Cover of Champion
    FictionPolitical FictionScienceThrillerYoung Adult

    Champion

    by Lu, Marie
    “Champion” by Marie Lu is the gripping conclusion to the Legend trilogy, a dystopian series set in a divided future America. The story follows prodigy June Iparis and former criminal Day as they navigate political turmoil, war, and personal sacrifices. Key themes include loyalty, power, and the cost of revolution. As tensions escalate between the Republic and its enemies, June and Day must confront their pasts and make difficult choices to save their nation. The novel explores the complexities of leadership and the blurred lines between right and wrong, delivering a thought-provoking and action-packed finale. Lu’s world-building and character development shine, making “Champion” a standout in young adult dystopian literature.

    The chap­ter opens with June anx­ious­ly scan­ning the crowd at Col­burn Hall’s Inde­pen­dence Day event, hop­ing to spot Day amidst the polit­i­cal elite. Despite her rehearsed smiles and pol­ished appear­ance, her focus wavers as she recalls their strained recent inter­ac­tions. Anden, the Elec­tor, prais­es her pub­licly, but the Sen­a­tors’ thin­ly veiled resent­ment under­scores the ten­sion sur­round­ing her rapid rise. June’s unease grows as she search­es for Day, torn between hope and doubt about his arrival, while the for­mal­i­ties of the event weigh heav­i­ly on her.

    June’s per­sis­tence pays off when she final­ly spots Day across the ball­room, stand­ing silent­ly dur­ing the pledge with a date on his arm. His pres­ence stirs her emo­tions, remind­ing her of his strik­ing beau­ty and untamed spir­it. As Anden deliv­ers his speech, June observes Day’s sub­dued demeanor and notices his phys­i­cal decline, hint­ing at recent strug­gles. Deter­mined to recon­nect, she approach­es him, exchang­ing polite pleas­antries with his date before the two are left alone, their reunion charged with unspo­ken ten­sion.

    Their con­ver­sa­tion is a mix of famil­iar­i­ty and restraint, with June teas­ing Day about the sti­fling polit­i­cal atmos­phere and Day respond­ing with his trade­mark irrev­er­ence. Despite the light­ness of their ban­ter, June’s under­ly­ing guilt and Day’s guard­ed­ness sug­gest deep­er unre­solved issues. She informs him of the upcom­ing pri­vate ban­quet with Anden and the Prin­ceps-Elects, hint­ing at the grav­i­ty of the dis­cus­sion to come. Day’s skep­ti­cism and June’s eva­sive­ness fore­shad­ow the dif­fi­cult rev­e­la­tions await­ing them.

    As they pre­pare to leave for the ban­quet, Day’s prox­im­i­ty unset­tles June, his casu­al touch reignit­ing her long­ing. Her inter­nal conflict—balancing duty with per­son­al feelings—mirrors the chapter’s cen­tral ten­sion. The chap­ter ends on an omi­nous note, with June acknowl­edg­ing Day’s like­ly dis­ap­proval of the impend­ing news, leav­ing their rela­tion­ship and the polit­i­cal stakes hang­ing in the bal­ance. The scene sets the stage for a piv­otal con­fronta­tion, blend­ing per­son­al and polit­i­cal intrigue.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does June’s internal monologue reveal her conflicting emotions about Day’s potential attendance at the event?

      Answer:
      June’s thoughts oscillate between hope and doubt regarding Day’s presence. She initially spots what might be him (“A FLASH OF WHITE-GOLD HAIR”) but second-guesses herself, wondering if he refused the invitation due to their strained friendship. Her nervous scanning of the crowd and admission that she “looked so nice tonight” subtly betray her desire to impress him. However, she also rationalizes her actions by attributing them to the significance of Independence Day, suggesting she’s trying to downplay her feelings even to herself. This duality highlights her vulnerability beneath her composed exterior.


      2. Analyze the political tensions evident in the interactions between June, Anden, and the Senators.

      Answer:
      The scene reveals layered power dynamics: Anden publicly praises June’s intellect to assert his authority in selecting future leaders, while Senators like Serge and Tanaka undermine her with veiled remarks about her lack of experience (“learned outside of texts”). Mariana’s sarcastic comment about Serge’s ego further exposes factionalism within the Senate. Anden’s visible nervousness—mirroring June’s—hints at broader instability, particularly with the looming threat of Colonies’ influence. These interactions illustrate a fragile political climate where mentorship (Anden-June) clashes with tradition (Senators’ seniority).


