Small Great Things

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    Jodi Picoult’s Small Great Things (2016) explores themes of race, privilege, and justice through the story of Ruth Jefferson, an African American labor and delivery nurse accused of causing the death of a white supremacist couple’s newborn. The novel alternates perspectives between Ruth, the infant’s father Turk Bauer, and Ruth’s public defender Kennedy McQuarrie, revealing systemic racism and personal biases. Inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s quote about doing “small things in a great way,” the narrative examines moral dilemmas and societal structures. The book has been praised for its thought-provoking examination of contemporary racial tensions and is being adapted into a film.

    The chap­ter opens with a poignant account of a baby born with severe facial defor­mi­ties, described as “the most beau­ti­ful baby” despite his con­di­tion. The moth­er, unaware of the defor­mi­ty due to incon­clu­sive pre­na­tal ultra­sounds, deliv­ers at a small­er hos­pi­tal. The deliv­ery room falls into stunned silence when the baby is born, and a stu­dent nurse’s hor­ri­fied reac­tion high­lights soci­ety’s dis­com­fort with phys­i­cal dif­fer­ences. The obste­tri­cian deliv­ers the dev­as­tat­ing news that the baby’s con­di­tion is incom­pat­i­ble with life, set­ting the stage for an emo­tion­al explo­ration of parental love and grief.

    Ruth, the nurse nar­ra­tor, focus­es on pro­vid­ing dig­ni­ty and care for the new­born, empha­siz­ing that even in death, the baby deserves the same bond­ing rit­u­als as any oth­er child. She swad­dles the infant while the par­ents grap­ple with shock and despair, their frag­ment­ed ques­tions reflect­ing uni­ver­sal fears. The moth­er’s ten­der nam­ing of the baby—“Ian Michael Barnes”—and her raw, lov­ing gaze con­trast sharply with the father’s ini­tial rejec­tion. Ruth inter­venes, urg­ing the father to con­front his emo­tions, argu­ing that avoid­ing this pain would leave him emo­tion­al­ly hol­low.

    The father’s even­tu­al break­down and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion with his wife and dying son form the chap­ter’s emo­tion­al cli­max. The par­ents take turns hold­ing Ian for ten hours, with the moth­er even attempt­ing to nurse him, demon­strat­ing uncon­di­tion­al love. Ruth uses this moment to teach the judg­men­tal stu­dent nurse a les­son about love tran­scend­ing phys­i­cal appear­ance. The baby’s peace­ful death is fol­lowed by small memo­ri­als, like hand and foot casts, and the cou­ple lat­er returns to have a healthy daugh­ter, under­scor­ing resilience.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Ruth reflect­ing on her own child­birth expe­ri­ence, con­trast­ing her super­fi­cial con­cern about her hair with the pro­found les­son she learned from Ian’s sto­ry: beau­ty is sub­jec­tive, shaped by our per­cep­tions. Her final lines—“every baby is born beau­ti­ful. It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly”—serve as a pow­er­ful the­sis on prej­u­dice, com­pas­sion, and the trans­for­ma­tive pow­er of love in the face of suf­fer­ing.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator’s professional approach to the birth of the facially deformed baby contrast with the student nurse’s reaction? What does this reveal about medical professionalism?

      Answer:
      The narrator demonstrates compassionate professionalism by immediately removing the screaming student nurse and focusing on providing dignified care to the infant and emotional support to the parents. In contrast, the student nurse calls the baby a “monster,” revealing her lack of emotional preparedness. This stark difference highlights key aspects of medical professionalism: maintaining composure in crises, treating all patients with dignity regardless of appearance, and prioritizing patient/family needs over personal reactions. The narrator’s actions—cleaning, swaddling, and facilitating bonding—show how medical professionals must balance clinical duties with profound emotional labor (as seen when she insists the father hold his son).

      2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the mother attempting to nurse her faceless baby. How does this moment encapsulate the chapter’s central theme?

      Answer:
      The nursing attempt represents unconditional maternal love transcending physical form, embodying the chapter’s thesis that “every baby is born beautiful.” This poignant moment—where the mother offers nourishment despite the baby’s inability to feed normally—demonstrates how parental love operates independently of societal standards of perfection. The narrator’s description of it being “like looking into the sun” suggests this love is both awe-inspiring and fundamentally human. This scene visually contradicts the father’s initial rejection and the student nurse’s revulsion, proving that beauty and worth are subjective perceptions rather than inherent qualities.

      3. What psychological rationale does the narrator provide for insisting the father hold his dying child? How does this reflect on trauma processing?

