Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Brave New World
    DystopianPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Brave New World

    by Huxley, Aldous
    Set in a dystopian future, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World explores a society engineered for stability through genetic manipulation, psychological conditioning, and pervasive pleasure. The World State prioritizes efficiency and happiness over individuality, with citizens divided into rigid castes and kept docile by the drug soma. The narrative contrasts this controlled existence with the experiences of John the Savage, an outsider raised on a reservation, whose struggle with the dehumanizing aspects of this “perfect” world exposes its moral and emotional emptiness. Themes of free will, technological dominance, and the cost of utopia remain strikingly relevant. A cornerstone of dystopian literature, the novel challenges notions of progress and human fulfillment.
    PreviousNext
    Brave New World

    Chapter 6: Six

    by Huxley, Aldous

    The chap­ter explores Leni­na Crowne’s con­flict­ed feel­ings about Bernard Marx, whose odd behav­ior sets him apart from the con­formist soci­ety of *Brave New World*. Leni­na ini­tial­ly con­sid­ers can­cel­ing their planned trip to the Sav­age Reser­va­tion in favor of a more con­ven­tion­al vaca­tion with Ben­i­to Hoover, as Bernard’s eccen­tric­i­ties unset­tle her. His aver­sion to crowds, pref­er­ence for soli­tude, and rejec­tion of soma—a hap­pi­ness-induc­ing drug—make him an anom­aly in a world where uni­for­mi­ty and instant grat­i­fi­ca­tion are the norms. Leni­na strug­gles to rec­on­cile his uncon­ven­tion­al desires with her con­di­tioned belief that hap­pi­ness stems from soci­etal par­tic­i­pa­tion and sen­so­ry plea­sures.

    Bernard’s dis­dain for main­stream activ­i­ties, such as Elec­tro-mag­net­ic Golf or crowd­ed enter­tain­ment venues, high­lights his alien­ation from the World State’s val­ues. He yearns for authen­tic expe­ri­ences, like walk­ing in nature or con­tem­plat­ing the sea, which Leni­na finds unset­tling and incom­pre­hen­si­ble. Their con­trast­ing per­spec­tives cul­mi­nate dur­ing a heli­copter ride, where Bernard insists on observ­ing the tur­bu­lent sea in silence, while Leni­na, ter­ri­fied by the raw empti­ness, seeks com­fort in mind­less enter­tain­ment. This moment under­scores the ten­sion between Bernard’s quest for indi­vid­u­al­i­ty and Leni­na’s con­di­tioned aver­sion to intro­spec­tion.

    The chap­ter delves into Bernard’s exis­ten­tial angst, as he ques­tions the lack of free­dom in their high­ly con­trolled soci­ety. He express­es frus­tra­tion with his con­di­tion­ing, long­ing to break free from the col­lec­tive mind­set, while Leni­na recoils at his blas­phe­mous ideas. Her inabil­i­ty to grasp his desire for auton­o­my reflects the per­va­sive indoc­tri­na­tion that equates hap­pi­ness with con­for­mi­ty. Bernard’s deri­sive remarks about the sys­tem’s hypocrisy—such as the emp­ty slo­gan “Every­body’s hap­py nowadays”—reveal his grow­ing dis­il­lu­sion­ment, though he remains pow­er­less to change his cir­cum­stances.

    Ulti­mate­ly, the chap­ter por­trays the stark divide between Bernard’s rebel­lious intro­spec­tion and Leni­na’s unwa­ver­ing adher­ence to soci­etal norms. Their failed attempts to con­nect emo­tion­al­ly high­light the iso­lat­ing effects of Bernard’s non­con­for­mi­ty. Leni­na’s insis­tence on soma as a solu­tion to his dis­con­tent under­scores the nov­el­’s cri­tique of a world that pri­or­i­tizes arti­fi­cial hap­pi­ness over gen­uine human expe­ri­ence. The chap­ter ends on a somber note, with Bernard reluc­tant­ly aban­don­ing his attempt to share his per­spec­tive, resign­ing him­self to the gulf between them.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Bernard Marx’s behavior contrast with the norms of his society in this chapter?

