Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story

    Leaving Time

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    “Leaving Time” by Jodi Picoult is a gripping novel that intertwines mystery, grief, and the bond between humans and elephants. The story follows Jenna Metcalf, a 13-year-old girl searching for her mother, Alice, a renowned elephant researcher who disappeared a decade earlier under mysterious circumstances. With the help of a skeptical psychic and a disgraced detective, Jenna uncovers buried secrets about her mother’s work and the tragic events at an elephant sanctuary. The novel explores themes of memory, loss, and maternal love, while weaving in fascinating insights into elephant behavior and emotions. Picoult blends emotional depth with suspense, culminating in a surprising twist that redefines the narrative.

    PreviousNext
    Leaving Time

    Chapter 2: Alice

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    The chap­ter explores the remark­able mem­o­ry and cog­ni­tive abil­i­ties of ele­phants, chal­leng­ing the com­mon per­cep­tion of the phrase “mem­o­ry like an ele­phant” as mere cliché. It begins with an anec­dote about an Asian ele­phant in Thai­land that accu­rate­ly returned shoes to the cor­rect chil­dren, demon­strat­ing their abil­i­ty to rec­og­nize and remem­ber indi­vid­ual items. This exam­ple sets the stage for a deep­er dis­cus­sion on how ele­phants retain com­plex infor­ma­tion, sug­gest­ing their mem­o­ry is not just a myth but a sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly observ­able trait.

    Fur­ther evi­dence of ele­phants’ long-term mem­o­ry is pro­vid­ed through their reac­tions to trau­mat­ic expe­ri­ences. In Botswana, a female ele­phant charged a heli­copter, asso­ci­at­ing it with past culling events. Sim­i­lar­ly, ele­phants at a sanc­tu­ary exhib­it­ed stress when hear­ing med­ical heli­copters, link­ing the sound to his­tor­i­cal vio­lence. These behav­iors high­light how ele­phants retain vivid mem­o­ries of past threats, often react­ing aggres­sive­ly or defen­sive­ly when encoun­ter­ing sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tions decades lat­er.

    The chap­ter also exam­ines ele­phants’ abil­i­ty to dis­tin­guish between friend and foe using olfac­to­ry cues. A study in Kenya revealed that ele­phants could dif­fer­en­ti­ate between the scents of the Masai, who his­tor­i­cal­ly hunt­ed them, and the Kam­ba, who did not. With­out visu­al con­tact, the ele­phants dis­played fear and avoid­ance behav­iors toward the Masai’s scent, show­cas­ing their sophis­ti­cat­ed sen­so­ry per­cep­tion and mem­o­ry. This con­trasts with humans, who often fail to rec­og­nize poten­tial dan­gers despite hav­ing advanced cog­ni­tive abil­i­ties.

    The con­clud­ing reflec­tion pos­es a thought-pro­vok­ing ques­tion: “What won’t they for­get?” This under­scores the chap­ter’s cen­tral theme—elephants’ extra­or­di­nary mem­o­ry is not just about recall but also about emo­tion­al and sur­vival-based reten­tion. Their abil­i­ty to remem­ber trau­ma, rec­og­nize threats, and per­form com­plex tasks sug­gests their mem­o­ry is deeply inter­twined with their social and envi­ron­men­tal inter­ac­tions, mak­ing it a vital aspect of their sur­vival.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What scientific evidence does the chapter present to support the idea that elephants have exceptional memories?

      Answer:
      The chapter provides multiple examples demonstrating elephants’ remarkable memories. In Thailand, an elephant accurately returned shoes to the correct children after they were jumbled, showing an ability to remember visual details. In Botswana, elephants reacted aggressively to helicopters decades after culling events, indicating long-term trauma recall. Additionally, Kenyan elephants distinguished between the scents of the Masai (who historically hunted them) and the Kamba (who didn’t), proving they retain generational knowledge of threats. These examples collectively validate that elephants possess sophisticated, long-lasting memory capabilities beyond mere instinct (p. 1–2).

