Leaving Time

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    “Leaving Time” by Jodi Picoult is a gripping novel that intertwines mystery, grief, and the bond between humans and elephants. The story follows Jenna Metcalf, a 13-year-old girl searching for her mother, Alice, a renowned elephant researcher who disappeared a decade earlier under mysterious circumstances. With the help of a skeptical psychic and a disgraced detective, Jenna uncovers buried secrets about her mother’s work and the tragic events at an elephant sanctuary. The novel explores themes of memory, loss, and maternal love, while weaving in fascinating insights into elephant behavior and emotions. Picoult blends emotional depth with suspense, culminating in a surprising twist that redefines the narrative.

    The chap­ter opens with the death of Mmaabo, a matri­arch ele­phant, observed by the researcher Alice. Mmaabo’s herd, par­tic­u­lar­ly her daugh­ter Onalen­na, attempts to revive her, dis­play­ing behav­iors that sug­gest grief, such as prod­ding her body and vocal­iz­ing dis­tress. Anoth­er unre­lat­ed ele­phant, Sethun­ya, arrives and per­forms a solemn, sway­ing rit­u­al over Mmaabo’s body, fur­ther hint­ing at cross-herd mourn­ing. Alice metic­u­lous­ly doc­u­ments these inter­ac­tions, not­ing the ele­phants’ unique iden­ti­fiers and behav­iors, as she shifts her research focus to ele­phant cog­ni­tion and emo­tion, a con­tro­ver­sial approach in her field.

    Alice reflects on the chal­lenges of study­ing ele­phant grief, a top­ic often dis­missed by tra­di­tion­al ani­mal researchers. She argues that under­stand­ing com­plex behav­iors requires intri­cate sci­ence, con­trast­ing it with more straight­for­ward dis­ci­plines like math or chem­istry. Despite her boss Grant’s skep­ti­cism, Alice remains com­mit­ted to her work, believ­ing that ele­phants exhib­it pro­found emo­tion­al respons­es to death. Her ded­i­ca­tion is evi­dent as she sac­ri­fices sleep to record every detail, from the ele­phants’ return vis­its to the arrival of oth­er ani­mals near Mmaabo’s corpse.

    The nar­ra­tive inten­si­fies as Onalen­na returns to her mother’s body at twi­light, stand­ing vig­il until inter­rupt­ed by a Land Rover. Anya, anoth­er researcher, informs Alice that Grant needs her, but Alice hes­i­tates, want­i­ng to give the ele­phants more time to grieve. The scene high­lights the ten­sion between sci­en­tif­ic oblig­a­tions and eth­i­cal con­sid­er­a­tions. Onalenna’s pro­tec­tive behavior—warding off a hye­na with her trunk—further under­scores the depth of her con­nec­tion to Mmaabo, leav­ing Alice to pon­der the emo­tion­al weight of the moment.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Alice wak­ing at dawn to find Onalen­na gone and scav­engers begin­ning to claim Mmaabo’s body. The imagery of lioness­es and vul­tures con­trasts sharply with the ear­li­er scenes of mourn­ing, empha­siz­ing the inevitabil­i­ty of nature’s cycle. Alice’s reluc­tance to leave reflects her emo­tion­al invest­ment in her research, blur­ring the line between observ­er and par­tic­i­pant. The chap­ter leaves read­ers ques­tion­ing the bound­aries of ani­mal emo­tion and the eth­i­cal respon­si­bil­i­ties of those who study it.

    FAQs

    • 1. What behaviors did Alice observe in elephants responding to Mmaabo’s death, and what do these suggest about elephant cognition?

      Answer:
      Alice documented several remarkable behaviors that suggest elephants experience complex emotional responses to death. Mmaabo’s daughter Onalenna attempted to lift her mother with her tusks and stayed by the body for hours, vocalizing periodically to her distant herd. Another unrelated matriarch, Sethunya, performed what appeared to be a mourning ritual—stepping over Mmaabo’s body and swaying for six minutes. These behaviors, along with the temporal gland secretions (indicating stress) and protective actions against scavengers, demonstrate cognitive complexity beyond instinct. Alice’s observations challenge traditional scientific boundaries by suggesting elephants may experience grief, form cross-herd social bonds, and engage in ritualistic behavior—all hallmarks of advanced cognition typically associated with humans.

      2. How does Alice’s research approach differ from conventional elephant studies, and what challenges does this present?

      Answer:
      Alice’s cognitive-focused research represents a significant departure from conventional elephant studies at the game reserve. While her colleagues study measurable phenomena like migration patterns, reproductive rates, and musth cycles, Alice investigates subjective experiences like grief—qualities that can’t be quantified through GPS tracking or DNA analysis. This approach faces scientific skepticism because attributing human-like emotions to animals violates traditional research boundaries. Her boss Grant dismisses it as a passing phase, reflecting institutional resistance to less tangible behavioral studies. Alice defends her methodology by arguing that complex behaviors require equally sophisticated scientific frameworks, suggesting behavioral science must evolve beyond purely quantitative measures to understand intelligent species fully.