      Answer:
      Bernard Marx exhibits several behaviors that defy the conditioned norms of his society. While most citizens seek constant entertainment, crowds, and soma-induced happiness, Bernard prefers solitude and meaningful conversation. He rejects typical activities like Electro-magnetic Golf and public events, instead proposing quiet walks in nature. His discomfort with social conditioning is evident when he says, “I’d rather be myself… Not somebody else, however jolly.” This contrasts sharply with Lenina’s adherence to societal expectations, such as her belief that “a gramme is always better than a damn” and her shock at Bernard’s desire for individuality. Bernard’s refusal to conform highlights his existential struggle within the rigid, pleasure-driven world of the novel.

      2. What does Lenina’s reaction to Bernard’s proposal of viewing the sea reveal about her character and conditioning?

      Answer:
      Lenina’s visceral discomfort with the natural sea and moon—described as “horrible” and “rushing emptiness”—demonstrates her deep conditioning to prefer artificial, controlled environments. She immediately seeks distraction by turning on the radio, reinforcing her reliance on technology and programmed entertainment. Her distress at Bernard’s philosophical musings (“Not just a cell in the social body”) further reveals her inability to question societal norms. The chapter underscores her programmed aversion to introspection or solitude, as seen when she insists, “Everybody’s happy nowadays.” Her reactions contrast with Bernard’s yearning for authenticity, emphasizing the novel’s theme of conditioned happiness versus individual freedom.

      3. Analyze the significance of Bernard’s rejection of soma in this chapter. How does this act symbolize his internal conflict?

      Answer:
      Bernard’s refusal of the “half-gramme raspberry sundae” soma represents his resistance to the society’s chemical suppression of dissent and emotion. While Lenina uses the slogan “a gramme in time saves nine” to advocate for soma’s numbing effects, Bernard asserts, “I’d rather be myself and nasty.” This rejection symbolizes his struggle to retain authentic feelings and critical thought, even if it means enduring misery. His later question—”what would it be like if I were free… not enslaved by my conditioning?“—ties this act to a broader critique of the World State’s control. However, his inability to articulate alternatives clearly (and Lenina’s bafflement) also shows the limits of his rebellion within the system.

      4. How does Huxley use contrasting settings (e.g., the Savage Reservation vs. the World State) to foreshadow future conflicts in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The chapter introduces the Savage Reservation as a tantalizing anomaly—a place “half a dozen people” have visited, contrasting with the sterile predictability of the World State. Lenina’s excitement about the trip (“unique” opportunity) hints at its later significance as a locus of disruption. Meanwhile, Bernard’s discomfort in crowded venues (Amsterdam’s wrestling match) and his preference for the untamed sea (“black foam-flecked water”) foreshadow his attraction to the Reservation’s raw authenticity. These contrasts set up the novel’s central tension between civilization’s artificial order and the “savage” unpredictability of natural human experience, which will culminate in John’s arrival and its consequences.

      5. Evaluate Fanny and Henry’s explanations for Bernard’s oddness. What do their perspectives reveal about societal attitudes toward nonconformity?

      Answer:
      Fanny’s claim that Bernard has “alcohol in his blood-surrogate” and Henry’s comparison of him to a “rhinoceros” (which “can’t be taught tricks”) reflect the society’s pathologizing of individuality. Their diagnoses reduce Bernard’s complexity to biological or zoological defects, avoiding any acknowledgment of legitimate dissent. Henry’s backhanded reassurance that Bernard is “pretty harmless” underscores the system’s tolerance of minor quirks—so long as productivity isn’t affected (“good at his job”). These explanations mirror real-world tendencies to medicalize or ridicule nonconformity, reinforcing Huxley’s critique of a culture that prioritizes stability over truth or diversity of thought.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Alcohol in his blood-surrogate,” was Fanny’s explanation of every eccentricity. But Henry, with whom, one evening when they were in bed together, Lenina had rather anxiously discussed her new lover, Henry had compared poor Bernard to a rhinoceros. “You can’t teach a rhinoceros tricks,” he had explained in his brief and vigorous style. “Some men are almost rhinoceroses; they don’t respond properly to conditioning.”