      3. What significance does Day’s silence during the pledge hold, and how does it contrast with June’s behavior?

      Answer:
      Day’s refusal to recite the pledge is a quiet act of defiance, emphasizing his resistance to the Republic’s authority despite his celebrity status. This contrasts sharply with June’s performative compliance—she pauses her search for Day to participate in the ritual, reflecting her ingrained discipline as a rising leader. Their differing stances symbolize their core conflict: June navigates systems of power from within, while Day, even in formal attire, remains “wild and untamed.” His silence foreshadows potential friction in their upcoming private meeting with Anden.


      4. How does the author use physical descriptions to convey the emotional tension between June and Day during their reunion?

      Answer:
      Sensory details heighten the emotional charge: June’s trembling hands and flushed cheeks betray her composure, while Day’s “wild” eyes and accidental touch (“arm brushes once against mine”) evoke their magnetic attraction. His tailored military jacket contrasts with his thinner appearance, suggesting hardship since their last meeting. Faline’s tactful exit—noting June’s blush—adds lightness while isolating them, intensifying their unresolved tension. These descriptions create intimacy amidst the formal setting, reinforcing their complicated history through body language rather than dialogue.


      5. What does June’s guilt about the upcoming banquet reveal about her role in the story’s political conflict?

      Answer:
      June’s guilt (“Probably not”) implies she’s orchestrating or enabling a difficult situation for Day, possibly involving Anden’s agenda. Her avoidance of specifics (“You’ll find out when we get there”) suggests she’s torn between loyalty to the Republic and her personal connection to Day. This moment positions her as a mediator—or pawn—in larger power struggles, hinting that the banquet will force Day to confront unwelcome realities. Her discomfort underscores the moral compromises required by her political ascent, setting up future ethical dilemmas.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I THINK I SEE DAY IN THE CROWD. A FLASH OF WHITE-GOLD HAIR, of bright blue eyes. My attention suddenly breaks from my conversation with Anden and the other Princeps-Elects, and I crane my neck, hoping to get a better look—but he’s gone again, if he was ever there.”

      This quote captures June’s intense focus on Day amidst a formal political setting, highlighting her emotional vulnerability and longing despite her poised exterior. It sets the tone for their reunion and the tension between personal feelings and public duty.

      2. “I’m not sure why I bothered to look so nice for tonight. It is Independence Day, I suppose, and the occasion is a large one.”

      June’s internal monologue reveals her subconscious effort to impress Day, masking her true motivations with logical justification. This showcases the subtle interplay between her disciplined persona and underlying emotions.

      3. “‘If you stare at his head long enough, it might sprout wings and take flight,’ she mutters.”

      Mariana’s sarcastic remark provides much-needed levity in the tense political atmosphere, while also illustrating the unspoken rivalries among the Senators. It demonstrates June’s ability to appreciate humor despite the gravity of her position.

      4. “Have I really forgotten how beautiful he is, how his eyes reflect something wild and untamed, free even in the midst of all this order and elegance?”

      This poetic observation encapsulates June’s awe at Day’s enduring spirit, contrasting his rebellious nature with the rigid structure of the Republic. It underscores their fundamental attraction despite their opposing worlds.

      5. “‘I’m not going to like this, am I?’ Day mutters close to my ear. Guilt rises in me. ‘Probably not.’”

      This exchange foreshadows impending conflict while revealing June’s internal conflict between her loyalty to the Republic and her care for Day. The brevity and honesty of their dialogue marks a turning point in the chapter’s tension.

    Quotes

    1. “I THINK I SEE DAY IN THE CROWD. A FLASH OF WHITE-GOLD HAIR, of bright blue eyes. My attention suddenly breaks from my conversation with Anden and the other Princeps-Elects, and I crane my neck, hoping to get a better look—but he’s gone again, if he was ever there.”

    This quote captures June’s intense focus on Day amidst a formal political setting, highlighting her emotional vulnerability and longing despite her poised exterior. It sets the tone for their reunion and the tension between personal feelings and public duty.

