Cover of The Obelisk Gate
    DystopianFantasyFictionScience Fiction

    The Obelisk Gate

    by Jemisin, N.K.
    “The Obelisk Gate” by N.K. Jemisin is the second installment in the acclaimed Broken Earth trilogy, a groundbreaking fantasy series exploring power, survival, and systemic oppression. Set in a world plagued by catastrophic climate events called Fifth Seasons, the story follows Essun, a woman with earth-manipulating abilities, as she searches for her missing daughter amidst societal collapse. The narrative delves into themes of identity, resilience, and the cyclical nature of oppression, while expanding on the mysterious obelisks and their connection to the planet’s turmoil. Jemisin’s innovative world-building and layered characters make this a standout work in contemporary fantasy, continuing the trilogy’s exploration of trauma and revolution.

    The chap­ter opens with a reflec­tive med­i­ta­tion on iden­ti­ty, empha­siz­ing how indi­vid­u­als are shaped by their rela­tion­ships and expe­ri­ences. The nar­ra­tor address­es Essun direct­ly, remind­ing her that she already knows her fate and the sur­vival of her liv­ing child, Nas­sun. At eight years old, Nas­sun returns home to find her younger broth­er dead and her father stand­ing over the body, a trau­mat­ic event that remains shroud­ed in mys­tery. The nar­ra­tive then shifts to explore Nassun’s appren­tice­ship as a lorist, a role deeply tied to the preser­va­tion of his­to­ry and sur­vival lore in the Still­ness, despite its dimin­ished sig­nif­i­cance over time.

    Lorists are described as enig­mat­ic fig­ures with a com­plex his­to­ry, orig­i­nat­ing from the Reg­wo peo­ple but now large­ly dis­con­nect­ed from their roots. They car­ry poly­mer tablets, wear shab­by clothes, and are rec­og­nized by their black-tint­ed lips, a fad­ing trib­ute to their ances­tors. Though their knowl­edge is often dis­missed as unre­li­able, lorists serve as teach­ers, enter­tain­ers, and sym­bols of resilience dur­ing harsh times. Their sur­vival through Sea­sons and soci­etal changes high­lights their endur­ing, if dimin­ished, role in the Still­ness. The chap­ter under­scores the irony of their per­sis­tence despite insti­tu­tion­al rejec­tion and cul­tur­al ero­sion.

    The focus then nar­rows to Ren­three Lorist Stone, a wan­der­ing lorist who arrives in Tir­i­mo. Once a glass-smith, Ren­three was drawn into the lorist life by love and cir­cum­stance, embody­ing the profession’s cycli­cal nature. Her back­sto­ry reveals the per­son­al sac­ri­fices and fleet­ing con­nec­tions that define lorists’ lives. When Nas­sun seeks her out, skip­ping creche to offer a dia­mond-embed­ded rock as trib­ute, the encounter becomes a piv­otal moment. Nassun’s excite­ment and naivety con­trast with Renthree’s sea­soned per­spec­tive, hint­ing at the unspo­ken sig­nif­i­cance of the gift.

    Nassun’s act of offer­ing the diamond—a dis­cov­ery made pos­si­ble by her hid­den orogeny—carries unin­tend­ed weight. Unaware of its true val­ue, she presents it as a token of her admi­ra­tion, defy­ing her mother’s warn­ings to con­ceal her abil­i­ties. The chap­ter clos­es with Renthree’s stunned reac­tion, fore­shad­ow­ing the con­se­quences of Nassun’s actions and the loom­ing con­flict between her poten­tial and the con­straints imposed by her world. The scene encap­su­lates themes of inno­cence, hid­den pow­er, and the ten­sion between indi­vid­ual ambi­tion and soci­etal expec­ta­tions.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of lorists in the Stillness, and how has their role evolved over time?

      Answer:
      Lorists in the Stillness are self-appointed keepers of stonelore, serving as historians, teachers, and cultural preservers. Originally from the Regwo people, they once chiseled vital survival knowledge into mountainsides. Over time, their role has been distorted by institutional disavowal (e.g., universities rejecting their work) and governmental propaganda, reducing their practical utility. Despite this, they persist, now identified by black-tinted lips (a homage to the Regwo) and carrying polymer tablets. Their modern functions include entertainment, childcare during Seasons, and symbolic reassurance of survival. The chapter highlights their decline from revered knowledge-bearers to marginalized figures, illustrating the Stillness’s cyclical destruction of history and memory.

