Cover of The Final Gambit (The Inheritance Games)
    MysteryThrillerYoung Adult

    The Final Gambit (The Inheritance Games)

    by Barnes, Jennifer Lynn
    “The Final Gambit” by Jennifer Lynn Barnes is the thrilling conclusion to The Inheritance Games trilogy. The story follows Avery Kylie Grambs as she navigates the high-stakes challenges of inheriting billions from Tobias Hawthorne, while facing threats from a mysterious adversary linked to the family’s past. As Avery unravels hidden secrets, she must outmaneuver dangerous players and protect those she loves. The novel blends mystery, romance, and suspense, culminating in a dramatic resolution that ties up the series’ intricate puzzles. Themes of trust, identity, and resilience drive the narrative, making it a compelling finale for fans of the trilogy.

    The chap­ter opens with Avery wak­ing up to Alisa, her lawyer, knock­ing on her door. Oren, her secu­ri­ty head, ini­tial­ly blocks Alisa’s entry, but Avery lets her in. Alisa brings a mys­te­ri­ous leather satchel and imme­di­ate­ly chas­tis­es Avery for not inform­ing her about Eve, the woman claim­ing to be Toby Hawthorne’s daugh­ter. Alisa empha­sizes her role in pro­tect­ing Avery’s legal inter­ests, ref­er­enc­ing her past deci­sion to move Avery back to Hawthorne House dur­ing her coma, which secured her inher­i­tance and secu­ri­ty team. The ten­sion between Alisa and Oren is pal­pa­ble as they debate whether the sit­u­a­tion is a legal or secu­ri­ty mat­ter.

    Alisa reveals she learned about the threats against Avery from Nash, sur­pris­ing Avery giv­en Nash’s strained rela­tion­ship with Alisa. The lawyer asserts her com­pe­tence and urges Avery to involve her in future crises. The con­ver­sa­tion shifts to a smear cam­paign tar­get­ing Avery, with gos­sip web­sites offer­ing high prices for com­pro­mis­ing pho­tos. Alisa also men­tions insta­bil­i­ty in com­pa­nies tied to Tobias Hawthorne, hint­ing at a larg­er con­spir­a­cy. Oren and Alisa agree to col­lab­o­rate, with Alisa vow­ing to inves­ti­gate the busi­ness dis­rup­tions while Oren han­dles secu­ri­ty.

    The dis­cus­sion turns to Toby’s poten­tial kid­nap­ping, with Alisa sug­gest­ing they keep Eve under sur­veil­lance and pre­pare for pos­si­ble ran­som demands. Avery reflects on the incom­plete rid­dle and the uncer­tain­ty of Toby’s fate, won­der­ing if the cap­tor is wait­ing to make demands. Alisa assures her the law firm can han­dle any finan­cial arrange­ments, but Avery remains uneasy about the unfold­ing sit­u­a­tion. The chap­ter high­lights the grow­ing com­plex­i­ty of the threats against Avery and the Hawthorne lega­cy.

    Final­ly, Alisa directs Avery’s atten­tion to the leather satchel, reveal­ing it was left by Tobias Hawthorne with instruc­tions to deliv­er it under spe­cif­ic con­di­tions. Avery is intrigued but wary, as the satchel rep­re­sents one of the few direct com­mu­ni­ca­tions from the late bil­lion­aire, whose only pre­vi­ous mes­sage to her was an apol­o­gy. The chap­ter ends on a sus­pense­ful note, leav­ing the con­tents of the satchel and its impli­ca­tions for Avery’s future unre­solved.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of Alisa’s confrontation with Avery and Oren in this chapter, and what does it reveal about their relationships?

      Answer:
      This confrontation reveals several key dynamics: First, it shows Alisa’s professional frustration at being excluded from security matters despite her legal expertise (shown when she says “you damn well pick up the phone”). Second, it highlights Oren’s protective instincts prioritizing security over legal counsel (“this was a security issue, not a legal one”). Most importantly, it exposes lingering tension from Alisa’s controversial decision to move Avery back to Hawthorne House during her coma—a decision that ultimately secured Avery’s inheritance but created distrust. The revelation that Nash called Alisa despite their strained relationship further underscores how seriously they’re taking the current threats.

      2. Analyze how the chapter builds suspense regarding the leather satchel. What narrative techniques are used, and what questions does this create for readers?

