Cover of Prodigy
    DystopianFictionPolitical FictionThrillerYoung Adult

    Prodigy

    by Lu, Marie
    “Prodigy” by Marie Lu is the second installment in the dystopian “Legend” trilogy, following the gripping journey of June and Day as they navigate a fractured society. After escaping the Republic’s clutches, the duo allies with the rebel Patriots to overthrow the oppressive regime, but their trust is tested by shifting loyalties and hidden agendas. Themes of power, sacrifice, and identity are explored against a backdrop of political intrigue and revolution. Lu’s taut prose and intricate world-building heighten the tension, making “Prodigy” a compelling exploration of morality and resilience in a divided world. The novel advances the series’ narrative while deepening character arcs and societal critiques.

    The chap­ter opens with June in a frag­ile state, heav­i­ly sedat­ed after sob­bing over her brother’s death. The nar­ra­tor, Daniel, watch­es her with empa­thy, recall­ing his own loss of an old­er broth­er. He tries to com­fort her by smooth­ing her hair and kiss­ing her fore­head, though it seems futile. The hos­pi­tal is qui­et, filled with dis­tant nois­es and a news broad­cast inter­spersed with unfa­mil­iar com­mer­cials. Daniel reflects on his mother’s care for his broth­er Eden dur­ing his ill­ness, draw­ing par­al­lels to June’s grief and his own past.

    A Colonies sol­dier enters the room, treat­ing Daniel with unex­pect­ed respect, as if he’s a high-rank­ing offi­cer. She informs him that June must remain hos­pi­tal­ized until she recov­ers and offers addi­tion­al accom­mo­da­tions. Daniel accepts, wary but grate­ful for the pref­er­en­tial treat­ment. The soldier’s demeanor shifts to curios­i­ty as she ques­tions him about his rep­u­ta­tion in the Colonies, ref­er­enc­ing exag­ger­at­ed tabloid sto­ries about his exploits. Daniel deflects her ques­tions, but her men­tion of a fir­ing squad exe­cu­tion trig­gers painful mem­o­ries of his brother’s sac­ri­fice.

    The sol­dier explains the his­to­ry of the war and the Colonies, detail­ing how cat­a­stroph­ic floods reshaped the con­ti­nent, lead­ing to mass migra­tions and ter­ri­to­r­i­al con­flicts. She boasts about the Colonies’ impend­ing vic­to­ry, claim­ing the war is root­ed in land dis­putes. Daniel recalls Kaede’s ear­li­er remarks about the Colonies’ dom­i­nance, now hear­ing it con­firmed. The con­ver­sa­tion high­lights the stark con­trast between the Republic’s and Colonies’ nar­ra­tives, leav­ing Daniel to pon­der the truth amid pro­pa­gan­da.

    As the dis­cus­sion ends, the noise out­side the hos­pi­tal grows loud­er, hint­ing at unrest or activ­i­ty in the city. The chap­ter clos­es with Daniel’s lin­ger­ing thoughts on the war’s ori­gins and the soldier’s con­fi­dent claims, leav­ing him unset­tled. The ten­sion between per­son­al grief and broad­er polit­i­cal con­flict under­scores the chapter’s emo­tion­al and the­mat­ic weight, set­ting the stage for fur­ther devel­op­ments.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the narrator (Daniel) demonstrate care for June in this chapter, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

      Answer:
      Daniel shows deep care for June by smoothing her hair, kissing her damp forehead, cheeks, and lips, and maintaining a vigil by her bedside while she sleeps. These actions mirror the comfort June has previously offered him, indicating a reciprocal and intimate bond. His persistence in comforting her despite her unresponsiveness highlights his devotion. The chapter also reveals their shared trauma—both have lost older brothers, which creates a profound emotional connection between them. Daniel’s tenderness contrasts with his usual rebellious persona, showing vulnerability in their relationship.

      2. What cultural differences between the Republic and the Colonies are highlighted in this chapter?

      Answer:
      The chapter underscores stark contrasts: the Colonies’ media includes commercials (unfamiliar to Republic citizens) and sensationalized tabloid stories about figures like Daniel, portraying him with dramatic nicknames like “The Phantom.” The soldier’s casual demeanor and lack of restraints for Daniel and June also reflect a more relaxed authority compared to the Republic’s strict control. Additionally, the Colonies openly discuss historical events like the floods and land wars, which the Republic likely suppresses. These differences emphasize the Colonies’ capitalist, media-driven society versus the Republic’s authoritarian propaganda.