      Answer:
      The narrator explains that avoiding the traumatic reality would create an emotional void that would expand over time, leaving the father “completely hollow.” This reflects contemporary psychological understanding that confronting grief (rather than suppressing it) facilitates healthier long-term adjustment. By compelling the father to engage in bonding behaviors like holding and naming the baby, she facilitates active mourning—a process later validated when the couple returns to deliver a healthy child. The father’s eventual emotional breakdown and reconciliation with his wife demonstrate the cathartic necessity of facing painful truths, a concept central to trauma-informed care.

      4. How does the chapter’s final line (“It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly”) serve as a thematic bridge to the abrupt shift in focus to the narrator’s postpartum hair concerns?

      Answer:
      This juxtaposition creates an ironic commentary on societal priorities. After establishing that true beauty lies in perception (through the extreme example of the faceless baby), the narrator reveals her own vulnerability to superficial concerns about her post-birth appearance. This sudden shift highlights how even professionals who champion body acceptance can internalize beauty standards. The hair anecdote serves as a relatable counterpoint to the earlier tragedy, suggesting that while we may intellectually understand the principle of projected ugliness, emotionally overcoming ingrained biases remains an ongoing personal challenge for everyone, including the narrator herself.

    Quotes

    • 1. “THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY I ever saw was born without a face.”

      This jarring opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s central paradox - that beauty and humanity aren’t defined by physical perfection. The quote introduces Ruth’s profound perspective as a nurse who sees beyond appearances to the essence of life.

      2. “It just goes to show you: every baby is born beautiful. It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly.”

      This powerful conclusion summarizes Ruth’s hard-won wisdom from the traumatic birth experience. The quote challenges societal perceptions of beauty and deformity while revealing Ruth’s core belief about inherent human worth.

      3. “I took that stupid nursing student into the room with me… to make her see with her own eyes how love has nothing to do with what you’re looking at, and everything to do with who’s looking.”

      This quote captures a pivotal teaching moment where Ruth demonstrates her philosophy of compassionate care. It reveals how she actively counters prejudice by reframing perceptions of difference through love’s lens.

      4. “She wore an expression I’ve only seen in paintings in museums, of a love and a grief so fierce that they forged together to create some new, raw emotion.”

      This beautifully observed moment crystallizes the chapter’s emotional core - the transformative power of parental love even in tragedy. Ruth’s poetic description elevates a private agony into universal human experience.

      5. “I would have said that I’d been trained to provide closure for grieving parents… a hole would open up inside him… until one day he would realize he was completely hollow.”

      This insight reveals Ruth’s professional philosophy about emotional honesty in facing trauma. The metaphor of the growing hollow illustrates her understanding of unprocessed grief’s destructive potential.

    Quotes

    1. “THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY I ever saw was born without a face.”

    This jarring opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s central paradox - that beauty and humanity aren’t defined by physical perfection. The quote introduces Ruth’s profound perspective as a nurse who sees beyond appearances to the essence of life.

    2. “It just goes to show you: every baby is born beautiful. It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly.”

    This powerful conclusion summarizes Ruth’s hard-won wisdom from the traumatic birth experience. The quote challenges societal perceptions of beauty and deformity while revealing Ruth’s core belief about inherent human worth.

    3. “I took that stupid nursing student into the room with me… to make her see with her own eyes how love has nothing to do with what you’re looking at, and everything to do with who’s looking.”

    This quote captures a pivotal teaching moment where Ruth demonstrates her philosophy of compassionate care. It reveals how she actively counters prejudice by reframing perceptions of difference through love’s lens.

    4. “She wore an expression I’ve only seen in paintings in museums, of a love and a grief so fierce that they forged together to create some new, raw emotion.”

    This beautifully observed moment crystallizes the chapter’s emotional core - the transformative power of parental love even in tragedy. Ruth’s poetic description elevates a private agony into universal human experience.

    5. “I would have said that I’d been trained to provide closure for grieving parents… a hole would open up inside him… until one day he would realize he was completely hollow.”

    This insight reveals Ruth’s professional philosophy about emotional honesty in facing trauma. The metaphor of the growing hollow illustrates her understanding of unprocessed grief’s destructive potential.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator’s professional approach to the birth of the facially deformed baby contrast with the student nurse’s reaction? What does this reveal about medical professionalism?

    Answer:
    The narrator demonstrates compassionate professionalism by immediately removing the screaming student nurse and focusing on providing dignified care to the infant and emotional support to the parents. In contrast, the student nurse calls the baby a “monster,” revealing her lack of emotional preparedness. This stark difference highlights key aspects of medical professionalism: maintaining composure in crises, treating all patients with dignity regardless of appearance, and prioritizing patient/family needs over personal reactions. The narrator’s actions—cleaning, swaddling, and facilitating bonding—show how medical professionals must balance clinical duties with profound emotional labor (as seen when she insists the father hold his son).