      Answer:
      The chapter uses several suspense-building techniques with the satchel: 1) Delayed revelation (Alisa doesn’t immediately explain its contents), 2) Mysterious provenance (it came from Hawthorne’s lawyers with strict delivery conditions), 3) Connection to the larger mystery (it’s the second physical message from Tobias after his cryptic “I’m sorry”). This creates key questions: Why was this satchel held back until now? How does it relate to Eve’s appearance and the threats? Is it another puzzle piece in the “riddle” Avery mentions? The unresolved nature of this detail maintains tension while hinting at deeper layers to Tobias Hawthorne’s plans.

      3. How does the chapter develop the theme of power dynamics through the business “turbulence” Alisa describes?

      Answer:
      The business turbulence (CEO turnover, FDA investigations, etc.) serves as a metaphor for the invisible power struggle surrounding Avery’s inheritance. Just as unseen forces are destabilizing Hawthorne-linked companies (tripling paparazzi prices, creating scandals), someone is systematically challenging Avery’s position. This parallels the “avenge/revenge” motif Avery recalls, suggesting the antagonist is using economic warfare as part of their strategy. The professional responses—Alisa’s legal maneuvering and Oren’s security precautions—show how institutional power is being marshaled against this shadowy threat, emphasizing that modern power battles extend beyond physical confrontations into corporate and media realms.

      4. What does the exchange about Nash reveal about character relationships and the current crisis?

      Answer:
      Nash’s unexpected call to Alisa—despite their personal rift—serves multiple purposes: 1) It underscores the severity of the threat (enough to overcome personal animosity), 2) Shows Nash’s protective instincts toward Avery, 3) Validates Alisa’s competence when she notes “he knows I am good at my job.” This moment also subtly contrasts with Avery and Oren’s earlier exclusion of Alisa, suggesting that Nash’s pragmatism in crisis may become a model for others. The detail about gossip websites targeting Avery further connects to Nash’s role as the Hawthorne brother most exposed to media scrutiny, hinting he may recognize patterns others miss.

      Answer:
      The dialogue is saturated with professional jargon—”attorney-client privilege,” “probate,” “NDA,” “ransom arrangements,” “surveillance”—which serves two purposes: First, it realistically portrays high-stakes wealth management (contrasting Avery’s casual sweatpants with this formal world). Second, each term escalates tension: “ransom” implies kidnapping threats, “NDA” suggests damaging secrets, and “surveillance” confirms Eve is suspect. The legal-security debate between Alisa and Oren (“ironclad will” vs. “security issue”) further shows how multiple systems are being engaged to protect Avery, emphasizing that the threats now require institutional—not just personal—responses.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Since I am the only one in this room who can claim to make the good, smart decision under fire—when things start going up in flames, you damn well pick up the phone.”

      This fiery statement from Alisa underscores her frustration at being excluded from critical decisions despite her proven competence. It highlights the tension between security, legal, and personal dynamics in the Hawthorne household.

      2. “Gossip websites, mostly. Nothing you need to concern yourself with, Avery, but one of my connections in the press has informed me that the going rate for pictures of you with any of the Hawthornes has inexplicably tripled.”

      This revelation about the smear campaign and media interest signals escalating external threats against Avery, suggesting a coordinated effort to undermine her position and the Hawthorne legacy.

      3. “Avenge. Revenge. Vengeance. Avenger. I always win in the end.

      This ominous internal monologue (likely referencing the captor’s taunts) crystallizes the chapter’s central threat - an unseen adversary playing a long game of vengeance, with Avery and the Hawthornes as pawns.

      4. “An incomplete riddle. A story—and we’re at the mercy of the storyteller.”

      This poignant reflection captures Avery’s vulnerable position - forced to react to an unfolding mystery where someone else controls the narrative, mirroring the book’s overarching themes of power and manipulation.

      5. “Mr. Hawthorne’s instructions were that it was to remain secure and unopened, unless certain conditions were met, in which case it was to be delivered promptly to you.”

      The mysterious satchel represents another of Tobias Hawthorne’s posthumous puzzles, maintaining the novel’s signature blend of suspense and legacy, while hinting at new revelations to come.

    Quotes

    1. “Since I am the only one in this room who can claim to make the good, smart decision under fire—when things start going up in flames, you damn well pick up the phone.”

    This fiery statement from Alisa underscores her frustration at being excluded from critical decisions despite her proven competence. It highlights the tension between security, legal, and personal dynamics in the Hawthorne household.

    2. “Gossip websites, mostly. Nothing you need to concern yourself with, Avery, but one of my connections in the press has informed me that the going rate for pictures of you with any of the Hawthornes has inexplicably tripled.”

