My Seventh Stage
byMy Seventh Stage begins as two journeys are set into motion—one by rail, the other by post. As autumn sunlight bathes the English countryside in warmth, Sigismund Zaluski departs from the peaceful town of Muddleton, answering an unexpected summons from his uncle in Russia. Though the visit is intended to be brief—just a fortnight—he leaves behind his belongings and a tender promise to Gertrude, his fiancée, to return soon. Simultaneously, a letter penned in idle malice—full of falsehoods—makes its own journey toward St. Petersburg, neither slowed by guilt nor guided by conscience. The convergence of these two paths—Zaluski’s hopeful visit and the letter’s poisonous errand—sets the stage for an unforeseen disaster.
The letter, upon arrival, is promptly absorbed into the mountain of correspondence at Dmitry Leonoff’s home. A government official burdened by endless documents, Dmitry gives it barely a glance, setting it aside with dozens of similar envelopes. But when a wave of police raids sweeps through the city—standard procedure in an age where suspicion equaled guilt—the letter is rediscovered by a zealous inspector. Suddenly, its contents are no longer dismissed. Instead, they become the foundation for a reckless investigation. The accusations, though baseless, align conveniently with the regime’s thirst for rooting out dissent, and Leonoff’s once mundane office is soon overrun by officers searching for evidence that doesn’t exist.
During the raid, even the most personal corners of the home are overturned, driven by an obsessive need to uncover hidden revolutionary documents. Papers are examined without context, family heirlooms mistaken for coded messages, and diaries read as confessions. Though Leonoff protests his innocence, the officials remain unmoved. To them, guilt is not determined by proof but by presence in the wrong place at the wrong time. He is detained overnight for further questioning, part of a system designed to punish fear rather than crime. Meanwhile, his family watches in silent despair, knowing that in such times, justice is a luxury few can afford.
Zaluski, staying elsewhere in the city, remains unaware until the storm of suspicion reaches him. That night, he dreams of the tranquil garden at Muddleton, of walking arm-in-arm with Gertrude under the soft glow of lanterns. The dream is shattered by the hammering of fists at his door and the shrill commands of uniformed men. Dragged from bed and questioned harshly, he is accused of connections to a conspiracy he’s never heard of. Incredulous, he tries to reason with them, his words lost in the echo of official accusations. His English manner and composed demeanor confuse his interrogators, but they only serve to deepen their suspicions.
The next day brings partial clarity, but not full freedom. The accusation, it turns out, is linked to a misinterpreted letter now believed to be evidence of subversive activity. Despite proving his identity and intentions, Zaluski remains marked—a man associated with doubt. Though eventually released, his faith in his homeland’s justice has been irreparably shaken. The experience reveals just how fragile safety is when truth is buried beneath bureaucracy and fear. For him, the comfort of England now seems like a distant dream, and the realization that his name might be permanently stained weighs heavily.
Back in Muddleton, the contrast could not be starker. Gentle winds rustle golden leaves, and life moves at a steady, uneventful pace. Gertrude, unaware of the chaos abroad, prepares for Zaluski’s return. She imagines his train pulling into the station, his smile unchanged, their plans resumed without disruption. But the slander has done more than delay a reunion—it has carved a wound invisible from the outside. While the gossip that sparked it was spoken lightly, its ripples have caused real harm, reaching across borders and into lives never intended to be touched.
This chapter captures how slander, once set loose, becomes almost impossible to recall. It gathers momentum, consumes context, and creates chaos far beyond its origin. In Zaluski’s case, it collided with a system already inclined to see enemies in shadows, transforming careless speech into a weapon. The events in Russia serve not just as a critique of governmental paranoia but also as a reflection on the responsibility we carry with our words. The damage caused by unexamined rumors may be indirect, but it is no less real. As Zaluski’s ordeal reveals, truth may eventually emerge, but the scars left behind never fully disappear.