Chapter Index
    Cover of Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel
    Adventure FictionThriller

    Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel

    by Larsen, Ward
    “Assassin’s Revenge—A David Slaton Novel” by Ward Larsen follows former assassin David Slaton as he is drawn back into a world of danger when a shadowy adversary targets his family. Forced to confront his past, Slaton employs his lethal skills to unravel a conspiracy that spans international borders. The novel explores themes of vengeance, loyalty, and the moral complexities of retribution, blending high-stakes action with intricate plotting. Larsen’s taut prose and relentless pacing make this a standout thriller, appealing to fans of espionage and suspense. The book underscores the enduring consequences of violence and the personal cost of redemption.

    The chap­ter “Sev­en­teen” depicts a tense and bru­tal con­fronta­tion between Sla­ton and three adver­saries. The third oppo­nent proves the most chal­leng­ing, engag­ing Sla­ton in a fierce hand-to-hand strug­gle after Sla­ton neu­tral­izes the first two. Despite the dark­ness and the wrestler’s skill, Sla­ton even­tu­al­ly over­pow­ers him by using a rock to deliv­er fatal blows. The fight leaves Sla­ton exhaust­ed but vic­to­ri­ous, though he reflects on the nar­row mar­gin of suc­cess and vows to avoid such close calls in the future. His anger and deter­mi­na­tion prove deci­sive in break­ing the dead­lock.

    After the fight, Sla­ton method­i­cal­ly dis­pos­es of the bod­ies and cleans the scene to avoid detec­tion. He hides the corpses under brush and dis­as­sem­bles his makeshift shoot­ing stand, which includ­ed a con­vinc­ing fake M16 rifle used as a decoy. The fac­sim­i­le weapon, unreg­u­lat­ed and eas­i­ly obtain­able, had lured his pur­suers into the open. Sla­ton leaves behind golf clubs and oth­er items to con­fuse inves­ti­ga­tors but ensures the fake gun is removed to pre­vent trac­ing it back to him. He also col­lects a Glock from one of the bod­ies, adding to his arse­nal.

    Sla­ton checks on his pri­ma­ry tar­get across the water, con­firm­ing the per­son remains in place. He then search­es the bod­ies for clues, pho­tograph­ing their IDs and access­ing a locked phone using a dead man’s fin­ger­print. How­ev­er, the phone yields lit­tle use­ful infor­ma­tion, so he leaves it behind to avoid poten­tial track­ing. His metic­u­lous cleanup under­scores his pro­fes­sion­al­ism, though he acknowl­edges the bod­ies will even­tu­al­ly be dis­cov­ered, like­ly the next day. The scene is grue­some, but Sla­ton’s pri­or­i­ty is elim­i­nat­ing traces that could lead back to him.

    The chap­ter high­lights Sla­ton’s resource­ful­ness and tac­ti­cal pre­ci­sion under pres­sure. His abil­i­ty to improvise—using a rock as a weapon and a fake gun as bait—demonstrates his adapt­abil­i­ty. Despite the vio­lence, he remains focused on his mis­sion, ensur­ing his tar­get is still with­in reach. The nar­ra­tive builds ten­sion as Sla­ton bal­ances urgency with cau­tion, aware that any mis­step could jeop­ar­dize his objec­tive. His inter­nal reflec­tions reveal a dis­ci­plined oper­a­tive who learns from near-fail­ures, dri­ven by a high­er pur­pose beyond mere sur­vival.

    FAQs

    • 1. What tactical advantage did Slaton gain by using a facsimile M16 rifle in his operation?

      Answer:
      Slaton used the fake M16 (called a “Rubber Duck”) as a strategic distraction to draw his adversaries into the open. Since facsimile weapons are unregulated and convincingly resemble real firearms, the decoy appeared authentic in the dark, luring the three men toward his position. This allowed Slaton to control the engagement, forcing them to approach one by one over a small bridge, which served as a funnel. The ruse eliminated the risk of gunfire alerting others and enabled silent, close-quarters combat—key to his mission’s success (Chapter: “He’d settled on a better way… drawing his adversaries in like moths to a light”).

      2. How does the chapter illustrate Slaton’s adaptability in combat, and what weakness does he critique in himself afterward?

      Answer:
      Slaton demonstrates adaptability by shifting tactics mid-fight: when grappling with the third opponent reaches a stalemate, he channels anger to break the deadlock, uses a nearby rock as an improvised weapon, and exploits the man’s wrestling-style leverage. However, he later critiques his own overconfidence, realizing he “cut things too close” by allowing the third attacker to nearly gain the upper hand. His self-reflection highlights the stakes—had the man arrived seconds earlier, the outcome might have been fatal. This underscores Slaton’s operational philosophy: complacency is unacceptable when “failure was not an option” (Chapter: “Slaton realized he’d cut things too close… failure was not an option”).