      2. How does the chapter contrast elephant memory with human judgment, and what implications does this comparison have?

      Answer:
      The author highlights elephants’ superior ability to discern threats (e.g., reacting to Masai scents without visual cues) while critiquing humans for repeated poor judgment (e.g., falling for scams). This contrast implies that elephants’ survival relies on precise memory, whereas humans often ignore learned caution. The deeper implication is that humans could learn from elephants’ ability to retain and act on critical information, particularly in avoiding harm or recognizing patterns of danger (p. 2).

      3. Analyze the ethical concerns raised implicitly by the elephant behaviors described in the chapter.

      Answer:
      The chapter underscores ethical issues through elephants’ trauma responses. For instance, their panic at helicopters reflects lasting psychological damage from culling, suggesting that such events cause enduring harm. Similarly, elephants charging villages to retaliate against poachers reveals how human actions trigger complex emotional responses in animals. These behaviors call into question practices like culling, captivity for entertainment, and poaching, emphasizing the need for conservation approaches that respect elephants’ cognitive and emotional capacities (p. 1–2).

      4. How might the olfactory study involving the Masai and Kamba tribes inform modern elephant conservation efforts?

      Answer:
      The study shows elephants associate specific smells with historical threats, which could guide conservation strategies. For example, reserves might minimize stressors by restricting clothing or scents linked to past trauma (e.g., avoiding red garments resembling Masai attire). It also suggests that non-threatening human groups (like the Kamba) could play mediator roles in human-elephant conflict zones. Understanding these nuanced reactions helps design safer habitats and reduce unnecessary stress for elephants (p. 2).

      5. The chapter ends with the question: What won’t they forget? Based on the evidence, what key experiences are elephants unlikely to forget, and why?

      Answer:
      Elephants are unlikely to forget traumatic events (e.g., culling, poaching) due to their survival significance, as seen in their decades-long fear of helicopters. They also remember social bonds and cooperative interactions, evidenced by the shoe-returning trick. Additionally, generational threats (like Masai hunters) persist in their collective memory. These memories endure because they are tied to survival, social structure, and emotional experiences, highlighting elephants’ complex cognitive and emotional lives (p. 1–2).

    Quotes

    • 1. “We’ve all heard the phrase before: He’s got a memory like an elephant. As it turns out, this is not cliché but science.”

      This opening quote establishes the chapter’s central theme—elephants’ remarkable memory—and transitions from common saying to scientific fact. It sets the stage for the evidence and anecdotes that follow.

      2. “The only helicopters some of these elephants had ever seen were the ones from which park rangers had shot their families with scoline fifty years earlier, during the culling.”

      This powerful example demonstrates elephants’ long-term traumatic memory, showing they can recall specific threats decades later. It underscores the emotional depth of their recollections.

      3. “One study suggested elephants showed greater fear when they detected the scent of clothes worn previously by the Masai rather than the Kamba.”

      This quote presents scientific evidence of elephants’ ability to distinguish between friend and foe through scent alone, showcasing their sophisticated threat assessment capabilities.

      4. “What is interesting is that elephants can accurately and reliably figure out who is friend and who is foe. Compare this to us humans, who still walk down dark alleys at night, fall for Ponzi schemes, and buy lemons from used-car salesmen.”

      This contrast between elephant and human judgment highlights elephants’ superior threat detection abilities while making a wry commentary on human vulnerability. It emphasizes the sophistication of elephant cognition.

      5. “I’d think, given all those examples, the question isn’t whether elephants can remember. Maybe we need to ask: What won’t they forget?”

      This concluding quote reframes the discussion from proving elephant memory to considering its implications. It suggests elephants remember everything important, leaving readers with a profound question about the depth of elephant experience.

    Quotes

    1. “We’ve all heard the phrase before: He’s got a memory like an elephant. As it turns out, this is not cliché but science.”

    This opening quote establishes the chapter’s central theme—elephants’ remarkable memory—and transitions from common saying to scientific fact. It sets the stage for the evidence and anecdotes that follow.