    2. “I’m not sure why I bothered to look so nice for tonight. It is Independence Day, I suppose, and the occasion is a large one.”

    June’s internal monologue reveals her subconscious effort to impress Day, masking her true motivations with logical justification. This showcases the subtle interplay between her disciplined persona and underlying emotions.

    3. “‘If you stare at his head long enough, it might sprout wings and take flight,’ she mutters.”

    Mariana’s sarcastic remark provides much-needed levity in the tense political atmosphere, while also illustrating the unspoken rivalries among the Senators. It demonstrates June’s ability to appreciate humor despite the gravity of her position.

    4. “Have I really forgotten how beautiful he is, how his eyes reflect something wild and untamed, free even in the midst of all this order and elegance?”

    This poetic observation encapsulates June’s awe at Day’s enduring spirit, contrasting his rebellious nature with the rigid structure of the Republic. It underscores their fundamental attraction despite their opposing worlds.

    5. “‘I’m not going to like this, am I?’ Day mutters close to my ear. Guilt rises in me. ‘Probably not.’”

    This exchange foreshadows impending conflict while revealing June’s internal conflict between her loyalty to the Republic and her care for Day. The brevity and honesty of their dialogue marks a turning point in the chapter’s tension.

    FAQs

    1. How does June’s internal monologue reveal her conflicting emotions about Day’s potential attendance at the event?

    Answer:
    June’s thoughts oscillate between hope and doubt regarding Day’s presence. She initially spots what might be him (“A FLASH OF WHITE-GOLD HAIR”) but second-guesses herself, wondering if he refused the invitation due to their strained friendship. Her nervous scanning of the crowd and admission that she “looked so nice tonight” subtly betray her desire to impress him. However, she also rationalizes her actions by attributing them to the significance of Independence Day, suggesting she’s trying to downplay her feelings even to herself. This duality highlights her vulnerability beneath her composed exterior.


    2. Analyze the political tensions evident in the interactions between June, Anden, and the Senators.

    Answer:
    The scene reveals layered power dynamics: Anden publicly praises June’s intellect to assert his authority in selecting future leaders, while Senators like Serge and Tanaka undermine her with veiled remarks about her lack of experience (“learned outside of texts”). Mariana’s sarcastic comment about Serge’s ego further exposes factionalism within the Senate. Anden’s visible nervousness—mirroring June’s—hints at broader instability, particularly with the looming threat of Colonies’ influence. These interactions illustrate a fragile political climate where mentorship (Anden-June) clashes with tradition (Senators’ seniority).


    3. What significance does Day’s silence during the pledge hold, and how does it contrast with June’s behavior?

    Answer:
    Day’s refusal to recite the pledge is a quiet act of defiance, emphasizing his resistance to the Republic’s authority despite his celebrity status. This contrasts sharply with June’s performative compliance—she pauses her search for Day to participate in the ritual, reflecting her ingrained discipline as a rising leader. Their differing stances symbolize their core conflict: June navigates systems of power from within, while Day, even in formal attire, remains “wild and untamed.” His silence foreshadows potential friction in their upcoming private meeting with Anden.


    4. How does the author use physical descriptions to convey the emotional tension between June and Day during their reunion?

    Answer:
    Sensory details heighten the emotional charge: June’s trembling hands and flushed cheeks betray her composure, while Day’s “wild” eyes and accidental touch (“arm brushes once against mine”) evoke their magnetic attraction. His tailored military jacket contrasts with his thinner appearance, suggesting hardship since their last meeting. Faline’s tactful exit—noting June’s blush—adds lightness while isolating them, intensifying their unresolved tension. These descriptions create intimacy amidst the formal setting, reinforcing their complicated history through body language rather than dialogue.


    5. What does June’s guilt about the upcoming banquet reveal about her role in the story’s political conflict?

    Answer:
    June’s guilt (“Probably not”) implies she’s orchestrating or enabling a difficult situation for Day, possibly involving Anden’s agenda. Her avoidance of specifics (“You’ll find out when we get there”) suggests she’s torn between loyalty to the Republic and her personal connection to Day. This moment positions her as a mediator—or pawn—in larger power struggles, hinting that the banquet will force Day to confront unwelcome realities. Her discomfort underscores the moral compromises required by her political ascent, setting up future ethical dilemmas.

    Note