Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of My Sister’s Keeper
    LiteraryLiterary FictionRelationshipYoung Adult

    My Sister’s Keeper

    by Picoult, Jodie
    “My Sister’s Keeper” by Jodie Picoult follows 13-year-old Anna Fitzgerald, who was conceived as a genetic match to donate organs and blood to her older sister Kate, who suffers from leukemia. When Anna is asked to donate a kidney, she sues her parents for medical emancipation, challenging the ethical boundaries of family obligation and bodily autonomy. The novel explores themes of sacrifice, moral dilemmas, and the complexities of love through multiple perspectives. Picoult’s narrative delves into the emotional and legal turmoil faced by the Fitzgerald family, raising profound questions about medical ethics and personal choice. The story is inspired by the real-life case of Anissa and Marissa Ayala.
    PreviousNext
    My Sister’s Keeper

    MONDAY CAMPBELL

    by Picoult, Jodie

    The chap­ter intro­duces Camp­bell Alexan­der, a prag­mat­ic lawyer who views law­suits as tools for those backed into a cor­ner. He reflects on his father’s adage about ham­mers and nails, draw­ing a par­al­lel to the Amer­i­can jus­tice sys­tem. His sec­re­tary, Ker­ri, orga­nizes his mes­sages with metic­u­lous pre­ci­sion, but Camp­bell dis­miss­es a call from his moth­er, reveal­ing his detached demeanor. His rou­tine is inter­rupt­ed when Anna Fitzger­ald, a deter­mined teenag­er, enters his office seek­ing legal eman­ci­pa­tion to avoid donat­ing a kid­ney to her dying sis­ter. Camp­bell ini­tial­ly mis­in­ter­prets her motives, assum­ing she’s anoth­er rebel­lious teen, until Anna clar­i­fies the grav­i­ty of her sit­u­a­tion.

    Anna’s back­sto­ry unfolds as she explains her role as a “spare-parts baby,” con­ceived to pro­vide med­ical resources for her sis­ter Kate, who suf­fers from leukemia. She recounts a life­time of invol­un­tary donations—cord blood, lym­pho­cytes, bone mar­row, and stem cells—all tak­en with­out her con­sent. Her anger and frus­tra­tion are pal­pa­ble as she describes feel­ing invis­i­ble to her par­ents except when her body is need­ed. Camp­bell, though ini­tial­ly reluc­tant, begins to rec­og­nize the eth­i­cal com­plex­i­ty of her case. Anna’s med­ical knowl­edge and resolve chal­lenge his assump­tions, prompt­ing him to recon­sid­er tak­ing her case despite his usu­al avoid­ance of high-main­te­nance clients.

    The dia­logue shifts to the legal and moral impli­ca­tions of Anna’s predica­ment. Camp­bell ques­tions her motives, prob­ing whether she’s tru­ly pre­pared for the con­se­quences of refus­ing to donate. Anna’s response—that she’s “here, aren’t I?”—underscores her des­per­a­tion. She offers her mea­ger sav­ings as pay­ment, reveal­ing her deter­mi­na­tion. Camp­bell, though cyn­i­cal, sees the case as a straight­for­ward win: no court would force Anna to donate an organ, and the pub­lic­i­ty would ben­e­fit his career. He agrees to file a peti­tion for med­ical eman­ci­pa­tion, though Anna remains skep­ti­cal of the system’s abil­i­ty to pri­or­i­tize her auton­o­my over her family’s needs.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with a moment of lev­i­ty as Anna teas­ing­ly points out the irony of Campbell’s back­ward name, light­en­ing the ten­sion. This exchange hints at a bud­ding rap­port between them. Campbell’s deci­sion to take the case marks a turn­ing point, blend­ing his self-inter­est with a grudg­ing acknowl­edg­ment of Anna’s plight. The chap­ter sets the stage for a legal bat­tle that will test bound­aries of fam­i­ly, ethics, and bod­i­ly auton­o­my, while reveal­ing glimpses of Campbell’s guard­ed human­i­ty beneath his pro­fes­sion­al exte­ri­or.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of Campbell Alexander’s opening statement: “When you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail”? How does this relate to his view of the American civil justice system?

