Chapter Index
    Cover of Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel
    Adventure FictionThriller

    Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel

    by Larsen, Ward
    “Assassin’s Revenge—A David Slaton Novel” by Ward Larsen follows former assassin David Slaton as he is drawn back into a world of danger when a shadowy adversary targets his family. Forced to confront his past, Slaton employs his lethal skills to unravel a conspiracy that spans international borders. The novel explores themes of vengeance, loyalty, and the moral complexities of retribution, blending high-stakes action with intricate plotting. Larsen’s taut prose and relentless pacing make this a standout thriller, appealing to fans of espionage and suspense. The book underscores the enduring consequences of violence and the personal cost of redemption.

    The chap­ter “Sev­en­ty” fol­lows Boutros and his team as they unload a nuclear bomb from an air­plane onto a fish­ing boat named *Alba­tross*. The process is phys­i­cal­ly demand­ing, requir­ing coor­di­na­tion among the group to move the heavy cask using a dol­ly and then onto the launch. Rafiq reveals a crit­i­cal issue—the ini­tia­tor, meant to boost the bom­b’s yield, is miss­ing. How­ev­er, he assures Boutros the weapon will still func­tion, albeit with reduced pow­er, enough to destroy their tar­get. The team refu­els the air­plane, and the flight crew departs, leav­ing Boutros and his men to con­tin­ue their mis­sion.

    As *Alba­tross* sets sail, Boutros reflects on their objec­tive, empha­siz­ing the impor­tance of their task despite the miss­ing ini­tia­tor. Sami, who was ini­tial­ly pre­pared for a painful mar­tyr­dom, appears relieved upon learn­ing his death will be less ago­niz­ing. The boat nav­i­gates toward its tar­get, with Boutros steer­ing east­ward. His thoughts briefly turn to his deceased sis­ter, Iri­na, whose mem­o­ry fuels his resolve. The team remains focused on assem­bling the bomb dur­ing the jour­ney, under­scor­ing their com­mit­ment to the mis­sion.

    Mean­while, Sorensen and Sla­ton dis­cuss the impend­ing threat at Mid­way Island. Sorensen updates Sla­ton on the mil­i­tary response, includ­ing air­borne radar, a divert­ed car­ri­er group, and Marines en route to secure the area. Sla­ton, skep­ti­cal of inter­cept­ing the bomb at sea, sug­gests an airstrike as a more reli­able solu­tion. He sur­veys the har­bor but dis­miss­es the moored boats as unre­lat­ed to the threat. Sorensen express­es frus­tra­tion at their lim­it­ed options, while Sla­ton con­tin­ues scan­ning the hori­zon for signs of the approach­ing fish­ing boat.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Park, the North Kore­an intel­li­gence head, sit­ting near a fire­place, his demeanor inscrutable. A brief men­tion of an Amer­i­can child fas­ci­nat­ed by the fire hints at an unre­solved sub­plot. The ten­sion builds as Boutros’ team advances toward their tar­get, while Sorensen and Sla­ton await rein­force­ments, high­light­ing the race against time to pre­vent a cat­a­stroph­ic attack.

    FAQs

    • 1. What was the significance of the missing initiator in the bomb material, and how did Rafiq reassure Boutros about its absence?

      Answer:
      The missing initiator (beryllium-polonium component) was meant to boost the nuclear weapon’s yield by generating additional neutrons. Rafiq reassured Boutros that while its absence would reduce the bomb’s power, the reaction would still occur—just at a lower yield. He emphasized it would be sufficient to destroy their target, and noted an unintended benefit: Sami, the martyr, wouldn’t suffer from polonium poisoning. This reveals the group’s pragmatism; despite the setback, they adapted their plans without compromising their core objective (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


      2. Analyze the dynamics between Boutros’ team and the flight crew. What does their interaction reveal about the mission’s broader context?

      Answer:
      The interaction highlights a transactional alliance based solely on a shared enemy. The teams lacked common language, culture, or religion, communicating only through functional English (e.g., “Petrol”). The flight crew’s abrupt departure and Boutros’ speculation about their destination (“like a homing pigeon”) underscore the mission’s covert, multinational nature. The awkward farewell—reduced to nods and waves—emphasizes the isolation of such operations, where collaboration is temporary and impersonal (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


      3. How does Boutros’ reflection on his sister Irina contrast with his commitment to the mission?

      Answer:
      Boutros’ fleeting thought of Irina—a “girl who suffered no longer”—hints at personal trauma that may drive his extremism. This humanizing moment contrasts sharply with his cold dedication to destroying a target symbolic of American victory. The juxtaposition suggests his ideology overrides empathy, yet the memory lingers as a subconscious motivator. It adds depth to his character, implying vengeance or martyrdom as a distorted form of healing (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


      4. Evaluate Sorensen and Slaton’s differing approaches to intercepting the bomb. What strategic trade-offs does each perspective represent?

      Answer:
      Slaton favors immediate, decisive action (an airstrike) to neutralize the threat, prioritizing speed over evidence. Sorensen, representing institutional caution, advocates interception at sea to preserve intelligence and justify political responses. Their debate reflects broader tensions in counterterrorism: kinetic efficiency vs. long-term strategic gains. Slaton’s skepticism about finding the boat (“a really big ocean”) also underscores the operational challenges of maritime interdiction (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


      5. What logistical and environmental details in the chapter reinforce the realism of the operation?

      Answer:
      Realism is anchored in specifics: the furniture dolly for the 300-pound cask, the coral runway, and the wooden planks in the launch to prevent capsizing. Environmental touches—like birds disturbed by the plane and isolated thunderheads—ground the action in a tangible setting. Even the Albatross’ maneuverability (“cleared the outer reef”) and the crew’s physical strain (“all five men to lift the cask”) heighten authenticity, making the high-stakes plot plausible (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).

