Cover of Allegiant
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Allegiant

    by Roth, Veronica
    “Allegiant” by Veronica Roth is the final installment in the dystopian Divergent trilogy. The story follows Tris Prior and Tobias Eaton as they venture beyond the confines of their fractured city, uncovering a shocking truth: their society is an experiment designed to repair damaged genetic traits. The novel explores themes of identity, sacrifice, and the consequences of rebellion as Tris and Tobias confront a new conflict between the genetically “pure” (Divergent) and “damaged” individuals. The dual-perspective narrative deepens character development, culminating in a tragic yet thematically resonant conclusion that challenges notions of freedom and human nature. Roth’s world-building expands significantly, revealing the broader scope of the series’ dystopian setting.

    The epi­logue of *Alle­giant* opens with Eve­lyn return­ing to Chica­go after two and a half years of exile. She reunites with her son, the nar­ra­tor, at a bound­ary between two worlds, marked by tire tracks and fre­quent trav­el. The nar­ra­tor observes how Eve­lyn appears younger and hap­pi­er, reflect­ing the pos­i­tive impact of her time away. The scene sets a tone of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and change, as the nar­ra­tor pre­pares to scat­ter Tris’s ash­es, sym­bol­iz­ing a step toward heal­ing on what would have been Choos­ing Day in their for­mer fac­tion-based soci­ety.

    The nar­ra­tive shifts to a dri­ve through the trans­formed land­scape around Chica­go, where crops now flour­ish and for­mer Bureau sci­en­tists work along­side locals. The absence of fac­tions is described as “ordi­nary,” yet the nar­ra­tor notes the vibrant diver­si­ty of cloth­ing col­ors, hint­ing at a new, uni­fied soci­ety. Evelyn’s curios­i­ty about life with­out fac­tions under­scores the theme of adap­ta­tion, while the narrator’s smile sug­gests cau­tious opti­mism. The imagery of growth—both in the fields and in their relationship—reinforces the chapter’s focus on renew­al.

    The nar­ra­tor takes Eve­lyn to his sparse apart­ment in the “fourth city,” a term reflect­ing Chicago’s repeat­ed cycles of destruc­tion and rebirth. Their con­ver­sa­tion reveals his role as a polit­i­cal assis­tant and his rejec­tion of vio­lence, con­trast­ing with Evelyn’s skep­ti­cism of politi­cians. The ten­sion between them lingers, but their shared history—symbolized by a blue glass object Eve­lyn gifts him—hints at deep­er emo­tion­al con­nec­tions. The object, a rel­ic of their past defi­ance, serves as a metaphor for the intan­gi­ble yet endur­ing bonds between them.

    The chap­ter clos­es with reflec­tions on let­ting go of the past, par­tic­u­lar­ly the narrator’s deci­sion to leave his father behind with­out con­fronta­tion. Evelyn’s prob­ing ques­tions about his father high­light their shared strug­gle with for­give­ness, but the narrator’s resolve to move for­ward remains firm. The blue glass object, rein­tro­duced as a sym­bol of beau­ty and defi­ance, ties the epilogue’s themes togeth­er: heal­ing is grad­ual, change is inevitable, and some connections—like the one between moth­er and son—transcend time and con­flict.

    FAQs

    • 1. How has Chicago changed in the two and a half years since the events of the main story, and what do these changes symbolize?

      Answer:
      Chicago has undergone significant transformations, most notably the spread of agriculture beyond Amity headquarters and the integration of faction colors in everyday life. The text describes “rows and rows of corn or wheat” with people wearing “red and blue and green and purple,” symbolizing the dissolution of rigid faction divisions. The restoration efforts on the river and lake, though slow, represent gradual healing. These changes reflect a move toward unity and sustainability, with former Bureau scientists contributing to agricultural and environmental recovery. The narrator also mentions this new phase as “the fourth city,” acknowledging Chicago’s cyclical history of destruction and rebirth.

      2. Analyze the evolving relationship between Tobias and Evelyn. How does their interaction in this epilogue demonstrate growth from their previous conflicts?

      Answer:
      The epilogue shows significant reconciliation between Tobias and Evelyn. Unlike their earlier antagonistic relationship, Tobias now allows Evelyn to kiss his cheek and even smiles—actions he previously resisted. Their conversation is warm, with Tobias welcoming her back to Chicago despite their past agreement for her to leave. Evelyn’s physical transformation (“younger, her face fuller and her smile wider”) mirrors their emotional healing. Tobias’ nervousness about her visiting his apartment yet willingness to bridge the gap demonstrates mature acceptance of their complicated bond. Their discussion about Marcus also reveals Tobias has moved beyond anger, choosing to “leave him behind” rather than seek confrontation.

