Cover of Long Island
    Historical FictionLiterary Fiction

    Long Island

    by Tóibín, Colm
    Long Island by Colm Tóibín is a sequel to his 2009 novel Brooklyn, continuing the story of Eilis Lacey two decades later. Now settled in Long Island with her husband Tony and their children, Eilis faces personal upheaval when she discovers Tony has fathered a child with another woman. She returns to her hometown in Ireland, confronting past relationships and seeking solace. The novel explores themes of identity, belonging, and the complexities of love and family across two countries.

    In this chap­ter, Rosel­la dis­creet­ly informs Eilis about their grandmother’s unex­pect­ed plan to join them in Amer­i­ca. What began as a casu­al remark about lone­li­ness turned into a con­crete deci­sion, as their grand­moth­er already secured her pass­port, visa, and a tick­et for the same flight. How­ev­er, the uncer­tain­ty sur­round­ing the length of her stay and who would care for her dur­ing the day cre­ates ten­sion. Mrs Lacey, Eilis’s moth­er, also reveals she has arranged to change Eilis’s return tick­et to align with the family’s plans, hop­ing for a more uni­fied vis­it despite Eilis’s reser­va­tions.

    Eilis express­es con­cern about the prac­ti­cal­i­ty of her grandmother’s vis­it, empha­siz­ing the chal­lenges of liv­ing in a small town with lim­it­ed social oppor­tu­ni­ties and the absence of fam­i­ly mem­bers dur­ing the day. Mrs Lacey’s dis­cov­ery of a let­ter addressed to Rosel­la, which she admits to read­ing, adds com­plex­i­ty to the fam­i­ly dynam­ics, high­light­ing issues of pri­va­cy and trust. Despite the awk­ward­ness, Mrs Lacey sug­gests that her pres­ence might pro­vide sup­port when Eilis returns to Amer­i­ca, acknowl­edg­ing the dif­fi­cul­ties Eilis will face.

    The chap­ter also touch­es on local news when Nan­cy Sheri­dan arrives unex­pect­ed­ly, sport­ing an engage­ment ring. The engage­ment to Jim Far­rell, the pub own­er, sur­pris­es Eilis, who is skep­ti­cal and seeks con­fir­ma­tion. This sub­plot intro­duces a lay­er of social intrigue and reflects the small-town atmos­phere where per­son­al rela­tion­ships and gos­sip car­ry sig­nif­i­cant weight. Eilis’s inter­nal con­flict and her desire to clear up the mis­un­der­stand­ing about Jim’s engage­ment reveal her emo­tion­al invest­ment in her rela­tion­ships back home.

    Final­ly, Eilis con­tem­plates Jim Farrell’s abil­i­ty to uproot his life eas­i­ly, giv­en his detached fam­i­ly ties and soli­tary posi­tion as a bar own­er. This reflec­tion under­scores the theme of tran­si­tion and uncer­tain­ty that runs through the chap­ter, as Eilis faces deci­sions about her own future in Amer­i­ca while grap­pling with the real­i­ties of those she leaves behind. The chap­ter clos­es with Eilis wait­ing anx­ious­ly to make a phone call, sym­bol­iz­ing her need for reas­sur­ance and con­nec­tion amid the changes sur­round­ing her.

    FAQs

    • 1. What unexpected development concerning Mrs Lacey’s travel plans is revealed in the chapter, and how does it affect Eilis?

      Answer:
      The chapter reveals that Mrs Lacey has secretly planned to accompany Eilis and Rosella to America, having already obtained her passport, visa, and a ticket on the same flight. This surprises Eilis because Mrs Lacey had only mentioned the idea in passing, but it turns out to be a deliberate plan. This development complicates Eilis’s situation, as Mrs Lacey’s presence means Eilis will not have the independence she might have anticipated. Moreover, Eilis feels uncertain about how her mother will manage alone in the new environment, especially since Rosella will be at university and Larry will be busy with school and friends. This unexpected visit also triggers a discussion about possibly changing Eilis’s return ticket to accommodate the new circumstances.

      2. How does the chapter explore the theme of communication and privacy within family relationships?

      Answer:
      The chapter highlights communication challenges and privacy boundaries through the incident involving the missing envelope and the intercepted letter. Mrs Lacey admits to taking the envelope from Eilis’s suitcase and reading the letter addressed to Rosella without permission. This breach of privacy causes tension, illustrating the delicate balance between family members’ desire to protect each other and the need for personal boundaries. Both Mrs Lacey and Eilis accuse each other of invading privacy, reflecting underlying mistrust and the complexities of familial relationships. The episode underscores how communication within families is fraught with misunderstandings and differing expectations about openness and secrecy.