    2. “The only helicopters some of these elephants had ever seen were the ones from which park rangers had shot their families with scoline fifty years earlier, during the culling.”

    This powerful example demonstrates elephants’ long-term traumatic memory, showing they can recall specific threats decades later. It underscores the emotional depth of their recollections.

    3. “One study suggested elephants showed greater fear when they detected the scent of clothes worn previously by the Masai rather than the Kamba.”

    This quote presents scientific evidence of elephants’ ability to distinguish between friend and foe through scent alone, showcasing their sophisticated threat assessment capabilities.

    4. “What is interesting is that elephants can accurately and reliably figure out who is friend and who is foe. Compare this to us humans, who still walk down dark alleys at night, fall for Ponzi schemes, and buy lemons from used-car salesmen.”

    This contrast between elephant and human judgment highlights elephants’ superior threat detection abilities while making a wry commentary on human vulnerability. It emphasizes the sophistication of elephant cognition.

    5. “I’d think, given all those examples, the question isn’t whether elephants can remember. Maybe we need to ask: What won’t they forget?”

    This concluding quote reframes the discussion from proving elephant memory to considering its implications. It suggests elephants remember everything important, leaving readers with a profound question about the depth of elephant experience.

    FAQs

    1. What scientific evidence does the chapter present to support the idea that elephants have exceptional memories?

    Answer:
    The chapter provides multiple examples demonstrating elephants’ remarkable memories. In Thailand, an elephant accurately returned shoes to the correct children after they were jumbled, showing an ability to remember visual details. In Botswana, elephants reacted aggressively to helicopters decades after culling events, indicating long-term trauma recall. Additionally, Kenyan elephants distinguished between the scents of the Masai (who historically hunted them) and the Kamba (who didn’t), proving they retain generational knowledge of threats. These examples collectively validate that elephants possess sophisticated, long-lasting memory capabilities beyond mere instinct (p. 1–2).

    2. How does the chapter contrast elephant memory with human judgment, and what implications does this comparison have?

    Answer:
    The author highlights elephants’ superior ability to discern threats (e.g., reacting to Masai scents without visual cues) while critiquing humans for repeated poor judgment (e.g., falling for scams). This contrast implies that elephants’ survival relies on precise memory, whereas humans often ignore learned caution. The deeper implication is that humans could learn from elephants’ ability to retain and act on critical information, particularly in avoiding harm or recognizing patterns of danger (p. 2).

    3. Analyze the ethical concerns raised implicitly by the elephant behaviors described in the chapter.

    Answer:
    The chapter underscores ethical issues through elephants’ trauma responses. For instance, their panic at helicopters reflects lasting psychological damage from culling, suggesting that such events cause enduring harm. Similarly, elephants charging villages to retaliate against poachers reveals how human actions trigger complex emotional responses in animals. These behaviors call into question practices like culling, captivity for entertainment, and poaching, emphasizing the need for conservation approaches that respect elephants’ cognitive and emotional capacities (p. 1–2).

    4. How might the olfactory study involving the Masai and Kamba tribes inform modern elephant conservation efforts?

    Answer:
    The study shows elephants associate specific smells with historical threats, which could guide conservation strategies. For example, reserves might minimize stressors by restricting clothing or scents linked to past trauma (e.g., avoiding red garments resembling Masai attire). It also suggests that non-threatening human groups (like the Kamba) could play mediator roles in human-elephant conflict zones. Understanding these nuanced reactions helps design safer habitats and reduce unnecessary stress for elephants (p. 2).

    5. The chapter ends with the question: What won’t they forget? Based on the evidence, what key experiences are elephants unlikely to forget, and why?

    Answer:
    Elephants are unlikely to forget traumatic events (e.g., culling, poaching) due to their survival significance, as seen in their decades-long fear of helicopters. They also remember social bonds and cooperative interactions, evidenced by the shoe-returning trick. Additionally, generational threats (like Masai hunters) persist in their collective memory. These memories endure because they are tied to survival, social structure, and emotional experiences, highlighting elephants’ complex cognitive and emotional lives (p. 1–2).

    Note