Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story

    Plain Truth: A Novel

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    Jodi Picoult’s Plain Truth (2000) is a legal drama and cultural exploration set in Pennsylvania’s Amish community. The novel centers on Katie Fisher, an unmarried Amish teenager accused of murdering her newborn after the infant’s body is discovered on her family’s farm. Ellie Hathaway, a disillusioned defense attorney, takes on Katie’s case and must live among the Amish as part of bail conditions. The story examines clashes between modern justice and Amish traditions, themes of secrecy, faith, and maternal bonds. Picoult weaves courtroom tension with insights into Amish life, culminating in revelations about the infant’s death and Katie’s hidden trauma. The novel is noted for its research into Plain Sect culture and moral ambiguity.

    PreviousNext
    Plain Truth: A Novel

    THIRTEEN

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    Detec­tive Lizzie Munro finds her­self in an unusu­al posi­tion, tes­ti­fy­ing against an Amish girl, Katie Fish­er, accused of mur­der. Lizzie observes Katie’s demure appear­ance with dis­dain, com­par­ing her to over­ly sen­ti­men­tal fig­urines. As she takes the stand, Lizzie con­fi­dent­ly recounts her cre­den­tials as a detec­tive-sergeant in East Par­adise Town­ship, empha­siz­ing the rar­i­ty of felonies in the area, par­tic­u­lar­ly among the Amish com­mu­ni­ty. The chap­ter sets the stage for a tri­al that pits mod­ern legal scruti­ny against the insu­lar world of the Amish, with Lizzie serv­ing as a bridge between the two.

    The nar­ra­tive shifts to Lizzie’s detailed tes­ti­mo­ny about the dis­cov­ery of a dead new­born in an Amish barn. She describes secur­ing the scene, inter­view­ing the far­m’s occu­pants, and not­ing the absence of preg­nant women in the house­hold. Key evi­dence includes a miss­ing pair of scis­sors and a size-sev­en bare­foot foot­print in the dirt. Lizzie’s ini­tial assump­tion is aban­don­ment rather than foul play, but the dis­cov­ery of blood­ied hay in the calv­ing pen hints at a con­cealed birth. Her method­i­cal approach under­scores the ten­sion between the Amish’s pri­vate way of life and the demands of a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion.

    Lizzie’s tes­ti­mo­ny reveals the piv­otal moment when she encoun­ters Katie Fish­er, who reacts vio­lent­ly to the sight of the dead baby. Notic­ing Katie’s severe bleed­ing, Lizzie orders her hos­pi­tal­iza­tion, despite Katie’s denial of preg­nan­cy. This con­tra­dic­tion sparks Lizzie’s sus­pi­cion, lead­ing her to obtain war­rants for fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion. The dis­cov­ery of a bloody night­gown under Katie’s bed and size-sev­en shoes in her clos­et strength­ens the case against her. Lizzie’s pro­fes­sion­al demeanor con­trasts with the emo­tion­al weight of the evi­dence, high­light­ing the clash between jus­tice and cul­tur­al norms.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Lizzie’s foren­sic find­ings, which defin­i­tive­ly link Katie to the new­born. Blood tests and DNA evi­dence con­firm Katie’s recent child­birth and her con­nec­tion to the blood found in the barn and on the baby. Lizzie’s tes­ti­mo­ny paints a damn­ing pic­ture, yet the read­er is left to pon­der the broad­er impli­ca­tions of an Amish girl fac­ing mur­der charges. The chap­ter mas­ter­ful­ly bal­ances legal pro­ce­dur­al details with the human dra­ma of a com­mu­ni­ty under scruti­ny, set­ting up a com­pelling con­flict for the sto­ry’s pro­gres­sion.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What key evidence did Detective Lizzie Munro gather that linked Katie Fisher to the newborn’s death?

      Answer:
      Detective Munro collected multiple pieces of evidence connecting Katie to the crime. First, she found a size-seven barefoot footprint in the barn matching Katie’s shoe size. Bloody hay in the calving pen was matched to Katie, as was the blood on the baby’s body and the bloody nightgown hidden under Katie’s bed. DNA and blood tests confirmed Katie’s biological relationship to the infant. Additionally, Katie’s physical condition (active vaginal bleeding) and her initial denial of pregnancy raised suspicions, which were later corroborated by medical examinations. These findings collectively established her as the mother and primary suspect.

