotically captures the fragile balance of their interactions—bound by gravity (love and shared history) but at risk of collision due to unresolved issues. Forgiveness is complicated by the father’s flaws and the family’s collective trauma, emphasizing that healing is a gradual and uncertain process.

    3. What role does the metaphor of the “solar system of planets” play in understanding the family dynamics described in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The “solar system of planets” metaphor vividly illustrates the family’s delicate and unstable dynamic. Each family member represents a planet whose orbit has been disrupted by incidents like the father’s outburst, causing increasing chaos and unpredictability in their interactions. The metaphor conveys how, despite the turmoil, the family members remain gravitationally bound—connected by love, shared experiences, and history—even as they risk “impact” or emotional collision. This imagery helps readers grasp the complexity of familial relationships where proximity and connection coexist with conflict and potential breakdown, highlighting the tension between the desire for closeness and the need for individual space or healing.

    4. In what ways does the chapter explore the theme of personal responsibility versus external circumstances in shaping behavior?

    Answer:
    The chapter grapples with the tension between personal responsibility and external pressures in explaining the father’s behavior. The father attributes his outburst to external stressors such as company pressures and household maintenance, suggesting that these circumstances overwhelmed him. The family’s proposed solutions focus on mitigating these external stressors, like keeping the house in good shape and managing expenses. However, Leighton and Campbell perceive this as insufficient, implying that the father’s personal accountability for his actions is being minimized. The dialogue between Leighton and her mother further emphasizes this conflict: while the mother acknowledges the father’s flaws and demons, Leighton resists excusing his behavior solely on that basis. This exploration invites reflection on how much weight should be given to context versus individual choice in understanding harmful actions.

    5. How might the family’s plan to include “more fun stuff” and family time impact their healing process, according to the chapter?

    Answer:
    The family’s plan to incorporate more affordable “fun stuff” and family time represents an effort to rebuild connection and reduce stress through positive shared experiences. This approach acknowledges that emotional healing and improved relationships often require intentional bonding and moments of joy to counterbalance conflict and hardship. However, the chapter suggests some ambivalence about this plan, particularly from Leighton, who feels that the focus on external fixes and superficial changes may not address deeper emotional wounds or underlying issues. While increased family time could foster communication and understanding, the success of this strategy depends on whether it is accompanied by sincere personal accountability and emotional openness. Without addressing core problems, such efforts risk being temporary distractions rather than catalysts for lasting healing.

    Note