Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.
    PreviousNext
    Legend (Legend #1)

    Chapter 32: Part Two: June 5

    by Marie, Lu,

    The chap­ter delves into the pro­tag­o­nist’s con­flict­ed emo­tions about Day, the accused killer of her broth­er, Metias. She dreams of him vivid­ly, recall­ing his touch and words, which chal­lenge her pre­vi­ous hatred. Day’s claims—that some­one else mur­dered Metias and that the Repub­lic is spread­ing the plague—haunt her, mak­ing her ques­tion her con­vic­tions. Her fas­ci­na­tion with Day resur­faces, min­gled with guilt over her grow­ing attrac­tion. She strug­gles to rec­on­cile her feel­ings with her loy­al­ty to the Repub­lic, torn between sus­pi­cion and desire.

    Dur­ing a tense din­ner with Thomas, a fel­low sol­dier, the pro­tag­o­nist nav­i­gates a web of dis­trust. Thomas probes her about her pri­vate con­ver­sa­tion with Day, hint­ing at jeal­ousy or sus­pi­cion. She feigns indif­fer­ence, mask­ing her inner tur­moil with cal­cu­lat­ed respons­es. The encounter leaves her wary, as she won­ders if Thomas is test­ing her or gen­uine­ly seek­ing rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. The setting—a café she once vis­it­ed with Metias—heightens her unease, espe­cial­ly as she notices details like rifle grease on the mur­der weapon.

    Alone in her apart­ment, the pro­tag­o­nist pores over Metias’s crime report and jour­nals, search­ing for clues. She notices odd mis­spellings in his recent entries, real­iz­ing they form a hid­den mes­sage. The dis­cov­ery excites and unset­tles her, sug­gest­ing Metias may have left a cod­ed warn­ing. Her grief and deter­mi­na­tion inter­twine as she pieces togeth­er the puz­zle, sens­ing her brother’s hand guid­ing her toward the truth. The mis­spellings, out of char­ac­ter for Metias, hint at a con­spir­a­cy he sought to expose.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates in her grow­ing resolve to uncov­er the truth, even as she risks alien­at­ing allies like Thomas. Her inter­nal mono­logue reveals a shift from blind loy­al­ty to crit­i­cal inquiry, dri­ven by love for her broth­er and Day’s unset­tling rev­e­la­tions. The mis­spellings become a bea­con, pulling her deep­er into a mys­tery that could upend her under­stand­ing of the Repub­lic. Her journey—marked by emo­tion­al tur­moil and intel­lec­tu­al rigor—sets the stage for a reck­on­ing with the forces that shaped her world.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does June’s perception of Day evolve throughout this chapter, and what key experiences contribute to this change?

      Answer:
      June’s perception of Day shifts dramatically from viewing him as her brother’s murderer to someone she feels fascination and attraction toward. This change is driven by Day’s claims that someone else killed Metias and that the Republic is intentionally spreading the plague, which plants seeds of doubt in June’s mind. Her dreams of Day and memories of his kindness (like wiping her tears) soften her anger. Additionally, her growing emotional connection—evident in her enjoyment of their prison cell interactions—further complicates her feelings. The chapter shows her internal conflict as she questions her loyalty to the Republic and her trust in Day.

      2. Analyze the significance of June’s dinner conversation with Thomas. What does this interaction reveal about their relationship and June’s suspicions?

      Answer:
      The dinner with Thomas highlights the tension and distrust between them. June suspects Thomas might be Metias’s killer, noting the rifle grease on the murder weapon—a detail tied to Thomas’s role as a soldier. Their conversation is a careful dance of deception: Thomas probes June about Day, while June feigns indifference to avoid suspicion. Her strategic lies (“I’ll be happier when he’s dead”) and physical distraction (touching his arm) show her caution. The scene underscores June’s isolation—she can’t trust even close acquaintances—and her growing paranoia about the Republic’s corruption.

      3. How does June discover potential clues in Metias’s journals, and what might they imply about his death?

      Answer:
      June notices deliberate misspellings in Metias’s journals (e.g., “refridgerator,” “elevatien”), which she recognizes as uncharacteristic of her meticulous brother. She deduces these are a coded message meant for her, possibly explaining the truth behind his death. The misspellings appear only in recent journals, suggesting Metias uncovered dangerous information and hid it before his murder. This discovery fuels June’s suspicion that his death was orchestrated by the Republic, aligning with Day’s claims. The journals symbolize Metias’s lingering presence and the systemic secrecy June must unravel.

      4. Evaluate the role of setting in this chapter. How do locations like the café and June’s apartment enhance the narrative’s tension?

      Answer:
      The café—where June once dined with Metias—heightens emotional tension by contrasting past camaraderie with present distrust, as Thomas’s presence taints the memory. Her apartment, a private space, becomes a sanctuary for her investigation but also a place of vulnerability, where she grapples with grief and paranoia. The juxtaposition of public deception (the café) and private revelation (studying journals at home) mirrors June’s dual life: outwardly compliant, inwardly rebellious. These settings ground the psychological drama, emphasizing her isolation and the risks of her quest for truth.

      5. What internal conflicts does June face in this chapter, and how do they drive her actions?

      Answer:
      June battles guilt over her attraction to Day (her brother’s alleged killer), loyalty to the Republic versus growing distrust, and fear of being surveilled. Her conflict is epitomized when she asks Ollie, “What am I doing?“—questioning her alliances. These tensions drive her to investigate Metias’s death secretly, lie to Thomas, and decode the journals. Her emotions (desire for Day, anger at the Republic) clash with logic (caution, military training), making her actions unpredictable yet calculated. This inner turmoil propels the plot toward her eventual rebellion against the system.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I can’t find the anger I used to have toward him. And if I discover proof that someone else killed Metias, for whatever reason, then I have no reason to hate him at all.”