      Answer:
      This proverb reflects Campbell’s cynical perspective on how people approach problems with limited tools or perspectives. In the context of the legal system, he suggests that individuals who feel trapped or desperate (like Anna) often resort to lawsuits as their only perceived solution, even when other options might exist. Campbell implies that litigation becomes the default “hammer” for those seeking justice or control, regardless of whether it’s the most appropriate tool for their specific situation. This worldview shapes his initial reluctance to take Anna’s case seriously, as he assumes she’s just another teenager overreacting to parental restrictions.

      Answer:
      Anna seeks emancipation to gain control over her body after years of being used as a medical donor for her sister Kate. Her case raises profound ethical questions about bodily autonomy versus familial obligation, and the moral implications of creating “savior siblings” through genetic selection. As a child conceived specifically to provide compatible tissue donations, Anna represents the controversial reality of “designer babies” - children bred for medical utility rather than unconditional love. This forces readers to consider where to draw the line between saving one child’s life and respecting another child’s right to bodily integrity and individual identity beyond being a donor.

      3. How does Campbell Alexander’s initial dismissal of Anna’s case contrast with his eventual decision to represent her? What factors contribute to this change?

      Answer:
      Campbell initially dismisses Anna’s concerns, assuming she’s just another teenager rebelling against parental rules about birth control (as shown by his Planned Parenthood suggestion). However, his perspective shifts dramatically when he learns the true nature of her medical history and the systemic pattern of her being treated as a donor rather than an individual. Key factors in his change include Anna’s detailed medical knowledge, her emotional revelation about being conceived as a donor, and the compelling ethical dimensions of the case. Additionally, Campbell recognizes the case’s potential for professional advancement through publicity and pro bono credit, though he also appears genuinely moved by Anna’s predicament.

      Answer:
      This brief but powerful statement encapsulates Anna’s sense of being trapped in an endless cycle of medical donations with no autonomy. It suggests she has reached a breaking point after years of compliance, recognizing that without legal intervention, the demands on her body will continue indefinitely. The phrase reveals both her exhaustion from being treated as a medical resource rather than a person, and her dawning awareness that she must assert control over her own life. Her decision to act now stems from this realization that passive acceptance would mean perpetual sacrifice, showing remarkable maturity in understanding the long-term implications of her situation.

      5. How does the chapter use Campbell’s professional demeanor and office environment to establish his character before the introduction of Anna’s case?

      Answer:
      The chapter establishes Campbell as an efficient, somewhat detached professional through details like his color-coded Post-it system and immediate dismissal of his mother’s calls. His initial interaction with Anna shows his tendency to make quick judgments and prioritize straightforward cases. However, subtle details like keeping a service dog (Judge) hint at hidden depths beneath his pragmatic exterior. The office environment reflects his organized but impersonal approach to law - until Anna’s case disrupts this routine, forcing him to engage more personally. This setup creates an effective contrast between his clinical professional persona and the more complex ethical considerations Anna’s case will require him to confront.

    Quotes

    • 1. “WHEN YOU ONLY HAVE A HAMMER, everything looks like a nail.”

      This opening quote establishes the chapter’s central metaphor about limited perspectives shaping actions. It introduces Campbell’s worldview that people (and legal systems) will use whatever tools they have to solve problems, even if inappropriate—a theme that resonates throughout Anna’s case.

      2. “They had me so that I could save Kate…They went to special doctors and everything, and picked the embryo that would be a perfect genetic match.”

      This devastating revelation captures the ethical core of the chapter—Anna’s existence as a “designer baby” created for medical purposes. It crystallizes her existential crisis and the novel’s exploration of bioethics, family duty, and bodily autonomy.

      3. “Because…it never stops.”

      Anna’s simple yet powerful explanation for finally resisting her family’s demands represents a turning point in the narrative. This minimalist response conveys years of accumulated trauma and the breaking point that led her to seek legal emancipation.

      Campbell’s declaration marks the formal beginning of Anna’s legal battle. This quote is significant as it transitions from philosophical discussion to concrete action, setting up the central conflict that will drive the story forward.

      5. “Or in other words, just another grown-up deciding what happens to me.”

      Anna’s cynical reinterpretation of the guardian ad litem process reveals her distrust of systems and authority figures. This quote underscores the chapter’s exploration of agency, showing how even legal solutions may feel like another form of control to the vulnerable.

    Quotes

    1. “WHEN YOU ONLY HAVE A HAMMER, everything looks like a nail.”

