Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.

    The pro­tag­o­nist, dis­ori­ent­ed and exhaust­ed from a recent oper­a­tion, is dragged by sol­diers to an inter­ro­ga­tion room instead of his cell. He observes the blurred sur­round­ings, sus­pect­ing he was sedat­ed. The room, lined with sound­proof glass, ampli­fies his dread as he hears dis­tant gun­fire and screams, like­ly from a crack­down on pro­test­ers. As he waits, his fatigue grows, but his ten­sion spikes when Cap­tain Thomas—the man who killed his mother—enters. Thomas, vis­i­bly uncom­fort­able, begins a for­mal inter­ro­ga­tion, hint­ing at the protagonist’s impend­ing exe­cu­tion.

    Thomas projects images of sus­pect­ed Patri­ots, demand­ing the pro­tag­o­nist iden­ti­fy them. The pro­tag­o­nist denies rec­og­niz­ing any­one, mock­ing Thomas’s loy­al­ty to the state. The ten­sion esca­lates when a pho­to of Kaede, a famil­iar face, appears, but the pro­tag­o­nist hides his recog­ni­tion. He taunts Thomas, accus­ing him of cow­ardice and cru­el­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly for mur­der­ing his moth­er. Thomas remains restrained, adher­ing to pro­to­col, but the protagonist’s provo­ca­tions chip away at his com­po­sure.

    The con­fronta­tion turns phys­i­cal when the pro­tag­o­nist spits in Thomas’s face, trig­ger­ing a vio­lent out­burst. Thomas strikes him repeat­ed­ly, vent­ing his resent­ment toward slum dwellers and accus­ing the pro­tag­o­nist of enti­tle­ment. The pro­tag­o­nist nee­dles Thomas fur­ther by ref­er­enc­ing a past kiss with June Iparis, Thomas’s appar­ent love inter­est, ignit­ing his rage. Thomas threat­ens the protagonist’s broth­ers, lever­ag­ing their safe­ty to silence him, but the pro­tag­o­nist refus­es to back down, endur­ing the beat­ing with defi­ant humor.

    The chap­ter ends with Thomas storm­ing out, his order­ly demeanor shat­tered by the protagonist’s taunts. The pro­tag­o­nist, bat­tered but unbro­ken, steels him­self against the pain, focus­ing on pro­tect­ing his broth­ers. The encounter under­scores the deep ani­mos­i­ty between the two men, with Thomas rep­re­sent­ing the oppres­sive state and the pro­tag­o­nist embody­ing rebel­lious defi­ance. The inter­ro­ga­tion fails to extract infor­ma­tion, instead reveal­ing the per­son­al vendet­tas dri­ving both char­ac­ters.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the protagonist’s physical and mental state contribute to the atmosphere of the interrogation scene?

      Answer:
      The protagonist’s exhaustion and drug-induced disorientation create a tense, surreal atmosphere. His blurred vision (“Everything around me looks blurred at the edges”) and heavy eyelids reflect both physical vulnerability and psychological strain. This impaired state contrasts sharply with Thomas’s controlled demeanor, heightening the power imbalance. The protagonist’s intermittent awareness—noticing distant screams and gunfire—adds layers of external threat, while his internal struggle to remain defiant despite pain and fatigue (“I will myself to stay silent”) demonstrates his resilience. These physical limitations make his psychological victories (like provoking Thomas) more impactful.

      2. Analyze the significance of Thomas’s background revelation and how it influences the conflict.

      Answer:
      Thomas’s confession about coming from “a poor sector too” reveals his internalized class resentment and explains his harsh judgment of the protagonist. His claim that he “earned [his] country’s respect” through compliance contrasts with the protagonist’s rebellious path, creating ideological tension. This backstory makes their conflict more personal than political—Thomas sees the protagonist as embodying what he rejected in himself. The revelation also critiques the Republic’s systemic oppression, showing how it pits marginalized individuals against each other. Thomas’s need to prove his loyalty through cruelty (“dirty, lazy cons”) demonstrates how oppressive systems reward internalized oppression.