    Quotes

    • 1. “Even without it, everything should still work… Enough to obliterate our new target.”

      This exchange between Rafiq and Boutros reveals the terrifying adaptability of their nuclear plot - even missing a key component, the weapon remains devastatingly effective. It underscores the imminent threat while showing the terrorists’ cold pragmatism.

      2. “The three Middle Easterners pushed their overburdened launch into deeper water… indeed, no bond whatsoever but that of a shared enemy.”

      This passage powerfully captures the transactional nature of global terrorism - disparate groups united only by hatred. The imagery of the overloaded boat becomes a metaphor for their dangerous, unstable alliance.

      3. “He imagined that name would soon hold very different meaning to the world’s nearly two billion Muslims. Not that Boutros cared about any of them.”

      This chilling insight reveals Boutros’ true motivation - personal vengeance rather than ideological cause. The contrast between global impact and personal obsession makes this particularly striking.

      4. “Inside eight hours, this is going to be the most heavily watched rock on earth.”

      Sorensen’s briefing to Slaton highlights the rapid military escalation and the high-stakes nature of the crisis. The phrase captures both the isolation of Midway and its sudden strategic importance.

      5. “It seems like we ought to be doing something.”

      Sorensen’s frustrated remark encapsulates the tension between action and waiting that dominates the chapter’s second half. This simple line speaks volumes about the helplessness even well-equipped operatives feel in such crises.

    Quotes

    1. “Even without it, everything should still work… Enough to obliterate our new target.”

    This exchange between Rafiq and Boutros reveals the terrifying adaptability of their nuclear plot - even missing a key component, the weapon remains devastatingly effective. It underscores the imminent threat while showing the terrorists’ cold pragmatism.

    2. “The three Middle Easterners pushed their overburdened launch into deeper water… indeed, no bond whatsoever but that of a shared enemy.”

    This passage powerfully captures the transactional nature of global terrorism - disparate groups united only by hatred. The imagery of the overloaded boat becomes a metaphor for their dangerous, unstable alliance.

    3. “He imagined that name would soon hold very different meaning to the world’s nearly two billion Muslims. Not that Boutros cared about any of them.”

    This chilling insight reveals Boutros’ true motivation - personal vengeance rather than ideological cause. The contrast between global impact and personal obsession makes this particularly striking.

    4. “Inside eight hours, this is going to be the most heavily watched rock on earth.”

    Sorensen’s briefing to Slaton highlights the rapid military escalation and the high-stakes nature of the crisis. The phrase captures both the isolation of Midway and its sudden strategic importance.

    5. “It seems like we ought to be doing something.”

    Sorensen’s frustrated remark encapsulates the tension between action and waiting that dominates the chapter’s second half. This simple line speaks volumes about the helplessness even well-equipped operatives feel in such crises.

    FAQs

    1. What was the significance of the missing initiator in the bomb material, and how did Rafiq reassure Boutros about its absence?

    Answer:
    The missing initiator (beryllium-polonium component) was meant to boost the nuclear weapon’s yield by generating additional neutrons. Rafiq reassured Boutros that while its absence would reduce the bomb’s power, the reaction would still occur—just at a lower yield. He emphasized it would be sufficient to destroy their target, and noted an unintended benefit: Sami, the martyr, wouldn’t suffer from polonium poisoning. This reveals the group’s pragmatism; despite the setback, they adapted their plans without compromising their core objective (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


    2. Analyze the dynamics between Boutros’ team and the flight crew. What does their interaction reveal about the mission’s broader context?

    Answer:
    The interaction highlights a transactional alliance based solely on a shared enemy. The teams lacked common language, culture, or religion, communicating only through functional English (e.g., “Petrol”). The flight crew’s abrupt departure and Boutros’ speculation about their destination (“like a homing pigeon”) underscore the mission’s covert, multinational nature. The awkward farewell—reduced to nods and waves—emphasizes the isolation of such operations, where collaboration is temporary and impersonal (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


    3. How does Boutros’ reflection on his sister Irina contrast with his commitment to the mission?

    Answer:
    Boutros’ fleeting thought of Irina—a “girl who suffered no longer”—hints at personal trauma that may drive his extremism. This humanizing moment contrasts sharply with his cold dedication to destroying a target symbolic of American victory. The juxtaposition suggests his ideology overrides empathy, yet the memory lingers as a subconscious motivator. It adds depth to his character, implying vengeance or martyrdom as a distorted form of healing (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


    4. Evaluate Sorensen and Slaton’s differing approaches to intercepting the bomb. What strategic trade-offs does each perspective represent?

    Answer:
    Slaton favors immediate, decisive action (an airstrike) to neutralize the threat, prioritizing speed over evidence. Sorensen, representing institutional caution, advocates interception at sea to preserve intelligence and justify political responses. Their debate reflects broader tensions in counterterrorism: kinetic efficiency vs. long-term strategic gains. Slaton’s skepticism about finding the boat (“a really big ocean”) also underscores the operational challenges of maritime interdiction (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).


    5. What logistical and environmental details in the chapter reinforce the realism of the operation?

    Answer:
    Realism is anchored in specifics: the furniture dolly for the 300-pound cask, the coral runway, and the wooden planks in the launch to prevent capsizing. Environmental touches—like birds disturbed by the plane and isolated thunderheads—ground the action in a tangible setting. Even the Albatross’ maneuverability (“cleared the outer reef”) and the crew’s physical strain (“all five men to lift the cask”) heighten authenticity, making the high-stakes plot plausible (Chapter: “SEVENTY”).

    Note