      3. What historical context does the soldier provide about the war between the Colonies and the Republic?

      Answer:
      The soldier explains that the war originated from land disputes after catastrophic floods wiped out southern U.S. states, forcing eastern refugees westward. The western states built walls to block migration, prompting the Colonies to create tunnels—later repurposed for military assaults by the Republic. She frames the conflict as a struggle for resources, with the Colonies now “winning.” This history reveals the war’s roots in environmental disaster and displacement, contrasting with the Republic’s likely narrative of ideological conflict. The soldier’s pride in the Colonies’ stability adds a layer of propaganda, mirroring the Republic’s bias.

      4. How does Daniel react to the soldier’s mention of his alleged exploits, and what does this reveal about his character?

      Answer:
      Daniel laughs at the absurd tabloid claims (e.g., dating singer Lincoln or dodging execution bullets) but becomes somber when reminded of his brother’s death. This reaction shows his discomfort with fame and the painful memories behind his legend. His silence when the soldier mentions executions underscores his guilt over Metias’s sacrifice, revealing how trauma overshadows his reputation. The contrast between his humor and sudden seriousness highlights his complexity—he’s both a defiant figure and a grieving younger brother, resistant to the Colonies’ glamorization of his suffering.

      5. Why might the Colonies treat Daniel and June with unexpected leniency, and what risks could this pose?

      Answer:
      The Colonies likely treat them leniently due to Daniel’s celebrity status as a Republic defector, which propaganda outlets like Evergreen Ent exploit for morale. The lack of restraints suggests they view the pair as non-threatening or valuable for PR. However, this poses risks: if the Colonies discover their ties to the Patriots (who botched the Elector’s assassination), their hospitality could vanish. June’s identity as the Republic’s “prodigy” is also a liability if revealed. The soldier’s casual attitude hints at either ignorance or overconfidence, leaving Daniel wary of their precarious position.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Those strong dark eyes of hers—now, their expression was just … broken. I wince. Of course, I know exactly what it feels like to lose an older brother.”

      This poignant moment captures the shared grief between the narrator and June, revealing their emotional bond through parallel experiences of loss. The raw vulnerability here underscores a key theme of trauma and mutual understanding.

      2. “No, I didn’t dodge any bullets. I let my older brother take them for me.”

      A devastating revelation that exposes the narrator’s survivor guilt and the true cost of his past actions. This brief statement carries immense emotional weight, contrasting sharply with the Colonies’ glamorized rumors about him.

      3. “Back in the day, this all used to be the United States of America. You know that, yes?” […] “Well, do you know about the floods? Came fast, in less than two years, and wiped out half of the low-lying south.”

      This world-building exchange provides crucial historical context about the environmental catastrophe that reshaped the continent. The soldier’s explanation reveals how geography and resource scarcity fuel the ongoing war between the Republic and Colonies.

      4. “This war won’t go on for much longer—we’ve been winning for a while now.”

      A bold claim that challenges the narrator’s (and reader’s) understanding of the conflict’s status quo. This quote introduces tension about the Colonies’ perceived superiority and foreshadows potential shifts in the power dynamic.

      5. “Every now and then Republic refugees come in just like you did […] No one likes civilians from an enemy territory suddenly taking up residence in one’s hometown.”

      This exposes the deep-seated animosity between the two societies, highlighting how war has eroded basic human empathy. The casual cruelty in “kicking them back over the warfront” reveals the Colonies’ harsh treatment of displaced people.

    Quotes

    1. “Those strong dark eyes of hers—now, their expression was just … broken. I wince. Of course, I know exactly what it feels like to lose an older brother.”

    This poignant moment captures the shared grief between the narrator and June, revealing their emotional bond through parallel experiences of loss. The raw vulnerability here underscores a key theme of trauma and mutual understanding.

    2. “No, I didn’t dodge any bullets. I let my older brother take them for me.”

    A devastating revelation that exposes the narrator’s survivor guilt and the true cost of his past actions. This brief statement carries immense emotional weight, contrasting sharply with the Colonies’ glamorized rumors about him.