      2. How does the cultural context of the Amish community influence the investigation, as revealed in Lizzie Munro’s testimony?

      Answer:
      The Amish community’s minimal interaction with law enforcement shaped the investigation’s dynamics. Lizzie notes that while the Amish occasionally report property crimes or DUIs, they generally avoid involving authorities in personal matters. This cultural isolation made it harder to gather information initially, as the Fishers claimed no women in the household were pregnant—a claim later proven false. The community’s insularity also meant Katie’s pregnancy could have been concealed more easily than in a non-Amish setting, complicating the detective’s ability to quickly identify the mother.

      3. Analyze Lizzie Munro’s attitude toward Katie Fisher during the trial. What does this reveal about her perspective on the case?

      Answer:
      Lizzie’s comparison of Katie to a “Precious Moments figurine” (dismissively cute and artificial) suggests skepticism about Katie’s demeanor, which she perceives as performative piety. Her reluctance to look at Katie implies distrust or discomfort, possibly due to Katie’s initial deception about the pregnancy. However, Lizzie’s professional focus on evidence—such as securing the crime scene and methodically collecting forensic data—shows she prioritizes facts over personal bias. Her testimony underscores a tension between cultural assumptions (e.g., Amish innocence) and the hard evidence implicating Katie.

      4. Why was the missing pair of scissors significant in the investigation?

      Answer:
      The scissors, normally used to cut baling twine and kept near the calving pen, were noted as missing by Aaron Fisher. This detail suggested the possibility of tool use during or after the birth, such as cutting an umbilical cord. While not directly tied to the infant’s death, their absence hinted at premeditation or an attempt to clean up evidence. The scissors’ disappearance also reinforced the idea that someone familiar with the barn (like Katie) had accessed tools there, aligning with the footprint and blood evidence.

      Answer:
      Lizzie emphasizes that the township had zero murders the previous year, making this case highly unusual. The scarcity of felonies likely intensified scrutiny on the investigation, as law enforcement lacked experience with similar crimes. For the community—especially the Amish, who avoid conflict—a murder trial would be profoundly destabilizing. The high stakes are evident in Lizzie’s meticulous evidence collection and the forceful medical intervention for Katie, reflecting both legal caution and the gravity of charging an Amish woman with infanticide in a close-knit, low-crime area.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Lizzie Munro would never have laid odds on the fact that one day, she’d be testifying against an Amish murder suspect.”

      This opening line sets the striking contrast between Lizzie’s expectations and reality, highlighting the cultural clash at the heart of the case - an Amish defendant in a murder trial.

      2. “The girl was sitting at the defense table next to that high-powered attorney of hers, head bowed and hands clasped like one of those godawful Precious Moments figurines Lizzie’s mother liked to litter her windowsills with.”

      This vivid description captures Lizzie’s prejudiced view of Katie Fisher, comparing her to overly sentimental figurines while revealing the detective’s cynical perspective on the case.

      3. “No. I wasn’t suspecting much of anything, other than abandonment.”

      Lizzie’s testimony reveals her initial assumptions about the case, showing how her investigation evolved from suspicion of simple abandonment to a murder charge.

      4. “Although she was reluctant, I had her forcibly removed by the EMTs and taken to the hospital for her own personal safety.”

      This turning point shows the moment when Katie’s deception unravels, as physical evidence contradicts her claims and forces authorities to intervene.

      5. “Once I knew that she had lied to me about the pregnancy, I got warrants to search the farm and the house, and to get a blood test and DNA from the baby and from the defendant.”

      This quote marks the critical shift in the investigation where Lizzie moves from suspicion to concrete action, gathering forensic evidence that would become central to the case.

    Quotes

    1. “Lizzie Munro would never have laid odds on the fact that one day, she’d be testifying against an Amish murder suspect.”

    This opening line sets the striking contrast between Lizzie’s expectations and reality, highlighting the cultural clash at the heart of the case - an Amish defendant in a murder trial.

