Cover of Small Great Things
    FictionLiterary Fiction

    Small Great Things

    by Picoult, Jodi
    Jodi Picoult’s Small Great Things (2016) explores themes of race, privilege, and justice through the story of Ruth Jefferson, an African American labor and delivery nurse accused of causing the death of a white supremacist couple’s newborn. The novel alternates perspectives between Ruth, the infant’s father Turk Bauer, and Ruth’s public defender Kennedy McQuarrie, revealing systemic racism and personal biases. Inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s quote about doing “small things in a great way,” the narrative examines moral dilemmas and societal structures. The book has been praised for its thought-provoking examination of contemporary racial tensions and is being adapted into a film.

    The chap­ter opens with Kennedy reflect­ing on the dichoto­my of pub­lic defend­ers: ide­al­ists who believe they can change the sys­tem and real­ists who rec­og­nize its over­whelm­ing flaws. She describes the gru­el­ing real­i­ty of the job, where vic­to­ries are small and per­son­al, like reunit­ing a reha­bil­i­tat­ed moth­er with her child or win­ning a motion to sup­press evi­dence. The work is Sisyphean, with end­less case­loads, poor pay, and lit­tle recog­ni­tion. To cope, Kennedy and her col­leagues draw strict bound­aries between work and per­son­al life, yet she finds her­self haunt­ed by dreams of her client, Ruth Jef­fer­son, sig­nal­ing her inabil­i­ty to com­part­men­tal­ize this case.

    Kennedy’s dreams about Ruth are sur­re­al and unset­tling. In the first, Ruth speaks an incom­pre­hen­si­ble lan­guage, cul­mi­nat­ing in a swarm of blue but­ter­flies. The sec­ond dream fea­tures a lav­ish din­ner that turns into a prison cell, leav­ing Kennedy parched and dis­turbed. These dreams blur into her wak­ing life, prompt­ing her to ask her hus­band, Mic­ah, what would hap­pen if she went to prison. Their play­ful ban­ter masks her under­ly­ing anx­i­ety about Ruth’s case, which lingers in her mind despite her usu­al abil­i­ty to leave work at the office.

    The next morn­ing, Kennedy’s pre­oc­cu­pa­tion with Ruth becomes evi­dent as she pre­pares for court. She con­sid­ers tak­ing on Ruth’s felony case, despite her already over­whelm­ing work­load. Mic­ah ques­tions her sud­den ambi­tion, link­ing it to her ear­li­er prison hypo­thet­i­cal. Kennedy admits her inabil­i­ty to shake Ruth’s sto­ry, which stands out from her usu­al cas­es. While she typ­i­cal­ly finds sym­pa­thy for clients who’ve made mis­takes, Ruth’s sit­u­a­tion feels unre­solved and inex­plic­a­bly unjust. Their con­ver­sa­tion is inter­rupt­ed by their daugh­ter, Vio­let, whose inno­cent antics pro­vide a brief respite from Kennedy’s pro­fes­sion­al tur­moil.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Kennedy at her office, where a small TV hints at the media atten­tion sur­round­ing Ruth’s case. This detail under­scores the pub­lic scruti­ny and pres­sure Kennedy faces, con­trast­ing with the pri­vate tur­moil revealed in her dreams and fam­i­ly inter­ac­tions. The chap­ter paints a vivid pic­ture of a pub­lic defend­er grap­pling with the emo­tion­al weight of a case that defies her usu­al detach­ment, blur­ring the lines between her pro­fes­sion­al resolve and per­son­al vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Kennedy describe the two types of public defenders, and which category does she place herself in?

      Answer:
      Kennedy identifies two types of public defenders: idealistic newcomers who believe they can “save the world” and jaded veterans who recognize the systemic limitations. She places herself in the latter category, describing how her initial idealism hardened into realism after witnessing the overwhelming caseloads and systemic injustices. Her victories are now measured in small, individual successes—like reuniting families or winning minor legal motions—rather than large-scale change. This reflects her view of public defenders as modern Sisyphus figures, endlessly pushing a boulder uphill (page 188).

      2. Analyze the symbolism in Kennedy’s dreams about Ruth Jefferson. What might they reveal about her subconscious concerns?

