Chapter Index
    Cover of Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel
    Adventure FictionThriller

    Assassin’s Revenge–A David Slaton Novel

    by Larsen, Ward
    “Assassin’s Revenge—A David Slaton Novel” by Ward Larsen follows former assassin David Slaton as he is drawn back into a world of danger when a shadowy adversary targets his family. Forced to confront his past, Slaton employs his lethal skills to unravel a conspiracy that spans international borders. The novel explores themes of vengeance, loyalty, and the moral complexities of retribution, blending high-stakes action with intricate plotting. Larsen’s taut prose and relentless pacing make this a standout thriller, appealing to fans of espionage and suspense. The book underscores the enduring consequences of violence and the personal cost of redemption.

    The chap­ter opens with Boutros and his crew aboard the *Alba­tross*, a fish­ing boat pro­cured for a covert mis­sion. The ini­tial moments at sea are marked by ten­ta­tive adjust­ments, as Boutros famil­iar­izes him­self with the vessel’s oper­a­tions under the guid­ance of Choe, the Kore­an fish­er­man who deliv­ered the boat. The crew set­tles into their roles, with some below deck and oth­ers observ­ing the stark, cold seascape. Boutros ques­tions Choe about the boat’s capa­bil­i­ties, includ­ing speed and nav­i­ga­tion sys­tems, while sub­tly test­ing the Korean’s knowl­edge and inten­tions. The ten­sion of the mis­sion is pal­pa­ble, under­scored by Boutros’ unease about their pre­pared­ness and the absence of tech­ni­cal sup­port.

    As the *Alba­tross* moves fur­ther from shore, Boutros reflects on the chal­lenges ahead, par­tic­u­lar­ly the vast and unpre­dictable North Pacif­ic. The Kore­ans’ impend­ing depar­ture adds urgency, as Boutros wants to max­i­mize their time learn­ing the boat’s quirks. The mission’s tim­ing, dic­tat­ed by exter­nal fac­tors rather than weath­er, height­ens the stakes. Boutros acknowl­edges the rel­a­tive luck of favor­able con­di­tions but remains wary of the risks. His naval expe­ri­ence, though lim­it­ed, sets him apart with­in his group, and he grap­ples with the weight of lead­ing an unprece­dent­ed oper­a­tion against Amer­i­ca. The chap­ter hints at the audac­i­ty of their plan, leav­ing the read­er to won­der about its specifics.

    Boutros’ inter­ac­tions with Choe reveal lay­ers of mutu­al sus­pi­cion and unspo­ken under­stand­ing. Choe, a sea­soned fish­er­man, claims igno­rance about the boat’s full capa­bil­i­ties but sub­tly admits to push­ing its lim­its. Boutros probes Choe’s back­ground, ques­tion­ing whether he has mil­i­tary expe­ri­ence, but Choe deflects, empha­siz­ing his sim­ple desire for a new engine. Their dia­logue under­scores the uneasy alliance between the two men, each aware of the other’s unstat­ed motives. Boutros also con­sid­ers how Choe per­ceives their mis­sion, rec­og­niz­ing the absur­di­ty of Islam­ic mil­i­tants oper­at­ing a Thai fish­ing boat pro­cured via North Korea.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Boutros tak­ing com­mand of the helm, sym­bol­iz­ing the tran­si­tion to full oper­a­tional con­trol. Despite ini­tial smooth progress, he remains cau­tious, antic­i­pat­ing inevitable set­backs. The deten­tion of a crew mem­ber in Frank­furt serves as a reminder of their vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty. Boutros’ lead­er­ship is marked by prag­ma­tism and fore­sight, as he bal­ances con­fi­dence in the mis­sion with an aware­ness of its pre­car­i­ous nature. The chap­ter leaves the read­er with a sense of impend­ing ten­sion, as the crew ven­tures fur­ther into unchart­ed waters, both lit­er­al­ly and fig­u­ra­tive­ly.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Boutros initially feel about his relationship with the Albatross, and what does this reveal about his character?

      Answer:
      Boutros compares his relationship with the Albatross to any new relationship—awkward at first, with tentative movements and little mistakes, but gradually developing trust over time. This reveals Boutros as a cautious and reflective leader who understands the importance of familiarity and patience when operating in unfamiliar territory. His apprehension about the boat’s capabilities (“Am I overstepping my abilities?”) further shows his self-awareness and sense of responsibility, traits crucial for leading a high-stakes mission.