    This revelation about the smear campaign and media interest signals escalating external threats against Avery, suggesting a coordinated effort to undermine her position and the Hawthorne legacy.

    3. “Avenge. Revenge. Vengeance. Avenger. I always win in the end.

    This ominous internal monologue (likely referencing the captor’s taunts) crystallizes the chapter’s central threat - an unseen adversary playing a long game of vengeance, with Avery and the Hawthornes as pawns.

    4. “An incomplete riddle. A story—and we’re at the mercy of the storyteller.”

    This poignant reflection captures Avery’s vulnerable position - forced to react to an unfolding mystery where someone else controls the narrative, mirroring the book’s overarching themes of power and manipulation.

    5. “Mr. Hawthorne’s instructions were that it was to remain secure and unopened, unless certain conditions were met, in which case it was to be delivered promptly to you.”

    The mysterious satchel represents another of Tobias Hawthorne’s posthumous puzzles, maintaining the novel’s signature blend of suspense and legacy, while hinting at new revelations to come.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of Alisa’s confrontation with Avery and Oren in this chapter, and what does it reveal about their relationships?

    Answer:
    This confrontation reveals several key dynamics: First, it shows Alisa’s professional frustration at being excluded from security matters despite her legal expertise (shown when she says “you damn well pick up the phone”). Second, it highlights Oren’s protective instincts prioritizing security over legal counsel (“this was a security issue, not a legal one”). Most importantly, it exposes lingering tension from Alisa’s controversial decision to move Avery back to Hawthorne House during her coma—a decision that ultimately secured Avery’s inheritance but created distrust. The revelation that Nash called Alisa despite their strained relationship further underscores how seriously they’re taking the current threats.

    2. Analyze how the chapter builds suspense regarding the leather satchel. What narrative techniques are used, and what questions does this create for readers?

    Answer:
    The chapter uses several suspense-building techniques with the satchel: 1) Delayed revelation (Alisa doesn’t immediately explain its contents), 2) Mysterious provenance (it came from Hawthorne’s lawyers with strict delivery conditions), 3) Connection to the larger mystery (it’s the second physical message from Tobias after his cryptic “I’m sorry”). This creates key questions: Why was this satchel held back until now? How does it relate to Eve’s appearance and the threats? Is it another puzzle piece in the “riddle” Avery mentions? The unresolved nature of this detail maintains tension while hinting at deeper layers to Tobias Hawthorne’s plans.

    3. How does the chapter develop the theme of power dynamics through the business “turbulence” Alisa describes?

    Answer:
    The business turbulence (CEO turnover, FDA investigations, etc.) serves as a metaphor for the invisible power struggle surrounding Avery’s inheritance. Just as unseen forces are destabilizing Hawthorne-linked companies (tripling paparazzi prices, creating scandals), someone is systematically challenging Avery’s position. This parallels the “avenge/revenge” motif Avery recalls, suggesting the antagonist is using economic warfare as part of their strategy. The professional responses—Alisa’s legal maneuvering and Oren’s security precautions—show how institutional power is being marshaled against this shadowy threat, emphasizing that modern power battles extend beyond physical confrontations into corporate and media realms.

    4. What does the exchange about Nash reveal about character relationships and the current crisis?

    Answer:
    Nash’s unexpected call to Alisa—despite their personal rift—serves multiple purposes: 1) It underscores the severity of the threat (enough to overcome personal animosity), 2) Shows Nash’s protective instincts toward Avery, 3) Validates Alisa’s competence when she notes “he knows I am good at my job.” This moment also subtly contrasts with Avery and Oren’s earlier exclusion of Alisa, suggesting that Nash’s pragmatism in crisis may become a model for others. The detail about gossip websites targeting Avery further connects to Nash’s role as the Hawthorne brother most exposed to media scrutiny, hinting he may recognize patterns others miss.

    Answer:
    The dialogue is saturated with professional jargon—”attorney-client privilege,” “probate,” “NDA,” “ransom arrangements,” “surveillance”—which serves two purposes: First, it realistically portrays high-stakes wealth management (contrasting Avery’s casual sweatpants with this formal world). Second, each term escalates tension: “ransom” implies kidnapping threats, “NDA” suggests damaging secrets, and “surveillance” confirms Eve is suspect. The legal-security debate between Alisa and Oren (“ironclad will” vs. “security issue”) further shows how multiple systems are being engaged to protect Avery, emphasizing that the threats now require institutional—not just personal—responses.

    Note