Cover of The Pact
    DramaFictionPsychological

    The Pact

    by Picoult, Jodi
    “The Pact” by Jodi Picoult explores themes of love, loyalty, and moral dilemmas through the story of two families bound by a tragic suicide pact. When teenagers Chris and Emily are found shot in a car, the aftermath reveals complex layers of friendship, parental expectations, and adolescent despair. Picoult’s narrative delves into legal and ethical questions surrounding assisted suicide, grief, and the boundaries of relationships. The novel’s courtroom drama and emotional depth make it a compelling read for fans of contemporary fiction.

    The chap­ter opens with Chris and Emi­ly, two mis­chie­vous chil­dren, mak­ing prank phone calls from Emi­ly’s bed­room in 1989. Their play­ful ban­ter and dar­ing esca­late as they call strangers with absurd ques­tions, like ask­ing if “Mr. Long­wanger” tru­ly has a long wanger, and imper­son­at­ing school staff to trick Chris’s moth­er. Their laugh­ter and cama­raderie high­light their close friend­ship, but their antics soon back­fire when Chris’s moth­er, Gus, can­cels an impor­tant appoint­ment to respond to the fake school call. The chil­dren’s reck­less­ness leads to con­se­quences, with Chris being ground­ed for three days, leav­ing him frus­trat­ed but still con­nect­ed to Emi­ly through their secret Morse code sig­nals.

    As Chris faces his par­ents’ stern rep­ri­mand, the chap­ter shifts to their per­spec­tive, reveal­ing their mixed emo­tions. Gus and James, though exas­per­at­ed, find humor in their son’s pranks, rem­i­nisc­ing about their own youth­ful mis­chief. Their play­ful teas­ing and affec­tion­ate dynam­ic con­trast with their dis­ci­pli­nary roles, show­ing their strug­gle to bal­ance author­i­ty with under­stand­ing. The ten­sion between parental respon­si­bil­i­ty and nos­tal­gia for child­hood free­dom is pal­pa­ble, as they acknowl­edge their own pasts while try­ing to guide Chris. Their light­heart­ed rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, end­ing with a roman­tic moment, under­scores the com­plex­i­ty of fam­i­ly dynam­ics.

    Mean­while, Chris and Emi­ly main­tain their bond despite being pun­ished. Using Morse code with bed­room lamps, they com­mu­ni­cate across the dis­tance, shar­ing their frus­tra­tions and sol­i­dar­i­ty. This silent dia­logue sym­bol­izes their unbreak­able con­nec­tion and resilience in the face of adver­si­ty. The chap­ter sub­tly con­trasts the inno­cence of child­hood rebel­lion with the weight of parental expec­ta­tions, as both gen­er­a­tions nav­i­gate their rela­tion­ships and iden­ti­ties.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with a diary entry from Emi­ly, offer­ing a glimpse into her inner world. Her scat­tered thoughts—ranging from school gos­sip to her admi­ra­tion for Chris—reveal her youth­ful per­spec­tive and the bud­ding emo­tions she strug­gles to artic­u­late. The unfin­ished entry about Guin­e­vere hints at her roman­tic ide­al­ism, mir­ror­ing the chap­ter’s themes of con­nec­tion, secre­cy, and the bit­ter­sweet tran­si­tion from child­hood to ado­les­cence. The diary serves as a qui­et reflec­tion on the chap­ter’s events, tying togeth­er the threads of friend­ship, fam­i­ly, and grow­ing up.

    FAQs

    • 1. How do Chris and Emily communicate after being grounded, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

      Answer:
      After being grounded, Chris and Emily use Morse code by flicking their bedroom lights on and off to communicate across the distance between their homes. This method, learned at summer camp, allows them to send messages like “HOW BAD” and responses indicating the severity of their punishments. This reveals the depth of their connection and creativity in maintaining contact despite restrictions. It also highlights their shared history (e.g., camp experiences) and their rebellious yet resourceful natures, as they find ways to defy parental authority while appearing to comply.


