Cover of The Art Thief: A True Story of Love, Crime, and a Dangerous Obsession
    True Crime

    The Art Thief: A True Story of Love, Crime, and a Dangerous Obsession

    by testsuphomeAdmin
    The Art Thief: A True Story of Love, Crime, and a Dangerous Obsession by Michael Finkel tells the riveting true story of Stéphane Breitwieser, one of the most prolific art thieves in history. Over the course of several years, Breitwieser stole hundreds of priceless works from museums across Europe, all while evading capture. Finkel explores the complex motivations behind Breitwieser's crimes, including his obsessive love for art and the impact of his actions on his personal life. The book examines themes of obsession, passion, and the thin line between art and crime.

    In Chap­ter 27 of “The Art Thief,” we delve into a tense night for thief Bre­itwieser, who finds him­self impris­oned once again in a Swiss police sta­tion, echo­ing his ear­li­er arrest four years pri­or. The next day, on Novem­ber 21, 2001, a police inspec­tor named Roland Meier arrives to inter­ro­gate him. Both men share a sim­i­lar age and back­ground, con­vers­ing in their native Alsa­t­ian accents. Meier per­ceives Bre­itwieser as a mere pet­ty thief, hav­ing stud­ied his past arrest in Lucerne.

    The inter­ro­ga­tion occurs in a stark, ster­ile room as Meier ques­tions Bre­itwieser about the recent theft of a his­tor­i­cal bugle from the Wag­n­er Muse­um. Bre­itwieser adamant­ly denies involve­ment, despite Meier’s calm per­sis­tence. The day of the theft had been qui­et, with few vis­i­tors. Esther Jaerg, the sole employ­ee present, dis­cov­ered the theft after a patron, donned in a dis­tinc­tive long green coat, left. After Jaerg’s call to the police, addi­tion­al details emerged when a near­by dog walk­er alert­ed author­i­ties upon see­ing a sus­pi­cious indi­vid­ual.

    As evi­dence against him mounts, includ­ing fin­ger­prints and pos­si­bly video record­ings, the pres­sure on Bre­itwieser esca­lates. How­ev­er, he catch­es on to Meier’s bluff; no defin­i­tive evi­dence exists link­ing him to the crime. This gives Bre­itwieser a glim­mer of hope—if he can reach out to his accom­plice, Anne-Cather­ine, he believes they might return the stolen bugle to exon­er­ate him.

    After the brief inter­ro­ga­tion, he is returned to a high-secu­ri­ty cell, where he learns he is clas­si­fied as a high-secu­ri­ty inmate and may not make calls. Meier’s ini­tial assess­ment of Bre­itwieser as a minor crim­i­nal now seems naïve, as he rec­og­nizes Breitwieser’s cun­ning dur­ing the ques­tion­ing. The pos­si­bil­i­ty of him being a ser­i­al thief looms, prompt­ing Meier to seek judi­cial approval to keep him detained and to pur­sue an inter­na­tion­al search war­rant, lead­ing to inves­ti­ga­tions in France regard­ing Bre­itwieser’s past crimes .

    0 Comments

    Heads up! Your comment will be invisible to other guests and subscribers (except for replies), including you after a grace period.
    Note