      This quote highlights the central tension of Bernard’s character—his inability to conform to societal norms. The rhinoceros metaphor underscores how Bernard’s nonconformity is seen as both pitiable and threatening in this highly conditioned world.

      2. “I’d rather be myself,” he said. “Myself and nasty. Not somebody else, however jolly.”

      Bernard’s rejection of soma (the happiness drug) encapsulates his existential struggle. This declaration represents his painful choice for authentic selfhood over artificial contentment, a radical stance in this engineered utopia.

      3. “I want to look at the sea in peace,” he said. “One can’t even look with that beastly noise going on… It makes me feel as though I were more me, if you see what I mean. More on my own, not so completely a part of something else. Not just a cell in the social body.”

      This moment of contemplative rebellion against constant stimulation reveals Bernard’s yearning for individuality. His desire to experience raw nature without distractions represents a fundamental challenge to the World State’s values of constant consumption and social cohesion.

      4. “But wouldn’t you like to be free to be happy in some other way, Lenina? In your own way, for example; not in everybody else’s way.”

      Bernard’s question to Lenina cuts to the philosophical core of the novel—the tension between collective happiness and individual freedom. His challenge to Lenina’s conditioned thinking represents one of the chapter’s most direct confrontations with the society’s foundational principles.

      5. “I don’t understand anything,” she said with decision, determined to preserve her incomprehension intact.”

      Lenina’s willful refusal to understand Bernard’s perspective perfectly illustrates the power of conditioning in this society. Her active resistance to new ideas demonstrates how deeply the World State’s ideology has shaped not just behaviors but cognitive processes themselves.

    Quotes

    1. “Alcohol in his blood-surrogate,” was Fanny’s explanation of every eccentricity. But Henry, with whom, one evening when they were in bed together, Lenina had rather anxiously discussed her new lover, Henry had compared poor Bernard to a rhinoceros. “You can’t teach a rhinoceros tricks,” he had explained in his brief and vigorous style. “Some men are almost rhinoceroses; they don’t respond properly to conditioning.”

    This quote highlights the central tension of Bernard’s character—his inability to conform to societal norms. The rhinoceros metaphor underscores how Bernard’s nonconformity is seen as both pitiable and threatening in this highly conditioned world.

    2. “I’d rather be myself,” he said. “Myself and nasty. Not somebody else, however jolly.”

    Bernard’s rejection of soma (the happiness drug) encapsulates his existential struggle. This declaration represents his painful choice for authentic selfhood over artificial contentment, a radical stance in this engineered utopia.

    3. “I want to look at the sea in peace,” he said. “One can’t even look with that beastly noise going on… It makes me feel as though I were more me, if you see what I mean. More on my own, not so completely a part of something else. Not just a cell in the social body.”

    This moment of contemplative rebellion against constant stimulation reveals Bernard’s yearning for individuality. His desire to experience raw nature without distractions represents a fundamental challenge to the World State’s values of constant consumption and social cohesion.

    4. “But wouldn’t you like to be free to be happy in some other way, Lenina? In your own way, for example; not in everybody else’s way.”

    Bernard’s question to Lenina cuts to the philosophical core of the novel—the tension between collective happiness and individual freedom. His challenge to Lenina’s conditioned thinking represents one of the chapter’s most direct confrontations with the society’s foundational principles.

    5. “I don’t understand anything,” she said with decision, determined to preserve her incomprehension intact.”

    Lenina’s willful refusal to understand Bernard’s perspective perfectly illustrates the power of conditioning in this society. Her active resistance to new ideas demonstrates how deeply the World State’s ideology has shaped not just behaviors but cognitive processes themselves.