      Answer:
      The first dream, where Ruth speaks an incomprehensible language and releases butterflies, symbolizes Kennedy’s struggle to understand Ruth’s perspective and the transformative potential of her case. The second dream, featuring a lavish meal in a prison cell, reflects Kennedy’s fear of being trapped by the case’s ethical weight and systemic constraints. Together, they reveal her subconscious tension between professional duty (the attorney-client relationship) and personal anxiety (the “thirst” for justice amid institutional barriers) (pages 189–190).

      3. How does Kennedy’s conversation with Micah about prison highlight the tension between her personal and professional life?

      Answer:
      Micah initially treats Kennedy’s hypothetical prison question as a joke, but her persistence—especially regarding their daughter Violet—shows her genuine anxiety about the risks of taking on Ruth’s case. His sarcastic remark about her workload (“since you already have five hundred open cases”) underscores the personal toll of her profession. This exchange reveals how Kennedy’s commitment to justice clashes with her roles as a wife and mother, forcing her to weigh professional ethics against family stability (pages 190–191).

      4. What does Kennedy’s decision to request a felony case reveal about her ethical framework as a public defender?

      Answer:
      Despite her overwhelming caseload, Kennedy seeks a felony (Ruth’s case) because she senses an injustice that “doesn’t quite add up.” This reflects her core belief that “everyone [deserves] equal access to the system.” Her willingness to take on extra work for a principled cause demonstrates her commitment to systemic fairness over personal convenience, even as she acknowledges the Sisyphean nature of the work. It also marks a shift from her earlier cynicism, reigniting her idealism (page 190).

      5. How does the chapter use Violet’s appearance in the bathroom scene to juxtapose Kennedy’s professional and domestic worlds?

      Answer:
      Violet’s chaotic Minnie Mouse outfit—a bikini top with formal gloves—mirrors Kennedy’s own role conflicts. Just as Violet innocently blends incongruous elements, Kennedy navigates competing identities: a meticulous attorney versus a playful parent. Micah’s joke about “fallen women” contrasts with Kennedy’s earlier prison fears, lightening the mood but also highlighting how her family provides respite from work’s gravity. The scene underscores the challenge of maintaining professional rigor while preserving childhood innocence (page 191).

    Quotes

    • 1. “There are two types of people who become public defenders: those who believe they can save the world, and those who know damn well they can’t.”

      This opening line perfectly captures the dichotomy of idealism vs. realism in public defense work. It introduces the chapter’s central theme about the harsh realities of the justice system and Kennedy’s own professional evolution from starry-eyed advocate to pragmatic defender.

      2. “As it turns out, public defenders are less Superman and more Sisyphus, and there’s no small number of lawyers who wind up crushed under the weight of the infinite caseloads and the crappy hours and the shitty pay.”

      This vivid metaphor illustrates the exhausting, often thankless nature of public defense work. The Sisyphus comparison emphasizes the systemic challenges that make meaningful reform seem impossible, setting up Kennedy’s personal struggle with these limitations.

      3. “I ask if I can get a refill, and Ruth looks horrified. ‘I thought you knew,’ she says, and when I glance up I realize that we are locked inside a prison cell.”

      This haunting dream sequence reveals Kennedy’s subconscious grappling with Ruth Jefferson’s case. The imagery symbolizes both literal imprisonment and the constraints of the justice system, foreshadowing Kennedy’s growing personal investment in Ruth’s plight.

      4. “Even when a client has done something unlawful, I can find sympathy. I can acknowledge a bad choice was made, but still believe in justice, as long as everyone has equal access to the system—which is exactly why I do what I do.”

      This statement encapsulates Kennedy’s professional philosophy and moral compass. It highlights the tension between her belief in systemic justice and her growing suspicion that Ruth’s case represents a fundamental breakdown of that system.

      This stark statistic demonstrates the overwhelming challenges public defenders face, providing crucial context for understanding why Kennedy’s decision to take on Ruth’s complex case represents such a significant professional risk and personal commitment.

    Quotes

    1. “There are two types of people who become public defenders: those who believe they can save the world, and those who know damn well they can’t.”

    This opening line perfectly captures the dichotomy of idealism vs. realism in public defense work. It introduces the chapter’s central theme about the harsh realities of the justice system and Kennedy’s own professional evolution from starry-eyed advocate to pragmatic defender.