      2. How does Nassun’s act of offering the diamond to Renthree Lorist Stone reflect her character and circumstances?

      Answer:
      Nassun’s impulsive gift of a diamond—unknowingly valuable—reveals her naivety, desperation, and latent power. At eight years old, she skips creche to pursue a dream of becoming a lorist, defying her mother’s strictures. The diamond, found through orogeny (a forbidden ability), symbolizes both her potential and her vulnerability: she doesn’t grasp its worth, just as she doesn’t fully understand the dangers of her powers. Her excitement contrasts with Renthree’s shock, underscoring Nassun’s isolation and yearning for guidance. This moment foreshadows her fraught relationship with authority and her struggle to navigate a world that fears her abilities.

      3. Analyze the narrative structure of the chapter, particularly the interjection “HMM. NO. I’M TELLING THIS WRONG.” How does this affect the storytelling?

      Answer:
      The abrupt meta-commentary disrupts the linear narrative, creating a layered, reflective tone. The narrator acknowledges that identity is shaped by relationships (“I am me, and you”), framing Nassun’s story as inseparable from Essun’s and others’. This technique invites readers to question memory and perspective, emphasizing how trauma (e.g., Nassun’s brother’s death) is often fragmented or unknowable. The interjection also builds intimacy, as if the narrator is revising the tale in real time to honor its complexity. This stylistic choice mirrors the lorists’ fragmented lore—history as an imperfect, evolving construct.

      4. Why might the author have chosen to include Renthree’s backstory in this chapter, and how does it connect to broader themes?

      Answer:
      Renthree’s history—seduced into loristry by a wandering mentor, then abandoned—parallels Nassun’s search for belonging and the cyclical nature of mentorship in the Stillness. Her journey from Breeder to lorist reflects themes of reinvention and survival, echoing how communities adapt during Seasons. The detail about her commissioning tablets with “mother-of-pearl” ties to the lorists’ role as preservers of beauty amid decay. Her story also critiques the profession’s romanticized veneer; like stonelore itself, it’s a patchwork of half-remembered truths. This underscores the novel’s exploration of how traditions persist even as their meanings erode.

      5. How does the chapter’s depiction of orogeny (through Nassun’s diamond discovery) complicate its portrayal of power and oppression?

      Answer:
      Nassun’s accidental discovery of the diamond—via orogeny—highlights the duality of her power: it’s both a resource (valuable gems) and a threat (forbidden ability). The diamond’s hidden worth mirrors how orogenes’ potential is suppressed by society. Her mother’s strict training (“not to display her orogeny”) reflects systemic oppression, yet Nassun’s innocent use of it for a personal goal reveals how power can’t be fully contained. This moment critiques the Stillness’s fear of orogeny: the very force it vilifies could sustain it (e.g., through mining), but prejudice prevents harnessing this potential, perpetuating cycles of scarcity and control.

    Quotes

    • 1. “After all, a person is herself, and others. Relationships chisel the final shape of one’s being.”

      This opening philosophical statement sets the thematic foundation for the chapter, exploring how identity is shaped by relationships and external forces. It introduces the interconnected nature of characters in the narrative.

      2. “Nassun, who is just eight years old when the world ends.”

      This stark sentence marks a pivotal moment, establishing both Nassun’s youth and the catastrophic scale of events surrounding her. It creates dramatic tension by juxtaposing childhood innocence with apocalyptic circumstances.

      3. “They’re still around, though they’ve forgotten how much they’ve forgotten.”

      This insightful observation about the lorists encapsulates the novel’s recurring theme of lost knowledge and cultural erosion. It highlights the paradox of preservation institutions that have themselves become fragmented over time.

      4. “Nassun knows it has some value, but she has no inkling that the pretty rock she’s just given to Renthree is worth a house or two. She’s only eight.”

      This moment reveals Nassun’s naive yet powerful act of offering, demonstrating both her extraordinary abilities and childhood innocence. It foreshadows her untapped potential while emphasizing her vulnerability.

    Quotes

    1. “After all, a person is herself, and others. Relationships chisel the final shape of one’s being.”

    This opening philosophical statement sets the thematic foundation for the chapter, exploring how identity is shaped by relationships and external forces. It introduces the interconnected nature of characters in the narrative.

    2. “Nassun, who is just eight years old when the world ends.”