      3. Analyze Slaton’s approach to operational security (OPSEC) during his cleanup. What evidence does he prioritize concealing, and why?

      Answer:
      Slaton meticulously removes traces that could link him to the scene or reveal his methods. He prioritizes hiding the facsimile M16, as its unique design could lead investigators to the gun shop, potentially exposing his identity via store records or cameras. He leaves generic items (golf clubs, duct tape) to confuse investigators but takes the Glock 26 for future use. He also photographs the dead men’s IDs for intelligence without removing them, avoiding suspicion. His OPSEC reflects calculated trade-offs: DNA/fingerprints are irrelevant (he has no records on file), but traceable tools or behavioral patterns (e.g., the fake gun tactic) must be erased (Chapter: “The one thing that had to be removed was the training gun… description”).

      4. What does the contrast between Slaton’s motivation and his adversaries’ imply about their combat effectiveness?

      Answer:
      The text frames Slaton’s “far more profound” motivation (implied to be personal or mission-critical) as a decisive factor against the mercenaries’ likely financial incentives. This dichotomy manifests in their tactics: the adversaries rely on predictable tools (MAC-10s, wrestling) and poor OPSEC (carrying identifiable wallets and phones), while Slaton improvises (using a rock, exploiting terrain) and maintains discipline. Their disorganization—burner phones with no data, a leader’s biometric-unlocked phone—suggests amateurism, whereas Slaton’s post-fight analysis and adaptability underscore professionalism. The mercenaries’ generic training becomes a liability against his tailored, emotionally driven resolve (Chapter: “The man he was up against was nothing more than a mercenary… a damned good motivator”).

      5. How does the author use environmental details to heighten tension and realism in the fight scene?

      Answer:
      The fight’s visceral realism stems from sensory details: the “ferrous odor” of blood, the “near darkness” forcing combat “by feel,” and the mud yielding the lifesaving rock. These elements ground the chaos in physicality. The setting also shapes tactics—the cramped underbrush dictates body concealment, while the bridge funnels enemies into Slaton’s kill zone. Environmental stakes are reinforced by Slaton’s repeated checks across the water to monitor his target, tying the fight’s urgency to a broader mission. Even cleanup reflects realism (e.g., predicting discovery by a “dog on its morning walk”), avoiding cinematic tropes for plausible logistics (Chapter: “Hopelessly entangled in near darkness… a vagrant might shoulder through the brush to urinate”).

    Quotes

    • 1. “Anger might not be much of a strategy … but it was a damned good motivator.”

      This quote captures Slaton’s internal shift during the fight, where raw emotion fuels his decisive action. It reveals a key character trait—his ability to channel intense feelings into focused effectiveness, even in life-or-death situations.

      2. “On this mission, failure was not an option.”

      This terse statement underscores the high-stakes nature of Slaton’s operation. It represents both his professional mindset and the chapter’s tension, emphasizing that every move carries irreversible consequences.

      3. “The M16 ‘Rubber Duck,’ with its black urethane body and metal barrel, was eminently convincing from a distance… the fac had given him a perfect distraction, drawing his adversaries in like moths to a light.”

      This passage highlights Slaton’s clever tactical deception. The detailed description of the fake weapon showcases his meticulous planning and the psychological manipulation central to the chapter’s action sequence.

      4. “He imagined a baffled Viennese detective scratching his head.”

      This darkly humorous aside reveals Slaton’s awareness of the crime scene he’s leaving behind. It demonstrates his calculated approach to covering tracks while subtly emphasizing the disparity between his skills and conventional law enforcement.

      5. “Without hesitation he pocketed the gun. The three MAC-10s he left where they were.”

      This pragmatic choice during Slaton’s weapon selection illustrates his strategic priorities—favoring concealability over firepower. It reflects the chapter’s recurring theme of precision over brute force in covert operations.

    Quotes

    1. “Anger might not be much of a strategy … but it was a damned good motivator.”

    This quote captures Slaton’s internal shift during the fight, where raw emotion fuels his decisive action. It reveals a key character trait—his ability to channel intense feelings into focused effectiveness, even in life-or-death situations.

    2. “On this mission, failure was not an option.”

    This terse statement underscores the high-stakes nature of Slaton’s operation. It represents both his professional mindset and the chapter’s tension, emphasizing that every move carries irreversible consequences.

    3. “The M16 ‘Rubber Duck,’ with its black urethane body and metal barrel, was eminently convincing from a distance… the fac had given him a perfect distraction, drawing his adversaries in like moths to a light.”