      3. What is the significance of Tris’s ashes being scattered on what would have been Choosing Day, and how does this connect to the novel’s larger themes?

      Answer:
      Scattering Tris’s ashes on the former Choosing Day holds profound symbolic weight. Choosing Day originally represented rigid faction divisions and life-altering decisions—the very system Tris fought to change. By commemorating her on this date, Tobias honors her role in breaking the faction system while acknowledging how far society has come (“if we still had factions”). The act represents both closure and continuation: saying goodbye to Tris while stepping into the new world she helped create. This moment ties into the novel’s themes of transformation, sacrifice, and rebuilding, showing how personal grief intersects with societal progress.

      4. How does the blue glass object Evelyn gives Tobias serve as a metaphor for their relationship and personal growth?

      Answer:
      The blue glass sculpture—originally a forbidden Abnegation object representing “quiet defiance”—now symbolizes reconciled contradictions. When young Tobias hid it, the glass embodied rebellion against his faction and secret connection to his supposedly dead mother. Its reintroduction mirrors their relationship’s evolution: once a clandestine tie, now openly acknowledged. Evelyn’s original explanation (“Beautiful things sometimes do [something in here]” while touching her heart) gains new meaning, suggesting their healed bond operates beyond utilitarian value. The object’s water-like form also reflects fluidity—both characters have moved beyond rigid identities (faction loyalties, vengeful roles) toward acceptance and complexity.

      5. Contrast Tobias’s current perspective on leadership and violence with his past behaviors. What do his career choice and refusal to train police reveal about his development?

      Answer:
      Tobias has shifted dramatically from his Dauntless fighter persona to embracing nonviolent change through politics (“using your words now”). His refusal to train police (“I’m done with guns”) rejects the militarized enforcement he once participated in, while his political assistant role aligns with Tris’s belief in systemic reform. This mirrors Chicago’s broader transition—George organizing police (structural authority) versus Tobias pursuing governance (policy change). His apartment choice (“nowhere near either of my old homes”) further shows a break from past identities. However, Evelyn’s skepticism (“I don’t trust politicians”) hints at ongoing tensions between idealism and pragmatism in rebuilding society.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The agreement, when I offered it to her more than two years ago, and when she made it again with Johanna shortly after, was that she would leave the city. Now, so much has changed in Chicago that I don’t see the harm in her coming back, and neither does she.”

      This quote marks a turning point in the relationship between the narrator and Evelyn, showing how time and change have softened old conflicts. It reflects the theme of reconciliation and the evolving nature of their post-faction world.

      2. “Change, like healing, takes time.”

      A profound observation about the gradual process of recovery—both personal and societal—after trauma. This metaphorical statement encapsulates the chapter’s broader message about patience in rebuilding lives and communities.

      3. “There was only one option left, and it was letting go.”

      This represents the narrator’s emotional climax regarding his father, demonstrating a hard-won wisdom about moving beyond past hurts. It’s a key moment of character growth that resonates with the book’s themes of forgiveness and release.

      4. “Beautiful things sometimes do.”

      Evelyn’s poetic justification for keeping the blue glass object serves as a thematic statement about finding value in aesthetics and emotional resonance rather than pure utility. This challenges the Abnegation faction’s philosophy and represents personal rebellion.

      5. “It’s very ordinary. You’ll love it.”

      The narrator’s simple yet powerful description of life without factions underscores the book’s ultimate message—that true peace comes in mundane, unremarkable daily existence rather than dramatic ideological structures.

    Quotes

    1. “The agreement, when I offered it to her more than two years ago, and when she made it again with Johanna shortly after, was that she would leave the city. Now, so much has changed in Chicago that I don’t see the harm in her coming back, and neither does she.”

    This quote marks a turning point in the relationship between the narrator and Evelyn, showing how time and change have softened old conflicts. It reflects the theme of reconciliation and the evolving nature of their post-faction world.

    2. “Change, like healing, takes time.”

    A profound observation about the gradual process of recovery—both personal and societal—after trauma. This metaphorical statement encapsulates the chapter’s broader message about patience in rebuilding lives and communities.