      3. How does the protagonist’s recognition of Kaede’s photo demonstrate his strategic thinking amid adversity?

      Answer:
      When recognizing Kaede’s photo, the protagonist immediately masks his reaction (“I don’t dare let the recognition show”), showing acute situational awareness. His deflection (“If I knew any of these people, do you really think I’d tell you?”) serves dual purposes: it plausibly denies knowledge while subtly mocking the interrogation’s futility. This moment reveals his ability to think tactically despite physical pain and emotional turmoil. His protection of Kaede—a fellow rebel—also shows loyalty to the resistance cause, contrasting with Thomas’s blind loyalty to the state. The scene underscores how survival in this regime requires both concealment and selective defiance.

      4. Evaluate how the power dynamics shift during the interrogation and what triggers these changes.

      Answer:
      The power dynamic fluctuates between institutional dominance and psychological resistance. Initially, Thomas holds all power as the interrogator, but the protagonist undermines this through verbal provocations (“You afraid of me or something?”). The true shift occurs when the protagonist references June (“I didn’t force her into anything”), exploiting Thomas’s personal jealousy. Thomas regains physical control through violence but loses moral authority, especially when threatening the protagonist’s brothers—a move that reveals his reliance on systemic cruelty rather than personal conviction. The protagonist’s ability to elicit uncontrolled rage from Thomas ultimately demonstrates that psychological resistance can temporarily destabilize institutional power.

      5. What does the chapter reveal about the Republic’s methods of maintaining control through Thomas’s behavior?

      Answer:
      Thomas embodies the Republic’s control mechanisms: performative procedure (“standard procedural questions”), dehumanization (“slum con”), and threats to family members. His initial adherence to protocol crumbles when personally provoked, exposing the system’s reliance on emotionally compromised enforcers. The Republic’s power is maintained not through ideological conviction but through fear (execution threats) and division (pitting poor citizens against each other). Thomas’s breakdown reveals the fragility of this control—when his personal insecurities surface, he resorts to unauthorized violence, demonstrating how the system rewards instability masked as discipline. The remote-controlled photo projection also showcases technological surveillance as a tool of oppression.

    Quotes

    • 1. “‘She’s just one less slum con to deal with.’”

      This chilling line from Thomas reveals his dehumanizing attitude toward the protagonist’s mother and the lower class, showcasing the systemic cruelty and class prejudice in their society. It marks a turning point in the interrogation scene, triggering the protagonist’s violent reaction.

      2. “‘I’m from a poor sector too. But I followed the rules. I worked my way up, I earned my country’s respect. The rest of you people just sit around and complain and blame the state for your bad luck.’”

      Thomas’s speech exposes the internalized oppression and justification of the system’s brutality by those who’ve “succeeded” within it. This quote encapsulates the novel’s exploration of systemic inequality and the psychology of oppression.

      3. “‘Ms. Iparis told me about what you did to her on the streets. How dare you force yourself onto someone of her rank.’”

      This accusation reveals Thomas’s personal vendetta against the protagonist, rooted in jealousy and class hierarchy. It introduces sexual tension and power dynamics between characters while showing how rumors can be weaponized.

      4. “‘Watch your tongue, unless you want to see their bodies lined up next to your mother’s.’”

      This threat demonstrates the Republic’s use of family as leverage and the complete moral corruption of its enforcers. It’s a pivotal moment where Thomas drops all pretense of professionalism, revealing the true nature of the regime’s control tactics.

      5. “‘I’ll see you on your execution day.’”

      The cold finality of this line underscores the chapter’s tension and foreshadows future conflict. It leaves the protagonist (and reader) with a sense of impending doom while showing Thomas regaining his controlled demeanor after losing composure.

    Quotes

    1. “‘She’s just one less slum con to deal with.’”

    This chilling line from Thomas reveals his dehumanizing attitude toward the protagonist’s mother and the lower class, showcasing the systemic cruelty and class prejudice in their society. It marks a turning point in the interrogation scene, triggering the protagonist’s violent reaction.

    2. “‘I’m from a poor sector too. But I followed the rules. I worked my way up, I earned my country’s respect. The rest of you people just sit around and complain and blame the state for your bad luck.’”

    Thomas’s speech exposes the internalized oppression and justification of the system’s brutality by those who’ve “succeeded” within it. This quote encapsulates the novel’s exploration of systemic inequality and the psychology of oppression.

    3. “‘Ms. Iparis told me about what you did to her on the streets. How dare you force yourself onto someone of her rank.’”

