Cover of Leaving Time
    DramaLiterary Fiction

    Leaving Time

    by Picoult, Jodi
    “Leaving Time” by Jodi Picoult is a gripping novel that intertwines mystery, grief, and the bond between humans and elephants. The story follows Jenna Metcalf, a 13-year-old girl searching for her mother, Alice, a renowned elephant researcher who disappeared a decade earlier under mysterious circumstances. With the help of a skeptical psychic and a disgraced detective, Jenna uncovers buried secrets about her mother’s work and the tragic events at an elephant sanctuary. The novel explores themes of memory, loss, and maternal love, while weaving in fascinating insights into elephant behavior and emotions. Picoult blends emotional depth with suspense, culminating in a surprising twist that redefines the narrative.

    Alice returns to bury her daugh­ter Jenna’s remains, which are shock­ing­ly incom­plete due to decom­po­si­tion and scav­eng­ing. Despite her sci­en­tif­ic under­stand­ing of decay, the real­i­ty of see­ing only frag­ments of her child’s bones leaves her emo­tion­al­ly shat­tered. She had hes­i­tat­ed to return, fear­ing arrest, but her need for clo­sure out­weighed her fears. Yet, even as Jenna’s cof­fin is low­ered, Alice feels dis­con­nect­ed, unable to ful­ly accept this as her daughter’s final rest­ing place.

    After the bur­ial, Alice vis­its her estranged hus­band, Thomas, at Hartwick House, where he has lived for a decade. She is stunned by his aged appear­ance, but his smile briefly revives the man she once knew. Their reunion is strained, as Thomas seems trapped in a delu­sion­al state, mis­tak­ing a Dr. Seuss book for a sci­en­tif­ic arti­cle and ref­er­enc­ing their daugh­ter as if she were still alive. Alice real­izes he is men­tal­ly unwell, unable to con­front their shared past or Jenna’s death.

    Thomas rem­i­nisces about Jen­na as a tod­dler, recall­ing her clever antics, obliv­i­ous to the tragedy that befell her. Alice is heart­bro­ken by his frag­ment­ed mem­o­ries, which reflect a hap­pi­er time before their lives unrav­eled. She mourns not only Jen­na but also the loss of the man Thomas once was. Their con­ver­sa­tion under­scores the endur­ing pain of their shared his­to­ry, leav­ing Alice with no solace or res­o­lu­tion.

    Back at her motel, Alice grap­ples with unre­solved guilt and fear, con­vinced the police will arrest her for an undis­closed crime. Instead, she is con­front­ed by a mys­te­ri­ous woman with pink hair, whose name she strug­gles to recall. The encounter hints at anoth­er lay­er of Alice’s trou­bled past, leav­ing her—and the reader—with unan­swered ques­tions about her actions and the truth behind Jenna’s death.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Alice’s scientific background influence her reaction to discovering her daughter’s remains?

      Answer:
      Alice’s scientific knowledge prepares her intellectually for the state of decomposition, as she understands how environmental factors like shallow graves and acidic soil accelerate the breakdown of a child’s remains. However, her professional understanding doesn’t shield her emotionally—she’s still horrified by the sparse bones (“a tangle of narrow bones”) that remain. This contrast highlights the tension between clinical knowledge and personal grief, showing how science fails to fully prepare her for the visceral reality of loss.

      2. Analyze the significance of Thomas’s mental state during Alice’s visit. What does it reveal about their shared trauma?

      Answer:
      Thomas’s dementia or delusion (believing a Dr. Seuss book contains encoded research) shows how trauma has fractured his grasp on reality. His fixation on academic rivalry and Jenna as a toddler suggests his mind has retreated to a safer time before their family’s collapse. This contrasts with Alice, who confronts their painful history directly. Their divergent coping mechanisms—Thomas’s escape into fantasy versus Alice’s unresolved guilt—illustrate how grief manifests differently, yet neither approach brings true closure.

      3. Why does Alice feel “stuck” even after Jenna’s burial? What does this reveal about closure?

      Answer:
      Alice expected burial to resolve her limbo between “reality and what-if,” but she remains emotionally paralyzed. This underscores how closure is more complex than physical evidence—she still grapples with guilt (“they know what I did”) and the symbolic weight of the incomplete remains (“This is still not my daughter”). The chapter challenges the notion that finding a missing person’s body automatically heals survivors, showing how unresolved questions and self-blame can persist beyond tangible resolution.

      4. How does the author use contrasting imagery to convey Alice’s emotional journey in this chapter?

      Answer:
      The chapter juxtaposes stark scientific descriptions (“porous” bones) with poetic metaphors (the grave as a “screaming mouth of the earth”) to mirror Alice’s dual perspective as both scientist and grieving mother. Thomas’s “smiley face” door sticker contrasts with his aged appearance, reflecting how memory distorts reality. The pink-haired woman’s “ghost breath” hair later evokes Jenna’s childhood, blending sweetness with haunting absence. These contrasts mirror Alice’s struggle to reconcile logic with loss.

      5. What thematic purpose does the pink-haired woman’s appearance serve in the chapter’s closing moments?

      Answer:
      Her arrival introduces ambiguity—Alice initially mistakes her for law enforcement, revealing persistent guilt, then associates her hair with Jenna’s love of cotton candy (“spook asem”). This liminal figure bridges past and present, justice and memory. As a potential spiritual guide or hallucination (given Alice’s exhaustion), she represents the unresolved nature of grief and the possibility of confronting truths Alice has avoided, setting up the narrative’s next emotional confrontation.