    FAQs

    1. How does Bernard Marx’s behavior contrast with the norms of his society in this chapter?

    Answer:
    Bernard Marx exhibits several behaviors that defy the conditioned norms of his society. While most citizens seek constant entertainment, crowds, and soma-induced happiness, Bernard prefers solitude and meaningful conversation. He rejects typical activities like Electro-magnetic Golf and public events, instead proposing quiet walks in nature. His discomfort with social conditioning is evident when he says, “I’d rather be myself… Not somebody else, however jolly.” This contrasts sharply with Lenina’s adherence to societal expectations, such as her belief that “a gramme is always better than a damn” and her shock at Bernard’s desire for individuality. Bernard’s refusal to conform highlights his existential struggle within the rigid, pleasure-driven world of the novel.

    2. What does Lenina’s reaction to Bernard’s proposal of viewing the sea reveal about her character and conditioning?

    Answer:
    Lenina’s visceral discomfort with the natural sea and moon—described as “horrible” and “rushing emptiness”—demonstrates her deep conditioning to prefer artificial, controlled environments. She immediately seeks distraction by turning on the radio, reinforcing her reliance on technology and programmed entertainment. Her distress at Bernard’s philosophical musings (“Not just a cell in the social body”) further reveals her inability to question societal norms. The chapter underscores her programmed aversion to introspection or solitude, as seen when she insists, “Everybody’s happy nowadays.” Her reactions contrast with Bernard’s yearning for authenticity, emphasizing the novel’s theme of conditioned happiness versus individual freedom.

    3. Analyze the significance of Bernard’s rejection of soma in this chapter. How does this act symbolize his internal conflict?

    Answer:
    Bernard’s refusal of the “half-gramme raspberry sundae” soma represents his resistance to the society’s chemical suppression of dissent and emotion. While Lenina uses the slogan “a gramme in time saves nine” to advocate for soma’s numbing effects, Bernard asserts, “I’d rather be myself and nasty.” This rejection symbolizes his struggle to retain authentic feelings and critical thought, even if it means enduring misery. His later question—”what would it be like if I were free… not enslaved by my conditioning?“—ties this act to a broader critique of the World State’s control. However, his inability to articulate alternatives clearly (and Lenina’s bafflement) also shows the limits of his rebellion within the system.

    4. How does Huxley use contrasting settings (e.g., the Savage Reservation vs. the World State) to foreshadow future conflicts in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The chapter introduces the Savage Reservation as a tantalizing anomaly—a place “half a dozen people” have visited, contrasting with the sterile predictability of the World State. Lenina’s excitement about the trip (“unique” opportunity) hints at its later significance as a locus of disruption. Meanwhile, Bernard’s discomfort in crowded venues (Amsterdam’s wrestling match) and his preference for the untamed sea (“black foam-flecked water”) foreshadow his attraction to the Reservation’s raw authenticity. These contrasts set up the novel’s central tension between civilization’s artificial order and the “savage” unpredictability of natural human experience, which will culminate in John’s arrival and its consequences.

    5. Evaluate Fanny and Henry’s explanations for Bernard’s oddness. What do their perspectives reveal about societal attitudes toward nonconformity?

    Answer:
    Fanny’s claim that Bernard has “alcohol in his blood-surrogate” and Henry’s comparison of him to a “rhinoceros” (which “can’t be taught tricks”) reflect the society’s pathologizing of individuality. Their diagnoses reduce Bernard’s complexity to biological or zoological defects, avoiding any acknowledgment of legitimate dissent. Henry’s backhanded reassurance that Bernard is “pretty harmless” underscores the system’s tolerance of minor quirks—so long as productivity isn’t affected (“good at his job”). These explanations mirror real-world tendencies to medicalize or ridicule nonconformity, reinforcing Huxley’s critique of a culture that prioritizes stability over truth or diversity of thought.

    Note