      2. What strategic concerns does Boutros have regarding the Albatross and the mission, and how do they impact his decision-making?

      Answer:
      Boutros is concerned about the Albatross’s mechanical reliability (noting the lack of a mechanic, manuals, or spare parts) and the limited time to learn its systems before the Koreans depart. These concerns force him to prioritize learning key operations—navigation, engine performance, and safety equipment—from Choe. Additionally, he worries about the team’s inexperience with fishing gear, deciding that maintaining appearances with nets on deck is sufficient. These factors highlight his pragmatic approach to risk management and operational security.

      3. Analyze the significance of the interaction between Boutros and Choe regarding the boat’s speed. What does this exchange suggest about their dynamic?

      Answer:
      When Boutros presses Choe about the Albatross’s maximum speed, Choe reluctantly admits to pushing the engine to 24–25 knots, despite its alarming noises. This exchange reveals a tension between Boutros’s need for transparency and Choe’s guardedness. Boutros’s skepticism (“Boutros didn’t buy it”) underscores his mistrust of the Koreans, while Choe’s hesitation hints at his discomfort with the mission. The dynamic is transactional—Choe is cooperative but evasive, while Boutros probes for weaknesses, reflecting the precarious alliance between the two.

      4. How does the chapter foreshadow the broader challenges Boutros and his team will face in their mission?

      Answer:
      The chapter foreshadows several challenges: the Albatross’s mechanical fragility (“the engine made noises I did not like”), the team’s inexperience (“they are not fishermen”), and the looming threat of exposure (“every delay increasing the chance of exposure”). Boutros’s reflection on his atrophied naval skills and the “uncharted waters” metaphor emphasize the mission’s unprecedented scale. The mention of Adnan’s detention in Frankfurt also hints at operational vulnerabilities, suggesting that their luck may soon run out.

      5. What does Boutros’s observation about the container ship’s bow wake reveal about his psychological state and past experiences?

      Answer:
      Boutros’s failed attempt to recall a naval rule of thumb about bow wakes triggers self-doubt, making him question how much his skills have eroded since his ISIS days. This moment contrasts his past confidence as a ground commander with his current uncertainty in a maritime operation. His nostalgia for battlefield camaraderie (“laughed with his men… sent them to die”) and his meticulousness (writing letters to martyrs’ mothers) reveal a leader grappling with imposter syndrome, yet still relying on discipline to navigate unfamiliar terrain.

    Quotes

    • 1. “A relationship with a boat is like any other. The first meeting is always awkward, little mistakes made and movements tentative. As things progress, irritants are revealed and confidences gained. Only with time does trust develop.”

      This opening metaphor sets the tone for Boutros’ cautious yet determined approach to commanding the Albatross, mirroring both the physical journey and the high-stakes mission ahead. It establishes the chapter’s theme of uneasy adaptation.

      2. “Boutros was, to use the mariner’s term, running in uncharted waters. He was here today, at the gates of the Pacific, because his naval experience was unique within the caliphate.”

      This pivotal reflection reveals Boutros’ self-awareness about the unprecedented nature of their mission and his personal role in it. The maritime metaphor underscores both the literal and figurative unfamiliarity of their terrorist operation.

      3. “The timing of their mission had always been more dependent on opportunity than the weather or seasons. They’d had to wait for the final component of their weapon. Soon it would be delivered, and from that point the race would be on, every delay increasing the chance of exposure.”

      This quote captures the critical tension between preparation and urgency that drives the narrative forward. It hints at the impending delivery of a weapon component while emphasizing the operational stakes of their maritime journey.

      4. “Choe looked at him with surprise. For the first time in two days he smiled. ‘I am but a simple fisherman. Right now, my boat has no engine so I cannot use it.’ […] ‘One new engine—that is all I ask for.’”

      This exchange reveals the complex human dynamics between the terrorists and their reluctant Korean facilitator. Choe’s pragmatic motivation (a new engine) contrasts with Boutros’ ideological mission, highlighting the transactional nature of their collaboration.

    Quotes

    1. “A relationship with a boat is like any other. The first meeting is always awkward, little mistakes made and movements tentative. As things progress, irritants are revealed and confidences gained. Only with time does trust develop.”