    3. “Back in the day, this all used to be the United States of America. You know that, yes?” […] “Well, do you know about the floods? Came fast, in less than two years, and wiped out half of the low-lying south.”

    This world-building exchange provides crucial historical context about the environmental catastrophe that reshaped the continent. The soldier’s explanation reveals how geography and resource scarcity fuel the ongoing war between the Republic and Colonies.

    4. “This war won’t go on for much longer—we’ve been winning for a while now.”

    A bold claim that challenges the narrator’s (and reader’s) understanding of the conflict’s status quo. This quote introduces tension about the Colonies’ perceived superiority and foreshadows potential shifts in the power dynamic.

    5. “Every now and then Republic refugees come in just like you did […] No one likes civilians from an enemy territory suddenly taking up residence in one’s hometown.”

    This exposes the deep-seated animosity between the two societies, highlighting how war has eroded basic human empathy. The casual cruelty in “kicking them back over the warfront” reveals the Colonies’ harsh treatment of displaced people.

    FAQs

    1. How does the narrator (Daniel) demonstrate care for June in this chapter, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

    Answer:
    Daniel shows deep care for June by smoothing her hair, kissing her damp forehead, cheeks, and lips, and maintaining a vigil by her bedside while she sleeps. These actions mirror the comfort June has previously offered him, indicating a reciprocal and intimate bond. His persistence in comforting her despite her unresponsiveness highlights his devotion. The chapter also reveals their shared trauma—both have lost older brothers, which creates a profound emotional connection between them. Daniel’s tenderness contrasts with his usual rebellious persona, showing vulnerability in their relationship.

    2. What cultural differences between the Republic and the Colonies are highlighted in this chapter?

    Answer:
    The chapter underscores stark contrasts: the Colonies’ media includes commercials (unfamiliar to Republic citizens) and sensationalized tabloid stories about figures like Daniel, portraying him with dramatic nicknames like “The Phantom.” The soldier’s casual demeanor and lack of restraints for Daniel and June also reflect a more relaxed authority compared to the Republic’s strict control. Additionally, the Colonies openly discuss historical events like the floods and land wars, which the Republic likely suppresses. These differences emphasize the Colonies’ capitalist, media-driven society versus the Republic’s authoritarian propaganda.

    3. What historical context does the soldier provide about the war between the Colonies and the Republic?

    Answer:
    The soldier explains that the war originated from land disputes after catastrophic floods wiped out southern U.S. states, forcing eastern refugees westward. The western states built walls to block migration, prompting the Colonies to create tunnels—later repurposed for military assaults by the Republic. She frames the conflict as a struggle for resources, with the Colonies now “winning.” This history reveals the war’s roots in environmental disaster and displacement, contrasting with the Republic’s likely narrative of ideological conflict. The soldier’s pride in the Colonies’ stability adds a layer of propaganda, mirroring the Republic’s bias.

    4. How does Daniel react to the soldier’s mention of his alleged exploits, and what does this reveal about his character?

    Answer:
    Daniel laughs at the absurd tabloid claims (e.g., dating singer Lincoln or dodging execution bullets) but becomes somber when reminded of his brother’s death. This reaction shows his discomfort with fame and the painful memories behind his legend. His silence when the soldier mentions executions underscores his guilt over Metias’s sacrifice, revealing how trauma overshadows his reputation. The contrast between his humor and sudden seriousness highlights his complexity—he’s both a defiant figure and a grieving younger brother, resistant to the Colonies’ glamorization of his suffering.

    5. Why might the Colonies treat Daniel and June with unexpected leniency, and what risks could this pose?

    Answer:
    The Colonies likely treat them leniently due to Daniel’s celebrity status as a Republic defector, which propaganda outlets like Evergreen Ent exploit for morale. The lack of restraints suggests they view the pair as non-threatening or valuable for PR. However, this poses risks: if the Colonies discover their ties to the Patriots (who botched the Elector’s assassination), their hospitality could vanish. June’s identity as the Republic’s “prodigy” is also a liability if revealed. The soldier’s casual attitude hints at either ignorance or overconfidence, leaving Daniel wary of their precarious position.

    Note