    Quotes

    • 1. “There is not very much left of my baby.”

      This opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s emotional core—Alice confronting the fragmented remains of her daughter Jenna. The stark, clinical description contrasts with the profound grief, setting the tone for the chapter’s exploration of loss and closure.

      2. “This was the closure I’d been waiting for, for years. How could I not go?”

      Alice grapples with the paradox of seeking resolution while fearing it might be a trap. This quote captures the tension between her scientific rationality and maternal desperation, a key theme in her journey.

      3. “Thomas so trapped by the past that he can’t accept the future.”

      This observation about Alice’s husband reveals the chapter’s exploration of how trauma manifests differently—Alice physically fled while Thomas mentally retreated. The contrast between their coping mechanisms underscores the story’s psychological depth.

      4. “She’ll be amazing,” Thomas says, answering his own rhetorical question. “Yes,” I say, my voice thick. “She will.”

      This heartbreaking exchange shows Thomas living in a memory where Jenna still grows up, while Alice must acknowledge reality. The dual perspectives on grief—one suspended in time, one forced to move forward—create profound pathos.

      5. “This was supposed to be what I needed to stop straddling the distance between reality and what-if. But I still feel rooted. Stuck.”

      Alice articulates the chapter’s central conflict: the illusion that finding Jenna’s remains would bring peace. This realization that closure remains elusive even after physical evidence appears marks a pivotal emotional turning point.

    Quotes

    1. “There is not very much left of my baby.”

    This opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s emotional core—Alice confronting the fragmented remains of her daughter Jenna. The stark, clinical description contrasts with the profound grief, setting the tone for the chapter’s exploration of loss and closure.

    2. “This was the closure I’d been waiting for, for years. How could I not go?”

    Alice grapples with the paradox of seeking resolution while fearing it might be a trap. This quote captures the tension between her scientific rationality and maternal desperation, a key theme in her journey.

    3. “Thomas so trapped by the past that he can’t accept the future.”

    This observation about Alice’s husband reveals the chapter’s exploration of how trauma manifests differently—Alice physically fled while Thomas mentally retreated. The contrast between their coping mechanisms underscores the story’s psychological depth.

    4. “She’ll be amazing,” Thomas says, answering his own rhetorical question. “Yes,” I say, my voice thick. “She will.”

    This heartbreaking exchange shows Thomas living in a memory where Jenna still grows up, while Alice must acknowledge reality. The dual perspectives on grief—one suspended in time, one forced to move forward—create profound pathos.

    5. “This was supposed to be what I needed to stop straddling the distance between reality and what-if. But I still feel rooted. Stuck.”

    Alice articulates the chapter’s central conflict: the illusion that finding Jenna’s remains would bring peace. This realization that closure remains elusive even after physical evidence appears marks a pivotal emotional turning point.

    FAQs

    1. How does Alice’s scientific background influence her reaction to discovering her daughter’s remains?

    Answer:
    Alice’s scientific knowledge prepares her intellectually for the state of decomposition, as she understands how environmental factors like shallow graves and acidic soil accelerate the breakdown of a child’s remains. However, her professional understanding doesn’t shield her emotionally—she’s still horrified by the sparse bones (“a tangle of narrow bones”) that remain. This contrast highlights the tension between clinical knowledge and personal grief, showing how science fails to fully prepare her for the visceral reality of loss.

    2. Analyze the significance of Thomas’s mental state during Alice’s visit. What does it reveal about their shared trauma?

    Answer:
    Thomas’s dementia or delusion (believing a Dr. Seuss book contains encoded research) shows how trauma has fractured his grasp on reality. His fixation on academic rivalry and Jenna as a toddler suggests his mind has retreated to a safer time before their family’s collapse. This contrasts with Alice, who confronts their painful history directly. Their divergent coping mechanisms—Thomas’s escape into fantasy versus Alice’s unresolved guilt—illustrate how grief manifests differently, yet neither approach brings true closure.

    3. Why does Alice feel “stuck” even after Jenna’s burial? What does this reveal about closure?

    Answer:
    Alice expected burial to resolve her limbo between “reality and what-if,” but she remains emotionally paralyzed. This underscores how closure is more complex than physical evidence—she still grapples with guilt (“they know what I did”) and the symbolic weight of the incomplete remains (“This is still not my daughter”). The chapter challenges the notion that finding a missing person’s body automatically heals survivors, showing how unresolved questions and self-blame can persist beyond tangible resolution.

    4. How does the author use contrasting imagery to convey Alice’s emotional journey in this chapter?

    Answer:
    The chapter juxtaposes stark scientific descriptions (“porous” bones) with poetic metaphors (the grave as a “screaming mouth of the earth”) to mirror Alice’s dual perspective as both scientist and grieving mother. Thomas’s “smiley face” door sticker contrasts with his aged appearance, reflecting how memory distorts reality. The pink-haired woman’s “ghost breath” hair later evokes Jenna’s childhood, blending sweetness with haunting absence. These contrasts mirror Alice’s struggle to reconcile logic with loss.

    5. What thematic purpose does the pink-haired woman’s appearance serve in the chapter’s closing moments?

    Answer:
    Her arrival introduces ambiguity—Alice initially mistakes her for law enforcement, revealing persistent guilt, then associates her hair with Jenna’s love of cotton candy (“spook asem”). This liminal figure bridges past and present, justice and memory. As a potential spiritual guide or hallucination (given Alice’s exhaustion), she represents the unresolved nature of grief and the possibility of confronting truths Alice has avoided, setting up the narrative’s next emotional confrontation.

    Note