      2. Analyze the contrasting parenting styles of Chris’s parents and their impact on him.

      Answer:
      Chris’s parents present a united front, standing “like sequoias” and alternating reprimands, which overwhelms Chris and makes him feel powerless. Their discipline is strict (a 3-day grounding) and focuses on the inconvenience caused by his prank, rather than exploring his motivations. However, the chapter also reveals their humorous, affectionate side in private, as they laugh about the prank and reconnect intimately. This duality suggests their sternness is performative, but their lack of open communication with Chris leaves him feeling misunderstood and resentful, as seen in his internal monologue about their expectations.


      3. What literary devices are used to emphasize the theme of youthful rebellion in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The chapter employs irony (Chris’s parents secretly finding the prank funny while punishing him), symbolism (the flickering lights representing clandestine defiance), and juxtaposition (the kids’ playful mischief vs. the parents’ stern facade). The prank calls themselves are metaphors for testing boundaries, while the Morse code scene underscores rebellion as a shared language between Chris and Emily. The parents’ private laughter contrasts with their public severity, highlighting the generational divide and the performative nature of authority.


      4. How does the chapter portray the transition between childhood and adolescence for Chris and Emily?

      Answer:
      The chapter captures their liminal stage through their actions: prank calls (childish mischief) are paired with emerging self-awareness (Chris’s guilt over his mother’s canceled appointment). Emily’s diary entry contrasts childish observations (guinea pigs, gossip) with her avoidance of discussing romantic tales with Chris, hinting at budding complexity. Their Morse code communication shows maturity in problem-solving, while their defiance (e.g., mocking authority figures) reflects adolescent resistance. The parents’ intimate reunion also subtly contrasts with the kids’ innocent bond, foreshadowing future emotional growth.


      5. Evaluate the significance of the chapter’s title, “THEN: 1989,” in framing the narrative.

      Answer:
      The title “THEN: 1989” establishes nostalgia, framing the events as a remembered past. The year 1989 anchors the pre-digital era (prank calls, phone books) and cultural references (Jesse Helms, Prince Albert jokes). The word “THEN” contrasts with the characters’ present, suggesting reflection on how these moments shaped them. For Chris and Emily, it marks a specific, formative time of rebellion and connection; for the parents, it recalls a phase of balancing discipline and passion. The title thus invites readers to consider how such fleeting moments define relationships over time.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Sometimes Chris wished he could sneak a peek at the back of the book, so to speak, and see how it was all going to turn out, so that he wouldn’t have to bother going through the motions.”

      This quote captures Chris’s adolescent frustration with expectations and his desire to understand life’s outcomes—a poignant reflection on youthful impatience and the universal human wish to foresee destiny.

      2. “They had learned Morse code at camp last summer. Emily’s room kept flickering. H… I. Chris flicked his thumb over the lamp’s base again. H… O… W… B… A… D.”

      This moment highlights the deep, playful connection between Chris and Emily, using coded communication to maintain solidarity even when punished—showcasing their creativity and bond.

      3. “Gus let herself remember what it had been like over a decade ago when the house still smelled of planed wood and fresh paint, and time was a gift given from the hospital scheduler.”

      Gus’s nostalgic reflection contrasts youthful passion with adult responsibilities, illustrating how parenthood and routine reshape intimacy—yet the spark remains, as shown in the playful “Mr. Longwanger” banter that follows.

      4. “Chris is reading an autobiography of Muhomad Alii for his book report. He asked what I was doing and I started to tell him about Lancelot and Guinevere and King Arthur but then I stopped. He’d probably want to know about the knights and those are the parts I’ve been skipping.”

      Emily’s diary entry reveals her selective engagement with stories (focusing on romance over adventure) and hints at her evolving feelings for Chris, subtly framing their relationship through literary parallels.

    Quotes

    1. “Sometimes Chris wished he could sneak a peek at the back of the book, so to speak, and see how it was all going to turn out, so that he wouldn’t have to bother going through the motions.”

    This quote captures Chris’s adolescent frustration with expectations and his desire to understand life’s outcomes—a poignant reflection on youthful impatience and the universal human wish to foresee destiny.