    3. “There was only one option left, and it was letting go.”

    This represents the narrator’s emotional climax regarding his father, demonstrating a hard-won wisdom about moving beyond past hurts. It’s a key moment of character growth that resonates with the book’s themes of forgiveness and release.

    4. “Beautiful things sometimes do.”

    Evelyn’s poetic justification for keeping the blue glass object serves as a thematic statement about finding value in aesthetics and emotional resonance rather than pure utility. This challenges the Abnegation faction’s philosophy and represents personal rebellion.

    5. “It’s very ordinary. You’ll love it.”

    The narrator’s simple yet powerful description of life without factions underscores the book’s ultimate message—that true peace comes in mundane, unremarkable daily existence rather than dramatic ideological structures.

    FAQs

    1. How has Chicago changed in the two and a half years since the events of the main story, and what do these changes symbolize?

    Answer:
    Chicago has undergone significant transformations, most notably the spread of agriculture beyond Amity headquarters and the integration of faction colors in everyday life. The text describes “rows and rows of corn or wheat” with people wearing “red and blue and green and purple,” symbolizing the dissolution of rigid faction divisions. The restoration efforts on the river and lake, though slow, represent gradual healing. These changes reflect a move toward unity and sustainability, with former Bureau scientists contributing to agricultural and environmental recovery. The narrator also mentions this new phase as “the fourth city,” acknowledging Chicago’s cyclical history of destruction and rebirth.

    2. Analyze the evolving relationship between Tobias and Evelyn. How does their interaction in this epilogue demonstrate growth from their previous conflicts?

    Answer:
    The epilogue shows significant reconciliation between Tobias and Evelyn. Unlike their earlier antagonistic relationship, Tobias now allows Evelyn to kiss his cheek and even smiles—actions he previously resisted. Their conversation is warm, with Tobias welcoming her back to Chicago despite their past agreement for her to leave. Evelyn’s physical transformation (“younger, her face fuller and her smile wider”) mirrors their emotional healing. Tobias’ nervousness about her visiting his apartment yet willingness to bridge the gap demonstrates mature acceptance of their complicated bond. Their discussion about Marcus also reveals Tobias has moved beyond anger, choosing to “leave him behind” rather than seek confrontation.

    3. What is the significance of Tris’s ashes being scattered on what would have been Choosing Day, and how does this connect to the novel’s larger themes?

    Answer:
    Scattering Tris’s ashes on the former Choosing Day holds profound symbolic weight. Choosing Day originally represented rigid faction divisions and life-altering decisions—the very system Tris fought to change. By commemorating her on this date, Tobias honors her role in breaking the faction system while acknowledging how far society has come (“if we still had factions”). The act represents both closure and continuation: saying goodbye to Tris while stepping into the new world she helped create. This moment ties into the novel’s themes of transformation, sacrifice, and rebuilding, showing how personal grief intersects with societal progress.

    4. How does the blue glass object Evelyn gives Tobias serve as a metaphor for their relationship and personal growth?

    Answer:
    The blue glass sculpture—originally a forbidden Abnegation object representing “quiet defiance”—now symbolizes reconciled contradictions. When young Tobias hid it, the glass embodied rebellion against his faction and secret connection to his supposedly dead mother. Its reintroduction mirrors their relationship’s evolution: once a clandestine tie, now openly acknowledged. Evelyn’s original explanation (“Beautiful things sometimes do [something in here]” while touching her heart) gains new meaning, suggesting their healed bond operates beyond utilitarian value. The object’s water-like form also reflects fluidity—both characters have moved beyond rigid identities (faction loyalties, vengeful roles) toward acceptance and complexity.

    5. Contrast Tobias’s current perspective on leadership and violence with his past behaviors. What do his career choice and refusal to train police reveal about his development?

    Answer:
    Tobias has shifted dramatically from his Dauntless fighter persona to embracing nonviolent change through politics (“using your words now”). His refusal to train police (“I’m done with guns”) rejects the militarized enforcement he once participated in, while his political assistant role aligns with Tris’s belief in systemic reform. This mirrors Chicago’s broader transition—George organizing police (structural authority) versus Tobias pursuing governance (policy change). His apartment choice (“nowhere near either of my old homes”) further shows a break from past identities. However, Evelyn’s skepticism (“I don’t trust politicians”) hints at ongoing tensions between idealism and pragmatism in rebuilding society.

    Note