    This accusation reveals Thomas’s personal vendetta against the protagonist, rooted in jealousy and class hierarchy. It introduces sexual tension and power dynamics between characters while showing how rumors can be weaponized.

    4. “‘Watch your tongue, unless you want to see their bodies lined up next to your mother’s.’”

    This threat demonstrates the Republic’s use of family as leverage and the complete moral corruption of its enforcers. It’s a pivotal moment where Thomas drops all pretense of professionalism, revealing the true nature of the regime’s control tactics.

    5. “‘I’ll see you on your execution day.’”

    The cold finality of this line underscores the chapter’s tension and foreshadows future conflict. It leaves the protagonist (and reader) with a sense of impending doom while showing Thomas regaining his controlled demeanor after losing composure.

    FAQs

    1. How does the protagonist’s physical and mental state contribute to the atmosphere of the interrogation scene?

    Answer:
    The protagonist’s exhaustion and drug-induced disorientation create a tense, surreal atmosphere. His blurred vision (“Everything around me looks blurred at the edges”) and heavy eyelids reflect both physical vulnerability and psychological strain. This impaired state contrasts sharply with Thomas’s controlled demeanor, heightening the power imbalance. The protagonist’s intermittent awareness—noticing distant screams and gunfire—adds layers of external threat, while his internal struggle to remain defiant despite pain and fatigue (“I will myself to stay silent”) demonstrates his resilience. These physical limitations make his psychological victories (like provoking Thomas) more impactful.

    2. Analyze the significance of Thomas’s background revelation and how it influences the conflict.

    Answer:
    Thomas’s confession about coming from “a poor sector too” reveals his internalized class resentment and explains his harsh judgment of the protagonist. His claim that he “earned [his] country’s respect” through compliance contrasts with the protagonist’s rebellious path, creating ideological tension. This backstory makes their conflict more personal than political—Thomas sees the protagonist as embodying what he rejected in himself. The revelation also critiques the Republic’s systemic oppression, showing how it pits marginalized individuals against each other. Thomas’s need to prove his loyalty through cruelty (“dirty, lazy cons”) demonstrates how oppressive systems reward internalized oppression.

    3. How does the protagonist’s recognition of Kaede’s photo demonstrate his strategic thinking amid adversity?

    Answer:
    When recognizing Kaede’s photo, the protagonist immediately masks his reaction (“I don’t dare let the recognition show”), showing acute situational awareness. His deflection (“If I knew any of these people, do you really think I’d tell you?”) serves dual purposes: it plausibly denies knowledge while subtly mocking the interrogation’s futility. This moment reveals his ability to think tactically despite physical pain and emotional turmoil. His protection of Kaede—a fellow rebel—also shows loyalty to the resistance cause, contrasting with Thomas’s blind loyalty to the state. The scene underscores how survival in this regime requires both concealment and selective defiance.

    4. Evaluate how the power dynamics shift during the interrogation and what triggers these changes.

    Answer:
    The power dynamic fluctuates between institutional dominance and psychological resistance. Initially, Thomas holds all power as the interrogator, but the protagonist undermines this through verbal provocations (“You afraid of me or something?”). The true shift occurs when the protagonist references June (“I didn’t force her into anything”), exploiting Thomas’s personal jealousy. Thomas regains physical control through violence but loses moral authority, especially when threatening the protagonist’s brothers—a move that reveals his reliance on systemic cruelty rather than personal conviction. The protagonist’s ability to elicit uncontrolled rage from Thomas ultimately demonstrates that psychological resistance can temporarily destabilize institutional power.

    5. What does the chapter reveal about the Republic’s methods of maintaining control through Thomas’s behavior?

    Answer:
    Thomas embodies the Republic’s control mechanisms: performative procedure (“standard procedural questions”), dehumanization (“slum con”), and threats to family members. His initial adherence to protocol crumbles when personally provoked, exposing the system’s reliance on emotionally compromised enforcers. The Republic’s power is maintained not through ideological conviction but through fear (execution threats) and division (pitting poor citizens against each other). Thomas’s breakdown reveals the fragility of this control—when his personal insecurities surface, he resorts to unauthorized violence, demonstrating how the system rewards instability masked as discipline. The remote-controlled photo projection also showcases technological surveillance as a tool of oppression.

    Note