    2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the mother attempting to nurse her faceless baby. How does this moment encapsulate the chapter’s central theme?

    Answer:
    The nursing attempt represents unconditional maternal love transcending physical form, embodying the chapter’s thesis that “every baby is born beautiful.” This poignant moment—where the mother offers nourishment despite the baby’s inability to feed normally—demonstrates how parental love operates independently of societal standards of perfection. The narrator’s description of it being “like looking into the sun” suggests this love is both awe-inspiring and fundamentally human. This scene visually contradicts the father’s initial rejection and the student nurse’s revulsion, proving that beauty and worth are subjective perceptions rather than inherent qualities.

    3. What psychological rationale does the narrator provide for insisting the father hold his dying child? How does this reflect on trauma processing?

    Answer:
    The narrator explains that avoiding the traumatic reality would create an emotional void that would expand over time, leaving the father “completely hollow.” This reflects contemporary psychological understanding that confronting grief (rather than suppressing it) facilitates healthier long-term adjustment. By compelling the father to engage in bonding behaviors like holding and naming the baby, she facilitates active mourning—a process later validated when the couple returns to deliver a healthy child. The father’s eventual emotional breakdown and reconciliation with his wife demonstrate the cathartic necessity of facing painful truths, a concept central to trauma-informed care.

    4. How does the chapter’s final line (“It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly”) serve as a thematic bridge to the abrupt shift in focus to the narrator’s postpartum hair concerns?

    Answer:
    This juxtaposition creates an ironic commentary on societal priorities. After establishing that true beauty lies in perception (through the extreme example of the faceless baby), the narrator reveals her own vulnerability to superficial concerns about her post-birth appearance. This sudden shift highlights how even professionals who champion body acceptance can internalize beauty standards. The hair anecdote serves as a relatable counterpoint to the earlier tragedy, suggesting that while we may intellectually understand the principle of projected ugliness, emotionally overcoming ingrained biases remains an ongoing personal challenge for everyone, including the narrator herself.

    Small Great Things

    by

    Picoult, Jodi

    Jodi Picoult’s Small Great Things (2016) explores themes of race, privilege, and justice through the story of Ruth Jefferson, an African American labor and delivery nurse accused of causing the death of a white supremacist couple’s newborn. The novel alternates perspectives between Ruth, the infant’s father Turk Bauer, and Ruth’s public defender Kennedy McQuarrie, revealing systemic racism and personal biases. Inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s quote about doing “small things in a great way,” the narrative examines moral dilemmas and societal structures. The book has been praised for its thought-provoking examination of contemporary racial tensions and is being adapted into a film.

    The chap­ter opens with Ruth, a nurse, recount­ing the birth of a severe­ly deformed baby boy whose facial abnor­mal­i­ties were unde­tect­ed dur­ing pre­na­tal care. Despite his shock­ing appear­ance, the new­born was oth­er­wise healthy, leav­ing the med­ical team and par­ents unpre­pared. The moth­er, though dev­as­tat­ed, imme­di­ate­ly bond­ed with her son, nam­ing him Ian Michael Barnes, while the father ini­tial­ly recoiled in hor­ror and denial. Ruth empha­sizes the impor­tance of acknowl­edg­ing the child’s human­i­ty, even in his brief life, and gen­tly guides the father toward accep­tance.

    Ruth describes her pro­fes­sion­al approach to this trag­ic sit­u­a­tion, focus­ing on help­ing the par­ents grieve and con­nect with their child. She con­trasts the moth­er’s uncon­di­tion­al love with the father’s ini­tial rejec­tion, as well as a stu­dent nurse’s cru­el descrip­tion of the baby as a “mon­ster.” Ruth inter­venes, cor­rect­ing the stu­dent and insist­ing the infant be treat­ed with dig­ni­ty. She lat­er brings the stu­dent back to wit­ness the par­ents’ pro­found love, chal­leng­ing her prej­u­diced per­spec­tive and demon­strat­ing that true love tran­scends phys­i­cal appear­ance.

