Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Brave New World
    DystopianPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Brave New World

    by Huxley, Aldous
    Set in a dystopian future, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World explores a society engineered for stability through genetic manipulation, psychological conditioning, and pervasive pleasure. The World State prioritizes efficiency and happiness over individuality, with citizens divided into rigid castes and kept docile by the drug soma. The narrative contrasts this controlled existence with the experiences of John the Savage, an outsider raised on a reservation, whose struggle with the dehumanizing aspects of this “perfect” world exposes its moral and emotional emptiness. Themes of free will, technological dominance, and the cost of utopia remain strikingly relevant. A cornerstone of dystopian literature, the novel challenges notions of progress and human fulfillment.
    PreviousNext
    Brave New World

    Chapter 12: Twelve

    by Huxley, Aldous

    In Chap­ter Twelve of *Brave New World*, Bernard Marx attempts to per­suade John the Sav­age to attend a social gath­er­ing he has orga­nized, but John refus­es, express­ing his dis­dain through sharp retorts and Zuñi phras­es. Bernard, des­per­ate to main­tain his social stand­ing, pleads with John, even invok­ing the pres­ence of the pres­ti­gious Arch-Com­mu­ni­ty-Song­ster of Can­ter­bury. How­ev­er, John remains unmoved, forc­ing Bernard to return to the par­ty alone and face the guests’ indig­na­tion. The atten­dees, espe­cial­ly the high-rank­ing offi­cials, feel insult­ed by Bernard’s fail­ure to deliv­er the Sav­age, fur­ther dam­ag­ing Bernard’s already pre­car­i­ous rep­u­ta­tion.

    The chap­ter high­lights the social dynam­ics of the World State, where sta­tus and con­for­mi­ty are para­mount. The guests’ reac­tions reveal their enti­tle­ment and super­fi­cial­i­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly the women who feel deceived by Bernard’s per­ceived inad­e­qua­cies. Leni­na, how­ev­er, is con­sumed by per­son­al anguish, believ­ing John’s absence reflects his rejec­tion of her. Her emo­tion­al tur­moil con­trasts sharply with the oth­ers’ pet­ty griev­ances, under­scor­ing her grow­ing dis­il­lu­sion­ment with the shal­low val­ues of her soci­ety. Mean­while, Bernard’s humil­i­a­tion is com­pound­ed as the guests open­ly mock him, leav­ing him iso­lat­ed and des­per­ate.

    The Arch-Com­mu­ni­ty-Song­ster’s depar­ture marks the cli­max of Bernard’s down­fall. The dig­ni­tary pub­licly chas­tis­es Bernard, urg­ing him to “mend his ways,” a moment that seals Bernard’s social ruin. Leni­na, though sum­moned by the Arch-Song­ster, remains emo­tion­al­ly detached, her ear­li­er hopes of con­nect­ing with John shat­tered. The chap­ter jux­ta­pos­es Bernard’s pub­lic dis­grace with John’s soli­tary defi­ance, as he retreats to read *Romeo and Juli­et*, sym­bol­iz­ing his rejec­tion of the World State’s arti­fi­cial­i­ty in favor of authen­tic human expe­ri­ence.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Mustapha Mond’s sub­plot, where he sup­press­es a hereti­cal sci­en­tif­ic paper chal­leng­ing the World State’s ide­ol­o­gy. His deci­sion to exile the author reflects the regime’s intol­er­ance of dis­sent, rein­forc­ing the theme of con­trol. This par­al­lel nar­ra­tive under­scores the broad­er con­flict between indi­vid­u­al­i­ty and soci­etal con­for­mi­ty, mir­ror­ing John and Bernard’s strug­gles. The chap­ter ulti­mate­ly por­trays a world where per­son­al desires and truths are sac­ri­ficed to main­tain col­lec­tive sta­bil­i­ty, leav­ing char­ac­ters like Bernard bro­ken and Leni­na adrift in unful­filled long­ing.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does John the Savage’s refusal to attend Bernard’s party reveal his growing disillusionment with society?

      Answer:
      John’s refusal to attend the party—expressed through his locked door and Zuñi expletives—demonstrates his deepening rejection of the World State’s values. Unlike previous appearances where he participated reluctantly, his outright refusal (“Let them wait”) signals a conscious break from societal expectations. His crude dismissal of the Arch-Community-Songster (“Ai yaa tákwa!”) mirrors his disdain for the shallow hierarchy and artificiality of this world, contrasting sharply with his earlier curiosity. This scene foreshadows his eventual complete withdrawal from society, rooted in his inability to reconcile his ideals with the hedonistic, controlled environment.

