Chapter Index
    Cover of Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel
    Adventure FictionThriller

    Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel

    by Larsen, Ward
    “Assassin’s Revenge—A David Slaton Novel” by Ward Larsen follows former assassin David Slaton as he is drawn back into a world of danger when a shadowy adversary targets his family. Forced to confront his past, Slaton employs his lethal skills to unravel a conspiracy that spans international borders. The novel explores themes of vengeance, loyalty, and the moral complexities of retribution, blending high-stakes action with intricate plotting. Larsen’s taut prose and relentless pacing make this a standout thriller, appealing to fans of espionage and suspense. The book underscores the enduring consequences of violence and the personal cost of redemption.

    The chap­ter “Thir­ty” opens with the ves­sel *Alba­tross* bat­tling rough seas as Boutros nav­i­gates east­ward under a mid­day sun. He adjusts course to han­dle the wors­en­ing con­di­tions, while spray and waves bat­ter the wheel­house. Rafiq joins him, report­ing that Sami and Saleem are sea­sick below deck. Boutros reas­sures him that sea­sick­ness is expect­ed and advis­es hydra­tion, though he pri­vate­ly con­sid­ers the over­lap of symp­toms with radi­a­tion sickness—a con­cern giv­en their clan­des­tine car­go. The crew had been warned about poten­tial expo­sure risks, par­tic­u­lar­ly dur­ing their upcom­ing stop, where han­dling radioac­tive mate­r­i­al would be unavoid­able.

    Boutros and Rafiq dis­cuss their route through the Tsug­aru Strait, a nar­row pas­sage between Japan­ese islands. Boutros explains that Japan’s sov­er­eign­ty lim­its in the area—reduced to three miles—allow inter­na­tion­al pas­sage, includ­ing for nuclear-armed U.S. ships. This detail suits their mis­sion, sav­ing them a day of trav­el. Mean­while, Boutros mon­i­tors the vessel’s track­ing sys­tem (VMS), which has been dis­abled to avoid detec­tion. He reflects on the risks of ran­dom inspec­tions, know­ing their lack of fish­ing activ­i­ty and inex­pe­ri­enced crew could raise sus­pi­cions. If board­ed, they would face dire con­se­quences due to their hid­den car­go and lim­it­ed mar­itime knowl­edge.

    The nar­ra­tive shifts to events in Danube Park, where three bod­ies are dis­cov­ered at dawn. The crime scene includes blood­stains, duct tape, MAC-10s, and children’s golf clubs. The vic­tims car­ry pre­paid phones and fake Aus­tri­an IDs, sug­gest­ing orga­nized activ­i­ty. The lead detec­tive notes their sim­i­lar age and eth­nic back­ground, hint­ing at poten­tial ter­ror­ism or hate crime involve­ment. The scene’s pecu­liar details—such as the golf clubs—add to the mys­tery, though the inves­ti­ga­tion is still in its ear­ly stages.

    The chap­ter jux­ta­pos­es the ten­sion aboard *Alba­tross* with the after­math of vio­lence in Danube Park. Boutros’s mis­sion is fraught with phys­i­cal and psy­cho­log­i­cal chal­lenges, from bat­tling the sea to grap­pling with the moral weight of their dead­ly car­go. Mean­while, the dis­cov­ery of the bod­ies sets the stage for a broad­er inves­ti­ga­tion, link­ing two seem­ing­ly dis­parate threads—maritime secre­cy and ter­res­tri­al violence—into a cohe­sive nar­ra­tive of covert oper­a­tions and their far-reach­ing con­se­quences.

    FAQs

    • 1. What are the primary challenges Boutros and his crew face aboard the Albatross, and how do they plan to address them?

      Answer:
      Boutros and his crew face multiple challenges, including severe weather conditions, seasickness among inexperienced crew members, and the risk of detection due to their illicit cargo. The rough seas force Boutros to adjust their course and throttle to maintain control, while he advises his crew to stay hydrated to combat seasickness. The more critical issue involves their hidden radioactive material, which could lead to radiation sickness and requires careful handling. Additionally, they risk detection by authorities due to their inoperative VMS tracking system and lack of fishing activity. Boutros plans to rely on forethought and, if necessary, divine intervention to navigate these dangers.