    This stark sentence marks a pivotal moment, establishing both Nassun’s youth and the catastrophic scale of events surrounding her. It creates dramatic tension by juxtaposing childhood innocence with apocalyptic circumstances.

    3. “They’re still around, though they’ve forgotten how much they’ve forgotten.”

    This insightful observation about the lorists encapsulates the novel’s recurring theme of lost knowledge and cultural erosion. It highlights the paradox of preservation institutions that have themselves become fragmented over time.

    4. “Nassun knows it has some value, but she has no inkling that the pretty rock she’s just given to Renthree is worth a house or two. She’s only eight.”

    This moment reveals Nassun’s naive yet powerful act of offering, demonstrating both her extraordinary abilities and childhood innocence. It foreshadows her untapped potential while emphasizing her vulnerability.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of lorists in the Stillness, and how has their role evolved over time?

    Answer:
    Lorists in the Stillness are self-appointed keepers of stonelore, serving as historians, teachers, and cultural preservers. Originally from the Regwo people, they once chiseled vital survival knowledge into mountainsides. Over time, their role has been distorted by institutional disavowal (e.g., universities rejecting their work) and governmental propaganda, reducing their practical utility. Despite this, they persist, now identified by black-tinted lips (a homage to the Regwo) and carrying polymer tablets. Their modern functions include entertainment, childcare during Seasons, and symbolic reassurance of survival. The chapter highlights their decline from revered knowledge-bearers to marginalized figures, illustrating the Stillness’s cyclical destruction of history and memory.

    2. How does Nassun’s act of offering the diamond to Renthree Lorist Stone reflect her character and circumstances?

    Answer:
    Nassun’s impulsive gift of a diamond—unknowingly valuable—reveals her naivety, desperation, and latent power. At eight years old, she skips creche to pursue a dream of becoming a lorist, defying her mother’s strictures. The diamond, found through orogeny (a forbidden ability), symbolizes both her potential and her vulnerability: she doesn’t grasp its worth, just as she doesn’t fully understand the dangers of her powers. Her excitement contrasts with Renthree’s shock, underscoring Nassun’s isolation and yearning for guidance. This moment foreshadows her fraught relationship with authority and her struggle to navigate a world that fears her abilities.

    3. Analyze the narrative structure of the chapter, particularly the interjection “HMM. NO. I’M TELLING THIS WRONG.” How does this affect the storytelling?

    Answer:
    The abrupt meta-commentary disrupts the linear narrative, creating a layered, reflective tone. The narrator acknowledges that identity is shaped by relationships (“I am me, and you”), framing Nassun’s story as inseparable from Essun’s and others’. This technique invites readers to question memory and perspective, emphasizing how trauma (e.g., Nassun’s brother’s death) is often fragmented or unknowable. The interjection also builds intimacy, as if the narrator is revising the tale in real time to honor its complexity. This stylistic choice mirrors the lorists’ fragmented lore—history as an imperfect, evolving construct.

    4. Why might the author have chosen to include Renthree’s backstory in this chapter, and how does it connect to broader themes?

    Answer:
    Renthree’s history—seduced into loristry by a wandering mentor, then abandoned—parallels Nassun’s search for belonging and the cyclical nature of mentorship in the Stillness. Her journey from Breeder to lorist reflects themes of reinvention and survival, echoing how communities adapt during Seasons. The detail about her commissioning tablets with “mother-of-pearl” ties to the lorists’ role as preservers of beauty amid decay. Her story also critiques the profession’s romanticized veneer; like stonelore itself, it’s a patchwork of half-remembered truths. This underscores the novel’s exploration of how traditions persist even as their meanings erode.

    5. How does the chapter’s depiction of orogeny (through Nassun’s diamond discovery) complicate its portrayal of power and oppression?

    Answer:
    Nassun’s accidental discovery of the diamond—via orogeny—highlights the duality of her power: it’s both a resource (valuable gems) and a threat (forbidden ability). The diamond’s hidden worth mirrors how orogenes’ potential is suppressed by society. Her mother’s strict training (“not to display her orogeny”) reflects systemic oppression, yet Nassun’s innocent use of it for a personal goal reveals how power can’t be fully contained. This moment critiques the Stillness’s fear of orogeny: the very force it vilifies could sustain it (e.g., through mining), but prejudice prevents harnessing this potential, perpetuating cycles of scarcity and control.

    Note