    2. “They had learned Morse code at camp last summer. Emily’s room kept flickering. H… I. Chris flicked his thumb over the lamp’s base again. H… O… W… B… A… D.”

    This moment highlights the deep, playful connection between Chris and Emily, using coded communication to maintain solidarity even when punished—showcasing their creativity and bond.

    3. “Gus let herself remember what it had been like over a decade ago when the house still smelled of planed wood and fresh paint, and time was a gift given from the hospital scheduler.”

    Gus’s nostalgic reflection contrasts youthful passion with adult responsibilities, illustrating how parenthood and routine reshape intimacy—yet the spark remains, as shown in the playful “Mr. Longwanger” banter that follows.

    4. “Chris is reading an autobiography of Muhomad Alii for his book report. He asked what I was doing and I started to tell him about Lancelot and Guinevere and King Arthur but then I stopped. He’d probably want to know about the knights and those are the parts I’ve been skipping.”

    Emily’s diary entry reveals her selective engagement with stories (focusing on romance over adventure) and hints at her evolving feelings for Chris, subtly framing their relationship through literary parallels.

    FAQs

    1. How do Chris and Emily communicate after being grounded, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

    Answer:
    After being grounded, Chris and Emily use Morse code by flicking their bedroom lights on and off to communicate across the distance between their homes. This method, learned at summer camp, allows them to send messages like “HOW BAD” and responses indicating the severity of their punishments. This reveals the depth of their connection and creativity in maintaining contact despite restrictions. It also highlights their shared history (e.g., camp experiences) and their rebellious yet resourceful natures, as they find ways to defy parental authority while appearing to comply.


    2. Analyze the contrasting parenting styles of Chris’s parents and their impact on him.

    Answer:
    Chris’s parents present a united front, standing “like sequoias” and alternating reprimands, which overwhelms Chris and makes him feel powerless. Their discipline is strict (a 3-day grounding) and focuses on the inconvenience caused by his prank, rather than exploring his motivations. However, the chapter also reveals their humorous, affectionate side in private, as they laugh about the prank and reconnect intimately. This duality suggests their sternness is performative, but their lack of open communication with Chris leaves him feeling misunderstood and resentful, as seen in his internal monologue about their expectations.


    3. What literary devices are used to emphasize the theme of youthful rebellion in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The chapter employs irony (Chris’s parents secretly finding the prank funny while punishing him), symbolism (the flickering lights representing clandestine defiance), and juxtaposition (the kids’ playful mischief vs. the parents’ stern facade). The prank calls themselves are metaphors for testing boundaries, while the Morse code scene underscores rebellion as a shared language between Chris and Emily. The parents’ private laughter contrasts with their public severity, highlighting the generational divide and the performative nature of authority.


    4. How does the chapter portray the transition between childhood and adolescence for Chris and Emily?

    Answer:
    The chapter captures their liminal stage through their actions: prank calls (childish mischief) are paired with emerging self-awareness (Chris’s guilt over his mother’s canceled appointment). Emily’s diary entry contrasts childish observations (guinea pigs, gossip) with her avoidance of discussing romantic tales with Chris, hinting at budding complexity. Their Morse code communication shows maturity in problem-solving, while their defiance (e.g., mocking authority figures) reflects adolescent resistance. The parents’ intimate reunion also subtly contrasts with the kids’ innocent bond, foreshadowing future emotional growth.


    5. Evaluate the significance of the chapter’s title, “THEN: 1989,” in framing the narrative.

    Answer:
    The title “THEN: 1989” establishes nostalgia, framing the events as a remembered past. The year 1989 anchors the pre-digital era (prank calls, phone books) and cultural references (Jesse Helms, Prince Albert jokes). The word “THEN” contrasts with the characters’ present, suggesting reflection on how these moments shaped them. For Chris and Emily, it marks a specific, formative time of rebellion and connection; for the parents, it recalls a phase of balancing discipline and passion. The title thus invites readers to consider how such fleeting moments define relationships over time.

    Note