Header Image
    Cover of The Witchand Other Stories
    Literary

    The Witchand Other Stories

    by

    A Male­fac­tor opens with a qui­et, almost com­i­cal ten­sion as Denis Grig­o­ryev stands before a mag­is­trate, unaware that his every­day action has land­ed him in legal trou­ble. Thin, poor­ly dressed, and con­fused by the set­ting, Denis is a fig­ure straight from the Russ­ian countryside—someone who sees the world through the lens of sur­vival rather than law. His crime? Remov­ing a nut from a rail­way track to use as a fish­ing weight. To Denis, this is no more crim­i­nal than pick­ing a stone from the road­side. His expla­na­tion is sin­cere and unpol­ished, laced with the log­ic of a man whose world is lim­it­ed to what he can touch and use. The mag­is­trate lis­tens, increas­ing­ly baf­fled by the gap between Denis’s per­spec­tive and the grave nature of rail­way safe­ty.

    In Denis’s mind, the tracks are just anoth­er part of the envi­ron­ment, much like a river­bank or an aban­doned barn. The rail­way, which sym­bol­izes progress and state con­trol to the author­i­ties, is sim­ply a place where use­ful things lie for­got­ten and unused. Denis defends his act as com­mon prac­tice among vil­lagers, pre­sent­ing it almost as a tra­di­tion. His words aren’t rebellious—they are inno­cent, even earnest. He doesn’t argue with the mag­is­trate so much as he fails to see why he should need to. While the court­room impos­es struc­ture and rules, Denis’s respons­es are shaped by his upbring­ing, where rules are flu­id and shaped by need. His stub­born inno­cence frus­trates the legal process, which demands guilt or rea­son, not mis­un­der­stand­ing.

    The mag­is­trate, increas­ing­ly per­plexed, tries to explain the dan­ger Denis has cre­at­ed. He out­lines how a miss­ing nut could lead to a train derail­ment, pos­si­bly killing dozens. But Denis remains unmoved, more con­cerned about return­ing home before mar­ket day. The law, with its codes and con­se­quences, feels dis­tant to some­one whose dai­ly con­cerns revolve around catch­ing fish or repair­ing a net. Denis’s detach­ment is not dis­re­spect; it’s root­ed in a world­view where state sys­tems are abstract and sur­vival is imme­di­ate. The magistrate’s lec­ture, though clear, fails to land. In his mind, Denis didn’t steal or destroy—he repur­posed some­thing idle. That intent, to him, mat­ters more than any poten­tial harm.

    As the inter­ro­ga­tion con­tin­ues, Denis even grows a bit irri­tat­ed. He repeats that oth­ers have done the same, that no one ever told him it was wrong. The mag­is­trate, sens­ing futil­i­ty, shifts from expla­na­tion to legal recita­tion. He cites arti­cles and men­tions penal servi­tude, but Denis’s expres­sion shows only faint recog­ni­tion. He doesn’t grasp the consequences—not ful­ly. Instead, he asks if he might return home soon, or at least fin­ish his errands. There’s no mock­ery in his tone, just gen­uine con­fu­sion about why he is being pun­ished so severe­ly. In this court­room, Denis is a stranger to the lan­guage and pri­or­i­ties of the law.

    The final deci­sion to imprison Denis lands heav­i­ly in the room. Still, Denis doesn’t protest; he’s only sur­prised. To him, the pun­ish­ment seems dis­con­nect­ed from the act. It is not jus­tice he rec­og­nizes but some­thing alien, wrapped in for­mal­i­ty and dis­tant con­cern. The sto­ry doesn’t aim to vil­i­fy the mag­is­trate, who is mere­ly doing his job, nor does it mock Denis, who acts out of sur­vival. Instead, it draws a painful, humor­ous line between two worlds: the gov­erned and the gov­ern­ing. Denis becomes a sym­bol of how poor­ly soci­ety bridges this divide.

    Ulti­mate­ly, A Male­fac­tor lays bare the cul­tur­al and sys­temic gaps between rur­al peas­ants and insti­tu­tion­al jus­tice. It under­scores how law, when applied with­out cul­tur­al empa­thy, becomes a tool of con­fu­sion rather than cor­rec­tion. The sto­ry leaves read­ers with the image of Denis—bewildered, sin­cere, and entire­ly out of place—being led away for a crime he still doesn’t believe was wrong. It’s a qui­et tragedy, made sharp­er by how lit­tle either side tru­ly under­stands the oth­er. And in that silence between two worlds, the sto­ry plants its most last­ing mes­sage.

    Quotes

    FAQs

    Note