      2. Analyze the significance of Lenina’s emotional response to John’s absence. How does it reflect the novel’s themes of conditioned emotions versus authentic feelings?

      Answer:
      Lenina’s melancholy and self-doubt (“Perhaps it’s because he doesn’t like me”) reveal her first experience with unscripted emotional pain, contrasting with her usual reliance on soma and conditioned responses. Her physical reaction—mimicking a Violent Passion Surrogate treatment—highlights the inadequacy of state-sanctioned coping mechanisms when faced with genuine rejection. This moment underscores the novel’s critique of a society that pathologizes authentic human emotions, as Lenina, despite her conditioning, instinctively grapples with raw, unmediated feelings that her world cannot accommodate.

      3. How does Bernard’s humiliation at the party expose the fragility of his social standing and the hypocrisy of the World State’s elite?

      Answer:
      Bernard’s downfall—from hosting a triumphant event to becoming a social pariah—reveals the conditional nature of his acceptance. The guests’ overt contempt (ignoring him or “talk[ing] about him loudly and offensively”) underscores how quickly status can collapse in this rigid hierarchy. The Arch-Community-Songster’s public admonishment (“Mend your ways”) exemplifies the performative morality of the elite, who feign outrage to reinforce conformity. Bernard’s reliance on others’ approval (e.g., name-dropping the Songster) contrasts with John’s defiance, exposing Bernard as a product of the very system he occasionally critiques but ultimately depends on.

      4. Interpret Mustapha Mond’s decision to censor the biology paper. What does this reveal about the World State’s control of knowledge?

      Answer:
      Mond’s labeling of the paper as “heretical” and “subversive” due to its exploration of “purpose” illustrates the regime’s suppression of ideas threatening its stability. By transferring the author to isolation (St. Helena), Mond prioritizes control over intellectual progress, fearing that philosophical questioning (“the goal was somewhere beyond”) could destabilize caste conditioning. This mirrors the party’s disdain for Bernard’s nonconformity, showing how the state weaponizes knowledge to maintain passive happiness. Mond’s regret (“a masterly piece of work”) hints at his own conflicted role as both scholar and oppressor.

      5. Contrast the ways Bernard and John cope with distress in this chapter. What broader commentary does this provide on their characters?

      Answer:
      Bernard seeks immediate escape through soma (“took four tablets”), embodying his society’s avoidance of discomfort. In contrast, John turns to literature (“reading Romeo and Juliet”), seeking solace in art that reflects his own tragic idealism. Bernard’s public breakdown (weeping) reveals his dependence on external validation, while John’s solitary defiance underscores his internal resilience. This dichotomy critiques the World State’s eradication of meaningful coping mechanisms—Bernard represents its failure to nurture self-reliance, while John, though tormented, embodies the human need for authentic emotional and intellectual engagement.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Let them wait,” came back the muffled voice through the door.

      This quote captures the Savage’s defiant rejection of Bernard’s social expectations, marking a turning point in their relationship and illustrating John’s growing disillusionment with the World State’s society.

      2. “Ai yaa tákwa! Háni! Sons éso tse-ná.”

      The Savage’s outburst in Zuñi language expresses his contempt for the Arch-Community-Songster and the shallow values of the World State, showing how his Native American heritage gives him a different moral framework.

      3. “Lenina suddenly felt all the sensations normally experienced at the beginning of a Violent Passion Surrogate treatment-a sense of dreadful emptiness, a breathless apprehension, a nausea.”

      This powerful description reveals how Lenina experiences genuine emotional pain, contrasting with the artificial emotions promoted by the World State and foreshadowing her unrequited feelings for John.

      4. “Mend your ways, my young friend, mend your ways.”

      The Arch-Community-Songster’s hypocritical admonishment to Bernard highlights the rigid social hierarchy and the consequences of failing to conform, while ironically coming from a figure who indulges in similar vices.

      5. “The author’s mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive.”

      Mustapha Mond’s censorship decision demonstrates the World State’s suppression of truth and intellectual freedom when it threatens social stability, a key theme in the novel’s critique of totalitarianism.

    Quotes

    1. “Let them wait,” came back the muffled voice through the door.

    This quote captures the Savage’s defiant rejection of Bernard’s social expectations, marking a turning point in their relationship and illustrating John’s growing disillusionment with the World State’s society.

    2. “Ai yaa tákwa! Háni! Sons éso tse-ná.”