      3. Analyze the significance of the news about Nancy Sheridan’s engagement and how it impacts Eilis’s thoughts and actions.

      Answer:
      Nancy Sheridan’s engagement to Jim Farrell, the owner of the pub, is significant because it introduces an element of social change and personal uncertainty into Eilis’s world. Eilis is initially skeptical and seeks to verify the news by calling Jim, revealing her need for reassurance about relationships and stability in her community. The engagement symbolizes shifting ties and the potential for change in the town’s social fabric. For Eilis, it also raises questions about Jim’s intentions and his readiness to uproot his life and move to America with her. This news prompts Eilis to reflect on Jim’s detachment from close relationships and his ability to leave at any time, adding complexity to her feelings about their future.

      4. What does the chapter suggest about the challenges of adjusting to life changes and new environments through the characters’ dialogue and concerns?

      Answer:
      The chapter conveys the challenges of adjusting to new environments and life changes through the concerns expressed by Eilis and Mrs Lacey. Eilis worries about her mother’s ability to cope alone in a small town without nearby shops or social opportunities, especially since Rosella and Larry will be occupied. Mrs Lacey’s desire to accompany Eilis to America, despite the difficulties it might cause, reflects a yearning for connection and support in unfamiliar surroundings. The dialogue reveals anxieties about loneliness, independence, and the practicalities of daily life, highlighting how transitions can be unsettling for all involved. The characters’ conversations underscore the emotional and logistical complexities of migration and settling into new phases of life.

      5. Considering Eilis’s reflections on Jim Farrell’s lifestyle and choices, what insights does the chapter provide about his character and his relationship with Eilis?

      Answer:
      Eilis’s reflections on Jim Farrell reveal a man who is somewhat isolated, with few close ties beyond his job and one employee, Shane. His parents are deceased, and his siblings have left town, which may contribute to his ability to consider uprooting easily. Despite his friendly demeanor, which Eilis understands is part of his role as a bar owner, he maintains a certain distance emotionally. The chapter suggests that Jim’s willingness to leave at short notice contrasts with the weight Eilis feels about making decisions that affect both their futures. This dynamic creates tension in their relationship, as Jim’s apparent readiness to move contrasts with Eilis’s need for stability and reassurance, revealing complexities in their connection and differing perspectives on commitment.

    Quotes

    • 1. “She already has her passport, her visa. All she needed was to buy a ticket. She made me show her my ticket and she made me come with her to Aidan O’Leary’s travel agency to get her a seat on the same flight as me and Larry.”

      This quote reveals a key turning point where Mrs Lacey’s plans to join Eilis and her siblings in America are unveiled, highlighting her determination and the surprise element in the family dynamics regarding travel and presence abroad.

      2. “‘I’m not sure this is the best time for a visit.’ … ‘Rosella won’t be there, she is going to university. Larry will be at school all day and then he’ll either be out with his friends or doing his homework. I have a job and, because I’ve been away, I’ll be working full-time when I get back.’”

      Here, Eilis expresses the practical difficulties and emotional reservations about her mother visiting at this moment, underscoring the challenges of balancing family expectations with personal responsibilities and the changing rhythms of their lives.

      3. “‘I was searching for your ticket and I saw that it was addressed to Rosella. Don’t worry. I haven’t shown it to her. But I did read the letter.’ … ‘I think it would be useful to have me with you when you go back to America. It will be something else to think about.’”

      This passage captures the tension between privacy and protection within the family, as well as Mrs Lacey’s insistence on being involved and supportive despite potential boundaries, reflecting underlying themes of care, control, and family cohesion.

      4. “What was strange, she thought, was how easy it was for Jim to consider uprooting. His parents were dead; his siblings had left the town. He mentioned no close friends or associates except Shane who worked for him. … He could, as he told her, just walk away, rent out the bar, find a suitcase and be in America the next day.”

      This introspective moment highlights Jim’s unique position and freedom to leave, contrasting with the deeper ties and complexities faced by others, and sets the stage for understanding his character’s motivations and the urgency behind his pressure on Eilis.

    Quotes

    1. “She already has her passport, her visa. All she needed was to buy a ticket. She made me show her my ticket and she made me come with her to Aidan O’Leary’s travel agency to get her a seat on the same flight as me and Larry.”

    This quote reveals a key turning point where Mrs Lacey’s plans to join Eilis and her siblings in America are unveiled, highlighting her determination and the surprise element in the family dynamics regarding travel and presence abroad.

    2. “‘I’m not sure this is the best time for a visit.’ … ‘Rosella won’t be there, she is going to university. Larry will be at school all day and then he’ll either be out with his friends or doing his homework. I have a job and, because I’ve been away, I’ll be working full-time when I get back.’”

