Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor, on the eve of their exe­cu­tion, expe­ri­enc­ing frag­ment­ed dreams blend­ing famil­iar and unfa­mil­iar voic­es. The final dream is a vivid child­hood mem­o­ry set in Lake sec­tor, where the nar­ra­tor, aged nine, recalls a joy­ful after­noon play­ing street hock­ey with their old­er broth­er John while their younger broth­er Eden tin­kers with machin­ery. The scene is idyl­lic, filled with laugh­ter and the aro­ma of a rare chick­en din­ner their moth­er pre­pared by sac­ri­fic­ing per­son­al belong­ings and work­ing extra shifts. The mem­o­ry cap­tures a rare moment of famil­ial warmth and John’s unchar­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly cheer­ful mood.

    The tone shifts when a street police­man inter­rupts their game after the nar­ra­tor acci­den­tal­ly hits him with a paper ball. Despite the harm­less nature of the inci­dent, the offi­cer reacts vio­lent­ly, strik­ing the nar­ra­tor with a knife han­dle and kick­ing them. John inter­venes, plead­ing and offer­ing their family’s mea­ger sav­ings to appease the offi­cer. The police­man fur­ther extorts their cher­ished chick­en din­ner, leav­ing the fam­i­ly humil­i­at­ed and deprived. The narrator’s moth­er avoids eye con­tact, focus­ing on com­fort­ing Eden, while John admon­ish­es the nar­ra­tor for defi­ant­ly star­ing at the offi­cer, empha­siz­ing the dan­gers of pro­vok­ing author­i­ty.

    John’s pro­tec­tive instincts are high­light­ed as he scolds the nar­ra­tor for their reck­less­ness, insist­ing com­pli­ance is nec­es­sary for sur­vival. He reveals his deep fear of los­ing the nar­ra­tor, stat­ing, “I would rather die than see them hurt you.” The nar­ra­tor, though phys­i­cal­ly hurt and emo­tion­al­ly shak­en, responds with tear­ful guilt over the lost meal. The mem­o­ry ends with John hug­ging the nar­ra­tor, a rare dis­play of affec­tion that under­scores the bond between them. The dream’s clar­i­ty and emo­tion­al weight leave the nar­ra­tor unset­tled upon wak­ing.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with the narrator’s grow­ing dread that John’s words in the dream might fore­shad­ow a trag­ic real­i­ty. The jux­ta­po­si­tion of the cher­ished mem­o­ry with the narrator’s impend­ing exe­cu­tion cre­ates a poignant con­trast, empha­siz­ing themes of famil­ial love, sac­ri­fice, and the bru­tal­i­ty of their world. The dream serves as both a com­fort and a haunt­ing reminder of loss, leav­ing the nar­ra­tor with an over­whelm­ing sense of fore­bod­ing as their exe­cu­tion date approach­es.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of the narrator’s dream about his childhood with John and Eden?

      Answer:
      The dream serves as a poignant memory that highlights the narrator’s bond with his brothers and the harsh realities of their upbringing. It contrasts moments of familial joy (playing hockey, celebrating John’s job) with the brutal oppression they face from authorities (the policeman’s violent reaction to an accidental offense). The dream gains deeper significance as the narrator faces execution—it underscores John’s protective nature (“I would rather die than see them hurt you”) and foreshadows potential tragedy. This memory resurfaces as the narrator grapples with fear that John’s words might ironically come true in their current circumstances.

      2. How does the chapter illustrate the power dynamics between civilians and authorities in this society?

      Answer:
      The policeman’s actions exemplify systemic abuse of power: he escalates a minor accident (being hit by a paper ball) into a violent confrontation, extorts money and food from the family, and humiliates them without consequence. The family’s response—apologizing, offering bribes, and submitting silently—reveals their vulnerability. John’s warning (“You never fight back. Ever.”) underscores the lethal consequences of resistance. This dynamic reflects a society where authorities enforce control through fear and violence, while civilians survive through compliance, reinforcing themes of oppression and survival at personal cost.

      3. Analyze the symbolism of the chicken in this chapter.

      Answer:
      The chicken represents both celebration and loss. It symbolizes the family’s rare joy (purchased through sacrifice—the mother selling possessions and working extra shifts) and their precarious socioeconomic status. Its confiscation by the policeman mirrors how systemic corruption strips marginalized communities of even small comforts. The chicken also highlights inequality: the policeman condemns it as a “luxury” for the family, implying they are undeserving, while he freely takes it. This moment reinforces how authority figures exploit and dehumanize the poor, turning symbols of hope into tools of oppression.

      4. How does John’s character develop in this flashback, and what does it reveal about his relationship with the narrator?

      Answer:
      John is portrayed as both protective and pragmatic. He shields the narrator physically and diplomatically (pleading with the policeman, offering money) but later scolds him for defiance, emphasizing survival over pride. His duality—fierce loyalty (“I would rather die than see them hurt you”) and harsh lessons—shows his role as a brother who bears the weight of responsibility in a dangerous world. Their relationship is rooted in love but strained by the need to navigate oppression. The narrator’s tears and John’s reluctant hug reveal vulnerability beneath their hardened exteriors.

      5. Why might the narrator describe this memory as “painfully clear” upon waking, and how does it connect to his present situation?

      Answer:
      The memory is “painfully clear” because it embodies unresolved guilt (his actions cost the family dearly) and dread (John’s protective vow now feels like foreshadowing). As the narrator faces execution, he fears John might sacrifice himself to save him, mirroring the past. The dream blurs past and present, emphasizing cyclical trauma—the same oppression that shaped their childhood now threatens their lives. His horror stems from realizing that survival tactics (submission, bargaining) may no longer work, and John’s love could become a tragic liability.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I would rather die than see them hurt you.”