    This passage highlights Slaton’s clever tactical deception. The detailed description of the fake weapon showcases his meticulous planning and the psychological manipulation central to the chapter’s action sequence.

    4. “He imagined a baffled Viennese detective scratching his head.”

    This darkly humorous aside reveals Slaton’s awareness of the crime scene he’s leaving behind. It demonstrates his calculated approach to covering tracks while subtly emphasizing the disparity between his skills and conventional law enforcement.

    5. “Without hesitation he pocketed the gun. The three MAC-10s he left where they were.”

    This pragmatic choice during Slaton’s weapon selection illustrates his strategic priorities—favoring concealability over firepower. It reflects the chapter’s recurring theme of precision over brute force in covert operations.

    FAQs

    1. What tactical advantage did Slaton gain by using a facsimile M16 rifle in his operation?

    Answer:
    Slaton used the fake M16 (called a “Rubber Duck”) as a strategic distraction to draw his adversaries into the open. Since facsimile weapons are unregulated and convincingly resemble real firearms, the decoy appeared authentic in the dark, luring the three men toward his position. This allowed Slaton to control the engagement, forcing them to approach one by one over a small bridge, which served as a funnel. The ruse eliminated the risk of gunfire alerting others and enabled silent, close-quarters combat—key to his mission’s success (Chapter: “He’d settled on a better way… drawing his adversaries in like moths to a light”).

    2. How does the chapter illustrate Slaton’s adaptability in combat, and what weakness does he critique in himself afterward?

    Answer:
    Slaton demonstrates adaptability by shifting tactics mid-fight: when grappling with the third opponent reaches a stalemate, he channels anger to break the deadlock, uses a nearby rock as an improvised weapon, and exploits the man’s wrestling-style leverage. However, he later critiques his own overconfidence, realizing he “cut things too close” by allowing the third attacker to nearly gain the upper hand. His self-reflection highlights the stakes—had the man arrived seconds earlier, the outcome might have been fatal. This underscores Slaton’s operational philosophy: complacency is unacceptable when “failure was not an option” (Chapter: “Slaton realized he’d cut things too close… failure was not an option”).

    3. Analyze Slaton’s approach to operational security (OPSEC) during his cleanup. What evidence does he prioritize concealing, and why?

    Answer:
    Slaton meticulously removes traces that could link him to the scene or reveal his methods. He prioritizes hiding the facsimile M16, as its unique design could lead investigators to the gun shop, potentially exposing his identity via store records or cameras. He leaves generic items (golf clubs, duct tape) to confuse investigators but takes the Glock 26 for future use. He also photographs the dead men’s IDs for intelligence without removing them, avoiding suspicion. His OPSEC reflects calculated trade-offs: DNA/fingerprints are irrelevant (he has no records on file), but traceable tools or behavioral patterns (e.g., the fake gun tactic) must be erased (Chapter: “The one thing that had to be removed was the training gun… description”).

    4. What does the contrast between Slaton’s motivation and his adversaries’ imply about their combat effectiveness?

    Answer:
    The text frames Slaton’s “far more profound” motivation (implied to be personal or mission-critical) as a decisive factor against the mercenaries’ likely financial incentives. This dichotomy manifests in their tactics: the adversaries rely on predictable tools (MAC-10s, wrestling) and poor OPSEC (carrying identifiable wallets and phones), while Slaton improvises (using a rock, exploiting terrain) and maintains discipline. Their disorganization—burner phones with no data, a leader’s biometric-unlocked phone—suggests amateurism, whereas Slaton’s post-fight analysis and adaptability underscore professionalism. The mercenaries’ generic training becomes a liability against his tailored, emotionally driven resolve (Chapter: “The man he was up against was nothing more than a mercenary… a damned good motivator”).

    5. How does the author use environmental details to heighten tension and realism in the fight scene?

    Answer:
    The fight’s visceral realism stems from sensory details: the “ferrous odor” of blood, the “near darkness” forcing combat “by feel,” and the mud yielding the lifesaving rock. These elements ground the chaos in physicality. The setting also shapes tactics—the cramped underbrush dictates body concealment, while the bridge funnels enemies into Slaton’s kill zone. Environmental stakes are reinforced by Slaton’s repeated checks across the water to monitor his target, tying the fight’s urgency to a broader mission. Even cleanup reflects realism (e.g., predicting discovery by a “dog on its morning walk”), avoiding cinematic tropes for plausible logistics (Chapter: “Hopelessly entangled in near darkness… a vagrant might shoulder through the brush to urinate”).

    Note