    Here, Eilis expresses the practical difficulties and emotional reservations about her mother visiting at this moment, underscoring the challenges of balancing family expectations with personal responsibilities and the changing rhythms of their lives.

    3. “‘I was searching for your ticket and I saw that it was addressed to Rosella. Don’t worry. I haven’t shown it to her. But I did read the letter.’ … ‘I think it would be useful to have me with you when you go back to America. It will be something else to think about.’”

    This passage captures the tension between privacy and protection within the family, as well as Mrs Lacey’s insistence on being involved and supportive despite potential boundaries, reflecting underlying themes of care, control, and family cohesion.

    4. “What was strange, she thought, was how easy it was for Jim to consider uprooting. His parents were dead; his siblings had left the town. He mentioned no close friends or associates except Shane who worked for him. … He could, as he told her, just walk away, rent out the bar, find a suitcase and be in America the next day.”

    This introspective moment highlights Jim’s unique position and freedom to leave, contrasting with the deeper ties and complexities faced by others, and sets the stage for understanding his character’s motivations and the urgency behind his pressure on Eilis.

    FAQs

    1. What unexpected development concerning Mrs Lacey’s travel plans is revealed in the chapter, and how does it affect Eilis?

    Answer:
    The chapter reveals that Mrs Lacey has secretly planned to accompany Eilis and Rosella to America, having already obtained her passport, visa, and a ticket on the same flight. This surprises Eilis because Mrs Lacey had only mentioned the idea in passing, but it turns out to be a deliberate plan. This development complicates Eilis’s situation, as Mrs Lacey’s presence means Eilis will not have the independence she might have anticipated. Moreover, Eilis feels uncertain about how her mother will manage alone in the new environment, especially since Rosella will be at university and Larry will be busy with school and friends. This unexpected visit also triggers a discussion about possibly changing Eilis’s return ticket to accommodate the new circumstances.

    2. How does the chapter explore the theme of communication and privacy within family relationships?

    Answer:
    The chapter highlights communication challenges and privacy boundaries through the incident involving the missing envelope and the intercepted letter. Mrs Lacey admits to taking the envelope from Eilis’s suitcase and reading the letter addressed to Rosella without permission. This breach of privacy causes tension, illustrating the delicate balance between family members’ desire to protect each other and the need for personal boundaries. Both Mrs Lacey and Eilis accuse each other of invading privacy, reflecting underlying mistrust and the complexities of familial relationships. The episode underscores how communication within families is fraught with misunderstandings and differing expectations about openness and secrecy.

    3. Analyze the significance of the news about Nancy Sheridan’s engagement and how it impacts Eilis’s thoughts and actions.

    Answer:
    Nancy Sheridan’s engagement to Jim Farrell, the owner of the pub, is significant because it introduces an element of social change and personal uncertainty into Eilis’s world. Eilis is initially skeptical and seeks to verify the news by calling Jim, revealing her need for reassurance about relationships and stability in her community. The engagement symbolizes shifting ties and the potential for change in the town’s social fabric. For Eilis, it also raises questions about Jim’s intentions and his readiness to uproot his life and move to America with her. This news prompts Eilis to reflect on Jim’s detachment from close relationships and his ability to leave at any time, adding complexity to her feelings about their future.

    4. What does the chapter suggest about the challenges of adjusting to life changes and new environments through the characters’ dialogue and concerns?

    Answer:
    The chapter conveys the challenges of adjusting to new environments and life changes through the concerns expressed by Eilis and Mrs Lacey. Eilis worries about her mother’s ability to cope alone in a small town without nearby shops or social opportunities, especially since Rosella and Larry will be occupied. Mrs Lacey’s desire to accompany Eilis to America, despite the difficulties it might cause, reflects a yearning for connection and support in unfamiliar surroundings. The dialogue reveals anxieties about loneliness, independence, and the practicalities of daily life, highlighting how transitions can be unsettling for all involved. The characters’ conversations underscore the emotional and logistical complexities of migration and settling into new phases of life.

    5. Considering Eilis’s reflections on Jim Farrell’s lifestyle and choices, what insights does the chapter provide about his character and his relationship with Eilis?

    Answer:
    Eilis’s reflections on Jim Farrell reveal a man who is somewhat isolated, with few close ties beyond his job and one employee, Shane. His parents are deceased, and his siblings have left town, which may contribute to his ability to consider uprooting easily. Despite his friendly demeanor, which Eilis understands is part of his role as a bar owner, he maintains a certain distance emotionally. The chapter suggests that Jim’s willingness to leave at short notice contrasts with the weight Eilis feels about making decisions that affect both their futures. This dynamic creates tension in their relationship, as Jim’s apparent readiness to move contrasts with Eilis’s need for stability and reassurance, revealing complexities in their connection and differing perspectives on commitment.

    Note