      2. How does the chapter illustrate the tension between the crew’s mission and their physical limitations?

      Answer:
      The chapter highlights the crew’s physical struggles—particularly seasickness—as a significant obstacle to their mission. Three of the four crew members have little maritime experience, making them vulnerable to nausea and dizziness, symptoms that overlap with radiation sickness. This creates psychological tension, as Boutros must distinguish between ordinary seasickness and potential radiation exposure. The crew’s inexperience also increases the risk of detection if inspected, as they lack the knowledge to convincingly pose as fishermen. This tension underscores the precarious balance between their high-stakes mission and their human vulnerabilities.

      3. What strategic advantage does the Tsugaru Strait offer Boutros’s mission, and why is it significant?

      Answer:
      The Tsugaru Strait provides a critical shortcut, saving the crew a full day of travel compared to alternative routes. Its narrow 12-mile passage between Honshu and Hokkaido is strategically valuable because Japan has limited its territorial claim to 3 miles in this area, designating the rest as international waters to accommodate U.S. nuclear-armed vessels. This loophole allows Boutros to avoid violating Japanese sovereignty while transporting his own hazardous cargo. The irony of using a route designed for nuclear transit underscores the mission’s audacity and the geopolitical vulnerabilities it exploits.

      4. How does the chapter foreshadow potential future conflicts or consequences for the crew?

      Answer:
      The chapter foreshadows several looming threats. The discussion of radiation sickness symptoms (e.g., hair loss, ocular bleeding) hints at the crew’s inevitable exposure during the next phase of their mission, particularly for Sami. The disabled VMS system and the risk of random inspections suggest that detection by authorities remains a persistent danger. Additionally, Boutros’s acknowledgment that they may need to “put themselves in the hands of Allah” implies a readiness for martyrdom, signaling that the mission could end in violence or sacrifice. These elements build suspense about the crew’s fate.

      5. Compare the parallel scenes of the Albatross at sea and the crime scene in Danube Park. What thematic connections emerge?

      Answer:
      Both scenes involve hidden threats and the aftermath of violence. On the Albatross, the crew conceals radioactive material and grapples with invisible dangers (seasickness, radiation), while in Danube Park, the police uncover a gruesome murder with weapons and duct tape suggesting premeditated violence. Thematically, both scenarios explore deception, the consequences of clandestine operations, and the inevitability of exposure. The crime scene’s lack of identifiable suspects mirrors the Albatross’s attempts to evade detection, linking the two narratives through a shared tension between secrecy and discovery.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The material belowdecks—half of what would eventually be utilized—was well contained inside a steel tube. This, the doctor had explained, offered a reasonable amount of shielding, and so the risk of exposure was minimal. That would change during the next stage of the operation.”

      This quote reveals the dangerous cargo aboard the Albatross and foreshadows the crew’s inevitable exposure to radiation. It underscores the mission’s high stakes and the grim fate awaiting at least one team member.

      2. “By declaring the channel as international water, America’s nuclear-armed warships can pass through without violating Japan’s constitutional ban on nuclear arms. They bow to the Americans. And it fits our needs perfectly.”

      This passage highlights the geopolitical irony exploited by Boutros’s team—using a loophole created for U.S. nuclear vessels to facilitate their own covert operation. It demonstrates the strategic planning behind their mission.

      3. “If a boarding appeared imminent, he could do little but cover up the device and tell everyone to keep their mouths shut. If that didn’t work—they had at least one weapon with which to make a stand.”

      This quote encapsulates the crew’s desperate contingency plans, revealing both the extreme measures they’re prepared to take and the inherent vulnerabilities of their operation. It heightens tension about potential confrontations.

      4. “Still, if Boutros had learned anything in his years at sea, it was that forethought could prove decisive in times of crisis. And when that wasn’t enough? Then he and his crew would gladly put themselves in the hands of Allah.”

      This concluding thought reveals Boutros’s dual approach to danger—pragmatic preparation combined with fatalistic faith. It perfectly captures the chapter’s tension between careful planning and the acceptance of potential doom.

    Quotes

    1. “The material belowdecks—half of what would eventually be utilized—was well contained inside a steel tube. This, the doctor had explained, offered a reasonable amount of shielding, and so the risk of exposure was minimal. That would change during the next stage of the operation.”

    This quote reveals the dangerous cargo aboard the Albatross and foreshadows the crew’s inevitable exposure to radiation. It underscores the mission’s high stakes and the grim fate awaiting at least one team member.