    2. “As it turns out, public defenders are less Superman and more Sisyphus, and there’s no small number of lawyers who wind up crushed under the weight of the infinite caseloads and the crappy hours and the shitty pay.”

    This vivid metaphor illustrates the exhausting, often thankless nature of public defense work. The Sisyphus comparison emphasizes the systemic challenges that make meaningful reform seem impossible, setting up Kennedy’s personal struggle with these limitations.

    3. “I ask if I can get a refill, and Ruth looks horrified. ‘I thought you knew,’ she says, and when I glance up I realize that we are locked inside a prison cell.”

    This haunting dream sequence reveals Kennedy’s subconscious grappling with Ruth Jefferson’s case. The imagery symbolizes both literal imprisonment and the constraints of the justice system, foreshadowing Kennedy’s growing personal investment in Ruth’s plight.

    4. “Even when a client has done something unlawful, I can find sympathy. I can acknowledge a bad choice was made, but still believe in justice, as long as everyone has equal access to the system—which is exactly why I do what I do.”

    This statement encapsulates Kennedy’s professional philosophy and moral compass. It highlights the tension between her belief in systemic justice and her growing suspicion that Ruth’s case represents a fundamental breakdown of that system.

    This stark statistic demonstrates the overwhelming challenges public defenders face, providing crucial context for understanding why Kennedy’s decision to take on Ruth’s complex case represents such a significant professional risk and personal commitment.

    FAQs

    1. How does Kennedy describe the two types of public defenders, and which category does she place herself in?

    Answer:
    Kennedy identifies two types of public defenders: idealistic newcomers who believe they can “save the world” and jaded veterans who recognize the systemic limitations. She places herself in the latter category, describing how her initial idealism hardened into realism after witnessing the overwhelming caseloads and systemic injustices. Her victories are now measured in small, individual successes—like reuniting families or winning minor legal motions—rather than large-scale change. This reflects her view of public defenders as modern Sisyphus figures, endlessly pushing a boulder uphill (page 188).

    2. Analyze the symbolism in Kennedy’s dreams about Ruth Jefferson. What might they reveal about her subconscious concerns?

    Answer:
    The first dream, where Ruth speaks an incomprehensible language and releases butterflies, symbolizes Kennedy’s struggle to understand Ruth’s perspective and the transformative potential of her case. The second dream, featuring a lavish meal in a prison cell, reflects Kennedy’s fear of being trapped by the case’s ethical weight and systemic constraints. Together, they reveal her subconscious tension between professional duty (the attorney-client relationship) and personal anxiety (the “thirst” for justice amid institutional barriers) (pages 189–190).

    3. How does Kennedy’s conversation with Micah about prison highlight the tension between her personal and professional life?

    Answer:
    Micah initially treats Kennedy’s hypothetical prison question as a joke, but her persistence—especially regarding their daughter Violet—shows her genuine anxiety about the risks of taking on Ruth’s case. His sarcastic remark about her workload (“since you already have five hundred open cases”) underscores the personal toll of her profession. This exchange reveals how Kennedy’s commitment to justice clashes with her roles as a wife and mother, forcing her to weigh professional ethics against family stability (pages 190–191).

    4. What does Kennedy’s decision to request a felony case reveal about her ethical framework as a public defender?

    Answer:
    Despite her overwhelming caseload, Kennedy seeks a felony (Ruth’s case) because she senses an injustice that “doesn’t quite add up.” This reflects her core belief that “everyone [deserves] equal access to the system.” Her willingness to take on extra work for a principled cause demonstrates her commitment to systemic fairness over personal convenience, even as she acknowledges the Sisyphean nature of the work. It also marks a shift from her earlier cynicism, reigniting her idealism (page 190).

    5. How does the chapter use Violet’s appearance in the bathroom scene to juxtapose Kennedy’s professional and domestic worlds?

    Answer:
    Violet’s chaotic Minnie Mouse outfit—a bikini top with formal gloves—mirrors Kennedy’s own role conflicts. Just as Violet innocently blends incongruous elements, Kennedy navigates competing identities: a meticulous attorney versus a playful parent. Micah’s joke about “fallen women” contrasts with Kennedy’s earlier prison fears, lightening the mood but also highlighting how her family provides respite from work’s gravity. The scene underscores the challenge of maintaining professional rigor while preserving childhood innocence (page 191).

    Note