    2. “The girl was sitting at the defense table next to that high-powered attorney of hers, head bowed and hands clasped like one of those godawful Precious Moments figurines Lizzie’s mother liked to litter her windowsills with.”

    This vivid description captures Lizzie’s prejudiced view of Katie Fisher, comparing her to overly sentimental figurines while revealing the detective’s cynical perspective on the case.

    3. “No. I wasn’t suspecting much of anything, other than abandonment.”

    Lizzie’s testimony reveals her initial assumptions about the case, showing how her investigation evolved from suspicion of simple abandonment to a murder charge.

    4. “Although she was reluctant, I had her forcibly removed by the EMTs and taken to the hospital for her own personal safety.”

    This turning point shows the moment when Katie’s deception unravels, as physical evidence contradicts her claims and forces authorities to intervene.

    5. “Once I knew that she had lied to me about the pregnancy, I got warrants to search the farm and the house, and to get a blood test and DNA from the baby and from the defendant.”

    This quote marks the critical shift in the investigation where Lizzie moves from suspicion to concrete action, gathering forensic evidence that would become central to the case.

    FAQs

    1. What key evidence did Detective Lizzie Munro gather that linked Katie Fisher to the newborn’s death?

    Answer:
    Detective Munro collected multiple pieces of evidence connecting Katie to the crime. First, she found a size-seven barefoot footprint in the barn matching Katie’s shoe size. Bloody hay in the calving pen was matched to Katie, as was the blood on the baby’s body and the bloody nightgown hidden under Katie’s bed. DNA and blood tests confirmed Katie’s biological relationship to the infant. Additionally, Katie’s physical condition (active vaginal bleeding) and her initial denial of pregnancy raised suspicions, which were later corroborated by medical examinations. These findings collectively established her as the mother and primary suspect.

    2. How does the cultural context of the Amish community influence the investigation, as revealed in Lizzie Munro’s testimony?

    Answer:
    The Amish community’s minimal interaction with law enforcement shaped the investigation’s dynamics. Lizzie notes that while the Amish occasionally report property crimes or DUIs, they generally avoid involving authorities in personal matters. This cultural isolation made it harder to gather information initially, as the Fishers claimed no women in the household were pregnant—a claim later proven false. The community’s insularity also meant Katie’s pregnancy could have been concealed more easily than in a non-Amish setting, complicating the detective’s ability to quickly identify the mother.

    3. Analyze Lizzie Munro’s attitude toward Katie Fisher during the trial. What does this reveal about her perspective on the case?

    Answer:
    Lizzie’s comparison of Katie to a “Precious Moments figurine” (dismissively cute and artificial) suggests skepticism about Katie’s demeanor, which she perceives as performative piety. Her reluctance to look at Katie implies distrust or discomfort, possibly due to Katie’s initial deception about the pregnancy. However, Lizzie’s professional focus on evidence—such as securing the crime scene and methodically collecting forensic data—shows she prioritizes facts over personal bias. Her testimony underscores a tension between cultural assumptions (e.g., Amish innocence) and the hard evidence implicating Katie.

    4. Why was the missing pair of scissors significant in the investigation?

    Answer:
    The scissors, normally used to cut baling twine and kept near the calving pen, were noted as missing by Aaron Fisher. This detail suggested the possibility of tool use during or after the birth, such as cutting an umbilical cord. While not directly tied to the infant’s death, their absence hinted at premeditation or an attempt to clean up evidence. The scissors’ disappearance also reinforced the idea that someone familiar with the barn (like Katie) had accessed tools there, aligning with the footprint and blood evidence.

    Answer:
    Lizzie emphasizes that the township had zero murders the previous year, making this case highly unusual. The scarcity of felonies likely intensified scrutiny on the investigation, as law enforcement lacked experience with similar crimes. For the community—especially the Amish, who avoid conflict—a murder trial would be profoundly destabilizing. The high stakes are evident in Lizzie’s meticulous evidence collection and the forceful medical intervention for Katie, reflecting both legal caution and the gravity of charging an Amish woman with infanticide in a close-knit, low-crime area.

    Note