      This quote marks a pivotal emotional shift for the protagonist as she grapples with her conflicting feelings toward Day. It captures her internal struggle between lingering hatred and growing fascination, foreshadowing her potential alignment with him against the Republic.

      2. “Day’s words will matter if he’s telling the truth.”

      A concise but powerful statement that reveals the protagonist’s growing suspicion of the Republic’s official narrative. This private thought contrasts sharply with her outward dismissal of Day’s claims, showing her intellectual independence and investigative instincts.

      3. “That many misspelled words from Metias can be nothing other than a message to me—the one person who was most likely to go through his writing. A secret code.”

      This discovery represents a major turning point in the chapter, as the protagonist deciphers her brother’s hidden message. The quote demonstrates both her analytical skills and the dangerous secrets that may have led to Metias’s death, setting up the central mystery of the story.

      4. “I’m befriending a criminal, and pushing away people I’ve known my entire life.”

      This confession to her dog Ollie perfectly encapsulates the protagonist’s moral dilemma and growing isolation. It highlights her awareness of her shifting alliances and the personal cost of pursuing the truth about her brother’s death.

    Quotes

    1. “I can’t find the anger I used to have toward him. And if I discover proof that someone else killed Metias, for whatever reason, then I have no reason to hate him at all.”

    This quote marks a pivotal emotional shift for the protagonist as she grapples with her conflicting feelings toward Day. It captures her internal struggle between lingering hatred and growing fascination, foreshadowing her potential alignment with him against the Republic.

    2. “Day’s words will matter if he’s telling the truth.”

    A concise but powerful statement that reveals the protagonist’s growing suspicion of the Republic’s official narrative. This private thought contrasts sharply with her outward dismissal of Day’s claims, showing her intellectual independence and investigative instincts.

    3. “That many misspelled words from Metias can be nothing other than a message to me—the one person who was most likely to go through his writing. A secret code.”

    This discovery represents a major turning point in the chapter, as the protagonist deciphers her brother’s hidden message. The quote demonstrates both her analytical skills and the dangerous secrets that may have led to Metias’s death, setting up the central mystery of the story.

    4. “I’m befriending a criminal, and pushing away people I’ve known my entire life.”

    This confession to her dog Ollie perfectly encapsulates the protagonist’s moral dilemma and growing isolation. It highlights her awareness of her shifting alliances and the personal cost of pursuing the truth about her brother’s death.

    FAQs

    1. How does June’s perception of Day evolve throughout this chapter, and what key experiences contribute to this change?

    Answer:
    June’s perception of Day shifts dramatically from viewing him as her brother’s murderer to someone she feels fascination and attraction toward. This change is driven by Day’s claims that someone else killed Metias and that the Republic is intentionally spreading the plague, which plants seeds of doubt in June’s mind. Her dreams of Day and memories of his kindness (like wiping her tears) soften her anger. Additionally, her growing emotional connection—evident in her enjoyment of their prison cell interactions—further complicates her feelings. The chapter shows her internal conflict as she questions her loyalty to the Republic and her trust in Day.

    2. Analyze the significance of June’s dinner conversation with Thomas. What does this interaction reveal about their relationship and June’s suspicions?

    Answer:
    The dinner with Thomas highlights the tension and distrust between them. June suspects Thomas might be Metias’s killer, noting the rifle grease on the murder weapon—a detail tied to Thomas’s role as a soldier. Their conversation is a careful dance of deception: Thomas probes June about Day, while June feigns indifference to avoid suspicion. Her strategic lies (“I’ll be happier when he’s dead”) and physical distraction (touching his arm) show her caution. The scene underscores June’s isolation—she can’t trust even close acquaintances—and her growing paranoia about the Republic’s corruption.

    3. How does June discover potential clues in Metias’s journals, and what might they imply about his death?

    Answer:
    June notices deliberate misspellings in Metias’s journals (e.g., “refridgerator,” “elevatien”), which she recognizes as uncharacteristic of her meticulous brother. She deduces these are a coded message meant for her, possibly explaining the truth behind his death. The misspellings appear only in recent journals, suggesting Metias uncovered dangerous information and hid it before his murder. This discovery fuels June’s suspicion that his death was orchestrated by the Republic, aligning with Day’s claims. The journals symbolize Metias’s lingering presence and the systemic secrecy June must unravel.

    4. Evaluate the role of setting in this chapter. How do locations like the café and June’s apartment enhance the narrative’s tension?

    Answer:
    The café—where June once dined with Metias—heightens emotional tension by contrasting past camaraderie with present distrust, as Thomas’s presence taints the memory. Her apartment, a private space, becomes a sanctuary for her investigation but also a place of vulnerability, where she grapples with grief and paranoia. The juxtaposition of public deception (the café) and private revelation (studying journals at home) mirrors June’s dual life: outwardly compliant, inwardly rebellious. These settings ground the psychological drama, emphasizing her isolation and the risks of her quest for truth.

    5. What internal conflicts does June face in this chapter, and how do they drive her actions?

    Answer:
    June battles guilt over her attraction to Day (her brother’s alleged killer), loyalty to the Republic versus growing distrust, and fear of being surveilled. Her conflict is epitomized when she asks Ollie, “What am I doing?“—questioning her alliances. These tensions drive her to investigate Metias’s death secretly, lie to Thomas, and decode the journals. Her emotions (desire for Day, anger at the Republic) clash with logic (caution, military training), making her actions unpredictable yet calculated. This inner turmoil propels the plot toward her eventual rebellion against the system.

    Note