    2. “By declaring the channel as international water, America’s nuclear-armed warships can pass through without violating Japan’s constitutional ban on nuclear arms. They bow to the Americans. And it fits our needs perfectly.”

    This passage highlights the geopolitical irony exploited by Boutros’s team—using a loophole created for U.S. nuclear vessels to facilitate their own covert operation. It demonstrates the strategic planning behind their mission.

    3. “If a boarding appeared imminent, he could do little but cover up the device and tell everyone to keep their mouths shut. If that didn’t work—they had at least one weapon with which to make a stand.”

    This quote encapsulates the crew’s desperate contingency plans, revealing both the extreme measures they’re prepared to take and the inherent vulnerabilities of their operation. It heightens tension about potential confrontations.

    4. “Still, if Boutros had learned anything in his years at sea, it was that forethought could prove decisive in times of crisis. And when that wasn’t enough? Then he and his crew would gladly put themselves in the hands of Allah.”

    This concluding thought reveals Boutros’s dual approach to danger—pragmatic preparation combined with fatalistic faith. It perfectly captures the chapter’s tension between careful planning and the acceptance of potential doom.

    FAQs

    1. What are the primary challenges Boutros and his crew face aboard the Albatross, and how do they plan to address them?

    Answer:
    Boutros and his crew face multiple challenges, including severe weather conditions, seasickness among inexperienced crew members, and the risk of detection due to their illicit cargo. The rough seas force Boutros to adjust their course and throttle to maintain control, while he advises his crew to stay hydrated to combat seasickness. The more critical issue involves their hidden radioactive material, which could lead to radiation sickness and requires careful handling. Additionally, they risk detection by authorities due to their inoperative VMS tracking system and lack of fishing activity. Boutros plans to rely on forethought and, if necessary, divine intervention to navigate these dangers.

    2. How does the chapter illustrate the tension between the crew’s mission and their physical limitations?

    Answer:
    The chapter highlights the crew’s physical struggles—particularly seasickness—as a significant obstacle to their mission. Three of the four crew members have little maritime experience, making them vulnerable to nausea and dizziness, symptoms that overlap with radiation sickness. This creates psychological tension, as Boutros must distinguish between ordinary seasickness and potential radiation exposure. The crew’s inexperience also increases the risk of detection if inspected, as they lack the knowledge to convincingly pose as fishermen. This tension underscores the precarious balance between their high-stakes mission and their human vulnerabilities.

    3. What strategic advantage does the Tsugaru Strait offer Boutros’s mission, and why is it significant?

    Answer:
    The Tsugaru Strait provides a critical shortcut, saving the crew a full day of travel compared to alternative routes. Its narrow 12-mile passage between Honshu and Hokkaido is strategically valuable because Japan has limited its territorial claim to 3 miles in this area, designating the rest as international waters to accommodate U.S. nuclear-armed vessels. This loophole allows Boutros to avoid violating Japanese sovereignty while transporting his own hazardous cargo. The irony of using a route designed for nuclear transit underscores the mission’s audacity and the geopolitical vulnerabilities it exploits.

    4. How does the chapter foreshadow potential future conflicts or consequences for the crew?

    Answer:
    The chapter foreshadows several looming threats. The discussion of radiation sickness symptoms (e.g., hair loss, ocular bleeding) hints at the crew’s inevitable exposure during the next phase of their mission, particularly for Sami. The disabled VMS system and the risk of random inspections suggest that detection by authorities remains a persistent danger. Additionally, Boutros’s acknowledgment that they may need to “put themselves in the hands of Allah” implies a readiness for martyrdom, signaling that the mission could end in violence or sacrifice. These elements build suspense about the crew’s fate.

    5. Compare the parallel scenes of the Albatross at sea and the crime scene in Danube Park. What thematic connections emerge?

    Answer:
    Both scenes involve hidden threats and the aftermath of violence. On the Albatross, the crew conceals radioactive material and grapples with invisible dangers (seasickness, radiation), while in Danube Park, the police uncover a gruesome murder with weapons and duct tape suggesting premeditated violence. Thematically, both scenarios explore deception, the consequences of clandestine operations, and the inevitability of exposure. The crime scene’s lack of identifiable suspects mirrors the Albatross’s attempts to evade detection, linking the two narratives through a shared tension between secrecy and discovery.

    Note