      This quote encapsulates John’s protective nature toward his younger brother, revealing the deep familial bonds and sacrifices made under oppressive conditions. It foreshadows the narrator’s later fear that this sentiment might tragically come true.

      2. “You never look at an officer like that, do you understand? You want to get us all killed?”

      John’s urgent warning highlights the brutal reality of living under authoritarian rule, where even a defiant glance can provoke extreme violence. This moment underscores the chapter’s theme of survival under oppression.

      3. “The smell of chicken fills the air. It’s not even a hot day today—it’s perfect, in fact. I pause for a second as John runs to fetch the ball again. I try to take a mental snapshot of this day.”

      This poignant description of a rare happy family moment makes its subsequent destruction by the policeman even more powerful. It represents the fragility of joy in their harsh world.

      4. “Street brats.”

      The policeman’s contemptuous remark, followed by his theft of both their money and celebratory meal, perfectly illustrates the systemic abuse and dehumanization faced by the family. This moment serves as a microcosm of their daily struggles.

      5. “I’m not a superstitious person, but when I wake up from this dream, this painfully clear memory of John, I have the most horrible feeling in my chest.”

      This reflection bridges the dream sequence with present-day dread, emphasizing how past trauma continues to haunt the narrator as he faces execution. It connects memory with impending fate.

    Quotes

    1. “I would rather die than see them hurt you.”

    This quote encapsulates John’s protective nature toward his younger brother, revealing the deep familial bonds and sacrifices made under oppressive conditions. It foreshadows the narrator’s later fear that this sentiment might tragically come true.

    2. “You never look at an officer like that, do you understand? You want to get us all killed?”

    John’s urgent warning highlights the brutal reality of living under authoritarian rule, where even a defiant glance can provoke extreme violence. This moment underscores the chapter’s theme of survival under oppression.

    3. “The smell of chicken fills the air. It’s not even a hot day today—it’s perfect, in fact. I pause for a second as John runs to fetch the ball again. I try to take a mental snapshot of this day.”

    This poignant description of a rare happy family moment makes its subsequent destruction by the policeman even more powerful. It represents the fragility of joy in their harsh world.

    4. “Street brats.”

    The policeman’s contemptuous remark, followed by his theft of both their money and celebratory meal, perfectly illustrates the systemic abuse and dehumanization faced by the family. This moment serves as a microcosm of their daily struggles.

    5. “I’m not a superstitious person, but when I wake up from this dream, this painfully clear memory of John, I have the most horrible feeling in my chest.”

    This reflection bridges the dream sequence with present-day dread, emphasizing how past trauma continues to haunt the narrator as he faces execution. It connects memory with impending fate.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of the narrator’s dream about his childhood with John and Eden?

    Answer:
    The dream serves as a poignant memory that highlights the narrator’s bond with his brothers and the harsh realities of their upbringing. It contrasts moments of familial joy (playing hockey, celebrating John’s job) with the brutal oppression they face from authorities (the policeman’s violent reaction to an accidental offense). The dream gains deeper significance as the narrator faces execution—it underscores John’s protective nature (“I would rather die than see them hurt you”) and foreshadows potential tragedy. This memory resurfaces as the narrator grapples with fear that John’s words might ironically come true in their current circumstances.

    2. How does the chapter illustrate the power dynamics between civilians and authorities in this society?

    Answer:
    The policeman’s actions exemplify systemic abuse of power: he escalates a minor accident (being hit by a paper ball) into a violent confrontation, extorts money and food from the family, and humiliates them without consequence. The family’s response—apologizing, offering bribes, and submitting silently—reveals their vulnerability. John’s warning (“You never fight back. Ever.”) underscores the lethal consequences of resistance. This dynamic reflects a society where authorities enforce control through fear and violence, while civilians survive through compliance, reinforcing themes of oppression and survival at personal cost.

    3. Analyze the symbolism of the chicken in this chapter.

    Answer:
    The chicken represents both celebration and loss. It symbolizes the family’s rare joy (purchased through sacrifice—the mother selling possessions and working extra shifts) and their precarious socioeconomic status. Its confiscation by the policeman mirrors how systemic corruption strips marginalized communities of even small comforts. The chicken also highlights inequality: the policeman condemns it as a “luxury” for the family, implying they are undeserving, while he freely takes it. This moment reinforces how authority figures exploit and dehumanize the poor, turning symbols of hope into tools of oppression.

    4. How does John’s character develop in this flashback, and what does it reveal about his relationship with the narrator?

    Answer:
    John is portrayed as both protective and pragmatic. He shields the narrator physically and diplomatically (pleading with the policeman, offering money) but later scolds him for defiance, emphasizing survival over pride. His duality—fierce loyalty (“I would rather die than see them hurt you”) and harsh lessons—shows his role as a brother who bears the weight of responsibility in a dangerous world. Their relationship is rooted in love but strained by the need to navigate oppression. The narrator’s tears and John’s reluctant hug reveal vulnerability beneath their hardened exteriors.

    5. Why might the narrator describe this memory as “painfully clear” upon waking, and how does it connect to his present situation?

    Answer:
    The memory is “painfully clear” because it embodies unresolved guilt (his actions cost the family dearly) and dread (John’s protective vow now feels like foreshadowing). As the narrator faces execution, he fears John might sacrifice himself to save him, mirroring the past. The dream blurs past and present, emphasizing cyclical trauma—the same oppression that shaped their childhood now threatens their lives. His horror stems from realizing that survival tactics (submission, bargaining) may no longer work, and John’s love could become a tragic liability.

    Note