    This opening quote establishes the chapter’s central metaphor about limited perspectives shaping actions. It introduces Campbell’s worldview that people (and legal systems) will use whatever tools they have to solve problems, even if inappropriate—a theme that resonates throughout Anna’s case.

    2. “They had me so that I could save Kate…They went to special doctors and everything, and picked the embryo that would be a perfect genetic match.”

    This devastating revelation captures the ethical core of the chapter—Anna’s existence as a “designer baby” created for medical purposes. It crystallizes her existential crisis and the novel’s exploration of bioethics, family duty, and bodily autonomy.

    3. “Because…it never stops.”

    Anna’s simple yet powerful explanation for finally resisting her family’s demands represents a turning point in the narrative. This minimalist response conveys years of accumulated trauma and the breaking point that led her to seek legal emancipation.

    Campbell’s declaration marks the formal beginning of Anna’s legal battle. This quote is significant as it transitions from philosophical discussion to concrete action, setting up the central conflict that will drive the story forward.

    5. “Or in other words, just another grown-up deciding what happens to me.”

    Anna’s cynical reinterpretation of the guardian ad litem process reveals her distrust of systems and authority figures. This quote underscores the chapter’s exploration of agency, showing how even legal solutions may feel like another form of control to the vulnerable.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of Campbell Alexander’s opening statement: “When you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail”? How does this relate to his view of the American civil justice system?

    Answer:
    This proverb reflects Campbell’s cynical perspective on how people approach problems with limited tools or perspectives. In the context of the legal system, he suggests that individuals who feel trapped or desperate (like Anna) often resort to lawsuits as their only perceived solution, even when other options might exist. Campbell implies that litigation becomes the default “hammer” for those seeking justice or control, regardless of whether it’s the most appropriate tool for their specific situation. This worldview shapes his initial reluctance to take Anna’s case seriously, as he assumes she’s just another teenager overreacting to parental restrictions.

    Answer:
    Anna seeks emancipation to gain control over her body after years of being used as a medical donor for her sister Kate. Her case raises profound ethical questions about bodily autonomy versus familial obligation, and the moral implications of creating “savior siblings” through genetic selection. As a child conceived specifically to provide compatible tissue donations, Anna represents the controversial reality of “designer babies” - children bred for medical utility rather than unconditional love. This forces readers to consider where to draw the line between saving one child’s life and respecting another child’s right to bodily integrity and individual identity beyond being a donor.

    3. How does Campbell Alexander’s initial dismissal of Anna’s case contrast with his eventual decision to represent her? What factors contribute to this change?

    Answer:
    Campbell initially dismisses Anna’s concerns, assuming she’s just another teenager rebelling against parental rules about birth control (as shown by his Planned Parenthood suggestion). However, his perspective shifts dramatically when he learns the true nature of her medical history and the systemic pattern of her being treated as a donor rather than an individual. Key factors in his change include Anna’s detailed medical knowledge, her emotional revelation about being conceived as a donor, and the compelling ethical dimensions of the case. Additionally, Campbell recognizes the case’s potential for professional advancement through publicity and pro bono credit, though he also appears genuinely moved by Anna’s predicament.

    Answer:
    This brief but powerful statement encapsulates Anna’s sense of being trapped in an endless cycle of medical donations with no autonomy. It suggests she has reached a breaking point after years of compliance, recognizing that without legal intervention, the demands on her body will continue indefinitely. The phrase reveals both her exhaustion from being treated as a medical resource rather than a person, and her dawning awareness that she must assert control over her own life. Her decision to act now stems from this realization that passive acceptance would mean perpetual sacrifice, showing remarkable maturity in understanding the long-term implications of her situation.

    5. How does the chapter use Campbell’s professional demeanor and office environment to establish his character before the introduction of Anna’s case?

    Answer:
    The chapter establishes Campbell as an efficient, somewhat detached professional through details like his color-coded Post-it system and immediate dismissal of his mother’s calls. His initial interaction with Anna shows his tendency to make quick judgments and prioritize straightforward cases. However, subtle details like keeping a service dog (Judge) hint at hidden depths beneath his pragmatic exterior. The office environment reflects his organized but impersonal approach to law - until Anna’s case disrupts this routine, forcing him to engage more personally. This setup creates an effective contrast between his clinical professional persona and the more complex ethical considerations Anna’s case will require him to confront.

    Note