    The nar­ra­tive high­lights the fam­i­ly’s ten pre­cious hours with their son, includ­ing the moth­er’s attempt to nurse him and the father’s even­tu­al emo­tion­al break­down as he holds the baby. Ruth reflects on her role in facil­i­tat­ing this painful but nec­es­sary bond­ing process, believ­ing it would pre­vent life­long emo­tion­al dam­age. The baby’s peace­ful death is fol­lowed by the cre­ation of keep­sakes for the par­ents, and Ruth lat­er learns they went on to have a healthy daugh­ter, under­scor­ing the resilience of the human spir­it.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Ruth’s per­son­al reflec­tion on beau­ty and per­cep­tion, assert­ing that all babies are born beau­ti­ful until soci­etal prej­u­dices dis­tort that view. This segues into her own post­par­tum expe­ri­ence after deliv­er­ing her son Edi­son, where her imme­di­ate con­cern about her hair’s appear­ance con­trasts with the pro­found themes of the pre­ced­ing sto­ry, sub­tly illus­trat­ing how soci­etal pres­sures can over­shad­ow life’s most mean­ing­ful moments.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator’s professional approach to the birth of the facially deformed baby contrast with the student nurse’s reaction? What does this reveal about medical professionalism?

      Answer:
      The narrator demonstrates compassionate professionalism by immediately removing the screaming student nurse and focusing on providing dignified care to the infant and emotional support to the parents. In contrast, the student nurse calls the baby a “monster,” revealing her lack of emotional preparedness. This stark difference highlights key aspects of medical professionalism: maintaining composure in crises, treating all patients with dignity regardless of appearance, and prioritizing patient/family needs over personal reactions. The narrator’s actions—cleaning, swaddling, and facilitating bonding—show how medical professionals must balance clinical duties with profound emotional labor (as seen when she insists the father hold his son).

      2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the mother attempting to nurse her faceless baby. How does this moment encapsulate the chapter’s central theme?

      Answer:
      The nursing attempt represents unconditional maternal love transcending physical form, embodying the chapter’s thesis that “every baby is born beautiful.” This poignant moment—where the mother offers nourishment despite the baby’s inability to feed normally—demonstrates how parental love operates independently of societal standards of perfection. The narrator’s description of it being “like looking into the sun” suggests this love is both awe-inspiring and fundamentally human. This scene visually contradicts the father’s initial rejection and the student nurse’s revulsion, proving that beauty and worth are subjective perceptions rather than inherent qualities.

      3. What psychological rationale does the narrator provide for insisting the father hold his dying child? How does this reflect on trauma processing?

      Answer:
      The narrator explains that avoiding the traumatic reality would create an emotional void that would expand over time, leaving the father “completely hollow.” This reflects contemporary psychological understanding that confronting grief (rather than suppressing it) facilitates healthier long-term adjustment. By compelling the father to engage in bonding behaviors like holding and naming the baby, she facilitates active mourning—a process later validated when the couple returns to deliver a healthy child. The father’s eventual emotional breakdown and reconciliation with his wife demonstrate the cathartic necessity of facing painful truths, a concept central to trauma-informed care.

      4. How does the chapter’s final line (“It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly”) serve as a thematic bridge to the abrupt shift in focus to the narrator’s postpartum hair concerns?

      Answer:
      This juxtaposition creates an ironic commentary on societal priorities. After establishing that true beauty lies in perception (through the extreme example of the faceless baby), the narrator reveals her own vulnerability to superficial concerns about her post-birth appearance. This sudden shift highlights how even professionals who champion body acceptance can internalize beauty standards. The hair anecdote serves as a relatable counterpoint to the earlier tragedy, suggesting that while we may intellectually understand the principle of projected ugliness, emotionally overcoming ingrained biases remains an ongoing personal challenge for everyone, including the narrator herself.

    Quotes

    • 1. “THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY I ever saw was born without a face.”

      This jarring opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s central paradox - that beauty and humanity aren’t defined by physical perfection. The quote introduces Ruth’s profound perspective as a nurse who sees beyond appearances to the essence of life.

      2. “It just goes to show you: every baby is born beautiful. It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly.”

      This powerful conclusion summarizes Ruth’s hard-won wisdom from the traumatic birth experience. The quote challenges societal perceptions of beauty and deformity while revealing Ruth’s core belief about inherent human worth.

      3. “I took that stupid nursing student into the room with me… to make her see with her own eyes how love has nothing to do with what you’re looking at, and everything to do with who’s looking.”

      This quote captures a pivotal teaching moment where Ruth demonstrates her philosophy of compassionate care. It reveals how she actively counters prejudice by reframing perceptions of difference through love’s lens.

      4. “She wore an expression I’ve only seen in paintings in museums, of a love and a grief so fierce that they forged together to create some new, raw emotion.”

      This beautifully observed moment crystallizes the chapter’s emotional core - the transformative power of parental love even in tragedy. Ruth’s poetic description elevates a private agony into universal human experience.

