Header Image
    Cover of The Autobiography of A Slander
    Fiction

    The Autobiography of A Slander

    by

    My Sec­ond Stage begins with a seem­ing­ly minor whis­per, still vague and bare­ly notice­able, gain­ing momen­tum as it finds a place in human thought. What start­ed as idle spec­u­la­tion takes shape like a seed exposed to light, fed by casu­al curios­i­ty and moments of doubt. As it evolves, the slan­der acquires a voice, no longer just an idea but a pres­ence with intent, seek­ing out hosts who might unknow­ing­ly har­bor its poi­son and help it spread fur­ther.

    Lena Houghton becomes its next tar­get, and although she enters the parish church with a heart focused on wor­ship, the slan­der lingers near­by, wait­ing for an open­ing. At first, Lena remains unmoved, shield­ed by the sanc­ti­ty of the set­ting and her own devo­tion. But dur­ing a lull in the service—while the rec­tor deliv­ers a par­tic­u­lar­ly unre­mark­able reading—the slan­der finds its chance. It slips into her mind not as a shout, but a sug­ges­tion, rephras­ing piety into sus­pi­cion, reshap­ing qui­et thought into judg­ment.

    Lena’s reflec­tion turns from scrip­ture to spec­u­la­tion, as her mind wan­ders toward Gertrude More­ly and Sigis­mund Zalus­ki. Their close­ness, once bare­ly noticed, now seems ripe for scruti­ny under the slander’s influ­ence. What had been inno­cent con­ver­sa­tions and shared glances now take on a dif­fer­ent cast, col­ored by impli­ca­tion. By the time the ser­vice con­cludes, Lena no longer views Zalus­ki as just a guest in their parish, but as a fig­ure wrapped in uncer­tain­ty, if not out­right men­ace.

    Out­side the church, Lena encoun­ters Mr. Black­thorne, the young curate whose eager­ness to do good often blinds him to the nuances of human com­plex­i­ty. She does not plan to share her thoughts, but the slan­der has tak­en hold of her, guid­ing her speech under the veil of con­cern. What she relays is not a lie out­right, but a reshap­ing of impres­sions, lay­ered with con­jec­ture and laced with unease. She implies dan­ger where none has been proven, rely­ing on phras­es like “one hears things” and “peo­ple have noticed.”

    Black­thorne lis­tens, torn between duty and doubt. His instincts urge cau­tion, but his inse­cu­ri­ties lead him to give Lena’s words more weight than they deserve. Though he stops short of pass­ing judg­ment, the idea has already root­ed itself in his con­scious­ness. In try­ing to remain impar­tial, he inad­ver­tent­ly pre­serves the slan­der, allow­ing it to smol­der qui­et­ly, wait­ing for its next breath of air. Even silence can be com­plic­it when sus­pi­cion is left unchal­lenged.

    The strength of the slan­der lies not in its vol­ume, but in its sub­tle­ty. It thrives in half-truths and vague rec­ol­lec­tions, gain­ing pow­er through whis­pers passed with hes­i­tant glances and fur­rowed brows. By wrap­ping itself in social cau­tion and con­cern for oth­ers, it avoids scruti­ny while caus­ing dam­age with every qui­et rep­e­ti­tion. Lena believes she is being pro­tec­tive; Black­thorne con­vinces him­self he is being pru­dent. Both fail to rec­og­nize the role they play in giv­ing the slan­der life.

    As the evening draws on, the weight of their con­ver­sa­tion lingers. The slan­der has suc­ceed­ed in pass­ing from one mind to anoth­er, refined and rearmed with each retelling. The dan­ger now is not in the words them­selves, but in the shift of per­spec­tive they’ve caused. Zalus­ki remains unaware, but his rep­u­ta­tion has begun to change shape in the minds of oth­ers, mold­ed by shad­ows and shaped by doubts that no one dares to speak aloud too clear­ly.

    This stage of the nar­ra­tive reveals how easy it is for dis­trust to mas­quer­ade as vig­i­lance. With­in a com­mu­ni­ty where appear­ances hold great val­ue and dis­cre­tion is mis­tak­en for wis­dom, a sin­gle thread of spec­u­la­tion can unrav­el friend­ships, rep­u­ta­tions, and peace of mind. The slan­der feeds on this cul­tur­al reluc­tance to ask hard ques­tions or con­front gos­sip, ensur­ing its sur­vival. In doing so, it lays the foun­da­tion for future harm, need­ing no proof—only belief.

    Quotes

    FAQs

    Note