    This opening metaphor sets the tone for Boutros’ cautious yet determined approach to commanding the Albatross, mirroring both the physical journey and the high-stakes mission ahead. It establishes the chapter’s theme of uneasy adaptation.

    2. “Boutros was, to use the mariner’s term, running in uncharted waters. He was here today, at the gates of the Pacific, because his naval experience was unique within the caliphate.”

    This pivotal reflection reveals Boutros’ self-awareness about the unprecedented nature of their mission and his personal role in it. The maritime metaphor underscores both the literal and figurative unfamiliarity of their terrorist operation.

    3. “The timing of their mission had always been more dependent on opportunity than the weather or seasons. They’d had to wait for the final component of their weapon. Soon it would be delivered, and from that point the race would be on, every delay increasing the chance of exposure.”

    This quote captures the critical tension between preparation and urgency that drives the narrative forward. It hints at the impending delivery of a weapon component while emphasizing the operational stakes of their maritime journey.

    4. “Choe looked at him with surprise. For the first time in two days he smiled. ‘I am but a simple fisherman. Right now, my boat has no engine so I cannot use it.’ […] ‘One new engine—that is all I ask for.’”

    This exchange reveals the complex human dynamics between the terrorists and their reluctant Korean facilitator. Choe’s pragmatic motivation (a new engine) contrasts with Boutros’ ideological mission, highlighting the transactional nature of their collaboration.

    FAQs

    1. How does Boutros initially feel about his relationship with the Albatross, and what does this reveal about his character?

    Answer:
    Boutros compares his relationship with the Albatross to any new relationship—awkward at first, with tentative movements and little mistakes, but gradually developing trust over time. This reveals Boutros as a cautious and reflective leader who understands the importance of familiarity and patience when operating in unfamiliar territory. His apprehension about the boat’s capabilities (“Am I overstepping my abilities?”) further shows his self-awareness and sense of responsibility, traits crucial for leading a high-stakes mission.

    2. What strategic concerns does Boutros have regarding the Albatross and the mission, and how do they impact his decision-making?

    Answer:
    Boutros is concerned about the Albatross’s mechanical reliability (noting the lack of a mechanic, manuals, or spare parts) and the limited time to learn its systems before the Koreans depart. These concerns force him to prioritize learning key operations—navigation, engine performance, and safety equipment—from Choe. Additionally, he worries about the team’s inexperience with fishing gear, deciding that maintaining appearances with nets on deck is sufficient. These factors highlight his pragmatic approach to risk management and operational security.

    3. Analyze the significance of the interaction between Boutros and Choe regarding the boat’s speed. What does this exchange suggest about their dynamic?

    Answer:
    When Boutros presses Choe about the Albatross’s maximum speed, Choe reluctantly admits to pushing the engine to 24–25 knots, despite its alarming noises. This exchange reveals a tension between Boutros’s need for transparency and Choe’s guardedness. Boutros’s skepticism (“Boutros didn’t buy it”) underscores his mistrust of the Koreans, while Choe’s hesitation hints at his discomfort with the mission. The dynamic is transactional—Choe is cooperative but evasive, while Boutros probes for weaknesses, reflecting the precarious alliance between the two.

    4. How does the chapter foreshadow the broader challenges Boutros and his team will face in their mission?

    Answer:
    The chapter foreshadows several challenges: the Albatross’s mechanical fragility (“the engine made noises I did not like”), the team’s inexperience (“they are not fishermen”), and the looming threat of exposure (“every delay increasing the chance of exposure”). Boutros’s reflection on his atrophied naval skills and the “uncharted waters” metaphor emphasize the mission’s unprecedented scale. The mention of Adnan’s detention in Frankfurt also hints at operational vulnerabilities, suggesting that their luck may soon run out.

    5. What does Boutros’s observation about the container ship’s bow wake reveal about his psychological state and past experiences?

    Answer:
    Boutros’s failed attempt to recall a naval rule of thumb about bow wakes triggers self-doubt, making him question how much his skills have eroded since his ISIS days. This moment contrasts his past confidence as a ground commander with his current uncertainty in a maritime operation. His nostalgia for battlefield camaraderie (“laughed with his men… sent them to die”) and his meticulousness (writing letters to martyrs’ mothers) reveal a leader grappling with imposter syndrome, yet still relying on discipline to navigate unfamiliar terrain.

    Note