Header Image
    Cover of The Three Taverns
    Poetry

    The Three Taverns

    by

    Rahel to Varn­hagen begins not with dec­la­ra­tions but with ten­sion. Rahel wres­tles with the uncer­tain­ty that fol­lows vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, unsure if her unveiled self will draw Varn­hagen in or qui­et­ly push him away. She has hand­ed over not just let­ters but pieces of her past, marked with pas­sion, joy, and anguish—memories that once felt pri­vate, now bared in stark light. His silence in response unset­tles her. Was he unmoved, or sim­ply choos­ing not to react? The lack of imme­di­ate judg­ment leaves her adrift, unsure if under­stand­ing has tru­ly been reached. Love, in her eyes, can­not exist with­out reflection—without see­ing and being seen with clar­i­ty.

    The qui­et that fol­lows her emo­tion­al risk does not equate to indif­fer­ence, but it does com­pel her to re-exam­ine the very foun­da­tion of what they share. She expect­ed either rejec­tion or rec­i­p­ro­ca­tion, but instead she meets patience—a kind that con­founds rather than com­forts. There is no dra­mat­ic scene, no furi­ous dis­pute. Varn­hagen, in his still­ness, intro­duces a third path: accep­tance with­out pos­ses­sion. This is alien to Rahel, who has lived love in extremes. Her for­mer rela­tion­ships car­ried inten­si­ty, often tee­ter­ing between wor­ship and dev­as­ta­tion. Now she ques­tions whether such heat was ever tru­ly love, or mere­ly its illu­sion. With Varn­hagen, there is no need for per­for­mance, only pres­ence.

    Her thoughts begin to turn inward. What she once offered as a challenge—“Can you still love me after know­ing all this?”—becomes a mir­ror. His response, or lack of one, forces her to reflect not just on him but on her­self. Was the goal to pro­voke or to be under­stood? She pon­ders how much of her iden­ti­ty has been shaped by past loves, and how much still belongs to her alone. There’s free­dom in his restraint, but also a dis­com­fort. It places the bur­den of inter­pre­ta­tion on her, remov­ing the famil­iar rhythm of emo­tion­al reac­tion and coun­ter­re­ac­tion. Varn­hagen is not indif­fer­ent; he is sim­ply not reactive—and this dif­fer­ence changes every­thing.

    As she revis­its the idea of what love tru­ly demands, Rahel finds her­self caught between grat­i­tude and unease. Varnhagen’s accep­tance offers no con­di­tions, no demands, yet it sub­tly chal­lenges her need for affir­ma­tion. He doesn’t ask her to change or jus­ti­fy her past, but nei­ther does he ele­vate it. He sees her—not as a col­lec­tion of for­mer selves but as some­one present. In that still recog­ni­tion, she sens­es a type of respect that runs deep­er than admi­ra­tion. It is, per­haps, the only kind of love that could sur­vive what she has revealed. And yet, the silence still gnaws, ask­ing more ques­tions than it answers.

    She speaks, too, of fear—not just the fear of rejec­tion but the fear of being tru­ly known. In shar­ing her­self, she has dared Varn­hagen to judge. And now, his qui­et response leaves her stand­ing in that fear alone. There is no abso­lu­tion, only endurance. She won­ders if love should real­ly feel like this—like stand­ing on the edge of some­thing both infi­nite and unknow­able. It is not a fall, but a wait­ing. And this wait­ing makes her ques­tion if all she has offered will be hon­ored, or mere­ly tol­er­at­ed.

    Yet amid all her doubts, a truth emerges. Her deep­est yearn­ing is not for con­trol or pas­sion, but for love that remains after the fire fades. The kind that sits beside you when the crowd is gone. She sees, maybe for the first time, that endurance may be more valu­able than ecsta­sy. The abil­i­ty to accept anoth­er, not as fan­ta­sy, but as they are, is rare. Varnhagen’s silence, then, is not a lack but a gift. A space where her pain is not dis­missed, nor mag­ni­fied, but allowed to exist.

    Robin­son allows Rahel’s voice to stretch across con­tra­dic­tions, nev­er set­tling into a sin­gle emo­tion. There is frus­tra­tion, yes, but also hope. There is sad­ness, but it does not drown her. Through this com­plex­i­ty, a deep­er pic­ture of love is drawn—one that hon­ors pain, wel­comes growth, and for­gives the unfin­ished self. Rahel is no longer try­ing to win Varnhagen’s love. She is instead learn­ing to receive it, as it is, on its own terms. That jour­ney, though qui­et and inter­nal, feels vast.

    In the end, Rahel’s mono­logue trans­forms into some­thing more reflec­tive than con­fronta­tion­al. She no longer seeks a reac­tion. What she tru­ly wants is understanding—not just from Varn­hagen but from her­self. That desire, once masked in chal­lenge, is final­ly exposed. And per­haps that is what love tru­ly requires—not proof, but patience. Not grand ges­tures, but qui­et acknowl­edg­ment of the whole per­son, past includ­ed. Rahel’s final thought is not a plea but a real­iza­tion: love that stays, not because it must, but because it choos­es to, is the rarest kind of all.

    Quotes

    FAQs

    Note