      3. Analyze the significance of Onalenna’s final interaction with her mother’s body and the hyena. What does this reveal about elephant behavior?

      Answer:
      Onalenna’s defense of her mother’s corpse against the hyena showcases profound aspects of elephant behavior. By inserting her trunk into Mmaabo’s mouth—a gesture possibly resembling calf nursing—she demonstrates recognition of their relationship even after death. Her violent repulsion of the hyena (using the extendable “accordion” portion of her trunk) goes beyond mere territoriality; it suggests protective behavior toward the deceased, as if preserving Mmaabo’s dignity. The temporal gland secretions indicate physiological stress accompanying these actions. This scene encapsulates Alice’s research focus: elephants display behaviors combining memory, emotional attachment, and social responsibility that transcend simple survival instincts, pointing to sophisticated emotional intelligence.

      4. How does the chapter use contrasting perspectives (scientific vs. observational) to explore the theme of animal emotion?

      Answer:
      The chapter creates tension between empirical science and direct observation. While Alice meticulously records measurable data (timing interactions, identifying elephants by physical markers), she simultaneously interprets these as emotional expressions—the “silent dirge,” Onalenna’s vigil, and her own reluctance to notify rangers about the tusks. This duality reflects the scientific conflict: her notes state facts (“six minutes of swaying”), while her narrative voice infers meaning (“a dance without music”). The hyena’s intrusion and the eventual scavenging by lions provide a brutal counterpoint, emphasizing nature’s indifference versus elephants’ apparent reverence. Alice’s internal debate (“which one of us I was trying to convince”) crystallizes the struggle to reconcile objective study with subjective experience in animal behavior research.

      5. What broader ethical questions does Alice’s research raise about human interaction with elephants?

      Answer:
      Alice’s work implicitly challenges anthropocentric views of emotion and morality. By documenting cross-herd mourning (Sethunya’s visitation), she suggests elephant societies may have communal values extending beyond kinship. Her hesitation to report Mmaabo’s death to rangers—knowing they’ll remove the tusks—reflects ethical tension between conservation protocols and respecting animal grief processes. The chapter prompts reflection: if elephants experience loss akin to humans, what responsibilities do researchers have in disrupting mourning rituals? Should protective measures (like tusk removal) consider emotional impacts? Alice’s observations invite reevaluation of how human interventions, even well-intentioned ones, might disregard the complex emotional lives of intelligent species we study and aim to protect.

    Quotes

    • 1. “How Onalenna and the others in the herd had made sounds of distress, had tried to prod their leader with their trunks and their bodies, pushing and pulling at Mmaabo’s corpse.”

      This quote vividly captures the elephants’ grief response to death, illustrating the emotional complexity and social bonds within elephant herds. It sets the stage for the chapter’s exploration of elephant cognition and mourning behaviors.

      2. “No matter how many times I recorded instances of elephants touching another elephant’s skull, or returning to the site where a former herd member died, the moment I interpreted that as grief, I was crossing a line animal researchers were not supposed to cross.”

      This statement highlights the scientific tension between objective observation and attributing human-like emotions to animals. It represents the chapter’s central conflict about studying elephant cognition within traditional research paradigms.

      3. “The more complex a behavior is, the more rigorous and complicated the science behind it. Math, chemistry, that’s the easy stuff—closed models with discrete answers.”

      This quote articulates the narrator’s defense of her unconventional research approach, arguing that studying complex behaviors requires equally sophisticated methodologies. It underscores the chapter’s theme about the challenges of studying animal cognition.

      4. “Onalenna slipped her trunk into her mother’s mouth… She popped that hyena so hard it went rolling away from Mmaabo’s corpse, whimpering.”

      These powerful observations demonstrate both the tenderness and protective instincts elephants display toward their dead. They provide compelling evidence for the narrator’s research into elephant grief behaviors.

      5. “You’re going to have to let her go,’ I said out loud, but I am not sure which one of us I was trying to convince.”

      This poignant closing reflection blurs the line between observer and subject, suggesting the narrator’s own emotional investment in the elephants’ mourning process. It encapsulates the chapter’s exploration of interspecies empathy.

    Quotes

    1. “How Onalenna and the others in the herd had made sounds of distress, had tried to prod their leader with their trunks and their bodies, pushing and pulling at Mmaabo’s corpse.”

    This quote vividly captures the elephants’ grief response to death, illustrating the emotional complexity and social bonds within elephant herds. It sets the stage for the chapter’s exploration of elephant cognition and mourning behaviors.

    2. “No matter how many times I recorded instances of elephants touching another elephant’s skull, or returning to the site where a former herd member died, the moment I interpreted that as grief, I was crossing a line animal researchers were not supposed to cross.”

    This statement highlights the scientific tension between objective observation and attributing human-like emotions to animals. It represents the chapter’s central conflict about studying elephant cognition within traditional research paradigms.