      5. “I would have said that I’d been trained to provide closure for grieving parents… a hole would open up inside him… until one day he would realize he was completely hollow.”

      This insight reveals Ruth’s professional philosophy about emotional honesty in facing trauma. The metaphor of the growing hollow illustrates her understanding of unprocessed grief’s destructive potential.

    Quotes

    1. “THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY I ever saw was born without a face.”

    This jarring opening line immediately establishes the chapter’s central paradox - that beauty and humanity aren’t defined by physical perfection. The quote introduces Ruth’s profound perspective as a nurse who sees beyond appearances to the essence of life.

    2. “It just goes to show you: every baby is born beautiful. It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly.”

    This powerful conclusion summarizes Ruth’s hard-won wisdom from the traumatic birth experience. The quote challenges societal perceptions of beauty and deformity while revealing Ruth’s core belief about inherent human worth.

    3. “I took that stupid nursing student into the room with me… to make her see with her own eyes how love has nothing to do with what you’re looking at, and everything to do with who’s looking.”

    This quote captures a pivotal teaching moment where Ruth demonstrates her philosophy of compassionate care. It reveals how she actively counters prejudice by reframing perceptions of difference through love’s lens.

    4. “She wore an expression I’ve only seen in paintings in museums, of a love and a grief so fierce that they forged together to create some new, raw emotion.”

    This beautifully observed moment crystallizes the chapter’s emotional core - the transformative power of parental love even in tragedy. Ruth’s poetic description elevates a private agony into universal human experience.

    5. “I would have said that I’d been trained to provide closure for grieving parents… a hole would open up inside him… until one day he would realize he was completely hollow.”

    This insight reveals Ruth’s professional philosophy about emotional honesty in facing trauma. The metaphor of the growing hollow illustrates her understanding of unprocessed grief’s destructive potential.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator’s professional approach to the birth of the facially deformed baby contrast with the student nurse’s reaction? What does this reveal about medical professionalism?

    Answer:
    The narrator demonstrates compassionate professionalism by immediately removing the screaming student nurse and focusing on providing dignified care to the infant and emotional support to the parents. In contrast, the student nurse calls the baby a “monster,” revealing her lack of emotional preparedness. This stark difference highlights key aspects of medical professionalism: maintaining composure in crises, treating all patients with dignity regardless of appearance, and prioritizing patient/family needs over personal reactions. The narrator’s actions—cleaning, swaddling, and facilitating bonding—show how medical professionals must balance clinical duties with profound emotional labor (as seen when she insists the father hold his son).

    2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the mother attempting to nurse her faceless baby. How does this moment encapsulate the chapter’s central theme?

    Answer:
    The nursing attempt represents unconditional maternal love transcending physical form, embodying the chapter’s thesis that “every baby is born beautiful.” This poignant moment—where the mother offers nourishment despite the baby’s inability to feed normally—demonstrates how parental love operates independently of societal standards of perfection. The narrator’s description of it being “like looking into the sun” suggests this love is both awe-inspiring and fundamentally human. This scene visually contradicts the father’s initial rejection and the student nurse’s revulsion, proving that beauty and worth are subjective perceptions rather than inherent qualities.

    3. What psychological rationale does the narrator provide for insisting the father hold his dying child? How does this reflect on trauma processing?

    Answer:
    The narrator explains that avoiding the traumatic reality would create an emotional void that would expand over time, leaving the father “completely hollow.” This reflects contemporary psychological understanding that confronting grief (rather than suppressing it) facilitates healthier long-term adjustment. By compelling the father to engage in bonding behaviors like holding and naming the baby, she facilitates active mourning—a process later validated when the couple returns to deliver a healthy child. The father’s eventual emotional breakdown and reconciliation with his wife demonstrate the cathartic necessity of facing painful truths, a concept central to trauma-informed care.

    4. How does the chapter’s final line (“It’s what we project on them that makes them ugly”) serve as a thematic bridge to the abrupt shift in focus to the narrator’s postpartum hair concerns?

    Answer:
    This juxtaposition creates an ironic commentary on societal priorities. After establishing that true beauty lies in perception (through the extreme example of the faceless baby), the narrator reveals her own vulnerability to superficial concerns about her post-birth appearance. This sudden shift highlights how even professionals who champion body acceptance can internalize beauty standards. The hair anecdote serves as a relatable counterpoint to the earlier tragedy, suggesting that while we may intellectually understand the principle of projected ugliness, emotionally overcoming ingrained biases remains an ongoing personal challenge for everyone, including the narrator herself.

    Note