    The Savage’s outburst in Zuñi language expresses his contempt for the Arch-Community-Songster and the shallow values of the World State, showing how his Native American heritage gives him a different moral framework.

    3. “Lenina suddenly felt all the sensations normally experienced at the beginning of a Violent Passion Surrogate treatment-a sense of dreadful emptiness, a breathless apprehension, a nausea.”

    This powerful description reveals how Lenina experiences genuine emotional pain, contrasting with the artificial emotions promoted by the World State and foreshadowing her unrequited feelings for John.

    4. “Mend your ways, my young friend, mend your ways.”

    The Arch-Community-Songster’s hypocritical admonishment to Bernard highlights the rigid social hierarchy and the consequences of failing to conform, while ironically coming from a figure who indulges in similar vices.

    5. “The author’s mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive.”

    Mustapha Mond’s censorship decision demonstrates the World State’s suppression of truth and intellectual freedom when it threatens social stability, a key theme in the novel’s critique of totalitarianism.

    FAQs

    1. How does John the Savage’s refusal to attend Bernard’s party reveal his growing disillusionment with society?

    Answer:
    John’s refusal to attend the party—expressed through his locked door and Zuñi expletives—demonstrates his deepening rejection of the World State’s values. Unlike previous appearances where he participated reluctantly, his outright refusal (“Let them wait”) signals a conscious break from societal expectations. His crude dismissal of the Arch-Community-Songster (“Ai yaa tákwa!”) mirrors his disdain for the shallow hierarchy and artificiality of this world, contrasting sharply with his earlier curiosity. This scene foreshadows his eventual complete withdrawal from society, rooted in his inability to reconcile his ideals with the hedonistic, controlled environment.

    2. Analyze the significance of Lenina’s emotional response to John’s absence. How does it reflect the novel’s themes of conditioned emotions versus authentic feelings?

    Answer:
    Lenina’s melancholy and self-doubt (“Perhaps it’s because he doesn’t like me”) reveal her first experience with unscripted emotional pain, contrasting with her usual reliance on soma and conditioned responses. Her physical reaction—mimicking a Violent Passion Surrogate treatment—highlights the inadequacy of state-sanctioned coping mechanisms when faced with genuine rejection. This moment underscores the novel’s critique of a society that pathologizes authentic human emotions, as Lenina, despite her conditioning, instinctively grapples with raw, unmediated feelings that her world cannot accommodate.

    3. How does Bernard’s humiliation at the party expose the fragility of his social standing and the hypocrisy of the World State’s elite?

    Answer:
    Bernard’s downfall—from hosting a triumphant event to becoming a social pariah—reveals the conditional nature of his acceptance. The guests’ overt contempt (ignoring him or “talk[ing] about him loudly and offensively”) underscores how quickly status can collapse in this rigid hierarchy. The Arch-Community-Songster’s public admonishment (“Mend your ways”) exemplifies the performative morality of the elite, who feign outrage to reinforce conformity. Bernard’s reliance on others’ approval (e.g., name-dropping the Songster) contrasts with John’s defiance, exposing Bernard as a product of the very system he occasionally critiques but ultimately depends on.

    4. Interpret Mustapha Mond’s decision to censor the biology paper. What does this reveal about the World State’s control of knowledge?

    Answer:
    Mond’s labeling of the paper as “heretical” and “subversive” due to its exploration of “purpose” illustrates the regime’s suppression of ideas threatening its stability. By transferring the author to isolation (St. Helena), Mond prioritizes control over intellectual progress, fearing that philosophical questioning (“the goal was somewhere beyond”) could destabilize caste conditioning. This mirrors the party’s disdain for Bernard’s nonconformity, showing how the state weaponizes knowledge to maintain passive happiness. Mond’s regret (“a masterly piece of work”) hints at his own conflicted role as both scholar and oppressor.

    5. Contrast the ways Bernard and John cope with distress in this chapter. What broader commentary does this provide on their characters?

    Answer:
    Bernard seeks immediate escape through soma (“took four tablets”), embodying his society’s avoidance of discomfort. In contrast, John turns to literature (“reading Romeo and Juliet”), seeking solace in art that reflects his own tragic idealism. Bernard’s public breakdown (weeping) reveals his dependence on external validation, while John’s solitary defiance underscores his internal resilience. This dichotomy critiques the World State’s eradication of meaningful coping mechanisms—Bernard represents its failure to nurture self-reliance, while John, though tormented, embodies the human need for authentic emotional and intellectual engagement.

    Note