    3. “The more complex a behavior is, the more rigorous and complicated the science behind it. Math, chemistry, that’s the easy stuff—closed models with discrete answers.”

    This quote articulates the narrator’s defense of her unconventional research approach, arguing that studying complex behaviors requires equally sophisticated methodologies. It underscores the chapter’s theme about the challenges of studying animal cognition.

    4. “Onalenna slipped her trunk into her mother’s mouth… She popped that hyena so hard it went rolling away from Mmaabo’s corpse, whimpering.”

    These powerful observations demonstrate both the tenderness and protective instincts elephants display toward their dead. They provide compelling evidence for the narrator’s research into elephant grief behaviors.

    5. “You’re going to have to let her go,’ I said out loud, but I am not sure which one of us I was trying to convince.”

    This poignant closing reflection blurs the line between observer and subject, suggesting the narrator’s own emotional investment in the elephants’ mourning process. It encapsulates the chapter’s exploration of interspecies empathy.

    FAQs

    1. What behaviors did Alice observe in elephants responding to Mmaabo’s death, and what do these suggest about elephant cognition?

    Answer:
    Alice documented several remarkable behaviors that suggest elephants experience complex emotional responses to death. Mmaabo’s daughter Onalenna attempted to lift her mother with her tusks and stayed by the body for hours, vocalizing periodically to her distant herd. Another unrelated matriarch, Sethunya, performed what appeared to be a mourning ritual—stepping over Mmaabo’s body and swaying for six minutes. These behaviors, along with the temporal gland secretions (indicating stress) and protective actions against scavengers, demonstrate cognitive complexity beyond instinct. Alice’s observations challenge traditional scientific boundaries by suggesting elephants may experience grief, form cross-herd social bonds, and engage in ritualistic behavior—all hallmarks of advanced cognition typically associated with humans.

    2. How does Alice’s research approach differ from conventional elephant studies, and what challenges does this present?

    Answer:
    Alice’s cognitive-focused research represents a significant departure from conventional elephant studies at the game reserve. While her colleagues study measurable phenomena like migration patterns, reproductive rates, and musth cycles, Alice investigates subjective experiences like grief—qualities that can’t be quantified through GPS tracking or DNA analysis. This approach faces scientific skepticism because attributing human-like emotions to animals violates traditional research boundaries. Her boss Grant dismisses it as a passing phase, reflecting institutional resistance to less tangible behavioral studies. Alice defends her methodology by arguing that complex behaviors require equally sophisticated scientific frameworks, suggesting behavioral science must evolve beyond purely quantitative measures to understand intelligent species fully.

    3. Analyze the significance of Onalenna’s final interaction with her mother’s body and the hyena. What does this reveal about elephant behavior?

    Answer:
    Onalenna’s defense of her mother’s corpse against the hyena showcases profound aspects of elephant behavior. By inserting her trunk into Mmaabo’s mouth—a gesture possibly resembling calf nursing—she demonstrates recognition of their relationship even after death. Her violent repulsion of the hyena (using the extendable “accordion” portion of her trunk) goes beyond mere territoriality; it suggests protective behavior toward the deceased, as if preserving Mmaabo’s dignity. The temporal gland secretions indicate physiological stress accompanying these actions. This scene encapsulates Alice’s research focus: elephants display behaviors combining memory, emotional attachment, and social responsibility that transcend simple survival instincts, pointing to sophisticated emotional intelligence.

    4. How does the chapter use contrasting perspectives (scientific vs. observational) to explore the theme of animal emotion?

    Answer:
    The chapter creates tension between empirical science and direct observation. While Alice meticulously records measurable data (timing interactions, identifying elephants by physical markers), she simultaneously interprets these as emotional expressions—the “silent dirge,” Onalenna’s vigil, and her own reluctance to notify rangers about the tusks. This duality reflects the scientific conflict: her notes state facts (“six minutes of swaying”), while her narrative voice infers meaning (“a dance without music”). The hyena’s intrusion and the eventual scavenging by lions provide a brutal counterpoint, emphasizing nature’s indifference versus elephants’ apparent reverence. Alice’s internal debate (“which one of us I was trying to convince”) crystallizes the struggle to reconcile objective study with subjective experience in animal behavior research.

    5. What broader ethical questions does Alice’s research raise about human interaction with elephants?

    Answer:
    Alice’s work implicitly challenges anthropocentric views of emotion and morality. By documenting cross-herd mourning (Sethunya’s visitation), she suggests elephant societies may have communal values extending beyond kinship. Her hesitation to report Mmaabo’s death to rangers—knowing they’ll remove the tusks—reflects ethical tension between conservation protocols and respecting animal grief processes. The chapter prompts reflection: if elephants experience loss akin to humans, what responsibilities do researchers have in disrupting mourning rituals? Should protective measures (like tusk removal) consider emotional impacts? Alice’s observations invite reevaluation of how human interventions, even well-intentioned ones, might disregard the complex emotional lives of intelligent species we study and aim to protect.

    Note